- Thesis outline: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Chapter. Past and current work (2000) <br> | Chapter. Past and current work (2000) <br> | ||
Chapter: Relation to other practitioners, writers (2000) <br> | Chapter: Relation to other practitioners, writers (2000) <br> | ||
Conclusion (1000 words)<br> | Conclusion (1000 words)<br> | ||
Introduction (500 words) <br> | |||
<br><br> | <br><br> | ||
In the first year of Piet Zwart I have been looking at LGBT related topics. I mostly did so from a personal subjective perspective in photography, and by looking into queer cinema. In the presentation of the second term I made clear that I wanted to be make a statement with my work, be more political. As feedback the tutors told me I already make a statement in the work that I make. | In the first year of Piet Zwart I have been looking at LGBT related topics. I mostly did so from a personal subjective perspective in photography, and by looking into queer cinema. In the presentation of the second term I made clear that I wanted to be make a statement with my work, be more political. As feedback the tutors told me I already make a statement in the work that I make. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 12: | ||
<br> | Chapter. Past and current work (2000) <br> | ||
Chapter: Relation to other practitioners, writers (2000) <br> | |||
'''If one thing matters everything matters.''' <br> | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 12:18, 26 October 2017
Chapter. Past and current work (2000)
Chapter: Relation to other practitioners, writers (2000)
Conclusion (1000 words)
Introduction (500 words)
In the first year of Piet Zwart I have been looking at LGBT related topics. I mostly did so from a personal subjective perspective in photography, and by looking into queer cinema. In the presentation of the second term I made clear that I wanted to be make a statement with my work, be more political. As feedback the tutors told me I already make a statement in the work that I make.
Ideally, as a graduation proposal, I would to continue with the three lines of thought I’ve been working on in the first year. The photographic medium in itself (and the methodology of the ‘table’ not the tableau’) , making the (gay) cinematic language my own combined with CGI and LGBT issues/identity. As an end result I would like to bring these three things together, though it might still be loose entities. I think It could be interesting to work towards an installation through curation of the material I will gather.
In the thesis I would like to investigate the above mentioned lines of thought and by doing so reflecting on my own practice and methodology.
Chapter. Past and current work (2000)
Chapter: Relation to other practitioners, writers (2000)
If one thing matters everything matters.
Bibliography (not complete)
Graham, G. (2010), The Gay State
Photography:
Silverman, K. (2015), The miracle of analogy, Stanford University press
About Tillmans:
Dercon, C, Sainsbury, H, & Tillmans, H. (2017), Wolfgang Tillmans 2017, Tate publishing (catalogue of the tate exhibition)
Le Feuvre, L. (2007), Searching for Doubt, Foam magazine #13 searching, winter 2007
Tillmans, W. (2012), Neue Welt, Taschen
Shimizu, M. (2005), Wolfgang Tillmans: The Art of Equivalence (from the book, Wolfgang Tillmans truth study center), Taschen
Silverman, K. (1992), Male Subjectivity at the Margins, Routledge
Face:
https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21728617-life-age-facial-recognition-what-machines-can-tell-your-face