Wordhole: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Add transcluded section on dunch) |
||
(230 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Wordhole]] | [[Category:Wordhole]] | ||
[[Category:Special Issue]] | |||
[[File:WORDHOLE.jpg|center|frameless|720x360px]] | [[File:WORDHOLE.jpg|center|frameless|720x360px]] | ||
Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
==Accessibility== | ==Accessibility== | ||
==Analog== | ==Analog== | ||
==Archive== | ==[[Archive (Wordhole)| Archive]]== | ||
{{:Archive (Wordhole)| Archive}} | |||
==Active Archive== | ==Active Archive== | ||
==Annotation== | == [[Annotation (Wordhole)| Annotation]] == | ||
==Apocalypse== | |||
{{:Possible_Apocalypse_(Wordhole)| Apocalypse}} | |||
{{:Reimagine the postapocalypse archival practice (Wordhole)}} | |||
'''Alessia:'''{{:Alessiapocalypse_(Wordhole)| Alessiapocalypse (Wordhole)}} | |||
'''Rosa:'''{{:Just_Another_Apocalypse_(Wordhole)| Alessiapocalypse (Wordhole)}} | |||
{{audio|mp3=https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/images/1/1b/Case.mp3|style=width:100%}} | |||
==Aporee== | |||
==[[Audacity (Wordhole)| Audacity]]== | |||
{{:Audacity (Wordhole)|Audacity}} | |||
==[[Audience Interaction (Wordhole)|Audience Interaction]]== | |||
{{:Audience Interaction (Wordhole)|Audience Interaction}} | |||
==[[Brainstorming (Wordhole)|Brainstorming]]== | |||
{{:Brainstorming (Wordhole)}} | |||
==Breakfast lab== | |||
==[[Broadcasting (Wordhole)| Broadcasting]]== | |||
{{:Broadcasting (Wordhole)|Broadcasting}} | |||
== [[Choose Your Own Adventure Game (Wordhole)|Choose Your Own Adventure Game ]] == | |||
== [[Control Societies (Wordhole)|Control Societies]] == | |||
{{:Control Societies (Wordhole)|Control Societies}} | |||
==[[Chop Chop (Wordhole)|Chop Chop]]== | |||
{{:Chop Chop (Wordhole)|Chop Chop}} | |||
==[[Code (Wordhole)| Code]]== | |||
{{:Code (Wordhole)| Code}} | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
== | ==[[Collaborative (Wordhole)|Collaborative]]== | ||
{{:Collaborative (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Collaborative_Emacs|Collaborative Emacs]] == | |||
''This entry is borrowed from the Category of Protocols, and describes a protocol first applied in a session where a group of six students wanted to work together on an HTML soundboard.'' | |||
{{:Collaborative_Emacs}} | |||
==[[Communication (Wordhole)|Communication]]== | |||
{{:Communication (Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[CSS (Wordhole)|CSS]]== | |||
{{:CSS (Wordhole)|CSS}} | |||
==[[Death of the Author (Wordhole)| Death of the Author]]== | |||
{{:Death of the Author (Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[Deconstruction]]== | |||
{{:Deconstruction}} | |||
==Decision making process== | ==Decision making process== | ||
==[[Destroying the Protocol (Wordhole)|Destroying the Protocol]]== | |||
{{:Destroying the Protocol (Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[Discussing protocols (Wordhole)|Discussing protocols]]== | |||
{{:Discussing protocols (Wordhole)}} | |||
==Digital== | ==Digital== | ||
Line 144: | Line 131: | ||
==[[Disciplinary Societies (Wordhole)|Disciplinary Societies]]== | ==[[Disciplinary Societies (Wordhole)|Disciplinary Societies]]== | ||
== | {{:Disciplinary Societies (Wordhole)| Disciplinary Societies}} | ||
==[[Dunch_(Wordhole)|Dunch]]== | |||
{{:Dunch_(Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Escape Radio Room (Wordhole)| Escape Room Radio]] == | |||
{{:Escape Radio Room (Wordhole)|Escape Radio Room}} | |||
==[[Eternal Records (Wordhole)|Eternal Records]]== | |||
{{:Eternal_Records_(Wordhole)|Eternal Records}} | |||
==[[Exquisite corpse exercise]]== | |||
{{:Exquisite corpse exercise}} | |||
==Distributive== | ==Distributive== | ||
==[[Fictional_Field_Report:_Work_in_Progress_(Wordhole)|Fictional Field Report: Work in Progress]]== | |||
{{:Fictional_Field_Report:_Work_in_Progress_(Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[Gilles Deleuze (Wordhole)|Gilles Deleuze]]== | |||
==Gilles Deleuze == | |||
French philosopher (1925-1995), engaged in metaphysics and epistemology, specifically in issues of identity and difference. He uses the term "virtual" to describe ideas as the conditions of the actual experience. He criticizes the notion of the individual (as he accepts difference as fundamental in all experience). One of his major works (together with Felix Guattari) is Capitalism and Schizophrenia (the title is pretty much self-explanatory). | French philosopher (1925-1995), engaged in metaphysics and epistemology, specifically in issues of identity and difference. He uses the term "virtual" to describe ideas as the conditions of the actual experience. He criticizes the notion of the individual (as he accepts difference as fundamental in all experience). One of his major works (together with Felix Guattari) is Capitalism and Schizophrenia (the title is pretty much self-explanatory). | ||
Line 167: | Line 161: | ||
In his essay "Postscript on the Societies of Control" (1990) Deleuze marks the change in the structure of society and senses the importance of code in the new order. | In his essay "Postscript on the Societies of Control" (1990) Deleuze marks the change in the structure of society and senses the importance of code in the new order. | ||
==Glossary == | {{:Gilles Deleuze (Wordhole) | Gilles Deleuze}} | ||
==[[Georges Perec (Wordhole)|Georges Perec]]== | |||
{{:Georges Perec (Wordhole)|Georges Perec}} | |||
==[[Glossary (Wordhole)|Glossary]]== | |||
==Flowchart== | {{:Glossary (Wordhole)}} | ||
==[[Flowchart (Wordhole)|Flowchart]]== | |||
{{:Flowchart (Wordhole)}} | |||
==Graphviz == | ==Graphviz == | ||
{{:Graphviz_(Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[GREP (Wordhole)|GREP]]== | |||
{{:GREP (Wordhole)|GREP}} | |||
==[[Fiction_Writing|Fiction Writing]]== | |||
{{:Fiction Writing}} | |||
==[[Fediverse (Wordhole)|Fediverse]]== | |||
{{:Fediverse (Wordhole)|Fediverse}} | |||
==Have you tried turning it on and off again?== | |||
{{: Have you tried turning it on and off again}} | |||
== | ==[[Healing penplotters (Wordhole)| Healing pen plotters]]== | ||
{{:Healing penplotters (Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[Homophily]]== | |||
{{:Homophily}} | |||
==[[Interview (wormhole)|Interview]]== | |||
{{:Interview (wormhole)}} | |||
==[[Live_Transcription_(Wordhole)|Live Transcription]]== | |||
{{:Live_Transcription_(Wordhole)}} | |||
== | ==[[Mariapocalypse (Wordhole)|Mariapocalypse]]== | ||
{{:Mariapocalypse (Wordhole)|Mariapocalypse}} | |||
== | ==[[Microphones (Wordhole)|Microphones]]== | ||
{{:Microphones (Wordhole)|Microphones}} | |||
==Memory== | ==Memory== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
==[[Negotiate Collaboration (Wordhole)| Negotiate Collaboration]]== | |||
{{:Negotiate Collaboration (Wordhole)|Negotiate Collaboration}} | |||
==[[Oscillators A (Wordhole)|Oscillators A]]== | |||
{{:Oscillators A (Wordhole)|Oscillators A}} | |||
==[[Oscilloscope (Wordhole)|Oscilloscope]]== | |||
{{:Oscilloscope (Wordhole)|Oscilloscope}} | |||
==[[Pad (Wordhole)|Pad]]== | |||
{{:Pad (Wordhole)|Pad}} | |||
== [[Performative (Wordhole)|Performative]] == | == [[Performative (Wordhole)|Performative]] == | ||
{{:Performative (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Podcast (Wordhole)|Podcast]] == | == [[Podcast (Wordhole)|Podcast]] == | ||
{{:Podcast (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Prescriptive Technology (Wordhole)| Prescriptive Technology]] == | |||
{{:Prescriptive Technology (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Preparations for radio (Wordhole)| Preparations for radio]] == | |||
{{:Preparations for radio (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Reel-to-Reel Experimentation (Wordhole)| Reel to Reel Experimentation]]== | |||
{{:Reel-to-Reel Experimentation (Wordhole)|Reel-to-Reel Experimentation}} | |||
==[[Same_as_it_never_was_(Wordhole)|Same as it never was]]== | |||
{{:Same_as_it_never_was_(Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Shell_scripts_(Wordhole)|Shell scripts]]== | |||
{{:Shell scripts (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Structurelessness (Wordhole)| Structurelessness]] == | |||
{{:Structurelessness (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Secretorial Labour(Wordhole) | Secretorial Labour ]] == | |||
{{:Secretorial Labour(Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[Text Manipulation (Wordhole)|Text Manipulation]]== | |||
{{:Text Manipulation (Wordhole)|Text Manipulation}} | |||
== [[The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_an_Active_Archive_(Wordhole)|The Hitchhiker's Guide to an Active Archive]] == | |||
{{:The_Hitchhiker's_Guide_to_an_Active_Archive_(Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Tape_Vandalism_(UN)AMBIENT_WATER_(Wordhole)|Tape Vandalism]] == | |||
{{:Tape_Vandalism_(UN)AMBIENT_WATER_(Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[SP22 Timeline (Wordhole)| Timeline SI22]] == | |||
{{:SP22 Timeline (Wordhole)}} | |||
== [[Voting_by_show_of_hands|Voting by Show of Hands]] == | |||
''Voting by show of hands is a protocol established within the first weeks of Special Issue 22, and has been applied in the process of naming chopchop, among others. This Wordhole entry is borrowed from the [[:Category:Protocol|Category on Protocols]].'' | |||
{{:Voting_by_show_of_hands}} | |||
== [[Wiki_Wandering_(Wordhole)|Wiki Wandering]] == | |||
{{:Wiki_Wandering_(Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[Worm (Wordhole)| Worm]]== | |||
{{:Worm (Wordhole)}} | |||
==[[Zoom Recorder (Wordhole)|Zoom Recorder]]== | |||
{{:Zoom Recorder (Wordhole)}} |
Latest revision as of 22:15, 11 December 2023
Back to base: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed-11-Oct23
This page contains a glossary created in the XPUB 2023-2024 Special Issue 'Protocols for an Active Archive'.
