Erik Davis - Secret Earths: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
When you strip away the human sensory perception of an object, what remains are alleged primary qualities - mass, location, (existence in spacetime) - however these essential qualities can be broken down as well -- locations equals maps which are subjective, matter itself is tricky as it ultimately leads to the weirdness of quantum mechanics. | When you strip away the human sensory perception of an object, what remains are alleged primary qualities - mass, location, (existence in spacetime) - however these essential qualities can be broken down as well -- locations equals maps which are subjective, matter itself is tricky as it ultimately leads to the weirdness of quantum mechanics. | ||
Re-animism today is beyond attributing a special power to objects in that existence consists of relationships of mutual benefit between persons, '''only some of whom are actually humans'''. | Re-animism today is beyond attributing a special power to objects in that existence consists of relationships of mutual benefit between persons, '''only some of whom are actually humans'''. The definition of persons goes beyond what is typically referred to as humans, in that the human perspective of intelligence must be considered. The area between humans and non-humans is a social relationship from this perspective. Culture within the animal realm is the same as ours, Instinct is not a factor. Communication between shamans and the animal world are gestures of society that don't occur on some fantastic spiritual plane. | ||
Revision as of 12:48, 12 October 2016
Human experience is being taken over by technological processes, but at the same time it is also being re-defined through a process of re-animism.
Re-animism can be defined by moving experience away from human-centrism to a relational experience with non-organic actors and processes.
Nascent populist movements are representative of this re-animism, including indigenous nationalism, the nature of existence of objects etc...
The study of the phenomenon of smart objects feeds into this new definition of existence.
Looking at re-animist technological factors from a human society perspective is different from a robot resembling a human or a rock having a spirit, but revealing the relationships between these can help define the new study of existence.
Animism is the act of attributing spirit to non-human objects, what can be after science has defined the existence of something – adding spirit to objects and fantastical delusions to other humans.
"Modern" society are the naive faithful as they deem others having silly beliefs.
Descartes states that our observation of reality comes from our senses, which ultimately is a projection based on our subjectivism – not unlike animist beliefs.
When you strip away the human sensory perception of an object, what remains are alleged primary qualities - mass, location, (existence in spacetime) - however these essential qualities can be broken down as well -- locations equals maps which are subjective, matter itself is tricky as it ultimately leads to the weirdness of quantum mechanics.
Re-animism today is beyond attributing a special power to objects in that existence consists of relationships of mutual benefit between persons, only some of whom are actually humans. The definition of persons goes beyond what is typically referred to as humans, in that the human perspective of intelligence must be considered. The area between humans and non-humans is a social relationship from this perspective. Culture within the animal realm is the same as ours, Instinct is not a factor. Communication between shamans and the animal world are gestures of society that don't occur on some fantastic spiritual plane.