User:FLEM/Final presentation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:13, 13 June 2023

Special issue 16

My main project during the special issue 16 was the impossible process project.

Wiki research & documentation: poems translations.

Website: https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/theimpossibleprocess/

the impossible process of grasping the other side

the impossible process of grasping the other side is a project by Emma Prato, as part of the Special Issue 16 //Learning How to Walk While Catwalking// carried out by Piet Zwart Institute (XPUB) students on the topic of Vernacular Language Processing.

the impossible process is about:

playing around with the structure of poetry translations and mix together different versions of the same text, through a Python function.
multiple translations can give us a much better sense of the poem than a single translation can, so that even if we can’t read the poem in the original language, we can come closer to that experience.

the impossible process is made of two sections:

one (THE CROWD) is to gather //vernacular// information
the other (THE MASHUP) is to process texts, which can be both taken from the vernacular content or from already existing translations.
The poetry ARCHIVE will showcase the results, uploaded automatically after mashing up (json file).

Connection with second year project

I analysed patterns and disrupted common structures to create new versions of texts.

I created a prototype of linguistic patterns and the impossible project website, a tool for vernacular translations.

I used the annotation system created for Special Issue 16 to gather translations from users.

The final publication for the public to interact and understand the Python function I created has been the "envelope", an activity that would reproduce what happens in the function and ask the user to do it by hand.

In recalls what I am making in the Second Year project with the following question: what happens when you mirror digital interactions into a physical movement? In both cases, I reckon, it is a very interesting tool to make people who know nothing about coding, what is happening. I started to understand how python scripts work and started making some websites to try out things.

Contribution/groups

I was part of ADMIN TEAM: creating the meetings, schedules, keeping track of the work.
I was part of LAUNCH TEAM: event coordination, organisation and user experience for the launch day.
I was part of FRONT-END TEAM: support during the creation of front-end of the website, advices and considerations.
Content group: research on python function, set up, layout and flask for website of “the impossible process”; prints and booklet for the same project. In addition, general research for the “vernacular maps” group.

Other things

My notes documentation: User:FLEM/1.1

User:FLEM/The rejected side

Gallery

Special issue 17

The crossword experience

The crossword experience:

is a reference to the crosswords as a game
gives an overview of the productive play glossary, that will be found inside the loot box and represents the research part of our project.
The post-its/squared pieces of paper definitions act as a go-between the content and the players, and obviously share the values and reasons why post-its have been chosen as the mean for this project.
The idea emerged to reflect on some of our main topics (slow-thinking, delayed rewarding, gamification processes, competition, individuality, productive environment) in a gamified way.
Takes part in the collective publication and into the launch day, offering two different ways of interaction

During the event, he player will:

1. Complete a puzzle to create a word, therefore to play a game to obtain a drink, instead of having a need and satisfying it immediately. It is a critic of loot boxes philosophy and serves to slow the pace down because the players can't get the drink immediately (delayed-reward and slow-thinking).

 2. By the end of the event, the public will have produced a collective work, a big crossword made by everyone in the room. It's a way to create interaction and criticise the video games world that produces a lot of individuality and competition. Instead, this method invites the player to embrace collectivity and inclusivity.

Wiki research & documentation: User:FLEM/Crosswords

Connection with second year project

I tried to involve a public, to explain more than what seems like needed, I had in mind the idea that our public should understand

My intent was that of translating one form of research into an activity/event.

I like the idea that an audience can interact with what is shown to them: everyone has different learning methodologies, and it’s our job to put everyone in a situation where they can get the best out of the experience.

Contribution/groups

I researched and polished the glossary of productive play to transform it into a usable and understandable game for the public. A way to access our theoretical research through the use of gamification.
The result was presented inside the box as “The Crossword Imaginary Grid Game” .
The result was adapted to be presented during the launch as “the Fage Not Pound Bar Counter”.

I was part of LAUNCH group:
1. Price of the box.
2. Texts for the launch.
3. Documentation and presentation of the work.
4. Prints and plotting.
5. name tags.
6. Plexiglas letter game for the launch.

