Methods xpub: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
 
(173 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
In this series of workshops we concentrate on methods of annotation and text analysis which help us research this trimester's Special Issue. Each session has a specific outcome.


==XPUB1: 20 Sept 2023- 11:00 - 17:00 Methods for PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE with Steve + Lidia, in the aquarium==
XPUB1: 11:00 - 17:00 Methods with Steve + Lidia, in the aquarium


Intro:
'''Methods sesh #1 PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE with Lidia and Steve'''


The Reading, Writing, and Research Methodologies Seminar is tailored towards (further) developing research methods within the first year of this master. By establishing a solid foundation of research skills, it will eventually prepare students for their Graduate research in the second year. Through reading core theoretical texts, they will establish a common vocabulary and set of references to work from. They will learn the practice of classic ‘essayistic methodologies’, including close reading, annotation, description and notation, students learn to survey a body of literature, filter what is relevant to their research and create comparative pieces of analysis. The seminar helps students to establish methodical drafting processes for their texts, where they can develop ideas further and structure their use of notes and references. The course takes as axiomatic that the perceived division between ‘practice’ and ‘theory’ is essentially an illusion.
[[File:AndreMalrauxs1950.png|400px|thumb|left|André Malraux's "The imaginary museum" from 1950. Image: Krauss, Rosalind: Das Schicksalsministerium, In: Wolf, Herta (Ed.): Paradigma Fotografie-Fotokritik am Ende des fotografischen Zeitalters. Bd. 1. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. 2002, p. 395.]]


'''Outcome for the day:''' 4 annotations and discussion in which reading experiences are compared.




Curriculum: The seminar will involve:  
'''Outcome for the PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE methods seminars (December):''' an annotated reader.


(a.) Identifying the object of your research: description and analysis of your work
Intro:
 
(b.) Contextualizing your work through description and reflection on contemporary and historical practices.
 
(c.) Identify research material key to your practice.
 
(d.) Synopsis and annotation of key texts
 
(e.) Writing machines: creating methods for group and individual writing.
 
Throughout, there will be an emphasis on working collectively, whether in a larger discussion group or in smaller reading and writing groups.
 
 
[[ Editing Reading, Writing & Research Methodologies - handbook information]]
 
https://xpub.pzimediadesign.nl/curriculum.html
 
[[Plagiarism]]
 
 
==Simple Wiki Style Sheet:==
 
Titles and works = italics
 
Essays = Title in Caps
 
Notation = Harvard System (writer, page number) = (Smith, 26)
 
URL = make link
 
==Guide to Essay Writing==
 
 
[[A Guide to Essay Writing]]
 
 
'''Franc Gonzalez'''
 
First Draft (needs to be completed)
 
1) Writer: describe, in your own words, what the text (s) you are reading are about.
 
“The Art of Cybernetic Union” explores colour-blindness condition from artist Neil Harbisson, by analysing the advantages of connecting technology to a human, as a way to improve and broaden its natural given characteristics, when a particular disorder appears to be affecting the functions of the body. Although the unique possibilities to improving human physical or cognitive limitations by plugging a body to an electronic or mechanical device are yet very hypothetical and might extend beyond our imagination, technology is nevertheless continuously transforming the classic and fictional conception of cybernetics to a more realistic evidence. The communications between both automated and living systems are continuously evolving, upgrading and rising up advanced engineered tools, which might not only be able to increase our knowledge but also expand our senses, consequently inducing a wider, deeper and exclusive experience.
 
Neil Harbisson developed the ‘eyeborg’, a device that attaches to his head that uses a software and a sensor to transfer the natural wavelength of a colour’s tone into audible frequencies to the brain, allowing to conduct sound through the skull (whether for normal, weaken or damage hearing) enabling him to perceive colours in a complete different way as humans do. As a result of this transformation, he has not only adapted to an alternative new domain of codified information but simultaneously become significantly precise with detecting colours, proving that knowledge can reach superior states by implanting enginery. Moreover, he has increased awareness by upgrading the ‘eyeborg’ to a more sophisticated audio input that detects ultrasound, infrasound, ultraviolet waves and wifi signals with a 360-degree perception. To a certain extent, changing one’s senses for new better mechanical ones, can mislead to ethical interpretations manifesting on specific behavioural principles that might presume of the given nature as granted or unchangeable. However, whether or not technology might be detaching us from each other, the fact of being able to experience beyond our senses things we normally lack by interacting to cybernetics, it would indeed be a more efficient way to predict and have control over specific situations around us. Ironically and contrarily to what human qualities really applies for, Harbisson believes that technology could actually connect us all closer to better comprehend nature, while removing our fears from imaginary dangers, in fact he feels more connected to it than before.
 
