User:Ryan/Proposal/thesis-outline
THESIS OUTLINE
Topic
I am interested in researching the dislocative nature of technology. There are multiple incursions into the relationship with natural systems, human culture and ourselves that are embodied in the tools and artifacts we create, and this is fundamentally altering how we interact with the external world.
I intend to investigate this topic through a mixture of critical theory, key historical reference points, examples from art/music/film/design, and an analysis of my own work.
The final document will be a visual essay, where both fictional and academic-ish texts will be accompanied by imagery created and appropriated by me.
Structure
Spiritual Cyborg / Alchemical Fire
To establish the parameters in which we currently relate to the body, I will develop a lineage of this phenomenon. This will include an analysis of the early relationship between culture and technology, how tech developments are born of a lineage of mythology, rites, rituals and how they related to a collectivity of consciousness. In times of technological paradigm shifts, cultures turn to mythology in order to explain things they don't understand. From here, I will reconstruct a lineage of the bio-political references that have dictated this relationship through statecraft. The construction of gender normativity is key to this argument. I surmise that this disruptive force acted as the impetus that cultured society into today's networked state of being. Texts - Erik Davis-Techgnosis, Juan Downey-Radical Software, Paul Preciado
Metabolic Rift
How technological developments changed our relationship to the physical world. How modernity crumbled into the plastic-leaden toxic soup of global warming. The creation of physical liminal spaces by disaster. As rooting in the physical world becomes intangible, how does this lead to further dislocation. Texts - Timothy Morton-Hyperobjects, Isabelle Stengers:Gaia Intruding, Modernity at Large-Arjun Appadurai, Tarkovsky's Stalker
Mediating the Networked Self
Extensions of the body as networked beings, how telepresence alters the perception of the body and emphasizes a non-linear multiplicity of self. Through telepresence, our bodies become superfluous, our consciousness seems to expand to all corners of the universe. When our interaction with the world is reduced to mediated signals, how can we know to place the significance of reality on them? As Descartes claimed, our access to reality is already indirectly mediated through our senses. As technology is making perception increasingly indirect, it dictates that we take for granted the reality of what we perceive. "...the networked subject occupies a cartesian place where only the self can be taken for granted, and every other aspect of networked reality is a world of mediated shadows whose reality we can only infer". case study: drone warfare, actor-network theory texts - Robot in the Garden, Telepistemology in the Age of the Internet-Ken Goldberg, Paul Preciado-The Pharmo-Porno Body Politic, Hamlet on the Holodeck-Janet Murray
Tangible Resistance / Future Forms
Are there any possible forms of resistance to the totalising nature of the networked self? What are the speculative possibilities of dislocation, can this give agency towards defeating the technological hegemony? Do technologies of liberation exist? Through some of the readings I have been doing, there is a notion that whatever can be called "noise" is filtered out of communication models, and as such is the place of alterity, othering, resistance. Additionally, I will touch on the phenomenon of artificial intelligence through the lens of a speculative inquiry. In relation to my thesis topic, I will investigate aspects of the human emotional experience and its relation to future networked non-humans, looking into how dislocation from a human body will augment this. Also the ramifications of creating these intelligences that will operate beyond the realms of human knowledge. texts - Zach Blas, Michel Serres-ParaSite, Off the network-Ulises Ali Mejias, Cecil B Evans, Amy Ireland-Noise as an ontology for the Avant-Garde
Previous Work
In the last year, my work was centred around the investigation of a non-human entity on a quest to define key emotional aspects of the human experience. Additionally, through another project I investigated how technology is changing the role of the soldier through the drone use. In my last project, I investigated the manner in which technological affect can redefine the relationship an individual has with their body, though the manner in which dislocation changes perception.
BIN OF REJECTION
Tracing the methods of societal control in a lineage from pre-modernity to biopolitics, the totalising logic of the network has colonised our collective power to imagine alternatives. I am interested in researching methods of resistance to this. I deem there are methods in the voids outside of control where unassailable aspects of the human condition can offer a viable platform for the future. Communication theory dictates two nodes interfacing in the presence of noise, and the internet has perfected the elimination of noise -- but noise communicates difference. Only in the outside spaces of the network, beyond the nodes, to we have enough clarity to hear alternative subjectivities.
In the critical encounter of what defines being today, commodified technology has placed a hegemonic form of social reality within the confines of nodes, dots and lines that define the network stack. I am interested in investigating forms of resistance against this phenomenon, primarily in the space beyond the topological limits of the distributed network diagram.
