User:Cristinac/Day3
Third Day
Critique on the annotators of sentiment analysis/ pedophilia classifier
subjectivity is at the root of things, however it seems to be taken as matter-of-fact
marketing value
making things visible
there is no date of the assessment, no way of finding out more details about the annotation process.
not a process of annotation, but a process of evaluation
http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2013/ReesmanMcCann-Vehicle%20Detection.pdf
http://cs.stanford.edu/people/karpathy/deepimagesent/
http://cs.stanford.edu/people/karpathy/deepimagesent/devisagen_arxiv.pdf
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~fritz/absps/imagenet.pdf
http://machinelearning.wustl.edu/mlpapers/paper_files/icml2010_JiXYY10.pdf
feedback loops: analysis while typing
Otlet’s text; progressive at the time it came out, colonialist, racist(??-writing from memory) now
1984-a book being referenced a lot without previous knowledge of it, how is it influencing the current discourse
http://eipcp.net/transversal/0106/holmes/en
http://www.antidatamining.net/
http://theyrule.net/drupal/topics/visualization
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Bachelier
http://www.wdgann.com/about-us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_Bot
http://asuperstitiousfund.com/
http://www.corp-lab.com/tradewar/
W D Gann
Words for the annotator
-mild vs inflammatory -oriented vs disoriented