Reading, Writing & Research Methodologies 2013/2014
This is a shared page for the R,W & R module.
Trimester 2: 2013-14
Intro:
The Reading, Writing, and Research Methodologies Seminar is tailored towards (further) developing research methods within the first year of this master. By establishing a solid foundation of research skills, it will eventually prepare students for their Graduate research in the second year. Through reading core theoretical texts, they will establish a common vocabulary and set of references to work from. They will learn the practice of classic ‘essayistic methodologies’, including close reading, annotation, description and notation, students learn to survey a body of literature, filter what is relevant to their research and create comparative pieces of analysis. The seminar helps students to establish methodical drafting processes for their texts, where they can develop ideas further and structure their use of notes and references. The course takes as axiomatic that the perceived division between ‘practice’ and ‘theory’ is essentially an illusion.
26-6-14
Essay on method = final presentation
22-5-14
Essay on method = part one
8-5-14
Deadline: [edit]Reading Ideology in The Act of Killing and Enjoy Poverty
16-4-14
First draft: Reading Ideology in The Act of Killing and Enjoy Poverty Reading groups - group feedback
DRAFTS= DRAFT NIKOS http://pzwart3.wdka.hro.nl/wiki//IdeologyZizeketc
max Re-enactment & The Symbolic
7-4-14
Tutorials on drafts for: Reading Ideology in The Act of Killing and Enjoy Poverty
26-3-14
Reading Ideology in The Act of Killing and Enjoy Poverty
Intro to key contextualising texts:
http://www.chadmccail.co.uk/snake/snake.html
The Ruling Class and the Ruling ideas, Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels
http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01b.htm#b3
(i) History of the Subaltern Classes; (ii) The Concept of 'Ideology'; (iii) Cultural Themes: Ideological Material, Antonio Gramsci
Reading & Writing:
Question: How can Zizek’s understanding of ideology, as presented in The Pervert’s Guide to Ideology, be applied to Joshua Oppenheimer’s The Act of Killing and Renzo Martens’ Episode 3: Enjoy Poverty ?
1500 words https://piratenpad.de/p/igdVB32Rjz
Your text can be supported with these texts:
Interview with Renzo Martens
http://thepolitic.org/an-interview-with-yale-world-fellow-renzo-martens/
(8 minutes into video)
Transcript of Pervert's Guide to Ideology (thanks Henk Jelle):
On The Act of Killing
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2012/sep/14/act-of-killing-review
http://www.insideindonesia.org/current-edition/an-interview-with-joshua-oppenheimer
Zizek on charity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpAMbpQ8J7g
Key writers on ideology
Marx (the ruling class and ruling ideas = base and superstructure)
Gramsci (hegemony)
Adorno (culture industry)
Althusser (ideological state apparatus)
Viewing:
More from Zizek in Pervert's Guide to Ideology;
The Act of Killing part two
Steve's notes from last time:
enjoy poverty
Marten's thesis: poverty is a resource that should be exploited
poverty is produced to be sold
is this Zizek's cynical reason?
the act of killing:
ideology: big other
better economy
security
gangster's are 'free men'
'born free'
outside the system (state of exception)
god has secrets
'I win, so I can decide'
11-3-14
In this seminar we are following the themes of what is real? what is symbolic? and what is imaginary?
Today we will be watching extracts from 'the perverts guide to ideology', the 2012 British documentary film directed by Sophie Fiennes and written and presented by Slovene philosopher Slajvo Zizek, and 'Enjoy poverty', the 2008 documentary by Renzo Martins and The Act of Killing, 2012, Joshua Oppenheimer.
Using Pirate Pad we will WORK TOGETHER on a text, making notes on both films. We will try to answer the following questions:
What is Zizek's thesis?
In what way can Zizek's analysis be applied to Renzo Martens' film?
https://piratenpad.de/p/igdVB32Rjz
GENERAL FORMAT:
In the mornings we will look at films and artworks, conduct discussions, listen to lectures and give presentations. The theme for the morning sessions for second trimester will be: What is real? What is symbolic? What is imaginary? The afternoon will be set aside for writing. These sessions will take the form of group work and individual tutorials and we will also allow time for you to work alone on the writing assignments I’ll be giving you.
15-1-2014
Housekeeping
Today we will
1 - tidy up our individual work on this page, finding a place and format for the texts we have written, aspiring to the kind of page we see below:
2- add finishing touches to your texts
3- preview the issues that we will cover this trimester
Please upload your essays below:
It is very importent that we continue the practice of making notes of the things we read. Using the method adopted for the last session – of making a few lines of notes at the base of each page and then typing them up – continue to make annotations of the various texts we have been reading together. Feel free to visit the office and borrow what you need, brows, and spend a little time finding what interests you.
nikos:Online/networked identity DRAFT
[| Mihail]
29-1-2014
FULL DAY SEMINARS START TODAY
FORMAT:
In the mornings we will look at films and artworks, conduct discussions, listen to lectures and give presentations. The theme for the morning sessions for second trimester will be: What is real? What is symbolic? What is imaginary?
