LorenzoThesisDraftSteveSuggests
Travelling around the city of Rotterdam with my brother, who is in a wheelchair, has made me aware of the architectural, cultural and bureaucratic limits that define our movements. In this Thesis I will reflect upon, (de)construct and criticize Rotterdam. I will reflect on Rotterdam in contrast to the utopian postcard realities that I experience in the city. In this text [title please] I develop a "counter-mapping" [1] practice in relation to the issue of accessibility in Rotterdam. This will take the form of the transcription of a series of drawings which I made whilst writing [title]. I will also use my knowledge and experience in world building with 3D software. [2]
The text will be structured by the following themes, each of which represents one of the multiple obstacles to getting around.
Socially - Personal, Affordable, Family, Housing
Accessibly - Disability, Information provision, infrastructures
Bureaucratically - Protocols of local municipal / governments
Architecturally - Buildings, ways, pavements, roads, streets
Virtually - Imagery, impression, media, softwares, simulation, games
Culturally - budget cuts, false iconism, counterculture, grassroots, community, festivals/gigs/events
These issues become invisible. When people do not see them. they do not exist.
Chapter Outline
The chaptersn group the above into pairs:
- Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance It is crucial to mention that I will not allow myself to fall in a pit of despair but to healthily reflect on the topics, not having an answer but reacting honestly within the complex matters and also to look at the alternatives.
Virtually - Architecturally / Innovation and Virtual Tools as development or demolition of reality
- Bureaucratically - Culturally / Zoning: friction between counter culture and bureaucracy, false iconism vs community
Chapter One: GET AROUND / Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance
Chapter One Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance
In this chapter I highlight the multiple obstacles that exist, and how these are rendered invisible. When people do not see it, it does not exist.
Zooming from the big picture to personal experience, the questions is:
How does one Manoeuvre or get around 'town'?[3]
I can not ride a bike, so I either walk, take public transport, take a cab or carpool with someone. My brother can not walk, he is in a wheelchair so public transport mostly isn't an option. He can be transported from bed to wheelchair, from bed to mobility scooter, from wheelchair to a car. [4] My brother mostly gets around with Trevvel* a customized transport (social taxi). He manoeuvres around in his mobility scooter (electric wheelchair) for longer and shorter distances. He meets plenty of obstacles along the way.
Here's an example of a difficulty I encountered. I intended to go to a friends Halloween party.I needed to get there via metro and bus. I couldn't stay there, and the option of a taxi with a big group was too expensive. Another friend offered a place to stay, but that was only accessible via bike. I didn't go in the end, but that kinda struck to me [5] This wasn't the end of the world, just a bit shitty.
The frustration I felt through being presented with a series of comparatively low thresholds made me consider my brother. The thresholds that occur along the way for him: from a pavement without hills or ramps, to bureaucratic, social and architectural thresholds are of a different order. [6]
Here's an example of a difficulty my brother encountered. My aunt wanted to plan my grandfather's birthday at their place in Spijkenisse, but they were worried that my brother can't access the hallway, because it is too small and the chair might damage the varnish. The other option was that he comes in through the backdoor, (but that's still pending because we need top check the measurements of the door).
My mother came up with the idea that we would do it at 'our place'. Which means I have to 'work' for this: I sometimes help my mother as a Mantelzorger. [ informal caregiver ]
Every 4-6 weeks, my brother, mother and I have a little get together. Because, if I want to meet with my brother and mother at my mother's place, it takes some preparation: [7]
For my brother to enter my mother's house, we need*:
- to place a hill or a plank on an empty parking spot
- to place a plank/hill from the street to the curb
- to place a ramp from the curb that which transitions into another a hill(small ramp) going into the hallway
- to place another small ramp in the corridor to enter the entrance hall.
*The ramp and hills needed to be purchased.
- The ramp and hills need to be stored.
My brother has multiple ways to manoeuvre around, which gives him freedom. To get these things, there's a process that has to happen via the municipality
Because the mobility scooter is too heavy for the ramp, he needs to get there in a wheelchair. For this, he needs customized transport :**Trevvel Samen**.
You can apply for Trevvel Samen if you have an illness, handicap or of an age that public transport becomes impossible to use. It is a social taxi service that picks you up and delivers you to where you need to be.
Applying for this takes 6-8 weeks and is done through the Gemeente via communicative layers of bureaucracy (Fill in a form 14010 or visit the office). [8][9] It works like a regular taxi service. When requesting a Trevvel, you can reserve a booking via the app or call the company.
It gets communicated via some sort of telecommunication device :
## \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"I'mavailable"\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ## //////"We have a ride from Boermarke 65 to Statenweg 127a" ////////////////////////////////////////// ## \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'Yes I will take that one'\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////"Okay"///////////////////////
My brother then communicates that he has a Trevvel planned. He sends us a message and we set up the ramps and hills. We tip the driver (if they help, are friendly, cooperate and participate). He gets Trevvel via Wet maatschappelijke ondersteuning (law considering the social support act of 2015).
