User:Ohjian/Annotating Ghost Files: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:30, 18 November 2022

Annotating Ghost Files

For this collaborative session in the community based library Leeszaal in Rotterdam I prepared a bunch of postcards with my initial thoughts, sketches, photos … around the idea of Ghost Files. The audience of the event was invited to a collective annotation session. I was sitting at a table with all the cards spread out and up to six people could join me at the same time. Whenever there was a rotation and someone new was sitting down, I would briefly explain my curiosity in Ghost Files and invite them to think along with me. The annotation process was manifold: Some directly reacted to or intervened with the content on the cards, others were speculating and adding new ideas, questions and narratives. By writing, sketching and drawing on the cards, some people created a new starting point for the next person. The atmosphere was focused and most of the time silent, but once in a while a question would be formulated or read aloud. At one time a question evolved into a whole conversation, and the outcome of that talk would then be transcribed back onto the cards.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===<p style="font-family: Garmond; font-weight: normal; color:#bbbbbb; text-shadow: 10px 10px 18px #FFB6C1, 10px 10px 18px #FFB6C1">Annotating ''Ghost Files''</p>===
-– For this collaborative session in the community library Leeszaal I prepared a bunch of postcards with my initial thoughts, sketches, photos … around the idea of Ghost Files. The audience of the event was invited to a collective annotation session. I was sitting at a table with all the cards spread out and up to six people could join me at the same time. Whenever there was a rotation and someone new was sitting down, I would briefly explain my curiosity in Ghost Files and invite them to think along with me. The annotation process was manifold: Some directly reacted to or intervened with the content on the cards, others were speculating and adding new ideas, questions and narratives. By writing, sketching and drawing on the cards, some people created a new starting point for the next person. The atmosphere was focused and most of the time silent, but once in a while a question would be formulated or read aloud. At one time a question evolved into a whole conversation, and the outcome of that talk would then be transcribed back onto the cards.
+For this collaborative session in the community based library ''Leeszaal'' in Rotterdam I prepared a bunch of postcards with my initial thoughts, sketches, photos … around the idea of ''Ghost Files''. The audience of the event was invited to a collective annotation session. I was sitting at a table with all the cards spread out and up to six people could join me at the same time. Whenever there was a rotation and someone new was sitting down, I would briefly explain my curiosity in ''Ghost Files'' and invite them to think along with me. The annotation process was manifold: Some directly reacted to or intervened with the content on the cards, others were speculating and adding new ideas, questions and narratives. By writing, sketching and drawing on the cards, some people created a new starting point for the next person. The atmosphere was focused and most of the time silent, but once in a while a question would be formulated or read aloud. At one time a question evolved into a whole conversation, and the outcome of that talk would then be transcribed back onto the cards.
 [[File:Public Moment Leeszaal 06.jpg|1000px]]<br><br>