Special issue 4 / Editing: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:05, 7 December 2017

Scan from the book "A bed, a chair and a table"

My contribution

Transcriptions & Interviews

Communicating with people related to PG
Conducting interviews with them and transcribing

Searching in archives

Collecting material from and visiting different archives (city archive, HNI archive, Autonomous Archive)
Helping in taking photos from PG

Telegram about a new squat. Scan from the book.

Editing

Co- curating the book. Editing the content: texts into chapters, collection of images and categorization into chapters

Finding the best combination of photos of chairs taken from Elisa

Editing text and images into chapters

Wiki & Autonomous archive

Local archives and networks
Scanning the material for Autonomous Archive and categorizing the scanned material (photos, posters) into chapters
Editing the metadata in Autonomous Archive Wiki and the interface (template/semantic ask)

* navigation
** mainpage|mainpage-description
** Help:Getting Started | Getting Started
** Special:AllPages|All Pages
** Special:ListFiles|All Files
** randompage-url|randompage

** recentchanges-url|Recent Changes
** Special:Upload|Upload File
** Special:BatchUpload|Batch Upload Files 


* Semantic lists
** Common properties | Common Properties

* Browse and search
** Special:Browse|Browse subject 
** Special:Ask|Semantic Ask
** Special:SearchByProperty|Search By Property
** Special:Properties|All Properties
** Special:UnusedProperties|Unused Properties
** Special:AllPages|All Pages

* SEARCH
* TOOLBOX
* LANGUAGES

Finding the format of the posters and testing them in Zine Camp 2017

Zine- poster test in Zinecamp 2017

Editing manually the algorithmical alignment of the archive in the zine-posters, printing them with Riso printer, folding them

Zine-poster for the book. Chapter BED

Zine-posters for the book. All the chapters

Research

Research on:

theories on the archive and examples (active archives, pad.ma, Annet Dekker "Lost and living (in) archives")
licences
ideas and lists of documentation for archives in time capsules

Remaining in the future

Documenting the process

What I have learned

Transcribing and interviewing with the ethics of this method
Meeting all these people outside the context of the school was a very interesting part of the process, as I had to deal with realistic situations. Having input from different guest tutors that were introducing the same topic from a different point of view it was also very helpful in my research
I have learned different perceptions and aspects of publishing but mainly on a theoretical basis. I would expect these methods to be more embedded in our process
To manage all these chaotic inputs and arrange constantly meetings in the group gave me the ability to work at present time and organise roughly but effectively every time my thoughts.

organising my time better for a project
making quick decisions
organising a book from start to the end
working with riso printing
Being more consistent to my work and my opinions giving better alternatives that follow my principles

Conversations

Editorial meetings and discussions about the coherence of content and design. They were short and temporal procedures. Conversations and meetings-sometimes accidental- with guest tutors, people from PG, former students of PZI, interviewers, researchers.
Figuring out the network and the connections of PG with other contexts, institutions and archives. Sharing transcriptions, pads, online documents, conversations in apps with the editorial and design team

Diagram of my point of view for Habermas public sphere and Mouffe's agonistic model

diagram of Aymeric for different models of democracy

Transcription 0 - 18 minutes (Tash)
Transcription 18 - 36 minutes (Alice)
Transcription 36 - 54 minutes (Angeliki)
Transcription (Angeliki) 0 - 35 min
Transcription (Joca) 35 - 69 min
0 - 15 mins (Joca)
15 - 30 mins ( Angeliki)
30 - 46 mins ( Elisa )
Alice 00:00 - 25:00
Angeliki 25:00- 40:00
Elisa 40:00-50:00
...

Licencing

Where do I want to go

publishing my work on a way that is suitable for me (take care of licence, what I want to say, how)

being more free to organise with the team the whole project by taking all the decisions organically

being more experimental as a way of thinking?

wiki Local archives and networks

@@ Line 122: / Line 122: @@
 == What I have learned ==
-Transcribing and interviewing under the ethics<br />
+Transcribing and interviewing with the ethics of this method<br />
-programming in a practical way (algorithm)<br />
+Meeting all these people outside the context of the school was a very interesting part of the process, as I had to deal with realistic situations. Having input from different guest tutors that were introducing the same topic from a different point of view it was also very helpful in my research <br />
-met many people outside school because of the project/ many inputs in a chaotic way/ working at present/ organising roughly each time our thoughts/ I liked that all the different guest tutors introduced the same topic from a different point of view<br />
+I have learned different perceptions and aspects of publishing but mainly on a theoretical basis. I would expect these methods to be more embedded in our process  <br /> To manage all these chaotic inputs and arrange constantly meetings in the group gave me the ability to work at present time and organise roughly but effectively every time my thoughts. <br />
-different perceptions and aspects of publishing <br />
-(find solutions at emergent circmstances)<br />
 organising my time better for a project<br />
@@ Line 132: / Line 132: @@
 organising a book from start to the end<br />
 working with riso printing<br />
-being more consistent to my work and my opinions giving better alternatives that follow my principles
+Being more consistent to my work and my opinions giving better alternatives that follow my principles