VAP MY: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
For more than two decades, arts and humanities departments in universities in Europe and America have been engaged in supporting different models and debates aimed at consolidating the relationship between theory and practice. These discourses have produced multiple configurations such as practice as research; directed practice; mixed mode research practice; and practice through research, among others. These new practices have fostered interesting questions: What if an object using sounds, senses and non-linear narratives theorises? What if there is no distinction between the components of affects, precepts and concepts? And fundamentally, is art or creative research looking at this world or its antithesis? | For more than two decades, arts and humanities departments in universities in Europe and America have been engaged in supporting different models and debates aimed at consolidating the relationship between theory and practice. These discourses have produced multiple configurations such as practice as research; directed practice; mixed mode research practice; and practice through research, among others. These new practices have fostered interesting questions: What if an object using sounds, senses and non-linear narratives theorises? What if there is no distinction between the components of affects, precepts and concepts? And fundamentally, is art or creative research looking at this world or its antithesis? | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
How to move away from the dominant quantitative epistemologies and habits of modern research? Simondon (Hui, 2016) connects invention to an action of the future in the present. The moment of invention is when the two potential sets click, connect, couple into a single continuous system. A new synergy begins. A new "regime of functioning" has suddenly leapt into existence. A "threshold" has been crossed, like a quantum leap to a qualitatively new plane of operation. | How to move away from the dominant quantitative epistemologies and habits of modern research? Simondon (Hui, 2016) connects invention to an action of the future in the present. The moment of invention is when the two potential sets click, connect, couple into a single continuous system. A new synergy begins. A new "regime of functioning" has suddenly leapt into existence. A "threshold" has been crossed, like a quantum leap to a qualitatively new plane of operation. | ||
The quantum leap is a theoretical tool of Barad's and, at the same time, the subject of his study. Here is the definition: | |||
Quantum jumps are not jumps (big or small) through space and time. An electron making "jumps" from one orbit to another does not travel along a certain continuous trajectory from here-now to there-then. ... What makes a quantum jump different from everything else is that there is no certain answer to the question of where and when they occur. The point is that it is the internal interplay of continuity and discontinuity, determination and indeterminacy, of possibility and impossibility that constitutes the spatio-temporal differences of the world. (Barad 2007) | |||
=== Karen Barad === | === Karen Barad === | ||
According to atomistic metaphysics, space is a container and time is cut into successive fragments. The fact that we do not treat these assumptions as assumptions, or their effects as effects, is because we are used to atomistic metaphysics. We have always thought that the world was made of discrete objects and one-dimensional finalities, and interactions took place between individuals that pre-existed the exchanges. According to Karen Barad's (2007) agential ontology, or rather ethico-onto-epistemology, "individuals" do not pre-exist as such, but rather materialise in the event of intra-action. Bodies are not objects with inherent boundaries and properties, they are discursive material phenomena. Barad's concept of intra-action is central to developing a new understanding of the whole visual image and materiality beyond the limitations of traditional realism (positivism) and linguisticism. | According to atomistic metaphysics, space is a container and time is cut into successive fragments. The fact that we do not treat these assumptions as assumptions, or their effects as effects, is because we are used to atomistic metaphysics. We have always thought that the world was made of discrete objects and one-dimensional finalities, and interactions took place between individuals that pre-existed the exchanges. According to Karen Barad's (2007) agential ontology, or rather ethico-onto-epistemology, "individuals" do not pre-exist as such, but rather materialise in the event of intra-action. Bodies are not objects with inherent boundaries and properties, they are discursive material phenomena. Barad's concept of intra-action is central to developing a new understanding of the whole visual image and materiality beyond the limitations of traditional realism (positivism) and linguisticism. | ||
=== Notes === | |||
Revision as of 11:17, 11 April 2023
For more than two decades, arts and humanities departments in universities in Europe and America have been engaged in supporting different models and debates aimed at consolidating the relationship between theory and practice. These discourses have produced multiple configurations such as practice as research; directed practice; mixed mode research practice; and practice through research, among others. These new practices have fostered interesting questions: What if an object using sounds, senses and non-linear narratives theorises? What if there is no distinction between the components of affects, precepts and concepts? And fundamentally, is art or creative research looking at this world or its antithesis?
