Masters of Reality: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Masters of Reality - Steve Rushton Nudge Nudge article – facebook is participatory surveillance – digital economy transforms the goals of a corporation into the belie...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Masters of Reality - Steve Rushton | ==Masters of Reality - Steve Rushton== | ||
Nudge Nudge | ===Nudge Nudge === | ||
– facebook is participatory surveillance | – facebook is participatory surveillance | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
- the current art of governance implores citizens to self-regulate and produce improvements | - the current art of governance implores citizens to self-regulate and produce improvements | ||
===Control Society=== | |||
- Same mechanism that generates massive data for surveillance gives citizens the agency of freedom and creative self-expression | |||
- emerging networked citizen learns to distrust the welfare state and prefer libertarianism through behaviour modification | |||
- oppression and exploitation become expressions of free will and self - agency | |||
- GDP has now become Happiness Index | |||
- Art of politics has become market research to implant happiness | |||
- Unhappiness therefore has become an activist struggle against the new order |
Latest revision as of 11:15, 6 October 2016
Masters of Reality - Steve Rushton
Nudge Nudge
– facebook is participatory surveillance
– digital economy transforms the goals of a corporation into the belief you are making personal choices
- 17th century revolutions enabled a time when governments became super concerned with citizen welfare
- paradoxically when the state is the most violent it becomes the most concerned about citizenry
- human happiness became a political object
- the validity of the state became contingent on the happiness of the citizen, where state intervention on individual behaviour becomes a primary task of the government
- state uses tools such as the valuation of individuality in the citizen in order to enforce responsibility to the state
- key difference between liberal v. neolib is trade v. competition
- key paradox in liberalism is the drive to produce 'freedom' but inherently needs controls and limitations for this to actually function
- citizens as economic units produce their own freedom, the more you produce the more free you are
- self interest/investment becomes paramount to rights and laws within the competitive environment
- the current art of governance implores citizens to self-regulate and produce improvements
Control Society
- Same mechanism that generates massive data for surveillance gives citizens the agency of freedom and creative self-expression
- emerging networked citizen learns to distrust the welfare state and prefer libertarianism through behaviour modification
- oppression and exploitation become expressions of free will and self - agency
- GDP has now become Happiness Index
- Art of politics has become market research to implant happiness
- Unhappiness therefore has become an activist struggle against the new order