User:Cristinac/Cqrrelations: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[User:Cristinac/Day1 | Day 1]]
[[User:Cristinac/Day1 | Day 1]]


The Nearest Neighbours inherit from their Gold1000 Parent


10.1.10.1
[[User:Cristinac/Day2 | Day 2]]
cqrrelations


Gold 1000 dictionaries


:
[[User:Cristinac/Day3 | Day 3]]
:The neural processes of language
:Or: why we have a free mind.
:Kim Wende




[[User:Cristinac/Day4 | Day 4]]


causality-freewill.net


meaningful semantic information in the brain.
[[User:Cristinac/Day5 | Day 5]]
causality=cement of the universe
Axiom: the force is everywhere
heteromodal association cortex


Why language/ why the semantic network?
free thought ability to create new and meaningful abstract information
ex 1: talking in sleep; ex 2: schizophrenia


while we are saying something at the same time we are generating the reason to do so
[[User:Cristinac/LinksBrussels | Links]]
putting energy into word production
 
language makes us subjective individuals
lateralisation
cerebellar hemispheric dominance varies between individuals
what is semantic memory?
continuous “reason production” = verbal fluency
the task: 3 conditions: on screen one single word (cue word) then 3 different fluency tasks, semantic associations
 
what is verbal/conceptual memory?
active when you hear language too
words that have a meaning=semantic retrieval,
 
hyper association
metacognition: when we reflect we can access concepts, flex them and reassociate them
we should look for free will in neuroscience
when we generate explicitly meaning association we put more effort in image retrieving
retrieving meaning about relations=causality
concept of causality in semantic theory=relatedness, meaningful relations
 
the germans have 2 words for it: reflection and elaboration (nachdenken)
 
 
 
 
:(Des)Anonymisation Technique
:Hans Lammerant
 
 
denial of service
data protection: when is data personal or not? Libre text: any information related to an identified or identifiable person
technical means which can be reasonably used to changing non personal data to personal data
combining several data sets: can become a problem
not an easy thing to analyze, to make sure it isn’t personal data in legal terms
research claiming to be able to identify people based on age gender and
based on that research: how to anonymise, are you able to infer data about a person?
not all personal data has to be by definition private
add noise to be able to maintain anonymity and disguise
randomization techniques, adding mistakes
group people by generalizations: a minimum number prevents people from being identified

Latest revision as of 11:48, 23 January 2015