Other things

My notes documentation: User:FLEM/1.2

Gallery

Special issue 18

The SI18 structure gave more space for our personal interests, actions and reactions.

We experimented with annotation systems, annotation methods and distributive practices, which grasped my interest quite a lot.
Miriam and I, for the week02release, produced an instructional piece on “how to make sound”.
The editorial proposals I have been part of are also significant: Week5release was about collective writing, a practice that I find deeply interesting, and I was also interested in the idea of distributive practice.
Transcription methods that feed the need of experimenting with text (see Libretto of week3).
I worked on the Draggable, another online tool to mess up with texts (and audio in this case).
The other editorial proposal was about folder and content nesting: the activation by users is essential for the functionality of the tool we curated for this release. The result was a collective process: the result will be obtained only if others will actively participate.

I enjoyed creating small weekly prototypes, and the possibility to try new things proposed by other people: the moment when I received the proposals and had to discover what it could be about. Then, seeing how my brain starts to work and looks for inventive solutions to learn and to try out different methods or tools. I am happy how I managed, as a caretaker, to go deeper into my personal interests, to see how contributors reacted to the proposals (7&5) and the possibility that my ideas will change after other people experimented with them or created their own way out of it. I am pleased to see how we could influence each other and evolve in very different ways with every method we've been using and the person we were working with. It all gave me the feeling of collective work.

Contribution/groups

Wiki research & documentation:

week 01 ---> https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/SI18/01/recordings/

week 02 ---> https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/SI18/02/recordings/your%20personal%20guide%20to%20making%20sound.mp3
week 03 ---> audio file: ACT1 libretto: Within an entangled state

week 04

week 05 ---> https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/~flem/FIVE_nested_narratives_active_listening.mp4 instrument: voiced drum machine; audio piece: what-is-right-not-to.mp3 text: what-is-right-not-to.txt ---> The Drag-able

week 06

week 07 ---> https://hub.xpub.nl/soupboat/SI18/07/Interface/

week 08

Side things

My notes documentation: User:FLEM/1.3

emm&miri notations

reverb/paulstretch on piano piece in audacity

notebook

THREE_soundsexperiments

rack2 audio experiment

FIVE_experiments

The Drag-able

Gallery

week 2 - with alex
week 2 - with alex - visual result
week 5 - editorial work with alex and supi
week 7 - editorial work with miri and jian

Second Year

wikis:

Research & Thesis

my thesis for the archive: All the materials used to produce this thesis have been gathered from the XPUB studio/WdKA building/Trashbunker or from waste of stationery shops

Abstract: Paper Notebooks: From an Industrial Model to a Tool of Expression is an ongoing research project that attempts to understand how the structure, shape and functionality of a paper notebook can influence the way we take notes as well as the frequency and efficiency of use. The thesis uses theoretical research and practical methodologies to analyse paper notebooks, to discover how different prompts and activities can change the users’ mindset and consciousness, while inviting them to produce personalised DIY notebooks in their personal practice.

I started questioning my notebook's practice and tried to build a new paper device that would satisfy better the needs of my brain in that moment. To get there I asked myself what were the problems in the device I was using and how changing something small could already improve my use of the notebook.
I then wondered: Why are we all using a device with the same structure? And what impact does it have on our learning, thinking and living, as well as on the imaginary of self? And how creating our personal tools would help users to understand better themselves and their needs?
So my research question became: How can I, through research and explorative sessions, discover more about the topic and create a generative structure that can be interpreted by every person in their own way to promote creativity and self-expression?
The thesis is a report of my practice: informed through theoretical research and references that fed the research method section that is part of the body of the thesis. It charts a historical and contextual overview on notebooks, with a focus on the importance of making and the physical act of taking notes on paper notebooks. The text then presents the development of the project through the different methods and the findings that will lead to the creation of a physical outcome. [the spatial memory A process takes place when we take notes and the type of interface we use to do it makes a difference: “The hippocampus is crucially involved not only in memory encoding and retrieval processes but also in spatial memory itself” (Umejima et al., 2021). (..) Throughout my research, I discovered how much it is important, for recovery and reviewing reasons, where I specifically write words or sentences. Recently, I found myself scared of forgetting because the pages of an unfitting notebook did not allow a proper instinctive positioning of the content while taking notes.]
The final outcome took the shape of a guide or kick-starter kit to help others to analyse their own practice and to start questioning it, as well as to encourage a hands-on approach.

the first notebook in the wild

The methods

1. My personal notebook process

It consists in the creation of different prototypes to analyse and question my use of notebooks and to discover how to modify them to adjust them to my needs.

