LorenzoThesisDraftSteveSuggests
Steve: My general notes at bottom of page,
Travelling around the city of Rotterdam with my brother, who is in a wheelchair, has made me aware of the architectural, cultural and bureaucratic limits that define our movements. In this Thesis I will reflect upon, (de)construct and criticize Rotterdam. I will reflect on Rotterdam in contrast to the utopian postcard realities that I experience in the city. In this text [title please] I develop a "counter-mapping" [1] practice in relation to the issue of accessibility in Rotterdam. This will take the form of the transcription of a series of drawings which I made whilst writing [title]. I will also use my knowledge and experience in world building with 3D software. [2]
The text will be structured by the following themes, each of which represents one of the multiple obstacles to getting around.
Socially - Personal, Affordable, Family, Housing
Accessibly - Disability, Information provision, infrastructures
Bureaucratically - Protocols of local municipal / governments
Architecturally - Buildings, ways, pavements, roads, streets
Virtually - Imagery, impression, media, softwares, simulation, games
Culturally - budget cuts, false iconism, counterculture, grassroots, community, festivals/gigs/events
These issues become invisible. When people do not see them. they do not exist.
Chapter Outline
The three chapters of [title] group the above into pairs:
- Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance I refuse to allow myself to fall in a pit of despair. This is a healthy reflection on the topics; reacting honestly to a complex of issues [3].
- Virtually - Architecturally / Innovation and Virtual Tools as development or demolition of reality
- Bureaucratically - Culturally / Zoning: friction between counter culture and bureaucracy, false iconism vs community
Chapter One: GET AROUND / Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance

Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance
In this chapter I highlight the multiple obstacles that exist, and how these are rendered invisible. When people do not see it, it does not exist.
Zooming from the big picture to personal experience, the questions is:
How does one Manoeuvre or get around 'town'?[4]
I can not ride a bike, so I either walk, take public transport, take a cab or carpool with someone. My brother can not walk, he is in a wheelchair so public transport mostly isn't an option. He can be transported from bed to wheelchair, from bed to mobility scooter, from wheelchair to a car. [5] My brother mostly gets around with Trevvel* a customized transport (social taxi). He manoeuvres around in his mobility scooter (electric wheelchair) for longer and shorter distances. He meets plenty of obstacles along the way.
Here's an example of a difficulty I encountered. I intended to go to a friends Halloween party.I needed to get there via metro and bus. I couldn't stay there, and the option of a taxi with a big group was too expensive. Another friend offered a place to stay, but that was only accessible via bike. I didn't go in the end, but that kinda struck to me [6] This wasn't the end of the world, just a bit shitty.
The frustration I felt through being presented with a series of comparatively low thresholds made me consider my brother. The thresholds that occur along the way for him: from a pavement without hills or ramps, to bureaucratic, social and architectural thresholds are of a different order. [7]
Here's an example of a difficulty my brother encountered. My aunt wanted to plan my grandfather's birthday at their place in Spijkenisse, but they were worried that my brother can't access the hallway, because it is too small and the chair might damage the varnish. The other option was that he comes in through the backdoor, (but that's still pending because we need top check the measurements of the door).
My mother came up with the idea that we would do it at 'our place'. Which means I have to 'work' for this: I sometimes help my mother as a Mantelzorger. [ informal caregiver ]
Every 4-6 weeks, my brother, mother and I have a little get together. Because, if I want to meet with my brother and mother at my mother's place, it takes some preparation: [8]
For my brother to enter my mother's house, we need*:
- to place a hill or a plank on an empty parking spot
- to place a plank/hill from the street to the curb
- to place a ramp from the curb that which transitions into another a hill(small ramp) going into the hallway
- to place another small ramp in the corridor to enter the entrance hall.
*The ramp and hills needed to be purchased.
- The ramp and hills need to be stored.
My brother has multiple ways to manoeuvre around, which gives him freedom. To get these things, there's a process that has to happen via the municipality
Because the mobility scooter is too heavy for the ramp, he needs to get there in a wheelchair. For this, he needs customized transport :**Trevvel Samen**.
