User:Mxrwho/Assessssssment: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
General direction and starting point   
A non-linear presentation         


Learned bash: I found bash and text manipulating capabilities (commands such as grep, awk, shuf, but also fortunes and aliases) very inspirational. 
'''General direction and starting point'''   


Interesting to the see the computational take on language and use it along with semantics, pragmatics, socio- and even ethno-linguistics and concepts of philosophy and literary theory such as intentionality and reader-response and interactionism in its sociological sense, psychoanalysis and language.
Main interests: Language as a collection of segments but also as the non-static, ever changing space of making meaning, the (futile) effort to make language static, to give meaning a permanence that is unnatural, to colonize and monopolize it, the dynamics and importance of language in relation to a person's connection to society and the self.        


'''Influence of the course''' 


Main points of interest: Language as a collection of segments but also as the non-static, ever changing space of making meaning, the (futile) effort to make language static, to give meaning a permanence that is unnatural, to colonize and monopolize it, the dynamics and importance of language in relation to a person's connection to society and the self. 
I found bash and text manipulating capabilities (commands such as grep, awk, shuf, but also fortunes and aliases) very inspirational, as well as texts and talks connected to the politics of computational language (eg. choices regarding the interpretation of data, or the forming of commands and concepts).   
 
I enjoy comparing how different fields approach language and meaning, and exploring boundaries: Eg. How does computer science perceive language in comparison to semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics and even aesthetics? To what extend can we use concepts such as intentionality (both in its philosophical and literary-theory sense) and reader-response, interactionism (in its micro-sociological sense) and psychoanalytic symbolism to analyze and manipulate meaning?   


Future:  
Future:  
Line 14: Line 17:
Biggest challenge:  
Biggest challenge:  


Narrowing it down.  
Narrowing it down.    


Readings:  
Readings:  


Languages and Automata (Alexandra Silva)
Languages and Automata (Alexandra Silva)
Regular Languages and Finite Automata (Andrew Pitts)
Regular Languages and Finite Automata (Andrew Pitts)


Mainframe Experimentalism (Hannah Higgins)
Mainframe Experimentalism (Hannah Higgins)
Computing as Writing (Andrew Pitts)
Computing as Writing (Andrew Pitts)
Phenomenology of Spirit (GWF Hegel)
Phenomenology of Spirit (GWF Hegel)






Implemented the html and css on my personal page and used imagemagick ( composite -blend 20 -gravity center  Untitled2.1000x.png Untitled1.png Untitled3.png ) to enhance the visual aspect
Implemented the html and css on my personal page and used imagemagick ( composite -blend 20 -gravity center  Untitled2.1000x.png Untitled1.png Untitled3.png ) to enhance the visual aspect

Revision as of 12:20, 1 April 2024

A non-linear presentation

General direction and starting point

Main interests: Language as a collection of segments but also as the non-static, ever changing space of making meaning, the (futile) effort to make language static, to give meaning a permanence that is unnatural, to colonize and monopolize it, the dynamics and importance of language in relation to a person's connection to society and the self.

Influence of the course

I found bash and text manipulating capabilities (commands such as grep, awk, shuf, but also fortunes and aliases) very inspirational, as well as texts and talks connected to the politics of computational language (eg. choices regarding the interpretation of data, or the forming of commands and concepts).

I enjoy comparing how different fields approach language and meaning, and exploring boundaries: Eg. How does computer science perceive language in comparison to semantics, pragmatics, sociolinguistics and even aesthetics? To what extend can we use concepts such as intentionality (both in its philosophical and literary-theory sense) and reader-response, interactionism (in its micro-sociological sense) and psychoanalytic symbolism to analyze and manipulate meaning?

Future:

An installation that will allow the visitor to experience language units (eg. words, sentences, maybe even phonemes as organic elements) as objects, explore the impact these objects have on them, challenge and change them (so, exposing the importance of the narrative and our power over it, understand that every construct can be deconstructed and rebuilt).

Biggest challenge:

Narrowing it down.

Readings:

Languages and Automata (Alexandra Silva)

Regular Languages and Finite Automata (Andrew Pitts)


Mainframe Experimentalism (Hannah Higgins)

Computing as Writing (Andrew Pitts)

Phenomenology of Spirit (GWF Hegel)



Implemented the html and css on my personal page and used imagemagick ( composite -blend 20 -gravity center Untitled2.1000x.png Untitled1.png Untitled3.png ) to enhance the visual aspect