There are a few social factors and flaws in Trevvel:
We wanted to book a Trevvel that picks up my mother and me and then also picks up my brother. That wasn't possible, because *there has to be* an hour between rides. So we in that matter needed to be picked up and brought to my brother. And then we would join him on the same ride. We then decided to go separate and ended up being picked up in the same trevvel.
This ride was heading to my nephew's house. We would visit and look at his house. We were there on time and then the same family was not thinking about my brother's situation, were unintentionally ignorant. My nephew has concrete tile stairs. The house is a liminal space to my brother. It is highly upsetting that in these vinex type lifestyle arrangements of normality. It doesn't come to mind that a nephew that has been impaired since 2019, is taken into consideration. It was a hot summer day and we just continued, but then my mother and I were picked up and my brother was picked up the moment we arrived at my mothers place.
In the end, the three of us went to my grandfather for a custom version of my grandfather's birthday. Me and my mother were picked up around 13:00. My brother was in another bus and the driver picked up other people so it took a while in traffic. Returning, we were supposed to leave at 16:45, but we had to wait an hour to be picked up. My brother started to get tremors (myoclonias) [10] because he didn't have his medicine (we assumed he was going to be home in time). The way back was bizarre: The bus needed to pick up people in another location; and just before we reached my brother's house, the driver picked up another person at the Saint Francis Hospital (SFG) in Rotterdam. My brother was not doing well, getting pissed off and tired. When we were finally were heading to Crooswijk. The last picked up person squished herself out of the bus when we were almost at our own space. [this sounds crazy! please explain it tio me on Thursday] Whilst we could have also requested the same but chose to be less egotistical.
This is one of the many stories of how Trevvel Samen as a form as customized transport is somewhat of a social taxi service but still has plenty of drivers and systems that are not listening to the needs of the travelers. And the fact that people need to wait 6-8 weeks depending on their situation if they qualify for this?! My brother in this case ends up less healthy and supported than this Social Support Law and Customized Transport.
This is story exemplifies the degree of mental and physical preparation required to move through the city. There are MANY day-to-day transactions that require understanding and knowledge; it requires a municipal threshold; it requires physical support and aftercare and rest afterwards.
There are multiple obstacles to getting around, socially, accessibly, bureaucratically, architecturally, virtually. And these become invisible when people do not see this. When people do not see it, it does not exist.
https://www.rijnmond.nl/nieuws/1930343/vervoerder-trevvel-spant-kort-geding-aan-tegen-gemeente-rotterdam-we-maken-ons-grote-zorgen
https://www.government.nl/topics/care-and-support-at-home/social-support-act-wmo
https://www.rotterdam.nl/wonen-leven/vraagwijzer
https://www.trevvel.nl/trevvel-sociaal/uit-thuis-agenda/
https://www.verwijswijzer.nl/rotterdam/hulpmiddelen-en-aanpassingen/aanvullend-openbaar-vervoer.html
https://openrotterdam.nl/directeur-miniworld-woest-nadat-senior-klant-drie-uur-moet-wachten-op-taxi/
https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/zorg-en-ondersteuning-thuis/wmo-2015
https://www.trevvel.nl/doelgroepenvervoer/trevvel-samen/
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Anyway. Let's start with the show>>>>>>>>>>
- ↑ an infrastructure for counter-mapping / anti-campaigning by showing (human) complications?
- ↑ S:This is getting a bit off topic so I put it in a ref note.Remember an outline is all that is needed here; you do not have to justify every decision at the start, this can unfold slowly All these things are blend in with each other, however to narrow it down. These 3 blended topics will have the overhand: * Virtually - Architecturally / Innovation and Virtual Tools as development or demolition of reality
- Bureaucratically - Culturally / Zoning: friction between counter culture and bureaucracy, false iconism vs community
- Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance It is crucial to mention that I will not allow myself to fall in a pit of despair but to healthily reflect on the topics, not having an answer but reacting honestly within the complex matters and also to look at the alternatives.
- ↑ Manoeuvre meaning, a movement or series of moves requiring skill and care or carefully guide or manipulate someone or something in order to achieve an end.
- ↑ (My mother also uses a mobility scooter because she can not walk long distances, she also has arthritis and joint pain).
- ↑ It wasn't a big deal because I also was still feeling sick from the flu shot.
- ↑ The frustration was because I was complaining about how people are inconsiderate considering disabilities.
- ↑ asked and answered...My brother can not walk and he gets around by either his electric wheelchair or in a mobility scooter.
- ↑ cite
- ↑ You would say this system would be great, customized for the person. Social transport. Traveling together. This unfortunately depends as it were a case-by-case study. Concerning my brother and mother. It either can go well and as it should be. S: I didn't quite follow this, so I placed it in refs. we can discuss it on Thursday
- ↑ ref please