You can apply for Trevvel Samen if you have an illness, handicap or of an age that public transport becomes impossible to use. It is a social taxi service that picks you up and delivers you to where you need to be.
Applying for this takes 6-8 weeks and is done through the Gemeente via communicative layers of bureaucracy (Fill in a form 14010 or visit the office). [9][10] It works like a regular taxi service. When requesting a Trevvel, you can reserve a booking via the app or call the company.
It gets communicated via some sort of telecommunication device :
## \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"I'mavailable"\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ## //////"We have a ride from Boermarke 65 to Statenweg 127a" ////////////////////////////////////////// ## \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'Yes I will take that one'\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////"Okay"///////////////////////
My brother then communicates that he has a Trevvel planned. He sends us a message and we set up the ramps and hills. We tip the driver (if they help, are friendly, cooperate and participate). He gets Trevvel via Wet maatschappelijke ondersteuning (law considering the social support act of 2015).
There are a few social factors and flaws in Trevvel:
We wanted to book a Trevvel that picks up my mother and me and then also picks up my brother. That wasn't possible, because *there has to be* an hour between rides. So we in that matter needed to be picked up and brought to my brother. And then we would join him on the same ride. We then decided to go separate and ended up being picked up in the same trevvel.
This ride was heading to my nephew's house. We would visit and look at his house. We were there on time and then the same family was not thinking about my brother's situation, were unintentionally ignorant. My nephew has concrete tile stairs. The house is a liminal space to my brother. It is highly upsetting that in these vinex type lifestyle arrangements of normality. It doesn't come to mind that a nephew that has been impaired since 2019, is taken into consideration. It was a hot summer day and we just continued, but then my mother and I were picked up and my brother was picked up the moment we arrived at my mothers place.
In the end, the three of us went to my grandfather for a custom version of my grandfather's birthday. Me and my mother were picked up around 13:00. My brother was in another bus and the driver picked up other people so it took a while in traffic. Returning, we were supposed to leave at 16:45, but we had to wait an hour to be picked up. My brother started to get tremors (myoclonias) [11] because he didn't have his medicine (we assumed he was going to be home in time). The way back was bizarre: The bus needed to pick up people in another location; and just before we reached my brother's house, the driver picked up another person at the Saint Francis Hospital (SFG) in Rotterdam. My brother was not doing well, getting pissed off and tired. When we were finally were heading to Crooswijk. The last picked up person squished herself out of the bus when we were almost at our own space. [this sounds crazy! please explain it tio me on Thursday] Whilst we could have also requested the same but chose to be less egotistical.
This is one of the many stories of how Trevvel Samen as a form as customized transport is somewhat of a social taxi service but still has plenty of drivers and systems that are not listening to the needs of the travelers. And the fact that people need to wait 6-8 weeks depending on their situation if they qualify for this?! My brother in this case ends up less healthy and supported than this Social Support Law and Customized Transport.
This is story exemplifies the degree of mental and physical preparation required to move through the city. There are MANY day-to-day transactions that require understanding and knowledge; it requires a municipal threshold; it requires physical support and aftercare and rest afterwards.
There are multiple obstacles to getting around, socially, accessibly, bureaucratically, architecturally, virtually. And these become invisible when people do not see this. When people do not see it, it does not exist.
https://www.rijnmond.nl/nieuws/1930343/vervoerder-trevvel-spant-kort-geding-aan-tegen-gemeente-rotterdam-we-maken-ons-grote-zorgen
https://www.government.nl/topics/care-and-support-at-home/social-support-act-wmo
https://www.rotterdam.nl/wonen-leven/vraagwijzer
https://www.trevvel.nl/trevvel-sociaal/uit-thuis-agenda/
https://www.verwijswijzer.nl/rotterdam/hulpmiddelen-en-aanpassingen/aanvullend-openbaar-vervoer.html
https://openrotterdam.nl/directeur-miniworld-woest-nadat-senior-klant-drie-uur-moet-wachten-op-taxi/
https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/zorg-en-ondersteuning-thuis/wmo-2015
https://www.trevvel.nl/doelgroepenvervoer/trevvel-samen/
* This is a very good start to the text. It is well structured and has a very clear objective. The edit I have done above tries to streamline the origional, which is sometimes a bit digresive for this reader. The bits I found confusing I placed in the refs. I am sure all these points have a place, but you should not 'bury the lead' at the start of the text. * There is a proof of concept here. A drawing introduces each text (chapter). I think you can build on this and bring the drawings FRONT AND CENTRE; your drawings of the Ghent event may lead the way. We can discuss this more on Thursday.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Anyway. Let's start with the show>>>>>>>>>> this >> could be adapted into chapter two. The way you use drawings in this text is great.