2) Why this text is of interest to you?
 
It is interesting to make a union between technology and human perception and how this can assist people with rare conditions or disabilities carry on with their lives creatively to be actively not only part of society, but of a distinctive, exceptional and special view of art where imagination and inspiration are enticed by extrasensory computerized gadgets. In a world where art and the use of creative ideas used to be commonly related to artisans, it is nowadays broadening to a wider field where science, its engineers and neuroscientists have been particularly responsible for the fascinating and (in many cases as with Harbisson’s “eyeborg”) unpredictable powerfully compelling effects of connecting electronical devices to our bodies or brains. That can lead us all to new ingenious and insightful thinking, through which we might probably be able to turn ourselves into remote controls being able to operate multiple software at a distance, which in a pedagogic and psychic way it could enhance learning, reading, working or transmitting/communicating thoughts almost telepathically to people while dematerializing information or other tangible strains. In the age of information technology, artificial intelligence is moulding data into disembodied and accessible sources that carries and emerges a specific cultural dimension of man and machine; the “posthuman”. A new range of future cybernetic systems has to be further explored in order to compromise and implicate technology for our living needs but also to question reality and its boundaries in society, freeing individuals to independently merge their qualities to any tool that facilitates a lively feedback/transmission experience, whether or not coming from machinery or seemingly against nature’s constitution fundamental principles.
 
3) What is its relation to yourself directed research?
 
I am personally interested about our evolution on how we perceive information, and as a result new knowledge, thinking or reasoning based on cognitive experiences that gradually nurtures our understanding of the social life-frame we live in and its diverse environment. Harbisson’s colour-blindness is a particular example of many others prosthetic-like devices that needs to be functional through yet complicated procedures, in which a series of electrodes requires to be implanted onto certain areas of the brain’s surface (right inside the skull) in order to effectively transmit or stimulate electronic signals to  and how do we extend our knowledge beyond our human capacity 
 
Detaching from technology makes us feel that we lose part of our senses. Digital Prosthetics.
“Just that process of putting it in is a dangerous thing to do. You are still invading the body and you’d be wanting to make sure that the benefit outweighs the risk,” he says. The quest for more accurate, less invasive alternatives will no doubt continue. But even with the best emerging technology, there are risks to connecting our minds with machines.
 
4) How can you turn the questions these texts raise into work?


==Outcome of the seminar (trimester three) ==
Whilst working on PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE, the methods sessions provide a moment to step back and consider the special issue we are working on. We take time to reflect. In the first session we will experiment with methods of collective annotation. This is  an informal, group activity that helps collective reading and thinking. We read and take notes, share knowledge and raise questions.


The specific outcome for the RW&RM seminar of 2016-17 will be a 1500 word text which reflects on your own method and situates your work in relation to a broader artistic and cultural context.  The various texts produced within the RW&RM seminar will serve as source material for your text on method. In common with all modules on the course RW&RM serves to support your self-directed research. Therefore, the text on method will inform your Self-Evaluation at the end of the third trimester and provide the basis for your Graduate Project Proposal that you will produce in the fourth trimester.


Key texts that will inform this course


[[XPUB Reader]]


1) Brief intros: how, what and why we annotate?


== 16 Nov = DEADLINE FOR ESSAY FIRST DRAFT, REVIEW==
Protocol: For this session Steve and Lidia have chosen 4 texts which relate to PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE.  We will try out a collective annotation in a big group to establish the principle. As we progress, we can use these reading and annotation sessions to add texts (in which case "text" can be widely defined) and establish new protocols through which to collectively annotate. After several sessions a "reader" will be generated.
 
2) The group split into 4 sub-groups and annotate one of the texts below.


==Todays task==
3) The groups will gather into one group and reflect on their reading of the texts (the "thesis", the similarities and differences between texts).


Give a title
4) Building a PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE bibliography together (in which case "bibliography" can be widely defined).


