User:Andre Castro/2/semina aymeric: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
 
Line 17: Line 17:


* [[User:Andre_Castro/2/semina_aymeric/sessions/ | Sessions' Notes]]
* [[User:Andre_Castro/2/semina_aymeric/sessions/ | Sessions' Notes]]
=Andre=
* two forms of spam:
** crafty spam
** automated cyber crime  forms of spam
==feedback on essay==
* digital folklore - its definition is not clear enough to base the thesis on it
* asking if spam is a cultural artifact, its maybe stating the obvious. It doesn't need to be proved.
* what will be the thesis angle ?
** literary criticism
** ethnographic - create a map of the current forms of operation of spam
** culture studies - the evolution of spam (has been written by A.Ludovico, and in Spamology article)
==feedback of work==
* choose your own adventure
* hypertext fiction
* both contain the danger of diluting of the story - i don't have to add another layer to it
* how the personal conversations get - the real stories behind it (??)
* the use of hyper-fiction to document could work
* parallel universe going on 24/7(??)
===connecting facts and traces===
* showing the different narrative, that by placed together the fiction emerge
* the stories that are within the email
* what i want to tell? stick to fiction, or show what is behind the curtain - double narrative?
==next small project==
* map the interaction within all the emails
Aymeric: afraid that there is not that much inter-relations within the material
is there a mythology to be written about this characters or is simply a collections of small stories?
how far can be the these inter-links go?
what i want to communicate with the richness of this material ?
* once this information is mapped try to render this connections and materials

Latest revision as of 01:21, 18 February 2013

Seminar with Aymeric

Log

Blog

Mini Projects

  • The Head Body Legs of Spam book

Reports on works

Sessions Notes