The afternoon will be set aside for writing. These sessions will take the form of group work and individual tutorials and we will also allow time for you to work alone on the writing assignments I’ll be giving you.
Please upload your essays ahead of our last half-day seminar next week (15-1-14) onto the wiki.
Trimester 1: 2013-14
Plan for November
It is very importent that we continue the practice of making notes of the things we read. Using the method adopted for the last session – of making a few lines of notes at the base of each page and then typing them up – continue to make annotations of the various texts we have been reading together. Feel free to visit the office and borrow what you need, brows, and spend a little time finding what interests you.
We will next come together as a group on the 20-11-13, so here is an outline of what will be happening over the next three weeks.
27-11-13
To recap. The brief for the essay assignment is.
1) Make a synopsis of two texts we have been looking at in the class
2) Compare the two arguments
(One might conclude, for instance that: 'A and B agree on X but disagree on Y ')
As in the manner of the first exercises we did, please try to give a clear interpretation of each writer's position.
1500 words. Draft deadline 4th December -- final deadline 15th January (1st lesson after the break)
This week we review progress.
Lucia - Observations on Being a User
Max The performing Subject 1sdraft
nikos:Online/networked identity DRAFT
Interesting links to past debate on what we have been discussing this trimester:
http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2011/03/start/from-the-editor http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2011/03/features/sharing-is-a-trap http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2011/03/features/zuckerbergs-next-move http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2011/03/features/get-over-it http://www.wired.co.uk/magazine/archive/2012/06/ideas-bank/society-isnt-a-startup http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2010/nov/25/generation-why/
20-11-13
Review the texts you have annotated with a view to writing an essay in which your opinion is expressed (your thesis). Steve will also arrange personal tutorials to those he couldn't see on the 6-11-13
UPLOAD TEXTS HERE:
13-11-13
We attend the Mapping Free Culture Workshop. Please take notes on this, because many of the issues Eleanor and Dave are working on are directly related to the issues we have been covering in the seminar. Also make notes specifically on their methods.
6-11-13
Steve will see you for individual tutorials. Sign here:
30-10-13
Over the past few weeks we have articulated the distinction between disciplinary societies and control societies. Key points: control societies are governed by pattern and code, and regulated by images and algorithms. This is opposed to disciplinary societies, which are governed by meaning and sense and regulated by precepts (see A. Galloway’s ‘protocol’ and G. Deleuze’s ‘postscript on the societies of control’)
Recognition of these systems (control and discipline) allows us to understand contemporary media as a mode of (self) governance and opens up a number of avenues of enquiry. I will mention four here:
1) Databases and protocols as control mechanisms
2) Digital labor (immaterial labour)
3) Digital mediation providing new ‘technologies of self’
4) Participatory surveillance
Over the next few weeks we will study a series of texts that explore these avenues
Sample texts (you may have chosen a different text on Wednesday, which is fine ):
Tiziana Terranova: ‘free labor’ (from ‘digital labor, the internet as playground and factory’, ed Trebor Scholz, 2013)
Ayhan Aytes: ‘return of the crowds, mechanical Turk & neoliberal states of exception’ (from ‘digital labor, the internet as playground and factory’, ed. Trebor Scholz, 2013)
Geert Lovink: ‘Facebook, anonymity and the crisis of the multiple self’ and ‘ society of the query: googlization of our lives’ (from ‘networks without a cause’, 2011)
A. Galloway: Protocol, Introduction (2004)
A. Galloway: The Interface Effect, one chapter from the book (2012)
Douglas Rushkoff: Programme or be Programmed (2012)
Assignment for this session: make synopsis of one of the above texts and load it onto the wiki (use the method where you write the key points at the bottom of each page and then edit them together in an elagent fashion). In the next session we will come together and discuss the resource we have created (a collection of texts discussing our key issues from different perspectives.)
