User:Erica/Final presentation

   WARNING!!! WORK IN PROGRESS (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)

XPUB1

SPECIAL ISSUES

SI#16: Learning how to walk while catwalking

• https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Grgr_xpub1#SI16_Vernacular_Language_processing
• https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Grgr_xpub1#And_I_wish_you_that_your_question_has_been_answered

SI#17: This box found you for a reason

https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Grgr_xpub1#What_is_a_loot_box??

SI#18: Radio Implicancies. Methods to practice interdependencies

Approaches and methods:

• relating to the larger context/ecosystem in which these tools are situated (yet to be named with mitsa)
• smuggling techniques from one domain to another (patterns of crunchiness with chae)
• editing through interfaces (emergent opera with gersande and kamo)
• decontextualizing and re-enacting situations through hybrid formats (parliament with mitsa and miri)
• writing, reading and learning with others (nested narratives with jian collective writing)
• facilitating collective research (sharing methods for diffractive reading with kim and kamo)

Staged xpub studio

DEVELOPMENT OF RWM & PROTOTYPING

Prototyping, reading, writing, research

• Reading and writing habits developed in strict parallel with annotation, small coding experiment, and the playfulness of different formats. from the collective annotation in the pad to the intervention in the text with the replace function [Tiger Tsun] (which then become fundamental to the first special issue contribution) to the scripting of workshops, to more informal collective moments were spontaneous reading groups have formed (f.e. the Breakfast Club)

• Prototyping from playful creation of tools to use together and to code together (the soup generator, karaoke republishing, etc.) to a sharper construction of critical and situated making of tools that allow reflection and bring to the front hidden aspects and connections both digitally and physically (api that can be seen in the front end as publishing platform, the scripted workshops in SI18 with Kim and Kamo, and Amsterdam with Chae; public moments )

• interest in creating playful interfaces that intervene in the meaning of content through their function, aesthetics (the parliament)
• 

  map of the public moment #3 at Leeszaal
  
  Hackpacts

• in the end I tried to include coding in prototyping but it was super difficult to be consistent with the research I was doing. Later in the second year, code-related prototyping popped up here and there but more as isolated or unrelated small exercises like:
  • learning how to work with databases and creating a personal library-blocknote
  • using pagedjs
  • ssh
  • learning ho to set up an automatic reload from nginx for flask apps
  • debian install party
  • wiki install
  • spreadsheet sequencer

• expanded on the idea of formats for public events, and experimented in that direction as well: how to make a public particiapate with more fluid roles? some more successful than others(f.e. residency in sardegna, asking to read a script to co-facilitate a workshop, breakfast club, talk in linz (didn't really manage to hijack the talk format))-- playing with the boundaries of formal, informal, behind the scenes, public and private,

In summary, through the Special Issues I enjoyed the development and exploration of a heterogeneous practice, with some recurring patterns that became even more evident in the second year: mapping, researching on a local/situated level through ad hoc tools or manipulating existing technologies, re-enacting through interfaces, reappropriating different languages, scripted and soft-performed workshops...

Thinking with and through (digital) tools with others: I really enjoy thinking through the tools and I can recognize that this is often the way my voice contributes to the bigger group. I often find myself supporting other people's ideas by building upon their ideas and thinking together which kind of interfaces and infrastructures would facilitate or amplify specific questions, suggesting a different approach or reading of things.

Table of patterns ...

THESIS AND GRADUATION PROJECT

HACKING MAINTENANCE WITH CARE

Reflections on the self-administered survival of digital solidarity networks

Within a context of generalized precarity and massive raise of the costs of life, maintenance has become an extremely delicate and contradicting issue for self-organized cultural initiatives. Special attention is dedicated here to those collectives, co-operatives, small institutions and organizations that rely on FLOSS (Free Open Source) software, self-hosted community infrastructure, for their artistic, cultural and activist practice. Their socio-technical infrastructure might inadvertently replicate the a condition of crisis and precarity whenever it turns out to be highly demanding and even unsustainable, in terms of energy costs, voluntary and affective labor, spare time consumption, and burnouts.

