User:Joca/rw rm 25042018
Plan de campagne
I want to use this day to start with the essay on the media object, because I think that the media object can help me as a tool of reflection for the special issue. I am interested in ways to explore a digital collection by serendipity, instead of looking up specific books by their title or the MD5 hash of the file. In that context and related to my previous research, I find it interesting to look at the non-human librarian present in interfaces that people use to access information. There are many forms of this non-human librarianship, like search box with auto complete, or a chat bot that gives advice. In my media essay I'd like to focus however on the recommendation engine: the part of the page we know from Amazon ("people who bought book X also bought Y), to Youtube (next recommended video playing in 10 seconds). This is quite a simple element on the first look, but the mechanisms to offer recommendations changed a lot over time: using hand curated titles, or algorithms based on specific types of data. I think that further research on this object can give me more insights on ways to let people explore a collection, and teach me about the pitfalls of certain methods to offer this functionality.
During the first part of the day I want to make a bibliography of articles that I can use for the essay on the media object. For each article I will make an abstract. During the holidays I will start making synopses of these articles, which I can use as components of my future essay on the media object.
Next to the bibliography and the abstracts, I want to have a reflection about the research done today and how it informed my work for the special issue. Based on that I define some next steps for the project. I plan on starting with the reflection about 1 or 2 hours before the deadline of 17:00 today.
Outcomes
Bibliography
“Fiction is outperforming reality”: how YouTube’s algorithm distorts truth.
Lewis, P. (2018, February 2). “Fiction is outperforming reality”: how YouTube’s algorithm distorts truth. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/feb/02/how-youtubes-algorithm-distorts-truth
Abstract
A critical article about the recommendation system of Youtube that is built to optimize the watch time of users, but has a bias towards problematic content like extreme violence and conspiracies as a side effect. The description of the mechanisms behind the system are based on the experiences of Guillaume Chauslot one of the engineers who developed it.
Comparing Recommendations Made by Online Systems and Friends
Sinha, R. R., & Swearingen, K. (2001, June). Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. In DELOS workshop: personalisation and recommender systems in digital libraries (Vol. 106).
Abstract
In this article researchers compare the quality of recommendations made by recommendation engines, verses endorsed books and movies by friends of the users. The best recommendations were done by friends, but recommendation systems tend to offer more often new en unexpected results.
Interesting quote: "Since the goal of most RS is to replace (or at least augment) what is essentially a social recommendations by process"
Recommender systems, Part 1 - Introduction to approaches and algorithms
Introduction to approaches and algorithms. (2013, December 12). Retrieved April 25, 2018, from http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/os-recommender1/index.html
Abstract
An overview of different approaches for recommendation engines, like collaborative filtering, content-based filtering and hybrid methods. Besides describing the methods, the author points out the challenges: scalability when the collection of works becomes larger, and the protection of the private user data used to deliver the recommendations.
Interesting quote: "Use of a recommendation engine is becoming a standard element of a modern web presence."