User:Lieven Van Speybroeck/Reading/Theory/Fernback The Individual within the Collective

Notes on Jan Fernback's The Individual within the Collective

Central questions:
- How is collectivity in cyberspace jusxtaposed against individuality?
- How is cyberspace used as a public space and what does this mean for the collectivity?
- How are anarchy and dissent dealt with among the collectivity of computer-mediated communication (CMC) users?

On (cyber)space:
- [...] space is not matter, but a set of culturally bound relations as well as an empirical construction. Urry (1985)
- The development of electronic communication technologies has abrogated space and time such that we live in a boundless "global village" with "no sense of place". (~McLucah & Meyrowitz)
-> widespread use of CMC made re-examination of our concept of space necessary.
- Cyberspace is popular culture: a pixelated mirror of everyday life and all it's 'features'
Users as consumers:
- Our participation in public life has been reduced to our media consumption
- Television as the main tool for mediaconsumption (passive consumption)
Openness of cyberspace:
- Only rules are social propriety and "netiquette"
-> Flaming and virtual harassment ("dark side of CMC")
- Nature and limits of public space ~ seventeeth-century coffee houses of Britain/salons Paris/...
- Cyberspace offers a surrogate for an authentic socially democratic public realm that in the 'real' world exists nowhere
- Cyberspace is both public and private
The term 'community':
- Both material and symbolic dimensions
- Notion of community us dynamic and evolves as society evolves
- Rheingold (1993): Virtual communities as social aggregations that emerge when people carry on discussions
- long enough

- with sufficient feeling

- to form personal relationships
- Ideologically cyberspace communities offer a platform for free speech, individualism, equality and open access
- Volatility of virtual 'membership' to communities: log on, log off
Collective versus individual
- Some negative viewpoints:
Sennet: community as a form of destructive gemeinschaft, where emotional relations between people take precedence over collective action.

Dewey: absence of individuality that can operate within the community. The individual's full potential cannot be realized without the context of the community to guide it.

Etzioni, Tipton, Bellah a.o.: individuals can subvert hyper-individualistic, selfish tendencies in favor of realizing the benefits acting responsably within a moralistic, transcendent order.

Jones: no one medium/technology has been able to provide crucial elements as empowerment, political action, moral, social order..., in combination.
-> communities of interest as aggregations of self-interested, self-seeking individuals who join together to augment individual good: communities degenerate into lifestyle enclaves

-> the paradox of meaning in community
'Threats' to virtual communities
- Things like copyright infringement, censorship, limited access only for 'technological elite' counteract with the ideals of openness (~ read: virtual communities)
- CDA: appliance of censorship on the internet -> legal disputes regarding freedom of speech/expression
- Providers acting as 'publishers/editors' of fora hosted on their servers. In some cases (nudity, sexuality) censorship approved by law.
- Behavior that is not conform the 'netiquette' can ruin the whole CMC environment for all (flame wars, propaganda, spam) -> censorship
- Hacker ethic: a countercultural activity against privatisation of the CMC collective and for democratization of cyberspace.
-> unique position within online communities: both rebels and protectors of civil liberties and democratic right to openness and freedom