Reading, Writing & Research Methodologies/ Angeliki: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[[File:VOLUME1NR1 art05-1.jpg|right|400px]] | [[File:VOLUME1NR1 art05-1.jpg|right|400px]] | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Line 19: | Line 18: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
<br /> | |||
== Writing and reading methods == | == Writing and reading methods == |
Revision as of 12:32, 7 December 2017
Page from Radical Software, volume 1
Writing and reading methods
Writing in english quickly and correctly it was the most difficult part for me, but I have learned a lot. By doing writing and reading tests gave me the ability to be more accurate and short in my writing. What I did next was to improve texts of my previous projects.
The pads were also a space for learning how to write fast and right. At the same time they became useful places for estimating my state each time (what I did, what I will do) as part of the team.
Research on catalogues, media art interventions
Most of the times with Steve Time capsule Imaginative situations
Where do I want to go
the writing to be my actual work (not representing the work/ like the texts in language poetry lab) I would like my research to become more deep and being able to say it right.
(problems with the language, different meanings)
order of arguments, presenting my work by writing