User:Cristinac/unrulyobject: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 7: Line 7:
*Duchamp's fountain, a replicated myth woven into popular culture
*Duchamp's fountain, a replicated myth woven into popular culture
*obsolete media
*obsolete media
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11_missing_tapes Apollo 11 tapes]
*[http://hyperallergic.com/187566/painting-a-kangaroo-when-youve-never-seen-one/ painting a kangaroo when you've never seen one]
*[http://hyperallergic.com/187566/painting-a-kangaroo-when-youve-never-seen-one/ painting a kangaroo when you've never seen one]
*internodal: refusing to be indexed
*internodal: refusing to be indexed
Line 17: Line 18:
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaero Quaero: Europe's answer to Google, a multimedia search engine that never existed, but had a vivid presence in the public mind]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaero Quaero: Europe's answer to Google, a multimedia search engine that never existed, but had a vivid presence in the public mind]
*[http://portfolio.mroth.info/ Matthew Rothenberg creates a website that deletes itself once it's indexed by Google] [https://github.com/mroth/unindexed his code here]
*[http://portfolio.mroth.info/ Matthew Rothenberg creates a website that deletes itself once it's indexed by Google] [https://github.com/mroth/unindexed his code here]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amber_Room Amber Room: curious attempted de- and reconstruction of a room hinting at its objecthood]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_island phantom islands]/[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lost_minor_planet lost minor planets: observers losing track of the planets' positions]




Line 33: Line 36:




''Dan Graham
''«Poem Schema»
*«Schema for a set of pages whose component variants are to be published in various places. In each published instance, it is set in its final form by the editor of the particular publication where it is to appear, the exact data used to correspond in each specific instance to the specific fact(s) of the published final appearance. The work defines itself in place only as information with simply the external support of the facts of its external appearance or presence in print in place of the object.» (March 1966)  (Source: Dan Graham, Art-Language, vol. 1 no 1, May 1969, p. 14, repr. in: Dan Graham, Works 1965–2000, Düsseldorf 2000, p. 95)
[[File:schema1.jpg|400px]][[File:schema2.jpg|400px]]





Revision as of 05:26, 9 June 2015



Hito Steyerl


  • But what, then, is the state of missing itself? Does it take place inside Schrödinger’s box, so to speak? Is it being both dead and alive? How can we understand its conflicting desires: to want and to dread the truth at the same time? The urge to both move on and keep hope alive? Perhaps the state of missing speaks of a paradoxical superposition that cannot be understood with the conceptual tools of Euclidian physics, human biology, or Aristotelian logic. Perhaps it reaches out to an impossible coexistence of life and death. Both are materially interlaced in limbo—as long as no observer opens the “box” of indeterminacy. Which is, in many cases, a grave.


  • Additionally, the twentieth century also perfected observation as a method of killing. Measurement and identification became tools of murder. Phrenology. Statistics. Medical experimentation. Economies of death. In his lectures about biopolitics, Michel Foucault described the stochastic calculus that determined life or death.9 Counting and observing were radicalized to make sure that anything that entered the box died when the box was reopened.




reminder to search for this book

reminder to read this