This problem of the academic theory/practice debate remains pedestrian but can be coupled to debates about trans-meta-posthumanist and decolonial ideas. We have reached a point where the practices of non-human material agents are as active as the mental practices of human agents (ideas).
How to move away from the dominant quantitative epistemologies and habits of modern research? Simondon (Hui, 2016) connects invention to an action of the future in the present. The moment of invention is when the two potential sets click, connect, couple into a single continuous system. A new synergy begins. A new "regime of functioning" has suddenly leapt into existence. A "threshold" has been crossed, like a quantum leap to a qualitatively new plane of operation.
The quantum leap is a theoretical tool of Barad's and, at the same time, the subject of his study. Here is the definition:
Quantum jumps are not jumps (big or small) through space and time. An electron making "jumps" from one orbit to another does not travel along a certain continuous trajectory from here-now to there-then. ... What makes a quantum jump different from everything else is that there is no certain answer to the question of where and when they occur. The point is that it is the internal interplay of continuity and discontinuity, determination and indeterminacy, of possibility and impossibility that constitutes the spatio-temporal differences of the world. (Barad 2007)
Karen Barad
According to atomistic metaphysics, space is a container and time is cut into successive fragments. The fact that we do not treat these assumptions as assumptions, or their effects as effects, is because we are used to atomistic metaphysics. We have always thought that the world was made of discrete objects and one-dimensional finalities, and interactions took place between individuals that pre-existed the exchanges. According to Karen Barad's (2007) agential ontology, or rather ethico-onto-epistemology, "individuals" do not pre-exist as such, but rather materialise in the event of intra-action. Bodies are not objects with inherent boundaries and properties, they are discursive material phenomena. Barad's concept of intra-action is central to developing a new understanding of the whole visual image and materiality beyond the limitations of traditional realism (positivism) and linguisticism.
Notes
maya deren - Kenneth anger
independent cinema: david lynch - Lost Highway - mullholand drive
AVANT GARDE as attitude ('the spirit of the avant grade', rebellious, against the image of authority )
AVANT GARDE as context ('the European Avant Garde')
Surrealist manifesto Andre Breton
Sigmund Freud the unconscious mind - the world of dreams
Canonical films of the European Avant Garde:
1. Surrealist
Un chien andalu = an andalucian dog
By Salvador Dali and Luis Bunuel
2. dadaist movement / dadaism (childish, palyful)
entr' acte
By Rene Clair
3. hell unlimited
By Norman Maclaren
4. Emak Bakia
by Man Ray
Some key words presented in class
bleak ?
oppresion ?
humour - absurd ?
against logic / rationality ?
Against good taste = bourgeoisie ? (middle classes)
"épater la bourgeoisie" (to scare mainstream society, or to scare the dominant echelons of society)
Abstract Cinema
Against representation / realism = stage drama
1. Realist Aesthetics
2. forms of narration = how we sequence time
Abstraction is not necessary something non representational in the image
Vision:
quarks / quantum physics
cosmology / stars / nebulas
spiritual visions / internal vision
mandala
Examples:
fantasia walt disney
oskar fischinger
stan brackhage: the streams of the mind had a grammar
cat's cradle
atmosphere = against external reality
non-objective image
Jordan Belson
Cosmology
Whitney brothers - lapis and yantra 1965
Len Lyle - Particles in space
Harry Smith
absurd
impressions / logic / feelings / sensations
inger lise hansen / michael snow (la region central, 1971)
Callum Cooper - London-based artist filmmaker
Malcom Le Grice - Berlin Horse (music by Brian Eno)
Kurt Kren - tv
The Tree of life - Terrence Malick
Walter Mignolo
Direct Theory
Maurizio Lazzarato
Surrealism
reference
“end of semiotics” (Leone, 2015)
https://www.academia.edu/11425425/2015_-_Double_Debunking_Modern_Divination_and_the_End_of_Semiotics
media philosophy, Luciana Parisi (2012)
the notion of objects (algorithms) operating at the heart of cybernetic architectures, which generate a logic that is abstract and infinite, and lie beyond direct human cognition and control.
Walter Mignolo’s decolonial critique of visual hegemony (1995)
Maurizio Lazzarato’s “Video philosophy” (1996).