16-10-13
'Every society has its diagrams' - G. Deleuze
Background for this week's seminar. How the idea of the control society can help us understand today's mediascape
Extract: 'how little we know of our neighbours', Rebecca Baron, 2005
Text: A. Galloway, 'protocol' introduction:
Digital Human - Urban:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03cf03g
Digital Human - Cyborg:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nphp7
Text: Brian Holmes' Future Map: http://www.mara-stream.org/think-tank/brian-holmes-future-map/
9-10-13
Background for this week's seminar:
Foucault and governmentality, 24 and the economy of the body:
santiago siera
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=naoYNgnDUl8&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DnaoYNgnDUl8
http://24.wikia.com/wiki/Interrogation
Clips for 24, season three
Clips from Harum Faroki 'The Creators of Shopping Worlds' and 'Immersion'
Clip from Amie Siegel, 'DDR/DDR'
Text: Brian Holmes' Future Map:
http://www.mara-stream.org/think-tank/brian-holmes-future-map/
Analysis: Edward Snowden: Leaker, Saviour, Traitor, Spy?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03c30cr
Your text for this week: You can pick up the Foucault, Deleuze and Lazzarato text from the office (on USB stick)
Assignment for this week (9-10-13):
1) Make a draft report on my lecture about the difference between discipline & control societies (as a group or individually)
2) Use parts of the texts by Foucault, Deleuze and Lazzarato to substantiate the position I take :-)
3) For references use Harvard System (see note below):
1000 words maximum.
Please upload below. Deadline 8-10-13
The Harvard System of referencing
The Harvard System of referencing works within the text itself and not in footnotes or endnotes. Whenever you quote, or refer to someone’s words (directly or indirectly), or use someone’s argument, or refer to a source, you should use the system described below. Whenever you quote you write the surname and the date of publication in brackets. When you quote directly, you should also add the page number:
In studying the anatomy of brains of early man, some 19th century anthropologists came to a conclusion which one writer reminds us was ‘at the time considered highly provocative but which is now obvious to every anthropologist’ (Wendt, 1974, p.12). If the name of the writer is part of the sentence itself, put the date in brackets after the name: Wendt (1974, p.12) reminds us that the conclusions of some 19th century anthropologists were ‘at the time considered very provocative’. The same applies when you are not quoting directly: Wendt (1974) reminds us that the conclusions of some 19th century anthropologists were considered very provocative when they were published.
Sometimes, you find a useful quotation from one author in a book by another. In such cases, reference like this: Johnson sweeps aside this argument: ‘His expressed view of the world has more style in it than sense – or evidence’ (quoted in Mason, 1990, p.44). In this case, you are quoting Johnson from a book which you have not read and which you therefore cannot quote directly. So the reference is to Mason’s book, which you have read.
You will sometimes need to refer to more than one book or article by the same author, each published in the same year. In this case, put a letter after the date to show which of the publications is referred to in this instance: Peterson (1989b, p.45) was risking the wrath of her profession by suggesting that ‘there is more to be gained by restraint than by rushing headlong into open debate’.
for more handy essay guidance, see:
http://pzwart3.wdka.hro.nl/wiki/A_Guide_to_Essay_Writing
2-10-13
Agenda for today's seminar:
1) a) revise the notes you took last week and edit text in groups to give an accurate account of what was covered last week, b) Josh Harris' continued adventures in We Live in Public.
2) a) look at the term 'governmentality' : b) view examples of 'governing at a distance' in the media, c) make and review notes
18-9-13
Your assignment for this week is to upload a text onto the wiki on Tuesday 17 Sept (ahead of next weeks seminar). Please write a 300 word text (maximum) describing three of your works / projects. Remember NOT to write about why or how, simply describe WHAT it is. This week we will review your texts in small groups.
PS: Please make notes of the Fuller - Harwood lecture on Thursday (following Annet's tour).
25-9-13
Please upload a direct link to your texts here
Outcome of the seminar (trimester three)
The specific outcome for the RW&RM seminar of 2013-14 will be a 1500 word text which reflects on your own method and situates your work in relation to a broader artistic and cultural context. The various texts produced within the RW&RM seminar will serve as source material for your text on method. In common with all modules on the course RW&RM serves to support your self-directed research. Therefore, the text on method will inform your Self-Evaluation at the end of the third trimester and provide the basis for your Graduate Project Proposal that you will produce in the fourth trimester.
Curriculum: The seminar will involve:
(a.) Identifying the object of your research: description and analysis of your work
(b.) Contextualizing your work through description and reflection on contemporary and historical practices.
(c.) Identify research material key to your practice.
(d.) Synopsis and annotation of key texts
(e.) Writing machines: creating methods for group and individual writing.
Throughout, there will be an emphasis on working collectively, whether in a larger discussion group or in smaller reading and writing groups.
Brief for 1500 word methods text. The aim of this assignment is to use description of your work as a way of identifying and articulating your method.
Describing first what and then how and why you make work often leads to discussions of the works context (what work is similar to the work you describe; what are the key ideas the work deals with). The theoretical elements of the texts you write should therefore emerge from, and have a very clear connection with, the work you are making.
For this experiment I am asking you to follow the method outlined above so that you can begin to reflect and write quite deeply about the work you are making.
A second method you will find useful is to draw on annotations of texts you have read which have a particular relation to the work you make.
First draft: early May (review in groups)
Final draft: late May (review in groups)