Sacha thesis drafts and notes: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022


notes on Jan13 meeting:
Busy with: swzland; experiment with the scale of the work and different modes of presentation; how to use space around the image; multiple projections...
Also went skiing; aren't a lot of tourists, so that was fun.
Thesis: still struggling with how the thesis should look:
1) method description (help develop practical work) = anthroposene; different views on the meaning of 'mountain'
2) look into 100 views of a mountain (compare the different ways people.
1) seems the best [Steve notes:  you already have material]
Steve suggest: Make the new research 'cut off point' after the Eye presentation.
We agreed Sacha would reflect on 3 recent works using WhatHowWhy method
Have been dealing with big issues (the sublime-the simulacrum): Would be good to concentrate on the detail of making things (medium specificity)
'''Outcome by next meeting:''' start with WhatHowWhy and discuss (describe) 3 specific pieces (2000 words in total).
'''Next time: review written work'''


== Key Dates and Deadlines ==
== Key Dates and Deadlines ==

Revision as of 14:08, 13 January 2022


Sacha-project proposal

Sacha-thesis outline


Realistic outcome for next meeting=

https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022

notes on Jan13 meeting:

Busy with: swzland; experiment with the scale of the work and different modes of presentation; how to use space around the image; multiple projections... Also went skiing; aren't a lot of tourists, so that was fun.

Thesis: still struggling with how the thesis should look:

1) method description (help develop practical work) = anthroposene; different views on the meaning of 'mountain'

2) look into 100 views of a mountain (compare the different ways people.


1) seems the best [Steve notes: you already have material]

Steve suggest: Make the new research 'cut off point' after the Eye presentation.

We agreed Sacha would reflect on 3 recent works using WhatHowWhy method

Have been dealing with big issues (the sublime-the simulacrum): Would be good to concentrate on the detail of making things (medium specificity)

Outcome by next meeting: start with WhatHowWhy and discuss (describe) 3 specific pieces (2000 words in total).

Next time: review written work

Key Dates and Deadlines

  • 19 November - Graduate Proposal Deadline = DONE
  • 19 November - Thesis Outline Deadline = DONE


  • 3 Dec - Deadline First Chapter = ?
  • 18 Feb - Deadline First Draft Thesis
  • 18 March - Deadline Second Draft thesis (texts to 2nd readers)
  • 1 April - Deadlines Second readers' comments
  • 14 April - DEADLINE THESIS


Grading procedure (Thesis):

Early May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha draft feedback on the thesis texts they supervised

Mid-May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha review each other’s feedback and grades

End of May: Finalize feedback and grades.

Early June: Finalized feedback and grades communicated to students.