Accessibility
Analog
Archive
Websters Dictionary :
1: a place in which public records or historical materials (such as documents) are preserved an archive of historical manuscripts also : the material preserved —often used in plural: "reading through the archives"
2: a repository or collection especially of information as verb: "She archived her e-mail messages in a folder on her hard drive."
Application (how we use it)
There has not yet been a shared definition of what an archive is, but datasets, libraries and collections have been mentioned in correlation to it.
See: ARCHIVE FEVER: A FREUDIAN IMPRESSION by JACQUES DERRIDA https://sites.duke.edu/vms565s_01_f2014/files/2014/08/DerridaPrenowitz1995fragment.pdf
Active Archive
Annotation
Apocalypse
Senka: In relation to archiving, an apocalypse is canonically data loss. But from my perspective, data loss and forgetting can sometimes be fruitful and productive, not only can it give us the opportunity to imagine an alternative (post-apocalyptic) world, but also allow us to consume less resources. For me an apocalypse is over-consumption, the endless stream of data that is hosted on a server, which consumes energy, calls from the mining of minerals in countries of the global South. (In my own country as well, Germany attempted to mine lithium as it is not on the land of the European union.) What concerns me is a lack of thinking about the fact that our how finite our resources are. How to make the resources we use to archive be more sustainable? How to compress audio? Can we sacrifice the quality of a recording if it means that it will consume less energy?
In relation to the apocalypse and the SI, I want to further develop the Radio Worm studio 3D model from a clean de-cluttered studio to a messy hoarding one. Though 3D modelling and simulation, it would be possible to physically show what amount of digital data is actually being stored without anyone being aware of it. If this digital data was for instance cassettes or vinyls, they might fill up the studio and overflow from the sides.
What could survive an apocalypse is:
- the community beyond digital data
- the ideas behind the shows and the oral histories and memories of broadcasts
- durable materials for storing data that are 'apocalypse-proof', if such a thing exists. What would this cockroach medium look like? (cockroaches are known for being durable and can allegedly survive a nuclear disaster)
Reimagine the postapocalypse archival practice:
The apocalypse in the context of the Special Issue is a new beginning. All survivors are invited to redefine what an active archive is and how it can serve us all. Everything is gone, we lost all the files, only interviews with radio makers collected by Xpub1 have survived. Despite the huge data-loss, we face a great opportunity to re-establish protocols for archiving practices, letting people participate to integrate many different voices and experience an archive as something beyond static storage of data. This new beginning is time for us to foster co-creation and shared-responsibility. Let's listen to the interviews to recreate the world before the apocalypse and draw conclusions for the future. Ooh, it turned out that the Glossary wordhole also survived in intact condition. Lets stimulate collective thinking and together imagine future alternatives that can bring to life neglected narratives and make our practice more sustainable.
Alessia:The very concept of apocalypse is particularly rooted in us, I believe due to the influence of the media, which often tend to emphasise the decline of our society, the constant threat of any weapon of mass destruction, we are all going to die right? We all live a post-modern daily life, surrounded by catastrophic images that only feed the vision we have of a society that is now adrift, in which all is lost, the constant feeling that we could see the world explode at any moment.
We are all waiting for an imminent apocalypse, a 'purification', fueled by the desire of society to renew itself, from the ground up, completely destroy itself and then be reborn in a better form.
The apocalypse becomes a symbol, however, an excellent tool for generating a new imagery, a new vision of the future. Let's be real, paranoia is addicting, people don't enjoy free happiness, they need the misery to go on, to get to a balance.
I chose, out of all the available themes, that of the apocalypse because it is, for me, partly an oxymoron of what the concept of 'active archiving' is. The apocalypse is a wave that leaves no escape, it is a possibility of creating the new, the future from scratch, while 'archiving' is the desire to keep the past as an active tool for the future. These two concepts do not match, and it is, I believe, from this clash that some excellent ideas might arise as to what an archive really is, why archiving, what "deserves" for real to survive and be archived.
I think it could be really nice to speak about how we don't have infinite resources, as Senka said, so why are we using our resources to make the radio worm archive an active one.
An apocalypse theme to play a little bit with the "erasing of data", the "data loss" we are facing because of digital obsolescence, the potential loss of knowledge, the fragmentation of the archive. With an immersive installation, of a (post)apocalyptic landscape, without losing the hopeful vibe, a possible positive athmosphere for the audience, getting rid of that anxiety of preserving everything, could be a good idea.
It may be evocative in a possible installation to present a story, a narrative, a path, to let the worm community think about the archiving process of their own products, how difficult that is to do, how massive and messy is the archive, celebrate the Community, Community that is the only thing that is goint to survive the apocalypse for sure.
Rosa:
- As a metaphor, i think the apocalypse, or the pressuring feeling of a nearing apocalypse, speaks to mind, and will help us, or me at least, to set a strong and cohesive narrative to the various things we'd like to present in the event.
- the idea of the pressuring feeling of the nearing apocalypse and therefore doomsday prepping, makes the reason for archiving more tangible, and also fits into the concept of permacomputing, which i've been reading more about lately, and i closely relates to XPUB.
- Permacomputing aims for a more sustainable approach of creating computers and networks, by maximizing the hardware lifespans, minimising its energy use, finding alternative solutions and re-using existing materials.
- This not only suits the metaphor of the pressuring feeling of the nearing apocalypse but also very much suits the narrative of worm, where the physical space is not only below ground, but created from excisting materials.
- Troughout the semester we've actively been working with finding these alternative solutions, both by looking in the past for excisting methods of listening, recording and broadcasting, and by experimenting with Open Source software that does not follow the current big tech, and i'd consider these methods and experiments a core aspect of the special issue.
- The other core aspect of the special issue is the idea of an archive, inspired by the archive of radio worm. to quote the wiki of permacomputing:
- In a permacomputing world, servers that host file collections would be just as common as public libraries. People would primarily use the servers that are geographically close to them. They would contain all the commonly used software and documentation (and their complete dependencies) along with large amounts of other freely distributable media (books, entertainment, reference databases such as Wikipedia, etc.)
- This is something that i'd like us to create for radio worm. I'm 99% sure Worm, and more specifically Worm Radio, would surive the inevitable apocalypse, and still try to keep their doors open for their community. I'd like us to create a kit that could be used in case of an emergency. Like a fire exctuingisher in the building. This KIT should be designed to last; and not be dependant on the internet.
- The kit is similar to the public library just described. By plugging in a data holder such as a USB stick, you'll get access to instructions and software, anything needed to create your own broadcast and how to actively archive the broadcast. Additionally, trough this kit you could interact with the existing archive of worm, finding various pieces of transcribed content trough methods like the media fragments URI.
Aporee
Audacity
1. A willingness to take bold risks.
2. The name of a software package which records sound and manipulates sound recordings.
Application (as used by us)
to make recordings for Worm radio broadcasts
See also: field recording
Audience Interaction
As part of the project Radio Worm: Protocols for an Active Archive, there is also interaction with a public and thus an audience. On the one hand, the audience consists of people who, for example, listen to our radio programmes (by chance), but at the same time it also consists of ourselves when we become listeners to our own programme. We interact with an audience when we talk about the project with acquaintances and/or strangers. What do we tell in these moments? Is there repetition in what we tell and how we tell it?
Extensions to this definition:
- include examples of ...
- ... radio shows with and without audience interaction (go specific)
- ... include the purpose / goal of audience interaction
- clear out specific situations in which audience interacts (one-way/two-way/no-way)
- invite reader to interact with this wikipage (as (un)specific as we want) -> link to Thijs Wiki game
Brainstorming
Definition
A technique that involves the spontaneous exchange of ideas from members of the group to find a conclusion for a specific problem.
Application (as used by us)
How do we brainstorm:
- Visualizing our goal
- Documenting the discussion
- Thinking aloud
- Encouraging every idea
- Collaborating instead of criticizing
- Asking questions
See also: Visual mapping
Breakfast lab
Broadcasting
Oxford Dictionary: /ˈbrɔːdˌkɑːstɪŋ/
noun
1. the transmission of programmes or information by radio or television. "the state monopoly on broadcasting"
Choose Your Own Adventure Game
Control Societies
Gilles Deleuze discusses the concept of a society of control in his 1992 text 'Postscript on the Societies of Control'. Societies of control are governed by codes, which give access or bar individuals from flows of information, at "informational intersections" and, as a result, the subject flows “in a continuous network.” Deleuze contrasts control societies with disciplinary societies, as theorised by Foucault, which are governed by the control of discreetly defined spaces through the execution of social protocols. However, control societes, Deleuze argues, are distinct from disciplinary societies (as theorised by Michel Foucault) but in connection to them, as their immediate development after WWII. Control societies are reforming the institutions of disciplinary societies, including prisons, hospitals and schools, but one can go further and think of how eg. genetic engineering or pharmaceutical research is conducted. Reflecting on Foucalt's analysis of disciplinary societies, Deleuze reminds us that subjects in disciplinary societies are constituted on the basis of two axes: 'number' and 'signature', and are tangible and clearly witnesses in our society. These organising principles are of less importance within control societies and instead codes are implemented. Such codes govern who can access what. This is especially evident not only in the end-barrier but in the systems of tracking and actual control that defines whether one qualifies to cross a barrier. Some methods of control, that could have been borrowed from previous societies of sovereignty, are becoming interchangeable. At the time the essay was written, Deleuze could already perceive a crisis of the institutions as new mechanism of controls were being installed and implemented in different types of systems: school, prison, hospital and corporate. The question that arose was how unions would survive the advent of new, harmful forms of societies of control.
Application (as used by us)
Collective Annotation of Postscript on the Societies of Control: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/PostscriptControlSocieties
Subgroup Annotation of Postscript on the Societies of Control: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Deleuze_Control_Group
Citation: Mentioned in: Deleuze, G., Postscript on the Societies of Control (1992)
Chop Chop
Definition by Wikipedia
"Chop chop" is a phrase first noted in the interaction between Cantonese and English people in British-occupied south China. It spread through Chinese workers at sea and was adopted by British seamen. "Chop chop" means "hurry" and suggests that something should be done now and without delay.
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chop_chop_(phrase)
Definition by XPUB Chop Chop is the name we have chosen for our dear Raspberry Pi. This is because we want our server to be quick and do what we want it to do. Chop-chop!!
To discover the contents of Chop Chop go to https://hub.xpub.nl/chopchop/
See also SSH
Code
Oxford dictionary: /kəʊd/noun
1.a system of words, letters, figures, or symbols used to represent others, especially for the purposes of secrecy. "the Americans cracked their diplomatic code"
2. COMPUTING: program instructions.
Collaborative
Can someone please write something for this page?
thx.
Collaborative Emacs
This entry is borrowed from the Category of Protocols, and describes a protocol first applied in a session where a group of six students wanted to work together on an HTML soundboard.
