Sacha thesis drafts and notes: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
notes on Jan13 meeting: | notes on Jan13 meeting: | ||
Busy with: swzland; | Busy with: swzland; experimenting with the scale of the work and different modes of presentation; how to use space around the image; multiple projections... | ||
Also went skiing; aren't a lot of tourists, so that was fun. | Also went skiing; aren't a lot of tourists, so that was fun. | ||
Thesis: still struggling with how the thesis should look: | Thesis: still struggling with how the thesis should look (mode of address): | ||
1) method description (help develop practical work) = | 1) method description (help develop practical work) = ( big themes: the anthropocene &c.); | ||
2) | 2) different views on the meaning of 'mountain'. Look into 100 views of a mountain (compare the different ways people experience mountains) | ||
1) seems the best [Steve notes: you already have material] | 1) seems the best [Steve notes: you already have material to move quickly forward on this] | ||
Steve suggest: Make the new research 'cut off point' after the Eye presentation. | Steve suggest: Make the new research 'cut off point' after the Eye presentation. | ||
We agreed Sacha | We agreed Sacha will reflect on 3 recent works using WhatHowWhy method | ||
Have been dealing with big issues (the sublime-the simulacrum): Would be good to concentrate on the detail of making things (medium specificity) | Have been dealing with big issues (the sublime-the simulacrum): Would be good to concentrate on the detail of making things (medium specificity) | ||
Revision as of 14:12, 13 January 2022
Realistic outcome for next meeting=
https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_Seminar_2021-2022
notes on Jan13 meeting:
Busy with: swzland; experimenting with the scale of the work and different modes of presentation; how to use space around the image; multiple projections...
Also went skiing; aren't a lot of tourists, so that was fun.
Thesis: still struggling with how the thesis should look (mode of address):
1) method description (help develop practical work) = ( big themes: the anthropocene &c.);
2) different views on the meaning of 'mountain'. Look into 100 views of a mountain (compare the different ways people experience mountains)
1) seems the best [Steve notes: you already have material to move quickly forward on this]
Steve suggest: Make the new research 'cut off point' after the Eye presentation.
We agreed Sacha will reflect on 3 recent works using WhatHowWhy method
Have been dealing with big issues (the sublime-the simulacrum): Would be good to concentrate on the detail of making things (medium specificity)
Outcome by next meeting: start with WhatHowWhy and discuss (describe) 3 specific pieces (2000 words in total).
Next time: review written work
Key Dates and Deadlines
- 19 November - Graduate Proposal Deadline = DONE
- 19 November - Thesis Outline Deadline = DONE
- 3 Dec - Deadline First Chapter = ?
- 18 Feb - Deadline First Draft Thesis
- 18 March - Deadline Second Draft thesis (texts to 2nd readers)
- 1 April - Deadlines Second readers' comments
- 14 April - DEADLINE THESIS
Grading procedure (Thesis):
Early May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha draft feedback on the thesis texts they supervised
Mid-May: Steve, Marloes and Natasha review each other’s feedback and grades
End of May: Finalize feedback and grades.
Early June: Finalized feedback and grades communicated to students.