Make an abstract (two to three sentences which give outline of the text- answer: what do you want this text to do?)
Group 1


Use the Harvard method to make references
'''On the data set’s ruins'''


Make bibliography
Nicolas Malevé (2020)


Useful links:
https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s00146-020-01093-w


Notes on Harvard method are here:
'''ANNOTATE HERE:''' https://pad.xpub.nl/p/AnnotateDataset'sRuins


[[A Guide to Essay Writing]]
Group 2


Jstor is a very useful resource
'''Postscript on the Societies of Control'''


http://www.jstor.org/
Gilles Deleuze (1992)


https://cidadeinseguranca.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/deleuze_control.pdf


This is the guideline from the last session:  
'''Collective Annotation:''' https://pad.xpub.nl/p/PostscriptControlSocieties


Describe, in your own words, what the text (s) you are reading are about.
'''Subgroup Annotation:''' https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Deleuze_Control_Group
Group 3


Why this text is of interest to you?
'''The Tyranny of Structurelessness'''


What is its relation to your self directed research?
Jo Freeman (1970-73)


How can you turn the questions these texts raise into work?
https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm


'''ANNOTATE HERE:''' https://pad.xpub.nl/p/TyrannyAnnotation


Make link to your drafts here >
Group 4


'''Queering Homophily'''


*  ''[[User:noemievd | '''Noémie''' Vidé]]''
Wendy Chun (2018)
*  [[User:giulla | '''Giuli₳''']]
*  [[User:Buzzo | <span style="background-color:#ff9999;color:#FFF;font-family:chalkboard"> E M I L Y </span>]] http://www.arngren.net/JUL2010-reindeer05.gif
* [[User:Eastwood | Max]]
* [[User:Clàudia | ♥ Claudii]]
* [[User:Karina | Karina]]
* [[User:Francg | Franc]]


==9 Nov==
https://meson.press/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/9783957961457-Pattern-Discrimination.pdf


Lesson plan:
(PAGE 59)


Continuing from the last session
'''ANNOTATE HERE:''' https://pad.xpub.nl/p/QueeringHomophily


The aim between now and the end of the trimester to write an essay (1500 words max).


This week we will discuss the material you are working on and next session (next week) we will review the first drafts.
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/MethodsSesh123


Aim of essay: Choose two texts that have been reading which have a relation to each other and make a comparison.
==Barthes Radio==


To do so you will need to make a synopsis of the texts (outline what the thesis of each is = what is the text about? = what does it have to say?).
[[BarthesRadio]]


Text for next week: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/BarthesWormRadio


Groups of three: Make notes on the pad of what your peers have to say.  
Upload Barthes sound files here: https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/BarthesRadio


http://piratepad.net/zjuOfHBY37


1) Writer: describe, in your own words, what the text (s) you are reading are about.  
[[File:CesareLombroso.jpg|400px|thumb|left|Album of photographs gathered by Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909), Italian criminologist: the photographs correspond to different types of criminals (at least according to the system Lombroso used). “The criminal man”]]


2) Readers: make notes on the pad of what your peer is saying.
==Methods Session #2==


Readers, ask:  
11:00 - 17:00 Xpub1 Methods with Lídia


3) Why this text is of interest to you?
'''Methods sesh #2 PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE with Lídia'''


4) What is its relation to your self directed research?
'''Outcome for the day:''' Collective visual mapping exercise, introduction to PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE glossary


'''Outcome for the PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE methods seminars (December):''' an annotated reader.


At 16:30 we meet as a group to review work done.
'''Intro:'''


==12 Oct==
In the second session, we will finish the collective annotation experiment of our previous session. In order to start processing the materials and connecting these texts to what you have been doing and reading with Michael, Manetta & Joseph, we will then get started on a visual mapping exercise in order to link concepts, practices and ideas. This map will be an ongoing process. Finally, we will introduce the PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE glossary.


Lesson Plan
1) Finish collective annotation exercise in 4 groups.


2) The groups will gather into one group and reflect on their reading of the texts (the commonalities, the divergences, the updates, agreements and disagreements).


So far you have
3) Collective visual mapping of concepts, practices and ideas discussed so far.