When collaborating on a project, all kinds of problems can occur. In particular, version conflicts can be difficult to resolve and can be interruptive of a workflow. For this problem (and others), version control systems like Git may be used. (Not needed for this page)
Moreover, while collaborating it might be nice to see each other's changes in real time: a particularly difficult case of version control. To this end, the CRDT datastructure can be used. Several editors have an implementation of CRDT to allow for collaboration.
This page focusses on CRDT collaboration with Emacs. Emacs opens in the terminal, and hence this guide allows for collaborative work live on the server.
Step by step guide
The following is a step by step guide to setting up a collaboration session within Emacs. It assumes the user is in a terminal.
- Connect to chochop:
ssh USERNAME@145.24.139.16
(or to any other address you'd want tossh
to), press return.- Enter your password, press return.
- Open emacs:
- Enter
emacs
. Press return.
- Enter
- IF THIS IS YOUR FIRST TIME COLLABORATING THROUGH EMACS: Install the CRDT package:
- If you are using MacOS, perform the following steps. Otherwise, skip to 3.2
- Go to terminal settings.
- Go to profile.
- Check the box 'Use Option as Meta Key'.
- Close the terminal settings, so that the terminal is in focus again.
- Press
Alt+X
(or for MacOSOption+X
). - Enter
package-install
, press return. - Enter
crdt
, press return.
- If you are using MacOS, perform the following steps. Otherwise, skip to 3.2
- IF YOU ARE HOSTING A SESSION:
- Press
Control+X Control+F
. - Type in the path for the file you want to share, press return.
- Press
Alt+X
. - Type
crdt-share-buffer
, press return.
- Press
- IF YOU ARE JOINING A SESSION:
- Press
Alt+X
- Use
crdt-connect
, press return. - Fill in the open parameters:
- For URL, enter:
localhost:6530
. - For Display, enter:
USERNAME
. - Press return.
- For URL, enter:
- Select the the file you want to work on:
- Use the arrow keys to move to the file you want to work on.
- Press return.
- Press
You should now be able to collaborate! Should being the operative word.... This works in duos, maybe not in groups of six...
Communication
The word "communication" has its root in the Latin verb "communicare", which means "to share" or "to make common". Communication is usually understood as the transmission of information.
The evolution of human communication took place over a long period of time. Humans evolved from simple hand gestures to the use of spoken language. Most face-to-face communication requires visually reading and following along with the other person, offering gestures in reply, and maintaining eye contact throughout the interaction.
CSS
CSS (or Cascading Style Sheets) is a programming language used to change the styling (color, typography, layout, etc.etc... the limits are almost endless) of web content, by referencing HTML elements using various CSS selectors. Additionally to HTML, CSS specs are maintained my the W3C, but implementation of these specs can deffer per browser (looking at you, Internet explorer).
Example of CSS
body, .bg--red, a:hover {
background-color: red;
}
In this example, the selector selects the <body> element, and any element with the class bg--red, and every link that has a pseudo class of "hover" (mouse over element). The changed property is the background-color of these elements, with a value of red.
Examples of websites that use CSS
Images and links
- CanIUse to check if your CSS property can be used in a specific browser
- W3 specs for CSS
- HTML & CSS; Design & build website by Jon Duckett
See also
Death of the Author
Text by Roland Barthes, published in 1967. Barthes claims here that the meaning of a text is given not by the author but by the reader. It belongs to a school of literary theory criticism called reader-response criticism with applications not only in literature but in fields such as psychology and philosophy.
Citations
The text has been extensively citated and not always in a good way, as eg. in Jacques Derrida's ironic essay "The Deaths of Roland Barthes".
In context
One of the most well-known applications of this text is critical pedagogy, advocating dialogic learning (letting students arrive to their own conclusions, rather than being fed the meaning of a text).
How we use it
Listen to Xpub reading of Barthes' text
Deconstruction
Cambridge dictionary: The act of breaking something down into its separate parts in order to understand its meaning, especially when this is different from how it was previously understood.
Deconstruction implies "breaking down" something to understand its significance and create new meanings.
Application (as used by us)
- Deconstruction in critical thinking can be used to find something new by breaking the text or taking a concept to pieces. Firstly we deconstruct the archive to be able to activate it. It can generate new meanings through the interpretation, analysis, discussion.
- Decontruction can be used as a form of critique
Application in other contexts (examples) Why does Derrida refuse to define deconstruction? Derrida writes, there is nothing that could be said to be essential to deconstruction in its differential relations with other words. In other words, deconstruction has to be understood in context. This kind of fluidity also prevents the possibility of defining deconstruction.
Decision making process
Destroying the Protocol
was an episode of Radio Worm: Protocols for an Active Archive, broadcast on [date] The broadcast was....
Discussing protocols
We talked a lot about how protocol can make it easier for us to work together and be helpful in making decisions as a group. We tried to establish a system that would be helpful in reading texts together and writing down our reflections and sharing them. Depending on the activities undertaken in the group, new protocols appeared. These include taking notes in etherpad, how effectively we can share observations after listening to a radio show, making sure everyone has a voice, and how to speed up the decision-making process. We also established a hand shake protocol to express consent or disagreement. A breakfast protocol for listening to the radio emerged, but it did not last.
We talked about whether strict adherence to protocols is limiting at some point. One of the groups prepared a radio broadcast titled: destroying protocols. This topic inspired one student, who started to wonder how to gentle the protocol and how to highlight its sensitive sides. This led to a game of love letters from the protocol. Love letters from the protocol are like a kiss on the forehead when you are completely stuck and hopeless. It's like holding your hand when you get lost in the documents you need to fill out.
We questioned, when is it helpful to create strict rules, and when is it more fruitful to not follow them? It's something that's fluid and there's no protocol for it.
Digital
Digital is the representation of physical items or activities through binary code. When used as an adjective, it describes the dominant use of the latest digital technologies to improve organizational processes, improve interactions between people, organizations and things, or make new business models possible. The word digital comes from Latin digitus = finger, which refers to the bit yes/no structure of the information - the finger is either up or down.
Link: https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/digital-2 https://www.oed.com/dictionary/digital_n?tab=meaning_and_use#6774585
Digital(post)
Disciplinary Societies
According to Michel Foucault, disciplinary societies are characterized by a constant passage from closed structure to closed structure, namely from the family to the school to the factory etc. The idea behind a disciplinary society is to group and organize individuals for a more effective distribution of labor.
In Discipline and Punish, Foucault traces the introduction of prisons into society; the movement away from public executions towards carceral systems and several implications of these historical changes. Discipline is closely connected to increasing bureaucracy and the development of biopolitics.
Foucault doesn't fail to mention the way disciplinary societies indirectly shape mentalities that work around their structure, and how rites are developed to protect a sense of self and a sense of pride through niche, anti-authoritarian communities.
Steve's notes on the difference between disciplinary and control societies:
"In Foucault disciplinary society is governed by ‘precepts’ (“texts” establishing protocols of behavior, discipline and social organization) which govern spaces. Society organized through capsularity (sic?): in which specific spaces have specific functions and specific "means of correct training". “In the disciplinary societies one was always starting again (from school to the barracks, from the barracks to the factory)” Each space has its own discourse (specialist language) which regulates them. In Foucault’s discipline society the subject internalizes discipline (becomes subject to the discourse of a given space) in which case re-form is the model (the subject under discipline is re-formed). By contrast: societies of control are governed by code- which give access or bar individuals from flows of information (at "informational intersections"). The subject flows “in a continuous network.”
- Foucault Discipline and Punish
See also: Control Societies (Wordhole)
Dunch
Dunch is a term describing the popular social social phenomenon of a meal that functions both as lunch and dinner in one. It is a portmanteau of the two. Though one can have dunch one their own, it is often a social gathering. There is no universally accepted standard time on which dunch is served, but it is generally understood to be had between the early afternoon and early evening. Dunches served later during the evening might be preceded by a smaller meal, referred to as prunch (pre-dunch).
Escape Room Radio
an archivial apocalypse
The apocalypse describes the catastrophic escalation of events, the downfall, the disaster, the horror, a state of emergency in which rational and irrational actions merge. Escape Radio is a fictional scenario in which players find themselves at Radio WORM a local radio station at Rotterdam. It is their task to save the files that are most important to them. While actively archiving, they deal with the question of relevance in relation to time pressure.
Eternal Records
An interesting aspect of archives to address, is the fact that most common data-storage devices are relatively short lived. In the age of information a vast majority of data is stored digitally in one form and other. It might be easy to forget that these mediums too have materiality, as we rarely directly interact with these devices, usually you need som sort of interface or interpreter like a computer or a disc-player.
The lifetime of different contemporary media varies, but they do not live forever. Take for an instance the hard disk drive, a device that stores data on spinning magnetic discs. Since they contain lots of moving parts, they are quite prone to deuteration over time, and one can expect a HDD to last a mere 3-5 years. The Solid State Drive, a more modern relative of the HDD, does not contain moving parts. Instead the SSD stores data via electrical signals on transistors. Thus you can expect it to last roughly 10 years. In fact none of the more recent ways of keeping records have a lifespan of more than a couple of decades at best. To work around this, modern archives are reliant on backups and copies in order to ensure that the data is safe.
read more on different data storage media here: https://www.arcserve.com/blog/data-storage-lifespans-how-long-will-media-really-last
Therefore if you want to make a record that is intended to last for lets say for centuries or even millennia, you will need a simpler and more durable way to encode the data. The best way to keep a record, or make a publication so that it will endure the tooth of time, is to either use paper or stone. An acid free paper with ink/print/scripture that is not prone to fading is a possible approach. Another way is to learn from ancient civilisations, and turn to stoneware tablets with the information imprinted in the material. Findings of such tablets are the reason we have insights in proverbs from the birth of society.
In order to interrogate this further recreations of said clay tablets have been made. Maybe this could help us gain insight in how such craftful and "primitive" could be applied in a contemporary setting. A tablet could be made with a flattened piece of clay, and a pointed object like a needle to engrave the information.
Exquisite corpse exercise
Exquisite corpse is a method for collectively assembling images or words.
The name originates from the French term cadavre exquis.
It is often executed by one person drawing or writing on a piece of paper, folding it so that a tiny portion of the drawn lines or the last few words are visible, and handing it off to the next person to continue writing or drawing.
In Context
The Exquisite corpse exercise was used in the creation of the fictional narrative for the broadcast episode "Personal Accounts of Irreplaceable Lace: a 200 year old history of Lost and Found".
The protocol for this was as follows:
- The caretakers divided the narrative into past, present and future. Each caretaker taking one tense.
- They all wrote for about 10 minutes, after which they would pass it on clock-wise for the next person to continue writing.