I finished my notebook and started a plan to build up a new one.
I then produced different prototypes to play around with the concept of adapting notebooks to my needs.
I tried to distribute notebooks prototypes around and realised how it was not possible that I would create the notebooks. My classmates started experimenting with their own and I saw what was happening was much more interesting than me looking for a perfect notebook, that obviously does not exist as our needs change depending on who we are and in which situation we need the object.
Documentation: User:FLEM/Notebook

my personal notebook process
a pile of notebooks
the triad one - first idea for the final publication
the notebook kit - used to organise thesis and project materials
the prototype for the final publication - physical random choice
the wiki scroll (what happens when you print a website on a long sheet?)
the one that did not work
the letter one - could participate in grad show
the letter one for chae and kim
the rings one
the rings one
invitation to ces
the columned one for chae
the first notebook kit for supi
the first one
the first one
the first one
the last one
the last one
the last one

2. Gathering and analysing the work of other users

supi's prototype

The aim was to understand how others approach the same process.

Supi and Erica have been my case studies: throughout the year I could follow their choices and reasoning on their use of notebooks.
Supi had a very strong connection with the tool, her Muji pen
Erica instead, had a very strong connection for time-based notebooks and scattered notes that come together when needed
Their work was essential to demonstrate that others can go through this process by themselves.
Documentation: User:FLEM/Analysis of sessions#personal notebook research from others

3. Discussion groups (or Preparatory Sessions)

unfolding the prototype of the "notebook kit" by Michael Murtaugh

The preparatory sessions helped me to collect opinions through conversation and questions.

I organised three preparatory sessions in which I brought up specific questions and discussed them together with the participants.
The main aim was to discover if notebooks are part of their lives and if I could use this specific object to incite a certain type of thoughts and associations to promote self-expression and creativity.
New questions and ideas arose
Documentation: User:FLEM/Analysis of sessions#Preparatory sessions

4. The Collaborative Explorative Sessions (C.E.S.)

helping out a participant by Al Nik

A collaborative playground to experiment with a collection of exercises together with the workshop participants.
I created the C.E.S. through the knowledge acquired in the process and specifically thanks to the first three methods included in the research, as well as inspired by Generative Design Research, which includes the end user in the design process (Sanders and Stappers, 2014).
My aim was to experiment with different activities to help participants to imagine the iterative process to arrive to a notebook.
It was important to transform my questions into practice.
The session and the final toolkit are starting points/initialiser for them to test scenarios to see what works better (the CES are for me, the toolkit is for the people, made by me as a researcher together with the participants) --> it is different if I organise the sessions for my research's purposes

Documentation: User:FLEM/Analysis of sessions#C.E.S.

CES 2 - smelling paper
CES 2 - writing exercise
CES 2 - prototype
CES 2 - prototype
CES 2 - cutting area in use
paper table
glueing area
cutting area
CES 1 - binding
CES 1 - writing exercise
CES 2 - binding
CES 1 - prototype
CES 1 - prototype
CES 1 - prototype
CES 1 - prototype
Preparatory session - Leeszaal (by Michael Murtaugh)
Preparatory session - Leeszaal (by Michael Murtaugh)
Preparatory session - Leeszaal (by Michael Murtaugh)
Preparatory session - M&Ms
Preparatory session - M&Ms

The publication and plans for the grad show

The final project aims to achieve two results:

A) Involving others, to make notebooks' making more accessible/a tool of expression

to achieve this --> A modular notebook that alternates info (on different features of notebooks, where to find materials etc), activities to make notebooks, and the invitation to reflect on the notebook practice.

B) Documenting, storytelling, experiencing a note-taking practice.