• Starting from the Soupboat as thinking tool, and as a common social space
• Maintenance as framework (it's necessarily a collective endeavor!) but how?
• Bonus: self-hosting vs service providers --> interesting that the choice of specific group self-organizing around indipendent and self-hosted digital infrastructure, sometimes find themself being service providers in order to economically survive.

BOILER INSPECTION

the starting point(s)

• necessity of imagining sustainable life and work in the cultural field, while maintaining specific technological choices and forms of organization. (from the project proposal: "To create meaning and context around publishing practices, in order to legitimize amatorial knowledge, safe learning environments, and collaborative work. An earlier step, though, needs to be taken in consideration: how to sustain whatever publishing practice in the first place? How to be realistic about the resources available, funding plans, and working conditions? To embody these questions in my practice, I would like to learn how to facilitate dialogue and negotiate collaborative work, and also how to do my taxes.")
• one of the first research questions: how do self-organized cultural initiatives find ways of sustaining themselves while at the same time maintaining their codes of conduct and their technological choices?
• from previous assessment: breaking down all the assumptions, especially the ideological ones (openness, collective, autonomous, indipendent, care, horizontality, self-organization, etc.)
• xpub3: how to keep working together next year and how to create a support platform... (https://pad.xpub.nl/p/xpub-funds)

the research process

• • boiler inspection---> personal digestion of the discussion ---> writing of reflections--->thesis + edit of the inspection form (draw a map of the process)
  • thesis as part of the process, trying to analyze and categorize the tropes and contradictions emerging from the discussions

The boiler inspection and its form

• metaphors and playfulness, embracing the aesthetic of maintenance to bring visibility to invisible or neglected labor

• the form as a prop to trigger and facilitate a situated collective evaluation and discussion
  • situated because the form changes every time depending on both the discoveries of previous B.I. and the specific urgencies of each organization
  • 
    collective because anyone who fills in the form becomes an inspector and makes annotations on the form itself

• evolution of the boiler inspection: small interviews-> drawing of the infrastructure -> collective inspection with form -> carbon paper form -> script for a talk -> workshop tool to make your own boiler inspection.

{show the folder with the evolution and inspected boilerszz}

• As evaluation format: starting from the idea of stupidity of bureaucracy (from Graeber), and bureaucracy as interface for the enforcement of power -> The boiler inspection evolves around the idea of challenging bureaucratic stupidity and rigidity, becoming a tool to put into question again cristallized dynamics, relations and traditions in self-organization (ref to the tyranny of structurelessness by Jo Freeman)

• branching of possibility to document and present the gathered material

• current version of the inspection form and what is decided to be public and what not

Some reflections

Breaking expectations:

• From developing principles, to open questions as methodology: at the beginning I was planning to develop a system requirement specification as final project, as a way to formulate principles for sustainable collaborative practices in the cultural field and dealing with free software. But then I realized that that while there might be good practices they need to be reformulated according to the specificity of each collectivity: there's no one size fits all. I felt it was a more honest approach to stay with the format of open questions rather than crystallizing principles or guidelines. (connection to the Bollenpandje public moment).

• Another challenge was for me to stay with a format that can potentially open up to discussion and also learn how to negotiate values, how to talk in public, and how to take care of the more social aspects of (X)publishing. And indeed I think my practice developed a lot in this direction as well: thinking with and through the tools, but also without hiding behind the technology.

GRAD SHOW

the final pubblication:
is a pubblication including the thesis, a commented inspection form, the instructions and the stickers to make a custom inspection form.

The installation at the graduation:
the plan is to print as many stickers as possible to stick all around. a small informational installation is set up on a moving trashbin

FUTURE

• • archive of gathered material
  • commons and collaborative practices
  • Boiler Inspection as workshop
  • XBUB3