- After each writing cycle of 10 minutes, they would read out what has been written, in order to have some narrative consistency
Distributive
Fictional Field Report: Work in Progress
This entry to the Wordhole Glossary is a piece of fiction written as an exercise in modes of address in the 2023-11-08 Methods class with Lídia. It was first created using this etherpad.
See also: (please add the other modes of address exercise entries here once they're added to the glossary)
Work in Progress
A WIDE SHOT OF A RISING SUN. A CAR DRIVING TOWARDS A LARGE BODY OF WATER. THERE'S A PERSON SITTING ON A BENCH NEXT TO THE WATER. THE CAR STOPS. THREE PEOPLE STEP OUT
ONE HOLDING A DIRECTIONAL MICROPHONE ON A BOOMSTICK
ONE HOLDING A CAMERA
ONE HOLDING A SHEET OF PAPER
A SHOT OF THE REPORTER THROUGH THE CAMERA
REPORTER: WELCOME TO THE MORNING REPORT. I'M STANDING IN ROTTERDAM, AND WITH ME IS ACTRESS CAROL GRAY. CAROL, HOW DO YOU FEEL?
CAROL: IT'S HARD, Y'KNOW... WE, Rogers AND I, WERE JUST WORKING ON THIS PROJE--
REPORTER: SO IS IT TRUE, DID PROLIFIC AUTHOR Seth Bar DIE TONIGHT? WHAT CAN YOU TELL US ABOUT THE DEATH OF THE AUTHOR?
CAROL: I DON'T... YESTERDAY WE WERE JUST FINISHING UP WORKING ON A PROTOCOL FOR ACTING -- WE HAVE BEEN WORKING ON A PROTOCOL YOU KNOW -- AND HE WAS FATIGUED. HE TOLD ME HE WAS GOING FOR A SWIM.
REPORTER: INTERESTING. AT 4:03am THIS MORNING, WE RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING FIELD RECORDING THAT, SUPPOSEDLY, WAS MADE DURING THIS SWIMMING EVENT.
'Hey! where have you been?' said by Carol
'I just went swimming in the archival ocean....' Seth Bar looks extremely exhausting.
C: 'How was it?'
S: 'It was quite nice but there are too many annotations and protocools in the sea.... I barely drown....'
C: 'Ah, I already told you several times that if the weather is too bad, there will be too many archive creatures and sometimes they will bite you!'
S: 'Umm.... I feel like they are just adorable and friendly little monsters....'
C: 'Fine. Don't say that I didn’t tell you!'
'Cut!' said the director. 'Do you not like it, Jimmy?' said the director's assistant. 'I don't mind it' said Jimmy, but his facial expression spoke otherwise. 'Where shall we take it from?' said Vanessa, 'The beginning of this scene?' Vanessa was beginning to give up, she was tired and needed a coffee. The crew had been working on this scene for the best part of two days and it was beginning to become wearisome. They continued to speak about the film in hushed tones. Meanwhile, the actors sat around looking bored. It was hot in the studio, despite the weather, They were thirsty. Andrew needed to get some water. Nobody had eaten breakfast that morning so the atmosphere was unusuallly tense.
'Where are you going Andrew?' asked Jimmy. 'It's a cut right? I'm thirsty, I'm getting some water --- do you want some?' replied Andrew. 'Sure,' said Jimmy, 'Vanessa?' 'Yeah, bring a jug' Vanessa chimed in. On his way to the water fountain, Andrew bumped into Sam, the propmaker. They looked stressed. 'Gee, Andrew, good to see you', said Sam. 'Are you alright, Sam?' 'Not really, I'm drowning here, Luke just quit because Jimmy's an asshole and now I have to make a hundred zines for the Zine Scene by myself. I feel like he's plotting something against me.' 'Yeesh,' said Andrew, who couldn't care less because he had his own issues to worry about. 'I'm going to the water fountain,' he said, 'I'll see you later'. 'See you, say hello to the f i s h in the aquarium on my behalf'. 'Sure!' said Andrew, not quite seeing the point in doing so.
One hundred zines, thought Andrew. This was such a weird film. Jimmy was a weird guy and Vanessa just seemed to agree with him all the time. Jimmy was rarely satisfied with what was recorded. Andrew filled up a jug of ambient water and brought it back to the studio. 'Thanks, Andy' said Vanessa. Andrew sat back down on the set in front of the lights and the camera. 'What's happening with the Zine Scene?' said Andrew. 'Don't worry about the Zine Scene' said Jimmy, we're not due to shoot that until Friday. 'Can we start rolling again soon?' asked the camera operator.
A bell rings, it is the sound of the door being opened
Shopkeeper: Hi
Carol: Hello
Carol: I'm jyst going to have a browse around.
Shopkeeper: Sure
Carol walks around the store, it's a secondhand shop with old materials scattered around.
Shopkeeper: Is there anything particular you're looking for?
Carol: I don't think so. Well, It'll be Christmas soon so I was hoping to find some gifts.
Shopkeeper: You've come to the right place I think. This second hand store has plenty of things which would make great presents. We've got furniture, clothes, music, bric-a-brac-
Carol: Music? That'd be ideal. I have a friend who's really into cassette tapes; do you have any of these?
Shopkeeper: Yes, and we have CD's. They're 3.00 euros each.
Carol: Great! could you show me where they are?
Shopkeeper: Over here
Carol walks over to the music collection with the shopkeeper
Carol: Oh, you have a casette by Seth Bar?
Shopkeeper: Yes, he's quite the author. I went to a talk he gave in the town square several years ago. I heard he is writing about book called 'Recorder Obscura'.
Carol: Yes, I heard about that too.
Carol looks upset, she knows that Seth Bar is dead, but the news has obviously not met the shopkeeper yet.
Shopkeeper: Are you okay?
Carol: Yes, yes, I'd like to buy this tape please.
Shopkeeper: three euros please.
[Carol's flat, she is sitting at a table with a cassette player. Nearby there is some wrapping paper, scissors and sellotape. The last few words of the recording are vaguely audible as the camera approaches the table. It is the Seth Bar interviewing Jo Freeman about her article "The Tyranny of Structurelessness". The tape ends; Carol presses the eject button and places the cassette back into the box. She begins to wrap the box]
Voiceover (it is the voice of Seth Bar): "Dear Carol, When you read this letter that means I'm not in this world anymore, I'm in the other planet and lying on a beautiful archive forest with wine. A little while ago, I was working on a cassette called 'Destroy Protocols'. I decided to distribute it by visiting a selection of secoondhand stores around the town. So it's limited edition.
I hope you enjoy and get some new inspirations as well! "
Jimmy burst into tears. 'What's wrong?', Vanessa asked. 'Wrong? wrong!? Nothing is wrong. Can't you see this is the most beautiful thing ever produced? Never has such true emotion been captured on tape', he went on. Andrew was a bit baffled by Jimmy´s display of emotion, their impression was that Jimmy was the sort of director that made movies on demand, for the money. The movieset had been one ruled by structurelessness so far. Andrew thought that this was just a result of poor administration of the project, but now, it seemed to him that actually, Jimmy might just have been too personally entangled in his own story. Andrew faced Jimmy who still seemed a bit shook from the the scene they just taped, and asked 'Is this story we are making, YOUR story?'. 'In a way...', JImmy replied, 'but it's more than that. I'm trying to tell OUR story. I want all voices to be heard.' Vanessa who had been standing in her own thoughts, partially eavesdropping on jimmy´s and Andrew´s conversation. 'Our story? OUR story? I've been working my ass off for you, and not once have you asked for my input!'. Unexpectedly Jimmy was not irritated with this remark from Vanessa, on the contrary he looked at Vanessa with a welcomming look, and replied 'Maybe I have been too afraid that the story wouldn´t come across as OURS, so I had to take on the role of the caretaker.' Vanessa remained quiet, looking at Jimmy with a conflicted look on her face. Jimmy continued: 'didn't we have a visual map that we worked on together?' Vanessa let this sentence sink in, the visual map; Vanessa saw this as just a stupid team-building excercise, like the ones where you make tower out of marshmellow and uncooked spaghetti. Andrew looked puzzled: 'the visual map? I've only been reading the script from the wiki.' It suddenly dawned on Vanessa... they had been working distributively, while this had been a moment that called for a collaborative effort. She said, in a mellow voice 'I see. Let's not hide behind these tools any longer. Put them aside, and talk human to human.'
Jimmy is like 'ok bro, let's get to work. chop chop.'
Gilles Deleuze
French philosopher (1925-1995), engaged in metaphysics and epistemology, specifically in issues of identity and difference. He uses the term "virtual" to describe ideas as the conditions of the actual experience. He criticizes the notion of the individual (as he accepts difference as fundamental in all experience). One of his major works (together with Felix Guattari) is Capitalism and Schizophrenia (the title is pretty much self-explanatory).
Context
In his essay "Postscript on the Societies of Control" (1990) Deleuze marks the change in the structure of society and senses the importance of code in the new order.
Marxist philosopher (French, 1925-1995), who engaged in metaphysics and epistemology, specifically in issues of identity and difference. He uses the term "virtual" to describe ideas as the conditions of the actual experience. He criticizes the notion of the individual (as he accepts difference as fundamental in all experience). One of his major works (together with Felix Guattari) is Capitalism and Schizophrenia (the title is pretty much self-explanatory).
In context
In his essay "Postscript on the Societies of Control" (1990) Deleuze marks the change in the structure of society and senses the importance of code in the new order.
Georges Perec
Writer, filmmaker and documentalist (French, 1936-1982). Member of the Oulipo group, a group of writers seeking for patterns and structures that could be used for practicing constrained writing. One of his major projects was in effect producing and working with a writing algorithm, (also using flowcharts).
In context
An example of his practice can be seen in "The Machine". For the full experience, it can be best accompanied by its reading.
See also
Glossary
Oxford Dictionary: glossary/ˈɡlɒs(ə)ri/
noun
an alphabetical list of words relating to a specific subject, text, or dialect, with explanations; a brief dictionary. "a glossary of Inuktitut words"
Flowchart
This is an entry for 'Flowchart' for the Wordhole Glossary.
Definitions
- A diagram of the sequence of movements or actions of people or things involved in a complex system or activity. (From Oxford Languages)
- '[A flowchart] consists of a certain number of propositions that can take either yes or no for an answer, each answer having certain consequences. The concatenation of causes and effects and the choice of answers are represented by arrows that are the only syntactic connectors between the propositions. In brief, it is a tree structure, a network, a labyrinth, and the “reader” chooses ONE route among all the possible routes, the totality of possible routes being presented SIMULTANEOUSLY on the flowchart.' (From Mainframe Experimentalism, chapter 2)
Application (as used by us)
Flowcharts have been used to present different questions about archives, see pad of 2023-10-10.