(1) made a brief description (what, how and why?) of a project you worked on
3) Introduction of PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE glossary.


and
PAD OF THE DAY: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/MethodsSesh410


(2) made notes on a lecture by Vilém Flusser and/ or Marshall McLuhan
'''Group 1''' <br>
"On the data set’s ruins", Nicolas Malevé (2020)<br>
https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s00146-020-01093-w<br>
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/AnnotateDataset'sRuins


If you have not done so, please make a link from the methods page to those texts: like this:
''Who:''<br>
Thijs<br>
Bernadette<br>
Victor<br>
Rosa


https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Francg/expub/media-wiriting
'''Group 2'''<br>
"Postscript on the Societies of Control", Gilles Deleuze (1992)<br>
https://cidadeinseguranca.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/deleuze_control.pdf<br>
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Deleuze_Control_Group


or this
''Who:''<br>
Riviera<br>
Alessia<br>
Maria


https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Eastwood
'''Group 3'''<br>
"The Tyranny of Structurelessness", Jo Freeman (1970-73)<br>
https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm<br>
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/TyrannyAnnotation


(3) For Wednesday's session: Bring along a text you are reading or want to read in the near future.
''Who:''<br>
Zuzu<br>
Lorenzo<br>
Michel<br>
Mania


Please choose a* text* that has a relation to the work you are doing on the course.  
'''Group 4'''<br>
"Queering Homophily", Wendy Chun (2018)<br>
https://meson.press/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/9783957961457-Pattern-Discrimination.pdf (PAGE 59)<br>
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/QueeringHomophily


For instance, a text that may have been referred to in Florian's seminar; a text you have discussed in tutorials; or a text you have encountered in your self-directed research.
''Who:''<br>
Senka<br>
Anita<br>
Wang


In this session we will devote time to making a synopsis of the text and ask how we unpick and follow productive research strands.
=== Methods Session #3===


* This can be a text or other piece of media (online lecture, film or video).*
* with Steve


The key thing is that the text is important to you and relates to your own interests.
Outcomes: A GLOSSARY for a PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE + Visual map of PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE.


==28-Sept==
Pad of the day: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed-11-Oct23


Organizing my texts on the wiki
[[File:Visual map.jpg|thumb|Visual map]]


Please make page for your own RW&RM entries on your "student" page
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Problemsofnotation-for_annotation


Here is an example of good practice:
References:


https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Laurier_Rochon
Scratch Orchestra's Nature Study Notes (1969) http://intuitivemusic.dk/iima/sonsn.pdf


*  ''[[User:noemievd | '''Noémie''' Vidé]]''
John Cage's Song Books Vol 1 (1970) https://monoskop.org/images/0/03/Cage_John_Song_Books_Volume_1.pdf
*  [[User:giulla | '''Giuli₳''']]
*  [[User:Buzzo | <span style="background-color:#ff9999;color:#FFF;font-family:chalkboard"> E M I L Y </span>]] http://www.arngren.net/JUL2010-reindeer05.gif
* [[User:Eastwood | Max]]
* [[User:Clàudia | ♥ Claudii]]
* [[User:Karina | Karina]]
* [[User:Francg | Franc]]


==28-Sept==
Pad: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/LensBasedScratchNov2


Main session:
Addition to small library: Eno: Oblique Strategies (card game)


Today's theme: orality and literacy
https://monoskop.org/images/8/8c/Eno_Brian_Schmidt_Peter_Oblique_Strategies.pdf


Task: Identify the thesis in a given text, making notes


AKA what is it about?:
11:00 Review progress;


Steve will read or show a series of texts. Your task is to identify and articulate the argument at the heart of the text.
Intro: The Annotated Problems of Annotation are Problems of the Masses (some links and rabbit holes).


Links:  
From 11:30 work on


Flusser
AM: Visual Map (use to gather words for glossary)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyfOcAAcoH8
PM: Glossary for an Active Archive


McLuhan
"'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImaH51F4HBw
[[GLOSSARY of PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE]]


==14-Sept-Introducing Steve==
Definition (general)


http://www.roddickinson.net/pages/closedcircuit/project-video.php
Definition (as used by us)


Mentioned in:


http://www.roddickinson.net/pages/closedcircuit/project-text-theycame.php
In use (in context; example)


[[Glossary of productive play]]


http://www.roddickinson.net/pages/pre_reviews/SignalNoise-Bulletin.pdf
This is a TEST PAGE


[[Prototype for a Glossary]]


http://www.theshowroom.org/projects/signal-noise


This is the glossary:


I started working like this because of this:
=='''[[Wordhole]]'''==


http://bak.spc.org/everything/
Wordhole as category list


the last example of collaborative, discursive approach to research is this series of videos I did with Thomson & Craighead
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Category:Wordhole


http://www.thomson-craighead.net/warfilm.html
==Post-Apocalypse==


==What is RW&RM?==
11:00 - 17:00: The first Post-Apocalypse (ongoing apocalypse) Methods class with Steve


==Today's Task==
Pad of the day: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/2023-11-29


==Project That May...==


Pad That May or May not be...: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/17-4-24MethodsProjectsThat


{{:RapidPrototypeandProject that May}}


300 word description of your work
==Previously...==


100 words = what?
Archive of the 2023 methods sessions: [[Methods2023Archive]]


100=How?
Here is a link to Xpub Rapid Prototypes and Projects That May or May Not:


100= why?
[[Rapid Prototype Session 2]]


http://piratepad.net/Sz6I826p6h
Here is a page with all the methods sessions in SI18, SI19, SI20 (made for the audit by Leslie and Manetta): [[Methods SI18 SI19 SI20]].


