User:Karina/graduation project: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 20: Line 20:
===13 SEPT===
===13 SEPT===
Feedback from Steve
Feedback from Steve
<br>
Before starting PZI I was planning to look into digital publishing, interactive PDFs, change in technology and publishing, print vs digital. My thesis would have probably been an analysis of a section of publishing.
<br>
At the moment I feel that would be too simple. I'm more interested in creating something I might not get a chance to in the future: a large-scale installation / experience. This would not use a traditional publishing method as a means of communicating my research.
<br>
Do I stick to a topic that interests me and use publishing as a means, rather than analyse publishing itself?
* dance notation is a form of communication / publishing 
* experiments as research method
* look at Victor's (fine art) thesis - diagrams
* editorial: how will yo present experiments (event? publication?)
* discrete things & how they come together?
* my practise addresses this, this and that
* these things create chapters, which allow for development
* literacy / non-verbal communication
* Sean v.s. new dance partners
* being a good lead or follow. listening communicating signs / signals. communicating by touch
* notation as a means of instruction
* aim: what am I doing? what do I want to make out of it?
Next steps:
* look through previous experiments
* where will they take me? what experiment will flow next? don't stress, it'll flow
** experiment 1: time perception
** experiment 2: rhythm and notation
** experiment 3: flow
** experiment 4: memory and senses?
** experiment 5: archive?
<br>

Revision as of 12:28, 27 September 2017

notes from CAPTURING MEMORIES IN TIME

27 SEPT

Feedback from Michael

25 SEPT

Feedback from Andre

20 SEPT

Feedback from Malroes

18 SEPT

Feedback from Aymeric

13 SEPT

Feedback from Steve
Before starting PZI I was planning to look into digital publishing, interactive PDFs, change in technology and publishing, print vs digital. My thesis would have probably been an analysis of a section of publishing.
At the moment I feel that would be too simple. I'm more interested in creating something I might not get a chance to in the future: a large-scale installation / experience. This would not use a traditional publishing method as a means of communicating my research.
Do I stick to a topic that interests me and use publishing as a means, rather than analyse publishing itself?

  • dance notation is a form of communication / publishing
  • experiments as research method
  • look at Victor's (fine art) thesis - diagrams
  • editorial: how will yo present experiments (event? publication?)
  • discrete things & how they come together?
  • my practise addresses this, this and that
  • these things create chapters, which allow for development
  • literacy / non-verbal communication
  • Sean v.s. new dance partners
  • being a good lead or follow. listening communicating signs / signals. communicating by touch
  • notation as a means of instruction
  • aim: what am I doing? what do I want to make out of it?

Next steps:

  • look through previous experiments
  • where will they take me? what experiment will flow next? don't stress, it'll flow
    • experiment 1: time perception
    • experiment 2: rhythm and notation
    • experiment 3: flow
    • experiment 4: memory and senses?
    • experiment 5: archive?