User:Cristinac/thirdobject: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 27: Line 27:




-[http://www.technologyreview.com/news/521946/googles-growing-patent-stockpile/ Publicly, Google continues to disparage patent claims, which it says amount to a tax on smartphones that raises prices for consumers. The company’s top lawyer, David Drummond, has said that a typical smartphone could be covered by as many as 250,000 patents, but that, like most patents, they are “largely questionable” and for the most part “dubious.”]




-[http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html Richard Stallman: The term “intellectual property” is at best a catch-all to lump together disparate laws. Nonlawyers who hear one term applied to these various laws tend to assume they are based on a common principle and function similarly. Nothing could be further from the case. These laws originated separately, evolved differently, cover different activities, have different rules, and raise different public policy issues. ]


[http://www.technologyreview.com/news/521946/googles-growing-patent-stockpile/ Publicly, Google continues to disparage patent claims, which it says amount to a tax on smartphones that raises prices for consumers. The company’s top lawyer, David Drummond, has said that a typical smartphone could be covered by as many as 250,000 patents, but that, like most patents, they are “largely questionable” and for the most part “dubious.”]
 
-[http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=08676045&PageNum=1&IDKey=E46BB9438AC7&HomeUrl=http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/ Amazon patents the studio arrangement]
 
 
 
I have a friend who's mother is working at OFICIUL DE STAT PENTRU INVENŢII ŞI MĂRCI (OSIM), the patenting office in Romania. I've recently sent her an emaila sking about details of her job:
 
 
 
''Buna ziua doamna Andrei,
 
''Sunt o prietena de-a Anei, ma numesc Cristina. Nu sunt sigura daca a avut ocazia sa va spuna ceva despre mica mea investigatie. Momentan lucrez la un proiect despre brevete de inventie in cadrul primului an de master in design de media. Subiectul ma intereseaza din mai multe motive, cum ar fi propagarea cunoasterii - in ce masura sustin brevetele inovatia, interventia statului asupra inventiilor, dar si conditia retorica pe care o sustin, fiind scheme ale unui potential obiect al carui statut -existent/inexistent- este indeterminat.
 
''Daca considerati ca timpul va permite si nu va deranjeaza sa raspundeti la cateva intrebari pe care le voi enumera mai jos, mi-ar fi de mare ajutor discutia.
 
''Ati putea va rog sa-mi explicati in masura implicarii dumneavoastra in procesul de verificare al brevetelor, in ce consta?
 
''In engleza exista termenul de "patent troll", cu referire la companii care isi creeaza un portofoliu de brevete cu scopul de a aduce in instanta inventatori neinformati despre existenta lor. Intampinati astfel de cazuri des?
 
''In continuarea intrebarii de mai sus, ati intalnit o exprimare intentionat vaga pentru a indeplini cat mai multe cerinte? Sau un aplicant a carui exprimare este notabila?
 
''Este procesul de verificare a brevetului diferit in Romania de cel din strainatate?
 
''Au existat cazuri in care produsul brevetat nu a fost niciodata pus in aplicatie si a ramas la nivel de concept?
 
''Imi cer scuze ca intrebarile sunt atat de generale, inca nu am gasit un unghi asupra subiectului prin care as putea sa il privesc, dar as vrea sa aflu mai mult despre asta!
 
''Va multumesc mult pentru cititul emailului.
 
''Si sper ca nu v-am deranjat
 
''O seara buna,
 
''Cristina




[http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html Richard Stallman: The term “intellectual property” is at best a catch-all to lump together disparate laws. Nonlawyers who hear one term applied to these various laws tend to assume they are based on a common principle and function similarly. Nothing could be further from the case. These laws originated separately, evolved differently, cover different activities, have different rules, and raise different public policy issues. ]


[http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?docid=08676045&PageNum=1&IDKey=E46BB9438AC7&HomeUrl=http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/ Amazon patents the studio arrangement]


[http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0208/msg00122.html page ranking, not really related, but interesting]
[http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0208/msg00122.html page ranking, not really related, but interesting]
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 05:19, 11 June 2015

