2009 201: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
** [http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0182.html Mark Andreessen's] email proposal of the <img> tag. Note the discussion of formats (xbm). Interesting to cf discussion of propriety open formats such as JPEG and the more controversial "GIF" and eventual development of PNG as an open alternative. | ** [http://1997.webhistory.org/www.lists/www-talk.1993q1/0182.html Mark Andreessen's] email proposal of the <img> tag. Note the discussion of formats (xbm). Interesting to cf discussion of propriety open formats such as JPEG and the more controversial "GIF" and eventual development of PNG as an open alternative. | ||
== Linking | == Linking & Embedding == | ||
If you follow the archived discussion thread of the proposed image tag, you see things proposed such as an special "include" attribute on the anchor tag to mean to embed, or place that which is referenced in-line in the flow of the referring page. This behavior was not followed however as the anchor tag (<a>) has remained purely a mechanism to introduce click-able links (ie references that the user must click -- or explicitly request following in some fashion), in order to open. | If you follow the archived discussion thread of the proposed image tag, you see things proposed such as an special "include" attribute on the anchor tag to mean to embed, or place that which is referenced in-line in the flow of the referring page. This behavior was not followed however as the anchor tag (<a>) has remained purely a mechanism to introduce click-able links (ie references that the user must click -- or explicitly request following in some fashion), in order to open. | ||
Revision as of 16:04, 5 January 2009
- The History of the IMG (and EMBED tags)
- Mark Andreessen's email proposal of the
tag. Note the discussion of formats (xbm). Interesting to cf discussion of propriety open formats such as JPEG and the more controversial "GIF" and eventual development of PNG as an open alternative.
- Mark Andreessen's email proposal of the
Linking & Embedding
If you follow the archived discussion thread of the proposed image tag, you see things proposed such as an special "include" attribute on the anchor tag to mean to embed, or place that which is referenced in-line in the flow of the referring page. This behavior was not followed however as the anchor tag (<a>) has remained purely a mechanism to introduce click-able links (ie references that the user must click -- or explicitly request following in some fashion), in order to open.
It is interesting to parallel the discussion around tags to those around HTML 5's addition of <audio> and <video> tags. (need references)