Mentioned in
Mainframe Experimentalism, chapter 2
In context
'A flowchart [...] shows simultaneously all the steps and the order of their recursion in a set of instructions. It also contains within it all the possible moves allowed by the algorithm.' (From Mainframe Experimentalism, chapter 2)
Images and links
The Art of Asking your Boss for a Raise
See also
George Perec, Graphviz
Graphviz
This is an entry for 'Graphviz' for the Wordhole Glossary.
Definitions
- Graphviz is a package of open source tools initiated by AT&T Labs Research for graph visualization. The name is a stylized contraction of 'graph visualisation software', i.e. software that provides a way of representing structural information as diagrams of abstract graphs and networks. It uses DOT Lanugage scripts. (From Graphviz and Wikipedia)
Application (as used by us)
Graphviz has been used to create graphs, for example in an attempt to visualize different questions on archives (see pad of 2023-10-10).
Application (other contexts)
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphviz#Applications_that_use_Graphviz.
In context
- 'I have used Graphviz to visualize the connections between the items of the glossary on this special issue.'
Example
digraph D {
A [label="Hello" shape=diamond]
B [label="XPUB" shape=box]
C [label="1" shape=circle]
A -> B
A -> C
A -> D
}
Images and links
See also
GREP
A command-line utility for searching in plain-text data sets for patterns (eg. for regular expressions). It can be a powerful tool (alone or even better along other commands, for finding and handling elements in a text or list.
In context
The function of this command-line is so important that it has entered the Oxford English Dictionary (2003) both as a verb and noun. (Famous phrase: "You can't grep dead trees", referring to physical data)
Link
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/grep.1.html
Fiction Writing
Fictioning or fiction writing has been utilised as tool in activating the archive of Radio Worm. The tool includes but is not limited to: world-building, character-making, narrative structure, speculation, imagining and sonic fiction. Collective fictioning requires common ground and concensus.
Execution of fictioning in the radio broadcasts: This has been done most prominently in two broadcasts "Hitchhikers guide to an Active Archive" and "Personal Accounts of Irreplaceable Lace: a 200 year old history of Lost and Found". Both broadcasts had elements of both textual and sonic world-building and established characters or roles to tell a narrative.
"Hitchhikers guide to an Active Archive" was a non-linear choose-your-own adventure game that featured audience interaction as a quintessential part of a radio broadcast. All three of the radio makers took on roles (Navigator, Protocoler, Performer) and made use of repetitive sonic and textual elements, sharing the narrative structure through protocols presented on a flowchart and a textual wiki version of the narrative.
While "Personal Accounts of Irreplaceable Lace: a 200 year old history of Lost and Found" was a linear fictional story of archivists over the course of 2 centuries who archive through (fictional) mediums. The broadcast was tangentially inspired by the method of critical fabulation, formulated by academic and writer Saidiya Hartman. Critical fabulation is a writing method which combines archival records with fictional writing and critical theory in order to make sense of the blanks and cracks in historical narrative.
See also: Exquisite corpse exercise, Saidiya Hartman, Choose-your-own adventure, Critical Fabulation, The Hitchhiker's Guide to an Active Archive
Fediverse
On Wednesday 26/10/2023, Lídia introduced us shortly to the "Fediverse" during methods class. The Fediverse is a network of open source social networks, which can all communicate with each other.
Historically, (social) web platforms are closed off. When posting a video on Youtube, one can only access the video via this specific platform, and not using their own application of choice. This restriction is addressed within the Fediverse via the ActivityPub Protocol. Applications that are part of the Fediverse have all implemented (a version of) the ActivityPub Protocol, allowing applications to communicate with each other.
Well known (to this author) examples of Fediverse are Mastadon, Nextcloud, and as of this month (October) even Wordpress is part of the Fediverse![1]
Even though the protocol has been long in the making, I've seen the word ActivityPub pop up more and more this year, as bigger platforms are joining the Fediverse. Question is, how will Meta and other big companies treat the Fediverse?
“Podcasting is the analogy, right?” he says. “The end of every podcast ever is, you know, ‘subscribe to us on Spotify, iTunes, or your favorite app.’ And the reason people say it is because podcasting is a protocol, not a company. And because it’s an open protocol, you can take your podcasts and leave.” Anil Dash, the head of Glitch at Fastly [2]
But what about authorship and therefore ownership in the Fediverse? Platforms have always been hesitant in taking ownership about content on their platform, but and in the Fediverse this might get more complicated. There is a nice RadioLab episode that somewhat relates to this.
Funny sidenote is that the online spellcheck used to spell check this entry, did not know the term "Fediverse", "Mastadon" or "Nextcloud", but it did know about "Wordpress" and "Youtube".
Have you tried turning it on and off again?
Definition from Wikipedia
Quote from the show The IT Crowd (2006–2013), a British comedy written by Graham Linehan. The comedy follows Jen, Moss, and Roy and their work in the IT department, based in the basement of Reynholm Industries.
The scene script it comes from:
Roy Trenneman: [picking up the phone] Hello, IT. Have you tried turning it off and on again? Uh... okay, well, the button on the side, is it glowing? Yeah, you need to turn it on... uh, the button turns it on... yeah, you do know how a button works don't you? No, not on clothes.
Definition (as used by xpub1)
A joke used while working with many different machines that may or may not include an on/off button. Not everyone is familiar with the origin of the joke, but it is commonly known as the most basic question asked in relation to working with technology/getting a machine to work. It has become a sort of meme, a cultural memory of working with technology.
Variations can include: Have you tried refreshing the page?, Have you tried turning it on and off again again?
Citation, Mentioned in
- Prototyping class with Manetta. Manetta (paraphrased): If your computer does not register the plotter, type in exit() to leave chiplotle, turn off and on the plotter, and run chiplotle again
- Colloquially it will be mentioned by everyone studying XPUB in one point or another
Images and links:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nn2FB1P_Mn8 (The scene from IT Crowd)
- https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/362738 Know your Meme archived image for Have you tried turning it on and off again?
See also: Pen Plotter
Healing pen plotters
or destroying them, as you prefer.
Penplotters are incredible high precision pieces of technology that nobody cares about anymore, common back in the 70’s and 80’s to draw blueprints, charts, schemes... Luckily XPUB exist to regain control over these lost machines!
Healing penplotters is one of the main focus of XPUB during the first trimester '23. Some of us participated in few evening meetings organised by Joseph. 🚧The process is still ongoing 🚧
It was extremely exciting to play a bit, finally, with some physical/material practice of fixing hardwares. We got our hands dusty as we tried to find solutions to some technical issues, some of them were fixed some others are still undergoing investigation.
We focused on decoding online/offline manuals of those plotters we got (HP7475 A3, BBC Goertz Metrawatt SE-283, TAXAN X-Y KPL710...), then studying a bit the penplotter language (hpgl). We started inspecting the machines, then soldeing DB9 and DB25 connectors and pin them to the pen plotters.
After that the real disassembly of these graphic robots happened, so lot of screwing and unscrewing, cleaning, we had to 3dprint some part of the pen plotters that were broken (wheel mechanisms), we fixed cables and motors (someone could help with the techical terminology here (人´∀`) ).
It's interesting how we didn't get trapped in the apparent rigid, static, structure of the penplotters, we ranged more creatively in the use of different materials, pens, to create various types of outcomes. We got lot of good ideas.
It's important to accept it will take time to fix and find solutions to some issues of the machines, and that's the exciting part (so, one of the main aspect of this experience is the patience practicing).
Our goal is to let the penplotters become easy accessible tools for everyone in the studio, effortlessly connected to chopchop as well. Until now we produced zines, personal and collective works, radio show experimentations. We worked together??? We failed together??? We had fun???
Homophily
Homophily is the assumption that "birds of a feather flock together". In sociology, it has been presented as a principle to express love of the same (or similar), it is rooted in the belief that people connect to similar individuals more frequently. However, in the text "Queering Homophily", written by Wendy Hui Kyong Chun, this belief is questioned and criticized. The author writes that homophily is used as the building block of network sciences, creating pathways that discriminate based on patterns of presumed similarity. This leads to detrimental consequences which standardize people into uniformity, connecting people into "neighbourhoods" of sameness, that promote lack of variety and monotony. Homophily, according to Chun, is used as an excuse to perpetuate racism, sexism and inequality, by posing it as a biological fact of human nature.
Interview
a structured conversation where one participant asks questions, and the other provides answers. In common parlance, the word "interview" refers to a one-on-one conversation between an interviewer and an interviewee. The interviewer asks questions to which the interviewee responds, usually providing information. That information may be used or provided to other audiences immediately or later. Interviews can be unstructured, free-wheeling and open-ended conversations without predetermined plan or prearranged questions. Interviews can also be highly structured conversations in which specific questions occur in a specified order. They can follow diverse formats.
[Noun.]
1: a formal consultation usually to evaluate qualifications (as of a prospective student or employee)
2: a: a meeting at which information is obtained (as by a reporter, television commentator, or pollster) from a person b: a report or reproduction of information so obtained
[Verb.]
1. transitive : to question or talk with (someone) to get information : to conduct an interview with (someone)
2 .intransitive : to participate in an interview for a position (such as a job)
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interview https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/interview?src=search-dict-hed
Live Transcription
Mariapocalypse
What it is
The apocalypse is an editorial space. On the basis of a pending catastrophe we are called to decide upon the relevance of archives in the future and make choices based on our informed judgement and the needs that we imagine a future society will have in order to (re)build itself (and) in connection to radio making.
What to do with it
To connect SI22 to the apocalypse narrative I would like to fictionalize and adapt (excerpts of) the transcripts of the interviews we had on 7/11 (rendered by Riviera and Rosa) with prominent Radio Worm radio makers (Lucas, Lieuwe and Ash) as a radio activation manual/radio community survival guide, and turn it into a publication through weasyprint or another web to print F/LOSS tool. The publication could (maybe should) also include photos and/or illustrations (as a universal language). It will serve as a manifestation of the post-apocalyptic narrative, as a tribute to Worm Radio and as a thank you gift to the makers who opened their arms and studio for us.
The idea behind it
In this post-apocalyptic narrative the sense of community is central as well as the desire to establish practices that can be followed and sustained with the minimum possible resources. The archival elements should be economical but also supporting a positive climate of collaboration between the members of an emerging community. The apocalypse is not seen as a frustrating end of things but as an opportunity for a clean start upon the ruins of what might have been good at parts but was also essentially burdening us with its insufferable weight.
See also: Manual for Post-Apocalyptic Radio Making
Microphones
A microphone is a device that amplifies sound. There are three (or four) types of microphones:
(a) The dynamic microphone
(b) The small and large diaphragm microphone
(c) The ribbon microphone
and they have six different polar patterns: (cardioid, supercardioid, hypercardioid, omnidirectional, lobar and bidirectional), depending on where they capture the sound from, and they are accordingly used for different environments and specific purposes, eg. public speaking, recording in a noisy environment, recording for film, online streaming.