[[last years trail]]
Here is the archive of methods sessions from previous years [[Pre2020Methods]]

Latest revision as of 10:37, 15 May 2024

In this series of workshops we concentrate on methods of annotation and text analysis which help us research this trimester's Special Issue. Each session has a specific outcome.

XPUB1: 20 Sept 2023- 11:00 - 17:00 Methods for PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE with Steve + Lidia, in the aquarium

XPUB1: 11:00 - 17:00 Methods with Steve + Lidia, in the aquarium

Methods sesh #1 PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE with Lidia and Steve

André Malraux's "The imaginary museum" from 1950. Image: Krauss, Rosalind: Das Schicksalsministerium, In: Wolf, Herta (Ed.): Paradigma Fotografie-Fotokritik am Ende des fotografischen Zeitalters. Bd. 1. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. 2002, p. 395.

Outcome for the day: 4 annotations and discussion in which reading experiences are compared.


Outcome for the PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE methods seminars (December): an annotated reader.

Intro:

Whilst working on PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE, the methods sessions provide a moment to step back and consider the special issue we are working on. We take time to reflect. In the first session we will experiment with methods of collective annotation. This is an informal, group activity that helps collective reading and thinking. We read and take notes, share knowledge and raise questions.



1) Brief intros: how, what and why we annotate?

Protocol: For this session Steve and Lidia have chosen 4 texts which relate to PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE. We will try out a collective annotation in a big group to establish the principle. As we progress, we can use these reading and annotation sessions to add texts (in which case "text" can be widely defined) and establish new protocols through which to collectively annotate. After several sessions a "reader" will be generated.

2) The group split into 4 sub-groups and annotate one of the texts below.

3) The groups will gather into one group and reflect on their reading of the texts (the "thesis", the similarities and differences between texts).

4) Building a PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE bibliography together (in which case "bibliography" can be widely defined).

Group 1

On the data set’s ruins

Nicolas Malevé (2020)

https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s00146-020-01093-w

ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/AnnotateDataset'sRuins

Group 2

Postscript on the Societies of Control

Gilles Deleuze (1992)

https://cidadeinseguranca.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/deleuze_control.pdf

Collective Annotation: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/PostscriptControlSocieties

Subgroup Annotation: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Deleuze_Control_Group

Group 3

The Tyranny of Structurelessness

Jo Freeman (1970-73)

https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm

ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/TyrannyAnnotation

Group 4

Queering Homophily

Wendy Chun (2018)

https://meson.press/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/9783957961457-Pattern-Discrimination.pdf

(PAGE 59)

ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/QueeringHomophily


https://pad.xpub.nl/p/MethodsSesh123

Barthes Radio

BarthesRadio

Text for next week: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/BarthesWormRadio

Upload Barthes sound files here: https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/BarthesRadio


Album of photographs gathered by Cesare Lombroso (1835-1909), Italian criminologist: the photographs correspond to different types of criminals (at least according to the system Lombroso used). “The criminal man”

Methods Session #2

11:00 - 17:00 Xpub1 Methods with Lídia

Methods sesh #2 PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE with Lídia

Outcome for the day: Collective visual mapping exercise, introduction to PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE glossary

Outcome for the PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE methods seminars (December): an annotated reader.

Intro:

In the second session, we will finish the collective annotation experiment of our previous session. In order to start processing the materials and connecting these texts to what you have been doing and reading with Michael, Manetta & Joseph, we will then get started on a visual mapping exercise in order to link concepts, practices and ideas. This map will be an ongoing process. Finally, we will introduce the PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE glossary.

1) Finish collective annotation exercise in 4 groups.

2) The groups will gather into one group and reflect on their reading of the texts (the commonalities, the divergences, the updates, agreements and disagreements).

3) Collective visual mapping of concepts, practices and ideas discussed so far.

3) Introduction of PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE glossary.

