User:Mxrwho/The Final Project/Bibliography

Blomberg, J. & Zlatev, J. (2021) 'Metalinguistic relativity: Does one’s ontology determine one’s view on linguistic relativity?’, Language and Communication, 76(4), pp. 35-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.09.007 (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

A phenomenologist approach on language as a contextually situated and experientially grounded semiotic system.

Cooley, C. H. (1922), Human Nature and the Social Order. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. Available at: https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Cooley/Cooley_1902/Cooley_1902toc.htm (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

The dynamics of society and the concept of the "looking-glass self" or how the individual internalizes other people's views (true or perceived) and behaves accordingly.

Dusi, N. (2012) ‘Remaking as a Practice: Some Problems of Transmediality’, Cinéma & Cie. Film and Media Studies Journal, 12(18). Available at: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/cinemaetcie/article/view/16255 (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Repetition as remaking. Its narrative value.

Fellows, J. (2023) 'Making Up a Mimic: Interacting with Echoes in the Age of AI' (2024), Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science, 15, pp. 1-18. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376670787_Making_Up_a_Mimic_Interacting_with_Echoes_in_the_Age_of_AI (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Labeling in the age of AI, its categorizing power and our reduced resistance.

Hacking, I. (2006) ‘Making Up People’, London Review of Books, 17 August. Available at: https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n16/ian-hacking/making-up-people (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Institutional labeling and the fluidity of diagnoses.

Hassan, A. and Barber, S.J. (2021) ‘The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect’, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), p. 38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00301-5.

How repetition affects beliefs of truth.

Leech, G. (1985) Semantics. The study of meaning, Suffolk: Penguin Books, (first ed. 1974, Pelican). Available at: https://www.academia.edu/43763992/Geoffrey_leech_semantics_the_study_of_meaning?source=swp_share (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

How words and language acquire their meaning. Especially important is the classification of "meaning" in categories:

Conceptual, connotative, social, affective, reflected, collocative, thematic.

Lyons, J. (2009) Language and Linguistics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (first ed. 1981). Available at: https://ocd.lcwu.edu.pk/cfiles/English/Maj/Eng-204/kupdf.net_john-lyons-language-and-linguistics-an-introduction1.pdf (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Distinction between descriptive and non-descriptive meaning. The impossibility of defining "meaning" in semantic terms. Main question: What is the meaning of meaning?

Moncrieffe, J., Eyben, R. (ed.)(2007) The Power of Labelling: How People are Categorized and Why it Matters, London: Earthscan.

How labelling works and how it affects the behavior of the ones labelled.

Moskaluk, K., Zlatev, J. & Weijer, J. van de (2002) '“Dizziness of Freedom”: Anxiety Disorders and Metaphorical Meaning-making', Metaphor and Symbol, 37(4), pp. 303-322. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364981263_Dizziness_of_Freedom_Anxiety_Disorders_and_Metaphorical_Meaning-making (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Stress as a novelty factor in the creation of metaphor.

Palmer, F.R. (1997) Semantics. A new outline, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, (first ed. 1976). Available at: https://www.academia.edu/42620758/Palmer_f_r_semantics_a_new_outline (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

The difference between conceptual and social meaning.

Pilat D., and Sekoul D. (2024) 'False Consensus Effect', The Decision Lab. Retrieved December 2, 2024, Available at: https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/false-consensus-effect (Accessed: 2 December 2024).

The false consensus effect is a cognitive bias in which individuals overestimate the extent to which their beliefs, values, and behaviors are shared by others.

Smith Galer, S. (2021) 'The languages with built-in sexism', BBC. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210408-the-sexist-words-that-are-harmful-to-women (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

How language affects the way we perceive the world (and gender), with examples from different languages.

Tornborg, E. (2020) ‘Repetition in Transmediation: From Painting to Poem and GIF’, AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 45(1), pp. 29–44. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26974192?read-now=1&seq=1 (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Repetition in different media and how it enriches the message.

Tosca, S. (2023) ‘Many Happy Returns: Sameness in Digital Literature, Narrative Games, Adaptations and Transmedial Worlds’, in Sameness and Repetition in Contemporary Media Culture. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 85–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-952-920231005 (Accessed: 22 November 2024).

Adaptation as a familiar home that can be re-inhabited. The importance of conciseness.