In context
We have experimented with different types of microphones (and from different eras) their effect and the quality of their output when used for recording.
Memory
Negotiate Collaboration
Negotiate Collaboration
There are 5 steps and practices that consistently work. The model presented here identifies the five stages of any negotiation in a simplified framework that helps you to analyze and absorb. Collaborative negotiations are an ongoing process, which build confidence, trust and strong relationships.
Negotiate Collaboration Practices in SI22
- Discuss how to collaborate practices with others, sharing the best/worst experiences, personal preferences and feelings about it. Also talk about the difficulties of collaborations in a large group.
- How to distribute different tasks to people. Is it possible we could all focus on one project?
Difference between collaborative and distributed practices. (a) collaborative: moving towards a more unified outcome (b) distributive: sharing of methods, people are free to produce individual outcomes
- Small group collaboration practice in Radio Worm.
Learn how to do the team work and make an experimental radio show.
- Zine camp group distribution:
Zine/ Radio/ Presentation/ Marketing/ Retails team
Oscillators A
This is an entry for 'Oscillators A' for the Wordhole Glossary.
Definitions
- Oscillators A is a collection of actions to produce audio using Ableton.
Application (as used by us)
- Define the core: make a piece of audio based on an animal movement model
- Find an audio effect based on animal crowd movement Swarmalators T 1.0
- Produce noise: the audio automatically produces some sound consistently,record the sound, and then transforms the sound into another beat
- Drag the piece of the audio track made from the former step and then select the instrument
- Create a vocal track
- Combine: export all the soundtracks as an mp3 file
Application (other contexts)
Images and links
Oscilloscope
An oscilloscope used to be primarily an instrument for measuring voltage. Its useful graphic rendering of waveform allowed the analysis of properties such as amplitude, frequency, distortion etc.
Application
Oscilloscopes are used for the maintenance of electronic equipment in various fields, such as engineering, biomedical sciences, the automotive industry etc.
In context
The oscilloscope's hidden talent lies in making art, as it can be used to render .svg images that can then be manipulated through sound, something that we practiced extensively.
Pad
This is an entry for 'Pad' for the Wordhole Glossary.
Definition
- Shortening of '(an) EtherPad', an open source online editor providing real-time collaborative editing (From etherpad.org).
- A thick piece of soft material, typically used to protect or shape something, or to absorb liquid. (From Oxford Languages)
- The fleshy underpart of an animal's foot or of a human finger. (From Oxford Languages)
- Fill or cover (something) with soft material in order to protect it or its contents, make it more comfortable, or give it a particular shape. (From Oxford Languages)
- Lengthen a speech, piece of writing, etc. with unnecessary material. (From Oxford Languages)
Application (as used by us)
We often use EtherPads for collaborative work, note taking and documenting purposes. With 'a pad', we refer to any one pad. Never is 'pad' used in reference to the software EtherPad itself.
Application (other contexts)
The word 'pad' has seen multifunctional use, both as a verb and a noun, for centuries. The reference to 'EtherPad' is only more recent, with the software being launched in 2008.
In context
- 'Do we have a Pad of the Day?'
- 'Don't pad out your answer to make it seem impressive' (From Oxford Languages)
Images and links
- EtherPad website: https://etherpad.org/
- Main wiki entry on EtherPad: https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Etherpad
- Wiki entry on the EtherPatches project: https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/EtherPatches
Pad of the Day
This is an entry for 'Pad of the Day' for the Wordhole Glossary.
Definition
- Used in reference to any specific day's associated main EtherPad.
Application (as used by us)
Most days, XPUB students use a day-specific EtherPad to work collaboratively, take notes, document their process, and more. On the associated day, any of these is referred to as 'the pad of the day'. Not to be be confused with any of the other (often many) pads that may be used that day, the pad of the day serves as the common thread throughout the day.
In context
- 'Where can I find a link to the Pad of the Day?'
Images and links
- Example of a Pad of the Day (2023-10-11): https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed-11-Oct23
- Example of a Pad of the Day gone wrong (2023-11-07)
See also
Performative
Definition from Sources (Merriam-Webster)
- relating to or marked by public, often artistic performance
- disapproving: made or done for show (as to bolster one's own image or make a positive impression on others)
- determined and reinforced by the repeated performance of socially prescribed acts and behaviors rather than by biological factors
- grammar: being or relating to an expression (such as a word or statement) that performs the act it specifies or that effects a transaction
Application (as used by us)
Application (In other contexts)
In How to do Things With Words. John Langshaw Austin introduces the idea of performative speech acts. Austin argues that to deliver a 'performative utterance' is to 'do something' rather than simply to report or 'state something' (Austin, 1975). Saying "I do" in the context of a wedding ceremony is an example of performative utterance given by Austin.
In Context
- 'Truly performative, [the artwork] simultaneously does something (it runs and produces output) and it states something (through both its output and its code)' (Ledesma, 2015, p.93).
- 'Codeworks can potentially be executed and thus become performative' (Arns, 2005, p.8).
Citation: Mentioned in:
- Austin, J.L. (1975) How to Do Things with Words: Second Edition. 2nd edition. Edited by J.O. Urmson and M. Sbisà. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Arns, I. (2005) ‘Code as performative speech act’, Artnodes, 0(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i4.727.
- Butler, J. (2006) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge (Routledge classics).
- Culler, J: Philosophy and Literature: The Fortunes of the Performative (2000) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240740399_Philosophy_and_Literature_The_Fortunes_of_the_Performative
- Galloway, J. Protocol: How Control Exists After Decentralisation (2004) https://www.asounder.org/resources/galloway_protocol.pdf
- Ledesma, E. (2015) ‘The Poetics and Politics of Computer Code in Latin America: Codework, Code Art, and Live Coding’, Revista de Estudios Hispánicos, 49(1), pp. 91–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1353/rvs.2015.0016.
See also
Live Coding | Performance
Podcast
Definition
podcast [noun]
A broadcast accessible as a digital audio file that can be downloaded from the Internet and played on a personal device. [Wikipedia] It is a portmanteau of the words broadcast and iPod. [Oxford Reference] to podcast [verb]
to podcast [verb]
Is "to record something as a podcast". [Cambridge Dictionary]
podcasting [noun]
Is the activity of making a broadcast and putting it on the Internet. [Oxford Learners Dictionary]
Application (as used by us)
A (weekly and not necessarily self-contained) broadcast live or pre-recorded at Radio WORM, Rotterdam that is uploaded to our own server and the mixcloud site of Radio WORM where it can be streamed online.
Sidestory
The term dates back to 2004 when it was first mentioned by columnist and BBC journalist Ben Hammersley in The Guardian and later that year by Danny Gregoire who introduced it in the iPodder-dev mailing list in an audioblogging community from where it was used by Adam Curry who was later credited for popularizing podcasting and therefore called the Podfather. [Wikipedia]
Citation / Mentioned in
See also
Broadcast | Radio | Stream
Prescriptive Technology
The term is used in Ursula Franklin's lecture The Real World of Technology, in which "prescriptive technologies" oppose "holistic technologies".
Example: a form of "prescriptive technology" was used in Chinese bronze casting in 1200 BCE. The production required the skills of model makers, clay workers; metal workers, each of which had a specific set of tools and disciplines. This specialism represented a division of labour. Franklin makes the point that the workers naturalized their activities, so it was assumed there was only one procedure to make clay molds or work with metal.
Application (as used by us)
The “internalization” of a subject position (and of a discourse) engendered by prescriptive technology relates to Foucault's disciplinary societies and Deleuze's control societies. In a Marxist reading, "prescriptive technologies” operate at the level of ideology (they are disguised in plain sight).
Preparations for radio
Preparing for radio is important in making me feel less nervous about live performing.
In the two times i have been a caretaker (Week 2 - 5 Rythms and Week 6 - Hitchhikers Guide to an Active Archive) the preparations were different but still shared some common elements that were crucial in the development of the show. Both times, we started working by thinking about a structure or a "main theme" for the broadcast, and then worked around that. This structure helped in maintaining one common thread of thought in 2h long slots filled with a large variety of content.
For both we took upon roles, in the first one more implicitly and in the second one more explicitly. This made it so that workload was distributed in the preparation as well as the execution.
We sourced content to play in the show and wrote scripts on different collaborative platforms (first show pad, second show wiki). We prepared a musical background. We rehearsed parts of the show before Tuesday. We went to Worm earlier to set up our computers, test the audio and made sure we were recording. We decided to eat a cake as a reward and then started.
For even more information about the planning and script of the broadcast Hitchhiker's Guide to an Active Archive go to Hitchhiker's Guide to an Active Archive
Reel to Reel Experimentation
Process
(a) A team comes together and has a reel-to-reel tape recorder and at least one tape at its disposal.
(b) The team listens to the tape in order to test if it's still in working condition. Other reasons to listen are plain curiosity or in order to choose pieces the team would like to keep and integrate in a new recording. For example in one case it was a militaristic anthem, in another an aria, in a promising Joan Baez recording there was nothing, as the tape had been demagnetized.
(c) The team might choose to record directly on top of the tape or proceed first to step (d) and then record. Recording takes place directly through microphone(s) and its speed can be manually adjusted by pulling the tape or holding and releasing, or even speeding up or slowing down the movement of the casing while the tape rolls.
(d) The team members proceed to cutting the tape as needed, using a razor on a slicing plate, and then reconnect the tape pieces with special tape.
(e) The last step is to play the new tape (or indeed the loops) created and make adjustments where needed.
(f) The result can be further recorded using a cassette tape recorder or digital means.
Purpose
Explore the possibilities of physical tape and the potential crossing with digital media.
Same as it never was
This is a short story written in the 2023-11-15 Methods class in response to the exercise about thinking about the apocalypse.
