User:Tisa/pending: Difference between revisions
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
===Reductive collective composition technique.=== | ===Reductive collective composition technique.=== | ||
Can be programmed. But why? And in what way? What is the meaning of it, it's final goal? | Can be programmed. But why? And in what way? What is the meaning of it, it's final goal? What does it tell about the world? | ||
Fantasize on possible end results: Is it chaos? Is it conformity to the general sound parameters found in the mainstream? Does it go agains the mainstream completely - denying and contrasting it. | Fantasize on possible end results: Is it chaos? Is it conformity to the general sound parameters found in the mainstream? Does it go agains the mainstream completely - denying and contrasting it. | ||
Revision as of 12:37, 14 October 2019
Projects in becoming
Compositions
Reductive collective composition technique.
Can be programmed. But why? And in what way? What is the meaning of it, it's final goal? What does it tell about the world?
Fantasize on possible end results: Is it chaos? Is it conformity to the general sound parameters found in the mainstream? Does it go agains the mainstream completely - denying and contrasting it.
Improvisation and machines? It is not randomness. It is not chaos. How could improvisation protocols be "translated" into intuitive-machine learning processes? (Really? Call Dre or smth -> check meta, check 50?)
Play this pattern
collect the material, choose the collaborators (human or machine?), write about it #todo
Post-production of experience
giro sensors, making a 3D drawing, that is created from the movements a performer/lecturer makes in real-time. 3D printing the parts of the content that seem crucial -> the listener chooses the emphasis.
space
-> https://pad.xpub.nl/p/space
A collective process on the topic of public space, granted funds following the application to the funded by the city of Ljubljana, Slovenia