• Dislocation of identity from physicality ==> biometrics as self
• constructed physical world = perception of the body ==> virtual world perception of consciousness ==> boundaries of these spaces = noise/unconscious
• If existence is a means of control, then non-existence is a form of evading control. How can we non-exist towards the machines?
• Modulating perceptions of time that technological developments have on the individual
magic seems like reality since nothing else makes sense anyways
I am interested in researching the thresholds between the real and the virtual, with respect to the perception of the human body and physical spaces, and then consequently the virtual spaces that are being defined today, and their effect on our consciousness. There exists multiple relationships between these spaces, but they are centrally connected through performativity of the human, and its interaction with the non-human. These spaces have blurry boundaries and definitions, and become solid generally when they are commodified. At any moment in time, an individual can be spread across multiple locations, both real and virtual. Information exchanges transplant a portion of the mind to another place, apart from the physical body. I would like to investigate narrative spaces that tangibly manifest dislocation in a hallucinatory and dreamlike environment. Can architectural forms, light and sound ultimately question our perception of reality? The human psyche is constantly being threatened by a denial of service attack from the systems of information control, with the intent of creating the spectre of individual freedom. Individual’s consciousness are being spread across a vast virtual domain, this material forms a sort of de facto primordial soup for the ascent of artificial intelligences. Coupled with this, the physical spaces that contain our corporal being are irreversibly changing. Plastics and radioactive debris are becoming imbued into aspects of the planet that give us life. This has both a mutagenic and endocrinal disruptive effect on the body. These factors sum to the notion of what I would like to address within the concept of becoming posthuman.
The thesis territory I am interested in researching can be viewed on a coordinate plane, with the real and the virtual forming one axis, and the human and non-human (or post human?) forming the other. Within this system, I am interested in investigating the interactions of these polarities within human consciousness. The constructed physical world influences the perception of the body. The virtual world(s?) reflect the conscious desires of a space broken free of these tangible boundaries. In between is the unconsciousness and noise, and at the boundaries of these spaces are the transitory zones where the mind/body constructions dissolve into thought. In the physical world, I think this is where the constructions of modernity that are falling apart have this effect on the human psyche. Mass pollution, poverty, unending asymmetrical war, etc... are phenomena that break down the assumptions that formulate the psyche. Glaring discrepancies exist within the promises of technology and capital. This creates a cognitive dissonance where the unreal seems just as plausible as alleged reality.
(Some general related quotes)
"Cybernetic technology operating in synchrony with our nervous systems is the alternative life for a disoriented humanity Electronics inevitably stretching the human nervous system reshapes the manner in which we occupy environment . By expanding our perception, electronic circuits strengthen the man-space relationship, rendering apparent its dependency upon time " Juan Downey
“In the face of a politics that prefers to work in the speculative tense, what is called for is something like a creative sabotage of the future; a pragmatics of pre-emptive resistance capable of actualising the future outside of the policeable boundaries of property right. This is an abstract formula for resistance that applies to such diverse questions as the capitalisation of health and old age insurance, biological patents of all kinds, and the commercialisation of the elements, from privatised water to traceable pollution rights and environmental catastrophe bonds”. To sabotage this future that totalises the image as nothing more than representation, and submits to the oppressive reign of the informational present, how can my work fight against this? Finding a way to relate subjective experience to the political, to propose questions not as assertions or affirmations, but as ideas. "
“I am writing you all this from another world, a world of appearances. In a way, the two worlds communicate with each other. Memory is to one what history is to the other. An impossibility. Legends are born out the need to decipher the indecipherable. Memories must make due with their delirium, with their drift. A moment stopped would burn like a frame of film blocked before the furnace of the projector. Madness protects, as fever does. To play with the signs of memory. To pin them down and decorate them like insects that would have flown beyond time where you can contemplate them from a point outside of time — the only eternity left. I look at these machines, I think of a world where each memory could create its own legend…. Here is a story of one who has lost the ability to forget, who, through some peculiarity of his nature, instead of drawing pride from the fact and scorning humankind of the past and its shadows, turned to it first with curiosity and then with compassion. In the world they come from, to call forth a vision, to be moved and tremble at a portrait or the sound of music can only be signs of a long and painful prehistory. ”
Texts:
A long time between suns - the otolith group
Suspiria - Stan Douglas
Alien Agency, Experimental Encounters with the art of making - Chris Salter
Sans Soleil - Chris Marker
Hyperobjects - Timothy Morton