How to publish a notebook making practice? How to make a notebook public? (and accessible by others)

to achieve this --> include scans of notebooks and private notes inside the publication, editing the materials to make them easy to grasp.

ps:// accessible means: able to be reached or easily obtained; possible to approach, enter, or use; easy to understand or enjoy.

The printed publication

GIVE MORE SPACE FOR THE MOTIVATION OF THE CHOICES THAN TO THE CHOICES THEMSELVES

Documentation: User:FLEM/noteboox

Excerpt from the publication:

HOW TO USE:
Dear soon-to-be-maker,
This unique object in your hands is more than just a book; it’s a game, toolkit, diary, notebook, and photo-gallery, all into one. Its purpose is to inspire and guide you in creating your own notebooks while offering insights of my research, questions, and discoveries.
Before you dive in, here are a few key points about using this “(note-)book”. The content, consisting of texts, images, and notes from my research, is spread across 128 cards connected by a spine. While they can be read as a continuous flow, each card is designed to stand alone. You have the flexibility to read them separately or organize them into categories based on your interests. To help you navigate the publication, find below an overview of colors and quantities of cards per section.
If you’re curious to learn more about the research and the production choices, additional information can be found in the spreads at the back.
Enjoy the journey in the world of personalised notebooks and start experimenting!

WHY

Starting from the question: "how can I edit and present all of this material I gathered in the last year?" I wanted to share all the little discoveries I made and what I learnt with others, as well as inviting a hands-on approach.
why notebooks? 22.09.22 I have always been interested in the materiality of objects and their touch and how to build things myself. A lot is also about subjectivity and modularity: I am fascinated by the fact that, also a publication, for example, can be created in a way that every person that uses it can react in their own way. I think it's a lot about disrupting known formats and ideas.
what i would like is 18.04.23 I would like to create (active) makers, not consumers. The final outcome needs to be something to be used to make, not only to receive/consume. I want the users of this work to participate in the act of making notebooks against capitalism and commodity practices. I want to expand the spaces of this medium.
I would like this research to be a sort of manifesto for a general context but using the notebook as a metaphor: Who are you? How does your brain work? How do your ideas come along? What are your needs from a tool that society provides in a standardised form? It is not only about making a notebook, it is how making a notebook will put you in the position of questioning who you are and the objects you use, why you use them and how something made by you for you could look and feel like.

The triad notebook

CONTENT

The goal was to create a kit for making notebooks that could be read, but also used to practically make notebooks. The content originates from my reflections and both digital and handwritten notes. I used my existing collection of texts, conversations, images, thoughts.

SCRIPT & DESIGN

A Python script was developed for this project to embrace alternative methods for design; approach to web-to-print. The script is used to insert the content into an A4 layout, consisting of 8 cards each page.

the notebook kit

The selected content is organized and split into little squares.
The aim of the script is to generate a PDF with a different arrangement each time through random choice. The content mixes within the same row but not between rows to avoid contradictory connections.
Users will have the ability to move the squares around within the rows themselves.
Modularity is emphasized as the connections between cards can vary based on their positions.
The intention is to offer an individual experience and encourage users to create their own unique connections.
Tha cards are part of different categories, differentiated by different colours and headlines for easy recognition.
The cards can be use to create connections but the content can stand alone too.

PRODUCTION CHOICES

The goal was to create a kit for making notebooks that can be read and used practically.
The prototypes created during the research process shaped the material concept of the notebook.
The first prototype is an adjustable and editable notebook inspired by index cards, allowing for smaller, standalone content.
The concept of modularity led to the creation of the triad notebook with three browsable rows for recreating connections.
Customizability is a key aspect, allowing users to interact with the notebook and participate in its use and creation.
The spine of the notebook enables 360-degree rotation, connecting content between rows and experimenting with different structures.
Users can mix their own pages with the provided ones or remove all the provided pages to fill in with their own, allowing for the creation of new notebooks. The pages can also be used as cards without the spine, raising questions about the definition of a notebook.
The back cardboard and the intro-texts spread at the back are made from waste/leftovers from the studio.
The publication is printed on A4 layout to minimize paper waste.

Why a material printed publication is important?

