AstridvanNimwegen trimester2 2012

Description

Comments about short video:

In the short piece you can very much see that I ‘shaped’ it. It is not seen as a ‘reality’ anymore. The balance between literacy and symbolic value is not equal like it was before in my other video works. The red dress is too symbolic and gets its own narrative meaning apart from the other movements in the shot. A better choice could have been a nude violin player instead. (Or maybe no dead deer) Same thing happens with the close up of the fisherman fishing in his bucket; the meaning of this becomes too symbolic instead of literal.

Editing:

When I watch and ‘read’ the total shot on its own, I think this might be the total video because when I start to use the different shots and edit them together, the editing itself as well as the close ups suggest a kind of narrative which adds nothing to the piece as I meant it. The symbolic value is predominating even more in most of the middle and close up shots. And when those shots are highlighted in an edited piece it becomes more theater and narrative film then just reality and literal actions.

In the other piece where the man is digging a grave, the disruption of the timeline in the three-minute edit does not reinforce the concept (it does even ruin my concept here). Maybe I can use different shots in this video but then without disrupting the timeline and thus make a longer version. (for the Boerhaave project the video is shown on an iphone and for ‘tracking’ the video by pointing the phone on the photo it does work quite nice but I don’t think this video works best in such an installation) Time has always been of great importance in my work; for showing a reality I want to use real time as well.

Aims:

It seems the best way for not cutting and pasting my video work together in a traditional way so now I want to create a piece where everything is happening at the same time in one shot. No use of multiple scenes and a –beginning-middle-end- structure or use of different shots. Instead break up the timeline of a film and shoot it just in one total shot (maybe with multiple camera’s for more total shots). Give literal actions/gestures a context somehow but not one that slowly builds up like in the traditional way but structured only by time and space. I think of more daily gestures, which gets different meaning by how they are recorded and brought together in a shot. I want to try to make a piece in which every action is needed and impossible to leave one out. In the short piece I already shot things were redundant and could have been left out; they didn’t need each other maybe that much to clarify the concept… I also had some thinking that it might be interesting to shot from inside out instead of outside in; instead of pointing the camera towards something, what would happen when you shoot from within the action? Tutorials with Simon and Aymeric to discuss my ideas would be nice.

Readings/viewings:

Tarkovsky - Ingmar Bergman – Bresson – Roy Andersson – (Deleuze cinema1) – Bunuel/Tati/ research on surrealism – Alan Kaprow

Boerhaave Project

In the second trimester I worked on a short video for the Boerhaave museum. For this I asked an overweighted man to dig his own grave, wearing only white underpants. I edited the material back to three minutes for the exhibition. I never edited my video's before and now I ask myself the question if editing can add something to my concept (and in which way) or either does it take out the strenght of my working methods I used before? Does the work need a cut or how can I use a cut in a way that it adds something to the work?

Short Film

Essay's 2nd trimester

• Astrid Description Shooting day 26th March
• Astrid - Quotes Tarkovsky

Name, Trimester (1, 2 or 3), Year.
OR
Name, Graduation Project, Trimester (4, 5 or 6), Year.

NOTE: All documentation material, PDF, photos, videos, etc, must be uploaded to the wiki. No embedding or third party hosts allowed, for obvious archiving issues ;)

NOTE: Please use "your name, the title of your project, the year" as page name.

Your Project Title

Description

350 words including aims of the theoretical and practical research as well as its outcome.

Media

Photos

• At least 2, Max 5.
• native resolution only (that is the highest resolution you have for your photo and whatever resolution if you make screencaps)
• PNG format

Video

optional unless the final outcome of the project, or one of its main components, is a video/film/animation.

• allowed containers/codecs combos:
  • WebM (preferred):
    • Video codec: VP8 (3-5 Mbps data rate)
    • Audio codec: Vorbis (-q 6)
  • Ogg:
    • Video codec: Theora (3-5 Mbps data rate)
    • Audio codec: Vorbis (-q 6)
  • MP4:
    • Video Codec: H.264 (3-5 Mbps data rate)
    • Audio Codec: AAC (160kbps or 384kbps if 5.1) or MP3 (-V0 or -b 320)
• resolution: 720p if source >= 720p, native resolution otherwise, progressive.
• FPS: 24, 25, 30.
• Sample rate:
  • 44.1kHz if source is 44.1kHz or 88.2kHz
  • 48 kHz if source is 48kHz or 96kHz
  • 44.1 kHz for everything else.

Audio

optional unless the final outcome of the project, or one of its main components, is a sound piece/track.

• allowed containers/codecs combos:
  • Ogg: Vorbis (-q 6) preferred
  • MPEG: MP3 (-V0 or -b 320)
  • FLAC (-8)
• Sample rate:
  • 44.1kHz if source is 44.1kHz or 88.2kHz
  • 48 kHz if source is 48kHz or 96kHz
  • 44.1 kHz for everything else.
• Do not transcode! For instance, if the sound generated is directly an MP3, do not re-encode it with the settings above or with a different codec. Only encode original uncompressed or lossless compressed sources.

Essay

Abstract and bibs/ref + link to PDF (PDF must be uploaded to wiki).
Use Steve's recommendations for abstract length and bibliographic style.

Additional Information

optional

• Project URL (if lives on an external site)
• extra wiki links (in case you have relevant notes/journals/documentation in your User: page, this is useful particularly if you have been asked to articulate further or refine your project during your assessment)
• Animated GIFs