Sonia/synopses: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "'''Theory of Colours – Goethe''' Goethe presents his empirical observations of light phenomena in this ''quasi''-scientific text. Originally published in 1810 and translat...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Theory of Colours – Goethe''' | '''Theory of Colours – Goethe''' | ||
Goethe presents his empirical observations of light phenomena in this ''quasi''-scientific text. Originally published in 1810 and translated into an archaic form of English—from the presumably archaic form of German—the book is an interesting but fairly dry read. The volume is divided into chapters which are in turn divided into numbered sections adding to | Goethe presents his empirical observations of light phenomena in this ''quasi''-scientific text. Originally published in 1810 and translated into an archaic form of English—from the presumably archaic form of German—the book is an interesting but fairly dry read. The volume is divided into chapters which are in turn divided into numbered sections adding to its "sciency" feel. Goethe makes a clear distinction between objective and subjective observations (apparently a division that is much clearer in the German language) and covers refraction, reflection, chemical colours, etc. I was struck by the hubris with which the book is written; here we an individual (white and male) who, in spite of the fact that his theories are not supported by science, feels that what he has to say is worth sharing with the world. Granted, this was written over 200 years ago and in a context that I cannot relate to. I thought about taking on some of his experiments in my own work until I realised that I didn't want to pay any sort of homage to Goethe. I put the book down soon after reading the following:— | ||
[[File:Racistgoethe.jpg|800px|frameless]] | |||
Revision as of 19:02, 13 May 2019
Theory of Colours – Goethe
Goethe presents his empirical observations of light phenomena in this quasi-scientific text. Originally published in 1810 and translated into an archaic form of English—from the presumably archaic form of German—the book is an interesting but fairly dry read. The volume is divided into chapters which are in turn divided into numbered sections adding to its "sciency" feel. Goethe makes a clear distinction between objective and subjective observations (apparently a division that is much clearer in the German language) and covers refraction, reflection, chemical colours, etc. I was struck by the hubris with which the book is written; here we an individual (white and male) who, in spite of the fact that his theories are not supported by science, feels that what he has to say is worth sharing with the world. Granted, this was written over 200 years ago and in a context that I cannot relate to. I thought about taking on some of his experiments in my own work until I realised that I didn't want to pay any sort of homage to Goethe. I put the book down soon after reading the following:—