User:Lor.ensō/SELF-(RE)DIRECTION/A-CANE-STICKYNOTE-NOTHERBODY/DIARY/ETC
+ Steve's comments
GET AROUND - Steve Suggested edits and [comments]
[This is a really good proof of concept that a drawing can be the form around which you write a series of essays. Take a few lines to introduce the reader to the drawing, what are they seeing? The directed description of the drawing at the start of each "essay" will 1) provide a structure and direct the readers attention to what is important to you 2) it will establish the drawing as an instrument of your discourse, as a medium of interpretation 3) it provides a parallel form of reading.The drawing provides a map, it represents a form of "counter mapping" or "bespoke mapping". It is also evident that the thesis speaks directly to your proposal, on the level of practice.]
I am zooming in from the big picture to a personal experience. The questions I'm currently asking is:
=== How does one manoeuvre or get around 'town'? ===
Manoeuvre meaning, a movement or series of moves requiring skill and care or carefully guide or manipulate someone or something in order to achieve an end.
I can not ride a bike, so I either walk, take public transport, take a cab or carpool with someone.
[<<This can also be used in all the essays= a definition which the essay then discusses. This will provide a solid structure for the thesis as a whole.]
My brother can not walk, he is in a wheelchair or scootmobile, so public transport mostly isn't an option. He can be transported from bed to wheelchair, from bed to scootmobile, from wheelchair to a car.
It is mostly the case he gets around with something that is called Trevvel*: a customized transport. (A social taxi).
But more on that later.
He manoeuvres around in scootmobile for long distances and for shorter distances, his electric wheelchair. There are plenty obstacles that may come along the way.
My own recent example was that I intended to go to a friends halloween party. He lives in a location that I needed to get to via metro and bus. I couldn't stay there but a taxi with a big group was an option. A too expensive option. Another friend offered a place to stay but that was only accessible via bike ride. I didn't go but that kinda struck to me the other day. It wasn't a big deal because I also was still feeling sick from the flu shot. This wasn't the end of the world but just a bit shitty.
But it kind of resulted in a frustration concerning my brother. The thresholds that occur along the way: from a pavement without hills and ramps to bureaucratic, social and architectural threshold. The frustration was because I was complaining about how people are inconsiderate considering disabilities.
The reason was because my aunt wanted to plan my grandfathers birthday at their place in Spijkenisse. It is meant to be a social gathering. But they were worried that my brother can't access the hallway because it is too small and it might damage the varnish. The other option is that he comes in through the backdoor. But it still pending because we do not know the measurements of the door.
My mother came with the idea that we would do it at 'our place'. Which means I have to 'work' for this: I sometimes help my mother as a Mantelzorger
[ informal caregiver ] Every 4-6 weeks, my brother, mother and I do a little get together. Because, if I want to meet with my brother and mother at my mother's place. It takes some preparation: My brother can not walk and he gets around by either his electric wheelchair or in a mobility scooter(scootmobile?).
For my brother to enter my mother's house, we need*:
- an empty parkingspot to place a hill or a plank
- to place a plank/hill from the street to the curb
- to place a ramp from the curb that which transitions into another a hill(small ramp) going into the hallway
- to place another small ramp in the corridor to enter the entrance hall.
*The ramp and hills needed to be purchased.
