User:Ohjian/Thesis-Outline: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
Line 12: Line 12:
<br>
<br>
For my thesis I imagine a format that one could describe as a ''Situated and Annotated Manual''.
For my thesis I imagine a format that one could describe as a ''Situated and Annotated Manual''.
<br>
<br><br>


'''Why a manual?'''<br>
'''Why a manual?'''<br>
I want to use the well-known format of the ''manual'' to give detailed and technical information about the tool that I am creating in my graduation project. This includes hands-on descriptions on how the modules work and how to use them. This approach is quite formal, using standardized technical terms and schematics to give full insight and transparency.
I want to use the well-known format of the ''manual'' to give detailed and technical information about the tool that I am creating in my graduation project. This includes hands-on descriptions on how the modules work and how to use them. This approach is quite formal, using standardized technical terms and schematics to give full insight and transparency.
<br>
<br><br>


'''Why ''annotations''?'''<br>
'''Why ''annotations''?'''<br>
With the ''annotation'' layer I want to subvert this strictness of the technical ''manual'' and add a more intimate mode of address. I am hoping that informal notes, explanations and sketches make the ''manual'' more accessible to readers / users who are less familiar with technical terms and descriptions.
With the ''annotation'' layer I want to subvert this strictness of the technical ''manual'' and add a more intimate mode of address. I am hoping that informal notes, explanations and sketches make the ''manual'' more accessible to readers / users who are less familiar with technical terms and descriptions.
<br><br>
<br><br>
'''Why ''situated''?'''<br>
'''Why ''situated''?'''<br>
The tool I want to create is embedded in a whole context of discourse and practice. To help the reader / user to understand this environment I want to situate the manual and write about these references and relationalities.
The tool I want to create is embedded in a whole context of discourse and practice. To help the reader / user to understand this environment I want to situate the manual and write about these references and relationalities.
<br><br>
<br><br>
'''Who do I address?'''<br>
'''Who do I address?'''<br>
While the ''manual'' does justice to the technical complexity of the project, at the same time I want to make sure it is approachable for my specific audience: graphic designers and other makers who are unfamiliar with alternative tools and have little technical experience.<br>
While the ''manual'' does justice to the technical complexity of the project, at the same time I want to make sure it is approachable for my specific audience: graphic designers and other makers who are unfamiliar with alternative tools and have little technical experience.<br>
The ''annotations'' shall be a fun and playful way to take the technicalities serious yet make them more accessible and less overwhelming.<br>
The ''annotations'' shall be a fun and playful way to take the technicalities serious yet make them more accessible and less overwhelming.<br>
Writing about the context will help to explain the purpose and relevance of the tool. I hope to encourage readers to experiment with the modules and to reflect on the influence that tools have on their practice.
Writing about the context will help to explain the purpose and relevance of the tool. I hope to encourage readers to experiment with the modules and to reflect on the influence that tools have on their practice.

Revision as of 16:55, 7 December 2022

Thesis Outline

Mode of address and format


For my thesis I imagine a format that one could describe as a Situated and Annotated Manual.

Why a manual?
I want to use the well-known format of the manual to give detailed and technical information about the tool that I am creating in my graduation project. This includes hands-on descriptions on how the modules work and how to use them. This approach is quite formal, using standardized technical terms and schematics to give full insight and transparency.

Why annotations?
With the annotation layer I want to subvert this strictness of the technical manual and add a more intimate mode of address. I am hoping that informal notes, explanations and sketches make the manual more accessible to readers / users who are less familiar with technical terms and descriptions.

Why situated?
The tool I want to create is embedded in a whole context of discourse and practice. To help the reader / user to understand this environment I want to situate the manual and write about these references and relationalities.

Who do I address?
While the manual does justice to the technical complexity of the project, at the same time I want to make sure it is approachable for my specific audience: graphic designers and other makers who are unfamiliar with alternative tools and have little technical experience.
The annotations shall be a fun and playful way to take the technicalities serious yet make them more accessible and less overwhelming.
Writing about the context will help to explain the purpose and relevance of the tool. I hope to encourage readers to experiment with the modules and to reflect on the influence that tools have on their practice.