Printing the publication allows for physical interactions and movements that mirror digital interactions.
The reader becomes the one determining how to navigate through the rows of cards, adding a sense of control and anticipation.
The physical act of turning pages and the feeling of paper contribute to the overall experience.
Reading and taking notes in physical form have been found to have significant benefits.
The act of turning pages and the spatial layout of text enhance reader engagement, understanding, and memory.
Excerpts from the thesis provide further insights into the significance of physicality in reading and note-taking.

Prototypes experiments of the final publication

The first printed prototype
The second printed prototype: added intro spread at the back; added cardboard in the back.
The third printed prototype
The final printed prototype
The cover of the final printed prototype

The costs of production label

for one copy

inside paper (tot. 23 euros x 250 sheets) = 0,092 x 16 sheets = 1,472 euros
cover paper (1,25 per sheet) = 0,623 euros
spine = 0,649 euros
print (insides) = 2,88 euros (from hr printers, so I did not pay for them)
print (cover) = 0,25 euros
print (intro-texts) = 0,88 euros (from hr printers, so I did not pay for them)
making holes and attach spine = 0 euros

total of the costs of productions for one copy = 6,754 euros = 6,80 euros

total costs of production for one copy without the printing costs = 3,04= 3,00 euros

The website

The main reason of the existence of the screen version is to keep the work available after the prints are finished. therefore, i'd like that everyone could press the print button and get a printed version of the cards (that can be put together as a book but also just left as cards without holes).

What does the website offer more?

The grad show

22.05.23

I made a little notebook that i gifted kim and chae for the midwives work that showed itself to work for specific activities: writing letters, free-writing, getting rid of thoughts very fast. We are going to have a shop were we can sell little things and i will sell this specific notebook for a *on offer* price as i am making them with 0 expenses as it's all leftover materials.

I will have have a table with them and then other materials so if someone wants they can come and create them themselves. I will bind the ones to be sold directly on the spot in my area and if someone is interested in receiving a little gift to help them to write, they can get it here. It's also a way to give an example of what you can do with 0 money.

It could be interesting to say if you make it yourself it's for free and if you just want to get it you pay a little for my working time (that it's still very limited). Talking about the price of work, and how people can experiment with this shape and make them a tiny different from my version. It doesn't have to be a CES, it needs to be fast and easy to do on site and with little time. And with the making there'll be some chatting about notebooks.

I will probably also have a screen to

the grad show shelves team

the publication after the course

where does it go?

how can ppl access it?

possible questions:

How can you more precisely articulate your own values and concerns in this work?

a) I am concerned that people do not use notebooks with consciousness and do not see the impact this medium can have on their lives

b) with my research, i can work with the knowledge I am creating, through research and sessions, and make it accessible to more people

c) I do not only want to rely on my own opinions therefore I decided to invite other perspectives on this topic by organising the CES and open discussions on the topic with different people

The translation of materiality to web publishing could be worked on further.

What are some impacts of not being conscious on what notebook you use?

Easiest way to respond is to speak from her own experience: for me when a sheet of paper is folded: an example of the different ways you write : the materiality and the design of the notebook influence the writing, and the free writing and whatever

connection between the purpose of taking notes and how this is materialised?

what is the role of note-taking?

Giving more examples of moments when the format of a notebook influences the note taking would be good, it really helps to understand her point.

Breaking down the process could be a helpful thing?

- moment of creating a notebook

- moment of making notes

Side things

User:FLEM/Collective-care notebook

Gallery

General side things

volunteered at V2, Worm, Mama and art and music festival (Conflux, Rewire Festival) as a host since January 2022
worked as a archipelago member and designed and risoprinted 4 newspaper The Piet, as well as organised a series of events and workshops.ù

While working on the Piet, I experimented with different shapes and foldings of an A3 paper for every of the issues

Issue 4: Graduation Special
Issue 5: Intro Week
Issue 6
Issue 8

@@ Line 320: / Line 320: @@
 ==== The printed publication ====
+GIVE MORE SPACE FOR THE MOTIVATION OF THE CHOICES THAN TO THE CHOICES THEMSELVES
 Documentation: [[User:FLEM/noteboox]]