So, my brother has multiple ways to manoeuvre around, which gives him freedom. To get these things, there's a process that has to happen via the municipality.
Since the scootmobile is too heavy for the ramp, he needs to get there in a wheelchair. For this, he needs customized transport :**Trevvel Samen**.
Trevvel Samen is something you can apply for if you have an illness, handicap or age that public transport becomes impossible to use. It is a social taxi service that picks you up and delivers you to the spot where you need to be.
Applying for this takes 6-8 weeks and is done through the Gemeente via communicative layers of bureaucracy (Fill in a form, call 14010 or visit a location)
You would say this system would be great, customized for the person. Social transport. Traveling together.
This unfortunately depends as it were a case-by-case study. Concerning my brother and mother. It either can go well and as it should be.
But when requesting a Trevvel, you can reserve a booking via the app or call the company.
It literally just works like a regular taxi service. It gets communicated via some sort of telecommunication device :
## \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"I'mavailable"\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ## //////"We have a ride from Boermarke 65 to Statenweg 127a" ////////////////////////////////////////// ## \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'Yes I will take that one'\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////"Okay"///////////////////////
My brother then communicates that he has a Trevvel planned. He sends us a message and we set up the ramps and hills. We tip the driver based on the fact if they help, are friendly, cooperate and participate. He gets Trevvel via Wet maatschappelijke ondersteuning (law considering the social support act of 2015). There are a few social factors and flaws in Trevvel:
On a personal level: We wanted to book a trevvel that picks up my mother and me and then also picks up my brother. That wasn't possible, because *there has to be* an hour between rides. So we in that matter needed to be picked up and brought to my brother. And then we would join him on the same ride. We then decided to go separate and ended up being picked up in the same trevvel.
This ride was heading to my nephew's house. We would visit and look at his house. We were there on time and then the same family was not thinking about my brother's situation, were unintentionally ignorant. My nephew has these concrete tile stairs. So this house becomes a liminal space to my brother. It is highly upsetting that in these vinex type lifestyle arrangements of normality. It doesn't come to mind that a nephew that has been impaired since 2019, is taken into consideration. It was a hot summer day and we just continued, but then my mother and I were picked up and my brother was picked up the moment we arrived at my mothers place.
[The sense of frustration is conveyed powerfully here. I like the idea of how the personal maps on to broader issues, looking forward to seeing how this develops over the next few months]
So there are multiple obstacles to get around, socially, accessibly, bureaucratically, architecturally, virtually. And these become invisible when people do not see this. When people do not see it. It does not exist.
[<<if this is the introduction, the list of obstacles: "socially, accessibly, bureaucratically, architecturally, virtually" could provide a list of chapters/drawings (although the obviously always overlap)]
{feedback on draft proposal: in this text/drawing you are developing aspects of your proposal. The key here is that it is focussed and defines its parameters (protocol) = drawing +essay/annotation. I think you could do the same with the proposal. Consider, for instance, that your project be ONLY drawings or ONLY visualisations. The research question would then be something like "how to develop a counter-mapping practice in relation to he issue of accessibility in Rotterdam?" the proposal then becomes a more precise issue of developing a VISUAL LANGUAGE around the issue of accessibility in Rotterdam, as read through your own experience. The attendant issue would be the practical question of how best to present these drawings and visualisations (this could only be answered once you start producing the visual material and developing that question further). Let's discuss the implications of such a decision on Thursday.}
References - Bibliography
Constant workshops in Gent Constant -. https://constantvzw.org/site/Open-call-Worksession-a-Cane-Sticky-notes-Another-body.html.
Rotterdam, Is it Happening?. https://www.rotterdamisithappening.nl/. Possible Bodies(Rocha, J., Snelting, F.) (2022) Volumetric Regimes: Material cultures of quantified presence, Signs of Clandestine Disorder: The continuous aftermath of 3D-computationalism. The Industrial Continuum of 3D https://volumetricregimes.xyz/index.php?title=The_Industrial_Continuum_of_3D
Griffin, M. and Kittler, F.A. (1996) 'The City is a Medium,' New Literary History, 27(4), pp. 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1996.0051.
