User:Niek Hilkmann/creativeIndustries

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki

I do not believe that we will stay together forever, but when we will meet again, we might still be something resembling friends and have a nice time. It is a comforting thought that these sort of connections exist and are just waiting to be retouched. It's a shame that most of them are connected to a life that I will probably leave in the end.

It's pretty problematic that you do things without knowing why, do you feel the urge to do so? Should one follow an intuition without having a cognitive justification for it?

There are too many answers. When one situation is related to another (or even a person) this could evoke a pleasurable outcome. Such a situation can be 'doing something new' and it can be in connection to 'me'. This is not necessarily enough in connection to 'another person', because 'me' is not defined for this subject. Therefore the question is if the relation between the situation and 'me' needs to be defined and understood by an outsider.

When a situation corresponds to another situation without individuality involved it creates a connection that can complete a circle. The connection becomes a complete object in itself. Perhaps this object should also be related to 'someone' to become interesting. For example: Love + Love = LOVE, but Love =Not Love, though Love + Someone can be Art. What the artist perceives should not have an inherent meaning, but should approach the possibility multiple interpretations.

As such, the artist may or may not follow an intuition as long as he or she can relate to it. By presenting this relation with the object the perceiver can become a guided object or interesting and create value in itself.

Now that we are properly confused, we reread the previous sentences and approach them with the concept of beauty in the mind.