Sacha thesis drafts and notes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022 | https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022 | ||
notes on Jan13 meeting: | |||
Busy with: swzland; experiment with the scale of the work and different modes of presentation; how to use space around the image; multiple projections... | |||
Also went skiing; aren't a lot of tourists, so that was fun. | |||
Thesis: still struggling with how the thesis should look: | |||
1) method description (help develop practical work) = anthroposene; different views on the meaning of 'mountain' | |||
2) look into 100 views of a mountain (compare the different ways people. | |||
1) seems the best [Steve notes: you already have material] | |||
Steve suggest: Make the new research 'cut off point' after the Eye presentation. | |||
We agreed Sacha would reflect on 3 recent works using WhatHowWhy method | |||
Have been dealing with big issues (the sublime-the simulacrum): Would be good to concentrate on the detail of making things (medium specificity) | |||
'''Outcome by next meeting:''' start with WhatHowWhy and discuss (describe) 3 specific pieces (2000 words in total). | |||
'''Next time: review written work''' | |||
== Key Dates and Deadlines == | == Key Dates and Deadlines == |
Revision as of 14:08, 13 January 2022
Realistic outcome for next meeting=
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022
notes on Jan13 meeting:
Busy with: swzland; experiment with the scale of the work and different modes of presentation; how to use space around the image; multiple projections... Also went skiing; aren't a lot of tourists, so that was fun.
Thesis: still struggling with how the thesis should look:
1) method description (help develop practical work) = anthroposene; different views on the meaning of 'mountain'
2) look into 100 views of a mountain (compare the different ways people.
1) seems the best [Steve notes: you already have material]
Steve suggest: Make the new research 'cut off point' after the Eye presentation.
We agreed Sacha would reflect on 3 recent works using WhatHowWhy method
Have been dealing with big issues (the sublime-the simulacrum): Would be good to concentrate on the detail of making things (medium specificity)
Outcome by next meeting: start with WhatHowWhy and discuss (describe) 3 specific pieces (2000 words in total).
Next time: review written work
Key Dates and Deadlines
- 19 November - Graduate Proposal Deadline = DONE
- 19 November - Thesis Outline Deadline = DONE
- 3 Dec - Deadline First Chapter = ?
- 18 Feb - Deadline First Draft Thesis
- 18 March - Deadline Second Draft thesis (texts to 2nd readers)
- 1 April - Deadlines Second readers' comments
- 14 April - DEADLINE THESIS
Grading procedure (Thesis):
Early May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha draft feedback on the thesis texts they supervised
Mid-May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha review each other’s feedback and grades
End of May: Finalize feedback and grades.
Early June: Finalized feedback and grades communicated to students.