It is not every day that I can be carefree. Today, today is not such a day either. 'Could you fetch some water?', Robin's mom asked. Since the graduation ceremony, I feel like many people have been asking me to fetch some water. 'Come on', she continued, 'the phoneline's down, otherwise I would've asked the Keeper.' If I'm honest with you -- and I can be honest with you, right? -- I seldomly feel like fetching water. It's a long way to the shore, and there's all this sand I won't be able to clean off for days. 'The water will eat me.' 'The water won't eat you.' A lot of us have been scared -- not me. At the ceremony, I saw some people cry, that's how scared they were. Tears all over their faces. That's way scarier to me, the flood from within. I've learned to keep it in. 'Fine then.' We keep some buckets in the shed. A central place where we all meet. Well, not 'all' of us, I suppose. All of us who are able to, those on the island. 'Meeting' is also an exaggeration, maybe. I go to school there. And people discuss the wheater. Sometimes I overhear. Once, when the schoolbell had just rang and the class was leaving for home, I heard them say 'A storm's coming up'. It was a joke. The schoolbell doesn't ring all days -- those days are my happy days. I get to stay home with mom and dad, and we boardgames in the basement. It's cozy, we use candles on days the schoolbell doesn't ring. On my way to the shore, I tried to find footprints in the sand. No luck. This is why I hate sand: it's always sticking to you, but nothing ever sticks to it. It's just not fair. If only I could have followed the footsteps from last week, when we were all here. All 6 of us, my class, followed by everyone on the island. Slowly walking towards the Lighthouse. After the ritual, we are finally allowed to go to the water's edge. 'Perfect timing!', I heard someone say right when I passed the Lighthouse. It was the Keeper. 'It's stuck and I can't reach it.' The Keeper is a funny fellow, always making jokes. 'What is?', I asked. 'There's something preventing the watermill from turning. Look.' The Keeper pointed towards the mill. 'Serves him right. We don't need it anyway.' I have never been fond of it, fond of the dependency on it. 'Well I'd very much like it to work. It generated the --' 'The electricity for our whole island, I know, I know.' 'I like to call my spouse from time to time. This is not the only island, you know.' He winked. To this day, I don't know why he winked.
Shell scripts
Throughout SI #22: Radio Worm - Protocols for an Active Archive, several shell scripts have been made. These are small computer programmes which enhance productivity and make tasks less repetitive. On several occasions we have implemented shell scripts to get things done and probably we will use shell scripts again in the near future. In 'Tools to Fight Boredom: FLOSS and GNU/Linux for artists working in the field of generative music and software art' Marloes de Valk likens shell scripts to a sort of 'glue' capable of binding things together. Throughout SI #22 shell scripts have been used to diverse ends. This ranges from making a podcast generator to downloading files from the internet. From compiling pdf documents with pandoc and weasyprint to manipulating texts with grep, awk and sed. These scripts can be found on the internet via Gitea, on the Wiki and in etherpads. Overall, shell scripting has been more of a distributive practice than a collaborative practice. We have shared algorithms with each other without necessarily writing those algorithms together (i.e. in an Etherpad). Depending on how the shell script is written, a specific shell may or may not be required to execute the code. Primarily we have been using bash, the Bourne Again Shell, and fish, the Friendly Interactive Shell. These shells have subtle differences in syntax; bash often cannot execute fish scripts and vice-versa. Below is an example of a fish script which, when executed, downloads all episodes of the Laurence Rassel Show.
#! /usr/bin/fish
for n in 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 (seq 10 17);
wget (printf 'http://www.publicrec.org/archive/2-01/2-01-014/2-01-014-%s.mp3' $n);
end
Structurelessness
Without structure
Application (as used by us)
The Tyranny of Structurelessness (1970-73) is a text by Jo Freeman
THE TYRANNY of STRUCTURELESSNESS (1970-73) is an article by Jo Freeman aka Joreen. The discussion of structureless in this article is based on the 'organizational form of the movement'. According to the text, "Structurelessness" is a natural response to an overly structured society, however it is organizationally impossible. Not only we can not decide whether to have a formally structured group, but also whether to have one that is structured or not. A structureless group does not exist, despite our desire to think otherwise. Any kind of group of people will eventually organize itself in some way if they come together for any kind of purpose.
The word structure is derived from the Latin structura, which means "a fitting together, building.". In a broader sense its anything put together. The relationships between family members make up a family's structure, and the way your muscles and bones fit together might be considered your body's structure.
It's a challenge to paraphrase something that doesn't seem to work nor make 'sense' because the idea of having no structure is more a theoretical ideology than it is something practical to realize (?), which makes it difficult to realize, because there will be a structure based on that there isn't a structure. So then a counter-structure (alternative) makes more sense than having no structure at all(!?!)
However, contrary to the concept, it has gone from being a concept to a tool for the elite to grab power.
Secretorial Labour
In Context
Secretorial labour has many different name and takes on several forms (only a portion of them have been listed here):
- Extensive note taking of group meetings
- Taking minutes
- Doing live transcription of conversation
It is done as an act of care towards a group which is collaborating. It offers a history of group meetings and ideas, which can be used both by present and absent members of the group, and serves as a language aid for those of us who struggle following group conversations.
See also: Live Transcription
Text Manipulation
Through the works of Georges Perec and Simon Yuill as well as the experimentation with bash commands, such as grep, sed and awk, and the introduction to weasyprint, a wonderful opportunity arose for making a prototype based on a collaborative pad, from which lines containing keywords were selected, cut and rearranged in order to create a text with free associations.
The desire for distributive practices led further to the inclusion of a "recipe" in the printed version of this prototype, so that others could not just reproduce but pick up the basic idea and expand it further according to their own texts and focus.
Applications
From very functional ones (such as finding specific content in a text) to more abstract and creative ones (creating texts with a literary and/or poetic flair, the possibilities that text manipulation offers are seemingly endless.
The Hitchhiker's Guide to an Active Archive
The Hitchhiker's Guide to an Active Archive is an interactive radio play that was performed live by XPUB students Rosa, Anita and Thijs and broadcast on Radio Worm on 2023-10-24. They each voiced one of the three voices present in the script.
During the broadcast, a pad was used as the channel of communication between the Caretakers / performers of the show, and the audience. There was room for open interaction, and the story includes multiple forms of decision making (polls, dicerolls and time requirements) by the audience to navigate the non-linear script. The non-linearity is captured in a flowchart that was provided to listeners of the show.
The show could be recreated using the associated wiki pages and a fresh channel of communication (e.g. another EtherPad).
See also: Flowchart, Pad, Performative, Worm
Tape Vandalism
Reflection on leaving traces
One of the changes that come with starting a new study, is operating in new physical spaces. familiarizing oneself with the people, facilities and quirks of these spaces can offer a plethora of insights, questions, discussions and moments. Thus a great potential as source of inspiration.
One of the spaces at the PZI-institute at the 4th floor of the WDKA, that people tend to gravitate towards is the so-called "cantina". A strange pseudo-room that houses some relaxing furniture, a coffe-machine and a water machine. If one is to closely inspect the water machine, one can see that it offer multiple modes of water. You have the blue bottom at the top, which dispenses refreshing cold water. Under this button are two more ambiguous green buttons, with and instruction "~press both green buttons for ambient water".
The term "ambient water" has sparked many discussions and humorous moments, as it seems like a possibly poor translation has given the water machine a lot of personality.
Another more recently discovered feature of the fountain of ambience, is a red plastic can(the kind used to carry fuel). The can interfaces with the water-machine through a hose (the kind you´d see in a garden). In other terms its some sort of disposal for byproducts of "the production of drinking water" (Probably collection condensed water from the machines internal cooling). As a humoristic gesture a piece of red tape with the words "(Un)Ambient water was attached", a homage to the water-machine that serves us all with vital water.
Adding personal touches to the spaces is a way of activating and vitalizing the space. It can offer insights and raise questions on how communities are built and operate. It can be a way of spreading (dis)information through posters, flyers and other communicative media. It can also be a form of activism, raising attention to urgent topics or events.
Timeline SI22
Week 1 (18/09-22/09)
Monday:
SI: Visited Worm for the first time.
Prototyping: Produced memory and metadata recordings from field recordings on radio aporee. Riviera and Victor produced a cassette tape recording from an old Shell easy listening violin tape that they used to record from the radio.
Tuesday:
SI Broadcast: All the above recordings (along with the original field recordings) were used for our first broadcast at Radio Worm, along with sound and poetry reading experiments that we conducted on the spot. We introduced the pad as a method of communicating with the caretakers.
Caretakers: Bernadette, Victor, Maria
Prototyping: Introduction to the server and commands (ssh etc.)
Wednesday:
Methods: We produced our first collective annotated documents. We began annotating collectively "Postscript on the Societies of Control" (Deleuze, 1992) and then went on to divide into three groups that created their own annotating protocols (eg. reading all together, annotating separately and then discussing, or reading separately, discussing first and annotating as a group). One group annotated the aforementioned article, another the "Tyranny of Structurelessness" (Freeman, 1970-73) and a third one "Queerying Homophily" (Chun, 2018). We later came together to present the articles and our process to our classmates and to find common themes in all texts and how they connect to our project.
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-week1
Tuesday:
Wednesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/AnnotateDataset'sRuins
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/PostscriptControlSocieties
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Deleuze_Control_Group
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/TyrannyAnnotation
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/QueeringHomophily
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/BarthesWormRadio
Other:
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-protocols
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/future-broadcast-ideas
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/worm_reflections
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-shownotes-week1
Week 2 (25/09-29/09)
Monday:
Prototyping: We created and named our server, Chopchop. It was a collective effort, during which we also had the chance to discuss and choose voting protocols (hands high, middle-high or down).
Tuesday:
SI Broadcast: Our second broadcast was created, which had a participatory element, as there was interaction (and a game) between the caretakers and the class.
Caretakers: Anita, Mania, Wang
Prototyping: On the same day we created our first soundboards in teams, using html and css.
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Monday-Sept-25
Tuesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Monday-Sept-26
Wednesday:
Other:
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/naming-the-pi
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-shownotes-week2
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Radio_%F0%9F%AA%B1_%F0%9F%8D%93_%F0%9F%8D%93_%F0%9F%8D%93
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Soup_and_Salvation
Week 3 (02/10-06/10)
Monday:
Prototyping: We created our own radio on our servers. We produced audio files with protocols for Tuesday's radio show. We started sharing expectations and ideas regarding zine camp and teamed up (loosely).
Tuesday:
SI Broadcast: Third broadcast, that used the recorded protocols and "Death of the Author" readings and our collective annotation on "Ontology of Performance". The caretakers interacted with the class and asked questions.
Caretakers: Riviera, Lorenzo, Senka
Prototyping: We turned headphones into microphones and experimented with different types of microphones in teams.
Wednesday:
Methods: We created our visual map (with different colors and bigger letters according to the importance of a word) with all the processes and practices we had developed thus far and the keywords that would be used later as basis for our glossary.
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Monday-Oct-02
Tuesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-03-Oct-Tuesday
Wednesday:
Other:
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-shownotes-week3
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/plan-broadcast3
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/phelan-1993-ontology-of-performance
Week 4 (09/10-13/10)
Monday:
SI: We used curl and weasyprint to transform HTML and CSS into PDF documents. We used a pad as a collaborative stylesheet. Experimenting with Grep initiated more ideas how to manipulate text.
Tuesday:
SI Broadcast: The radio broadcast was devoted to destroying protocols. This time the caretakers group included interviews which turned out to be very interesting and as a group we decided that we wanted to continue this idea and continue to include interviews in our radio programs. During radio show we had breakfast ( a new protocol that emerged but did not survived).