Mattern, S. (2017) 'A city is not a computer,' Places [Preprint], (2017). https://doi.org/10.22269/170207.
Boer, R. (2023) Smooth city: Against Urban Perfection, Towards Collective Alternatives.
Van Den Bosch Christensen, L. (2015) I, (for one), welcome our new (Google) overlords. https://research.hva.nl/en/publications/i-for-one-welcome-our-new-google-overlords.
Wan, C. (2024) - Into The Digital Void https://canvaswan.com/into-the-digital-void
Wan, C. (2024) - Into the Digital Cartographic Void https://canvaswan.com/into-the-digital-cartographic-void.
Siegel, J. (2024) Default Alpha: Mapping the Emergence of Synthetic Culture in New Towns
Overdijke, M. (2024) The City as Anthology: Movements at the Margins of Public Space
Steyerl. H (2013) How Not To Be Seen: A Fucking Didactic Educational .MOV File https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LE3RlrVEyuo.
Hito Gibbons, A. (2022) Salvaging situationism: Race and space - salvage. https://salvage.zone/salvaging-situationism-race-and-space/.
Vers Beton (2024) Home - Vers beton. https://www.versbeton.nl/.
Recht op de stad - Recht op de stad (2024). http://www.rechtopdestad.nl/.
Kooyman. M (2024) Rotterdam niet langer armste stad, maar nog steeds leven duizenden inwoners in armoede. Algemeen Dagblad, October 17, 2024https://www.ad.nl/rotterdam/rotterdam-niet-langer-armste-stad-maar-nog-steeds-leven-duizenden-inwoners-in-armoede~a7f79119/
Liukku. A, (2024) 'Waarom Rotterdam opnieuw onderaan staat in lijst met gezonde steden: aantal punten valt op.' Algemeen Dagblad, November 11, 2024, https://www.ad.nl/rotterdam/waarom-rotterdam-opnieuw-onderaan-staat-in-lijst-met-gezonde-steden-aantal-punten-valt-op~adec7bd9/
Unitary urbanism at the end of the 1950s (Issue three of the journal of the Situationist International) December 1959 https://libcom.org/article/unitary-urbanism-end-1950s.
Mass Moving (2007) [documentary]. Directed by Françoise Levie. Belgium. Vlaams Audiovisueel Fonds
- ↑ an infrastructure for counter-mapping / anti-campaigning by showing (human) complications?
- ↑ S:This is getting a bit off topic so I put it in a ref note.Remember an outline is all that is needed here; you do not have to justify every decision at the start, this can unfold slowly All these things are blend in with each other, however to narrow it down. These 3 blended topics will have the overhand: * Virtually - Architecturally / Innovation and Virtual Tools as development or demolition of reality
- Bureaucratically - Culturally / Zoning: friction between counter culture and bureaucracy, false iconism vs community
- Socially - Accessibly / (un)Familiar barriers, social thresholds and unmeant ignorance It is crucial to mention that I will not allow myself to fall in a pit of despair but to healthily reflect on the topics, not having an answer but reacting honestly within the complex matters and also to look at the alternatives.
- ↑ and looking for alternatives Note: the alternatives are not yet stated in this draft
- ↑ Manoeuvre meaning, a movement or series of moves requiring skill and care or carefully guide or manipulate someone or something in order to achieve an end.
- ↑ (My mother also uses a mobility scooter because she can not walk long distances, she also has arthritis and joint pain).
- ↑ It wasn't a big deal because I also was still feeling sick from the flu shot.
- ↑ The frustration was because I was complaining about how people are inconsiderate considering disabilities.
- ↑ asked and answered...My brother can not walk and he gets around by either his electric wheelchair or in a mobility scooter.
- ↑ cite
- ↑ You would say this system would be great, customized for the person. Social transport. Traveling together. This unfortunately depends as it were a case-by-case study. Concerning my brother and mother. It either can go well and as it should be. S: I didn't quite follow this, so I placed it in refs. we can discuss it on Thursday
- ↑ ref please