Dan Graham, Poem Schema


  • «Schema for a set of pages whose component variants are to be published in various places. In each published instance, it is set in its final form by the editor of the particular publication where it is to appear, the exact data used to correspond in each specific instance to the specific fact(s) of the published final appearance. The work defines itself in place only as information with simply the external support of the facts of its external appearance or presence in print in place of the object.» (March 1966) (Source: Dan Graham, Art-Language, vol. 1 no 1, May 1969, p. 14, repr. in: Dan Graham, Works 1965–2000, Düsseldorf 2000, p. 95)


Schema1.jpgSchema2.jpg



patent or be patented:

From: "ova.kill" <mezandwalt {AT} wollongong.starway.net.au>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 13:52:35 +1000
In-Reply-To: <20000729173432.8156.qmail {AT} nwcst315.netaddress.usa.net>

Patent.png


What is a patent?

-a government grant to an inventor of the right to exclude others from making, using, or selling an invention, usually for a limited period. Patents are granted for new and useful machines, manufactured products, and industrial processes and for significant improvements of existing ones. Patents also are granted for new chemical compounds, foods, and medicinal products, as well as for the processes used to produce them. In some countries patents can be granted even for new forms of plant or animal life developed through genetic engineering. (from Encyclopedia Britannica)


-Publicly, Google continues to disparage patent claims, which it says amount to a tax on smartphones that raises prices for consumers. The company’s top lawyer, David Drummond, has said that a typical smartphone could be covered by as many as 250,000 patents, but that, like most patents, they are “largely questionable” and for the most part “dubious.”


-Richard Stallman: The term “intellectual property” is at best a catch-all to lump together disparate laws. Nonlawyers who hear one term applied to these various laws tend to assume they are based on a common principle and function similarly. Nothing could be further from the case. These laws originated separately, evolved differently, cover different activities, have different rules, and raise different public policy issues.


-Amazon patents the studio arrangement


I have a friend who's mother is working at OFICIUL DE STAT PENTRU INVENŢII ŞI MĂRCI (OSIM), the patenting office in Romania. I've recently sent her an emaila sking about details of her job:


Buna ziua doamna Andrei,

Sunt o prietena de-a Anei, ma numesc Cristina. Nu sunt sigura daca a avut ocazia sa va spuna ceva despre mica mea investigatie. Momentan lucrez la un proiect despre brevete de inventie in cadrul primului an de master in design de media. Subiectul ma intereseaza din mai multe motive, cum ar fi propagarea cunoasterii - in ce masura sustin brevetele inovatia, interventia statului asupra inventiilor, dar si conditia retorica pe care o sustin, fiind scheme ale unui potential obiect al carui statut -existent/inexistent- este indeterminat.

Daca considerati ca timpul va permite si nu va deranjeaza sa raspundeti la cateva intrebari pe care le voi enumera mai jos, mi-ar fi de mare ajutor discutia.

Ati putea va rog sa-mi explicati in masura implicarii dumneavoastra in procesul de verificare al brevetelor, in ce consta?

In engleza exista termenul de "patent troll", cu referire la companii care isi creeaza un portofoliu de brevete cu scopul de a aduce in instanta inventatori neinformati despre existenta lor. Intampinati astfel de cazuri des?

In continuarea intrebarii de mai sus, ati intalnit o exprimare intentionat vaga pentru a indeplini cat mai multe cerinte? Sau un aplicant a carui exprimare este notabila?

Este procesul de verificare a brevetului diferit in Romania de cel din strainatate?

Au existat cazuri in care produsul brevetat nu a fost niciodata pus in aplicatie si a ramas la nivel de concept?

Imi cer scuze ca intrebarile sunt atat de generale, inca nu am gasit un unghi asupra subiectului prin care as putea sa il privesc, dar as vrea sa aflu mai mult despre asta!

Va multumesc mult pentru cititul emailului.

Si sper ca nu v-am deranjat

O seara buna,

Cristina



page ranking, not really related, but interesting