Caretakers: Michel, Zuzu, Alessia
Prototyping: We worked on flow charts, reflecting the network of connections of various aspects that make up the broad topic of archives. For this task we used open source graph visualization software - Graphiz
We started by writing down the questions we would like to pay more attention to:
- Question of time (past/ present / future)
- Question of how to activate an archive
- Question of consent
- Question of accessibility
Each group had to discuss the topic and visualize their considerations in the form of a flow chart.
This excersise enabled us to visualize the network of relationships between individual entries and better understand the topic we are dealing with.
For the rest of the day the plan was to plot our diagrams with pen plotters.
Wednesday
Methods: We were working on a Glossary for the Special Issue publication ‘Protocols for an Active Archive'. Wordhole is a glossary containing a set of concepts that accompany our searches. Together, we created definitions of these concepts, taking into account our individual interpretations. The Glossary aims to help us understand the area in which we are moving, enabling critical reflection and creating new meanings. We want to make sure that we do not stay on the surface when using these concepts, but that we consciously and critically delve into them understanding its significance.
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Monday-Oct-09
Tuesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Tuesday-Oct-10
Wednesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed-11-Oct23
Other:
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/zine-camp-2023
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Sharing_thoughts_of_protocools
Week 5 (Autumn break)
Most of the time this week was dedicated for zine camp preparation and individual projects. We have been working in smaller teams on zines related to the topics we have covered in recent weeks. We also tried to take into account the tools we learned and reflect on the insights that we gathered so far.
Holiday special broadcast of the "best of" previous broadcasts.
Caretakers: Rosa
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: /
Tuesday: /
Wednesday: /
Other:
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/xpub-active-archive-holiday-special-2023
Week 6 (23/10-27/10)
Monday:
SI: Michael demonstrated downloading Youtube videos; now available on chopchop.
We had a discussion for INC Going Hybrid (10th November dissemination event)
https://networkcultures.org/goinghybrid/, during which we collectively decided what to include.
Prototyping: Joseph encouraged us to manipulate the tape. By cutting and connecting pieces again we created loops.
Tuesday:
SI Broadcast: Choose-your-own-adventure game broadcast "Hitchhikers guide to an Active Archive". Caretakers took on different roles with different protocols: Performer, Navigator and Protocoller were guiding us to get to WORMHOLE. We used a pad as a main method for communication between caretakers and the audience.
Caretakers: Thijs, Rosa, Anita
Prototypying: Working further on the soundboards, we have learned how to control mp3 with javascript to change the play rate and/or loop it.
During zine camp meeting we were discussing steps to move forward and tried to develop collaboration protocols.
Wednesday:
Methods: We used the Method's session to dive deeper into the Wordhole, by practicing our paraphrasing skills.
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Monday-Oct-23
Tuesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Tue-24-Oct23
Wednesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed25Oct23Methods
Other:
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-shownotes-week5
Week 7 (30/10-03/11)
Monday:
SI + Prototyping: Support mode class in preparation of Zine Camp. We shared what we were working on, offered feedback, and went through the making steps of Maria's zine to see how it can become welcoming for other to contribute. Shared our experiences with collaboration in the past and made proposals for future things to implement (eg. more frequent breaks, check-ins at the beginning of class, having an agenda and timekeeping). Introduction to Pandoc, universal document converter.
Tuesday:
SI - Broadcast: Speculative fiction broadcast "Personal Accounts of Irreplaceable Lace: A 200 year long history of Lost and Found". The broadcast utilized and made a collectively written speculative fiction story on the materials used to archive, created "jingles" for different time segments (past, present, future), and utilized a mixtape recording.
Caretakers: Riviera, Victor, Senka
Prototyping: Support mode class in preparation of Zine Camp. We explored HTML and CSS more.
Wednesday:
Methods: Produced more entries for the Wordhole glossary, by focusing on writing down what practices have we performed, elements we have produced, and plans we have made. We went into line by line collective editing to refine these new Wordhole entries, which are more related to what we have made, then simply what we have read or discussed.
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Monday-Oct-30
Tuesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/SI22-Tuesday-Oct-31
Wednesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed01Nov23Methods
Other:
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/worm_reflections
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Caretakers7
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/zine-camp-2023-schedule
Week 8 (6/11-10/11)
Monday:
SI + Prototyping: Split into groups of Content/Editorial and Event/Exhibition. Content group devised a set of questions that could be used to interview radio makers while the event group. Exhibition group made prototype proposals that were encompassed in a picnic box.
Tuesday:
SI - Broadcast: First collective-caretakers broadcast. Everyone was in Worm, fisrt the the presentation of Zine camp was played. Then people took turns in interviewing Lukas, Liuewe and Ash, with a set of questions we have collectively refined, voted on, and choose.
Caretakers: Everyone
Prototyping: Discussion of the Special issue without the use of laptops. We divided into groups to find consensus in what the purpose and goal of our publication is. Joseph tried to write down and summarize our points. Afterwards we mapped out possible metaphors, which could be the framework of our publication.
Wednesday:
Methods: Separated into 3 groups in order to write down what we have produced and organized so far. Each group wrote in a different genre: Fiction, Interviews, Field Report.
Pads (aka the field notes of our collective discussions and meetings):
Monday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Mon_6_11_23
Tuesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Tuesday_9_11_23
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Tue_Nov_7_2023
Wednesday: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed08Nov23Methods
Other:
References (in chronological order):
Week 1:
- Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong, (2018), Queerying Homophily [link]
- Deleuze, Gilles, (1992), Postscript on the Societies of Control [link]
- Freeman, Jo, (1970-73), The Tyranny of Structurelessness [link]
Week 2:
- Barthes, Roland, (1977), The Death of the Author [link]
- Birdsall Carolyn & Harrison, Erica, (2022), Researching Archival Histories of Radio [link]
- Badenoch, Alexander, (2022), European Radio’s Silenced Witness: The European Broadcasting Union’s Written Archives [link]
Week 3:
- Brecht, Bertolt, (1932), The Radio as a Communications Apparatus [link]
- Phelan, Peggy (2003), The Ontology of Performance [link]
- Reading Rhythms Club zine for reading methods [1]
- Hannah B Higgins and Douglas Kahn, MAINFRAME EXPERIMENTALISM Early Computing and the Foundations of the Digital Arts [link]
- Simon Yuill, All Problems of Notation Will be Solved bythe Masses:Free Open Form Performance, Free/LibreOpen Source Software, and DistributivePractice , [link]
- Georges Perec, [2]
- A zine documenting the different reading methods that were used [link]
- Example of visual poetry in Alice in Wonderland (the Mouse's Tale) [link]
Week 4:
Week 5:
Week 6:
- Black Trans Archive [3]
Week 7:
- Hartman, Saidiya, (2019) Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments [4]
Week 8:
Voting by Show of Hands
Voting by show of hands is a protocol established within the first weeks of Special Issue 22, and has been applied in the process of naming chopchop, among others. This Wordhole entry is borrowed from the Category on Protocols.
Voting by show of hands is an accessible social protocol that can be used to make group decisions.
Procedure
All options are presented to the voters in order. This order might be predetermined or randomly chosen. For each option, each party elligible to vote has three options:
- Raising their hands: this inditaces support of the option.
- Lowering their hands: this indicates rejection of the option.
- Neither raising nor lowering their hands: this indicates neither support nor rejection of the option. In some cases, this might be interpreted as being neutral on the option. In other cases, it might mean the user refrains from voting on the option, and in doing so forfeit their right to appeal the decision.
One round of voting might be followed by more. A new round may be planned before the first round, or be initiated by no option having seen enough support by the voters to be chosen over the others.
To find consensus, it is used to see if people disagree or have concerns about a particular decision. In this case, these concerns can be formulated and discussed until a full group consensus can be reached.
The show of hands can also be used in group discussions when participants agree or disagree with an opinion without interrupting the speaker.
Characteristics
This protocol is characterised by its accessibility: no additional equipment (e.g. ballots) are required in the procedure of voting. If voting is done publicly, it does not require a neutral party to count the votes. In this case, however, it does not provide anonimity to the voters.
Wiki Wandering
The Wiki is a shared, public space also used by XPUB students and staff based on the MediaWiki architecture. Wiki Wandering, for me, refers to the practise of exploring the Wiki, getting lost, getting unlost, creating pages, being surprised by what is or was there, getting (un)lost again, and editing your way out of there. Not necessarily in that order. Note that this 'wandering' refers not to contributing to the Wiki, but rather to be captivated by the Wiki, and maybe contribute in reaction to it.
Wiki Wandering has seen several uses already. In our practises of documentation, the Wiki is one: we have created Wiki entries for our protocols (e.g. personal protocols and caretaker protocols), projects (e.g. Platform is the Problem and EtherPatches), diaries, ... This specific documenting practise seems to have been in place for many years in XPUB now. This enables the circular narrative when exploring the Wiki that is at the heart of Wiki Wandering. It transforms the experience of the Wiki from a static space to an ever evolving one, in which its internal infrastructure reacts to and builds on itself. A result of this can be a self-sustaining practise: exploration leads to motivation leads to creation.
Wiki Wandering is not an explicit practise. Students were encouraged, but never instructed, to explore and use the Wiki in a way fitting to them, The practise of Wiki Wandering might continue to evolve. By nature of the Wiki, what is there will remain there, and every part that is there can serve as a starting point for a new part to be there. This can, in turn, affect the way we're exploring the Wiki, which can in turn affect the way we're using the Wiki.
An explicit example of Wiki Wandering was given by Steve in the 2023-11-01 Methods class when he described getting lost in a rabbit hole of working on the Wordhole glossary.
Worm
Definitions
noun 1. any of a number of creeping or burrowing invertebrate animals with long, slender soft bodies and no limbs.
verb 2. move with difficulty by crawling or wriggling. insinuate one's way into.
3. In the context of Xpub we would refer to the cultural space of Worm Rotterdam: WORM is the ultimate test environment for alternative art production, experimental ways of living and non-academic knowledge development. We are a network organisation at the intersection of (popular) culture and (performing) arts, fueled by an abiding interest in all the inspiring, beautiful, urgent, vital, raw, unruly and / or crazy shit that our fellow human beings come up with. We do not see the chaos that comes with it as a problem; rather we use it as energy for action.
Application
1. "eeew there is a worm in my apple!"
2. "I wormed my way along the roadside ditch"
3. "Hey wanna grab a drink at worm later, we can have look at the radio studio"
Links
Read more about Worm Rotterdam´s project here:
https://worm.org/about/organisatie/
Zoom Recorder
A Zoom recorder is a field recorder produced by the brand Zoom. A field recorder is a piece of portable equipment used to capture ambient sound. A device that we (XPUB1) have used to record sounds around us, e.g. a morning at worm/field recordings used in the radio broadcast/interviews for the broadcast, etc.