User:Thijshijsijsjss/Notes on SI22

This page reports on my explorations, findings, unfindings and (more) during Special Issue 22. In the spirit of the wiki, I will resist my current urge to write this introduction in detail -- because I can't write it in detail, yet.

Week 1

Tour at WORM

Monday 2023 - 09 - 18 we (XPUB1, Michael and Steve) gathered at Worm for a tour led by Lukas Simonis, Ash Kilmartin and Florian Cramer.

I'm still in the process of collecting imagery from the event. If you, reader, have something to contribute, feel free to reach out

Field Recording task

Monday afternoon, we started to discuss the concept post-digital, with the presence of a physical analogy in the form of a cassette player. We went on to take a look at Radio aporee and where tasked with finding a field recording that triggered a memory. This is to be used in the first radio show. My work on this task can be found here:

My field recording explorations

Show

Maria, Victor and Bernadette are this show's Caretakers. They are present in the Radio WORM studio, while the rest of us are gathered around stereo boxes connected to the (previously tellingly broken) digital screen. Communication between Caretakers and the Caretakers' caretakers goes via an Etherpad. This communication is semi-continuous. I notice I am hesitant to write in it.

(Retroactive) playlist

Time	Data	Content
0-25	20.6MB	About Radio Aporee
25-27	3MB	Chat from Victor, Bernadette
27-53	23MB	Collective Audio Field Recording
53- 57	~3MB	Studio Field Recording
57 -65	~11.5MB	Cassette Tape Recording
65-68	1.5MB	Bells
68-70	1MB	Victor: making the mixtape
70-77	4MB	Riffusion Jingle
77-86	8.5MB	Maria Reads a text (might be called 'Snow', might be by 'Ina Blom')
86-98	~11MB?	Aporee Mix / Voices / Westminster
98-105	6MB	droning windows movie maker music + voices
105-120	15MB?	The remainder

Shownotes discussion

In the afternoon after the show, we had a discussion with the classroom, this show's caretakers, Michael and Joseph. There are some important takeaways (for me):

• We all like the tension between a preprogrammed playlist and improvisation and the mysterious dynamic it creates for the listerner.
  • Personally, I was impressed by the cohesion of the show.
• We liked the overlays between music / sounds / voices. There is some balancing here that is important, it is easy to overwhelm the listener.
• One of the highlight's of the show was when the caretaker's used the etherpad as a script. This back-and-forth between the caretakers and the classroom is something to be fleshed out over the coming week(s).

We have chosen new caretakers already. Actually, my first instinct was not to pick them already. It will be interesting to see how this will change the dynamic between programmed and improvisational radio. Something to reflect on next week.

Prototyping

Tuesday afternoon we had our first prototyping session. In it, we set up a Raspberry Pi and create our own personal user profiles on it. Some useful commands we used today:

• Log in to the pi: ssh thijsoid@145.24.139.16
• Broadcast a message: wall [message]
• Print to the lineprinter: echo "[message]" > /dev/usb/lp0

Methods

Selected gear I use for annotating (zoom in for a description of this layout)

What is annotating? In it's simplest form: shouting at your TV. We spend some time thinking about the way we currently annotate (examining this Protocol). How do I annotate?

• It depends on the origin of the to-be-annotated work and the purpose of my annotation, but the common denominator tends to be the use of color to structure both the work as well as my notes.
• I tend to prefer physical annotation, because it feels like my annotations are more transformative: my digital notes feel separate from the work, but physical notes feel like a transformation of it.

Some nice quotes from / through Steve:

• Notetaking can be an act of generosity.
• Every text creates a reader.

Together with Victor, Bernadette and Rosa, I read the text On the data set's ruins. We spend quite a big portion of the allocated time on creating, adhering to and reflecting on a reading Protocol (see pad). I noticed I felt more at ease during this discussion. I figure it might have to do with the following aspects:

• Me being more familiar with the article's contents, and hence feeling more confident to speak
• The smaller group size being less intimidating to speak up -- and more easily invited to engage.
• In particular, it might be interesting to reflect on whether the presence of our Protocol had an effect on my at-easeness. It might have, in the sense that I did not have to worry about internally deciding when or where to make a comment: I just had to follow the Protocol.

After this group discussion, we met back with the whole class to discuss our findings (on Protocols and subject matter). In this plenary session, I felt more inclined to speak up that earlier that day. Is this me getting used to the implied Protocols of this class?

Miscellaneous Findings

It is now the weekend. If I'm honest, it has been a lot to take in, and I don't think my brain has caught up with processing the changes yet, let alone the contents of our conversations this week. That said, I'm very excited.

It might be useful -- in a way maybe even necessary -- to fix in time my current thoughts on why I am here. I cannot present an exhaustive list (which to me is wonderful, I hope to find new reasons as time goes on), but it includes:

the collaborative process speaks to me

it seems to allow -- encourage, even -- experimentation with and the use of multiple media

I expect xpub's attitude to help me with some paralyzing struggles of self-curation

I was looking forward to the methods class, and really enjoyed it. In particular, the group's still finding its dynamic, and this was showcase during this class. I'm excited to see this dynamic develop and the undoubtedly interesting conversations we're all going to have.

(AAAHH I'm self-curating again. I'm making this section super small because I'm usure what to do with it but have decided that I should do something to combat this paralysis.)

I have detected the presence of certain social insecurities from which I hoped I had moved on. I'm also terribly self-aware of my English, which is a self-fulfilling prophecy for disaster.

I notice I'm using my desk at home differently than before. Instead of being the 'home base' in my room, it has been a place governed by temporality. I don't think it will remain this way. It is the result of me having to get used to this new routine -- this new Protocol.

Week 2

Collaborative_Emacs

A_case_for_chopchop

Another Tour at Worm

This Monday we met at WORM again, this time to tour the radio studio and to talk with Lieuwe Zelle. There, Michael tried to copy the contents of a harddrive with material from radio WORM. This caused the system to fail -- presumably due to moving keyboard messing up the setup: a weird post-digitally rooted scenario.

Lieuwe Zelle made an offhand mention of the relationship between radio and podcasts that I think was interesting in the light of Phelan's paper The Ontology of Performance: podcast is to radio what a recording (or otherwise documented work) is to performance. I've been a bit nervous for the radio show, and the Phelan paper and this comment comforted me in the idea that such a show is just that: a performance. The act of doing is what's important, and is in many ways not comparable to the other shows we've done, or, for that matter, to any plans you had for the show beforehand.

Active Archiving and Collaborative Protocols

We talked about active archiving, constant, licensing

Show

the quiz -> people are excited about interactivity

surprises

Prototyping

Naming the server

Setting up the server

Start from the middle

Collaborative Emacs session

MiscMeeting

I had a meeting with Manetta and Michael to dicuss some anxiety I am experiencing. This was a comforting meeting.

Ethereal library