PAD OF THE DAY: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/MethodsSesh410

Group 1
"On the data set’s ruins", Nicolas Malevé (2020)
https://sci-hub.se/10.1007/s00146-020-01093-w
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/AnnotateDataset'sRuins

Who:
Thijs
Bernadette
Victor
Rosa

Group 2
"Postscript on the Societies of Control", Gilles Deleuze (1992)
https://cidadeinseguranca.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/deleuze_control.pdf
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Deleuze_Control_Group

Who:
Riviera
Alessia
Maria

Group 3
"The Tyranny of Structurelessness", Jo Freeman (1970-73)
https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/TyrannyAnnotation

Who:
Zuzu
Lorenzo
Michel
Mania

Group 4
"Queering Homophily", Wendy Chun (2018)
https://meson.press/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/9783957961457-Pattern-Discrimination.pdf (PAGE 59)
ANNOTATE HERE: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/QueeringHomophily

Who:
Senka
Anita
Wang

Methods Session #3

  • with Steve

Outcomes: A GLOSSARY for a PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE + Visual map of PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE.

Pad of the day: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Wed-11-Oct23

Visual map

https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Problemsofnotation-for_annotation

References:

Scratch Orchestra's Nature Study Notes (1969) http://intuitivemusic.dk/iima/sonsn.pdf

John Cage's Song Books Vol 1 (1970) https://monoskop.org/images/0/03/Cage_John_Song_Books_Volume_1.pdf

Pad: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/LensBasedScratchNov2

Addition to small library: Eno: Oblique Strategies (card game)

https://monoskop.org/images/8/8c/Eno_Brian_Schmidt_Peter_Oblique_Strategies.pdf


11:00 Review progress;

Intro: The Annotated Problems of Annotation are Problems of the Masses (some links and rabbit holes).

From 11:30 work on

AM: Visual Map (use to gather words for glossary)

PM: Glossary for an Active Archive

"'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."

GLOSSARY of PROTOCOLS FOR AN ACTIVE ARCHIVE

Definition (general)

Definition (as used by us)

Mentioned in:

In use (in context; example)

Glossary of productive play

This is a TEST PAGE

Prototype for a Glossary


This is the glossary:

Wordhole

Wordhole as category list

https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Category:Wordhole

Post-Apocalypse

11:00 - 17:00: The first Post-Apocalypse (ongoing apocalypse) Methods class with Steve

Pad of the day: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/2023-11-29

Project That May...

Pad That May or May not be...: https://pad.xpub.nl/p/17-4-24MethodsProjectsThat


Upload link to Project That May or May Not Be Made here:

Bernadette: User:Berna Bereit Project That May or May Not Be Made

Senka: Projects that May or May not be Made

Zuzu

Maria: User:Mxrwho/SI24 Repository

Thijs's PTMoMNBM depot

Lorenzo's Projects that May/Mayn't

Anita: Knitting city noise

Riviera's Project That May or May not be Made

Previous PMOMM - Rapid Prototype session:

https://pad.xpub.nl/p/Problemsofnotation-for_annotation

References:

Scratch Orchestra's Nature Study Notes (1969) http://intuitivemusic.dk/iima/sonsn.pdf

John Cage's Song Books Vol 1 (1970) https://monoskop.org/images/0/03/Cage_John_Song_Books_Volume_1.pdf

Brian Eno: Oblique Strategies (card game)

https://monoskop.org/images/8/8c/Eno_Brian_Schmidt_Peter_Oblique_Strategies.pdf

"Do it" project, Curated by Hans Ulrich Obrist: https://curatorsintl.org/exhibitions/18072-do-it-2013


Project That May or May Not Be Made template

What is it?

Why make it?

Workflow

Timetable

Rapid prototypes (scratches)

Previous practice

Relation to a wider context

Choice made


Rapid prototype template

Write one sentence instruction for a work.

Make it.


Previously:

https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/NotationsExperiment22

https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Rapid_Prototype_Directory_LB1

https://pad.xpub.nl/p/LensBasedScratchNov2

Previously...

Archive of the 2023 methods sessions: Methods2023Archive

Here is a link to Xpub Rapid Prototypes and Projects That May or May Not:

Rapid Prototype Session 2

Here is a page with all the methods sessions in SI18, SI19, SI20 (made for the audit by Leslie and Manetta): Methods SI18 SI19 SI20.

Here is the archive of methods sessions from previous years Pre2020Methods

Retrieved from "https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mw-mediadesign/index.php?title=Methods_xpub&oldid=266027"