User:Joca/essay Snowfalling Card Stacks

Snowfalling card stacks

Looking for the form of news

A briefing from the future

The future is an utopia with an everlasting afternoon sun and computers that perfectly understand people. At least, that is the techno perfect Los Angeles as portrayed in Spike Jonze's movie Her (2013). While transcribing people's thoughts and organizing their life, the digital assistants even have the time to fall in love with some of their users.

Even in the LA of the future the latter is controversial. However, there is a different scene that I remember in particular. During his commute the main character Theodore Twombly checks the news. I expected that something spectacular would happen: Could a virtual news anchor give an update? Is the latest news combined with matching memes that pop-up as holograms? Or, if it is not about the spectacle, at least this part would be as carefully designed as the rest of the movie.

In the end none of that follows. Even in this sunny future where everything is possible, the digital assistant spits out the latest headlines and Theodore falls for a clickbait article.

This is surprisingly similar to the way news is designed on conversational interfaces in 2019. With these type of interfaces I mean digital assistants like Siri and Google Assistent that are built into smartphones, as well as devices like the Google Home and Amazon Echo. What they have in common is that these conversational interfaces provide a way to interact with digital systems with your voice, without the need to touch a screen. Ask Alexa, Assistant, or Siri for the news, and you get a briefing that features a number of headlines with an unknown author. If you want to know more about a specific event, the speaker will read out the article or play a specific part of an hourly news broadcast.

Although the news briefing is often demoed in the commercials and presentations of these smart speakers and digital assistants, it is not often used by people that use these devices. The Verge, an online publication focused on technology and culture, concluded quickly that 'Smart speakers have no idea how to give us news'. (Brandom, 2018)

Between gossip and societal discourse

Making a computer voice read some text from the internet, without giving any context, is a questionable approach to news, but it is understandable if you take into account how conversational interfaces are mostly used nowadays: digital personal assistants that help people control their devices, in such a way that the actual technology and complexity is out of sight. This might be nice to control light switches in a home or to stream music, the most popular use cases for smart speakers at the moment (Molla, 2018). However, this urge for a nearly invisible interface ignores some specific characteristics of news and the role of journalism.

In The Elements of Journalism (2007) Kovach and Rosenstiel describe a moment where anthropologists compare their notes on communication and find some universal patterns for news throughout history and cultures: news has a certain momentness and pace. It is about what is happening outside of people's own experience but have an impact on their lives. The authors conclude that journalism is 'simply the system societies generate to supply this information about what is and what’s to come' and that it is part of the human instinct to be curious.

This is an idealistic view on the role of news, which doesn't tell the full story as the historian Michael Schudson (2013) argues in reaction to Kovach and Rosenstiel. Gossip might be universal, but the form and the conventions in journalism are highly dependent on the time and culture. For Schudson 'journalism today

relates to the constitution of a public life, an institution in which criticism

and discussion is part of its function', but to get that role journalism was dependent on something like the existence of a public sphere starting in the eighteenth century, and organized efforts to publish a collection of current affairs periodically.

Balancing between the gossip and the societal discourse, the idea of popular news and quality news is visible in different media, from newspapers to online. What these media have in common is that they try to create a meaningful news experience to their audience. To me such an experience is based on this idea that you read, see, or listen to coverage of a particular news event and that it sparks a thought. Beyond the transfer of information to the brain, you start to think about how this news event relates to you as a person, and your position. In case of an article about the new outfit of Kim Kardashian, it could be a chat I have with a friend after sharing the article. In case of an article about corruption in the Brazilian government, it might motivate me to start a protest. In both cases the article is not the end. It's a trigger for some extension.

There is a whole tradition in creating news media that facilitate a meaningful news experience fitting the character of the publication. It is not only in the choice of news to cover, but also in the ways news is designed: from the visual design of the newspaper, to the role of the news anchor on broadcast television. The current design of the news on smart speakers ignores these traditions mostly, showing little cues about the situatedness of the news. Before further discussing the causes and propose an alternative, it is good to see how news found its form in other media.

Anchors and newspapers

The archetype of the modern newspaper was developed in the United States during the first half of the 20th century (Barnhurst and Nerone, 2001)

.

Newspaper: heading, byline, character and signature of the paper is visible in the graphic design.

Radio: jingles, voices. TV Newsanchor.

Aggregrated

Online: different. Websites look more similar nowadays. Compare daily mail online to the paper version. On one hand technical explanation, on the other hand because of the way this articles reach their audience: via platforms that aggegrate articles.

"The homepage is not dead." In a time where many news media are focused on how their content is displayed in Google News, or try to game the news feed algorithm of Facebook, defending your own platform is quite a statement. S. Mitra Kalita, the vice president for programming at CNN Digital, did so in front of an audience of social media marketers.

Although articles are distributed on other platforms, and people might not need to visit the site and apps of a news medium, it pays off to focus on the homepage according to Kalita: it's an interface where you have full control over, and one which is used by the most loyal readers. She worked on a strategy where different channels focus on specific contexts of reading and watching the news of CNN (Beard, 2018).

By structuring and showing its content differently on each medium, CNN tries to pack the same story in different ways that are relevant to readers in various situations. To some extent, the interface guides the experience of the user.

This influence of the way news is designed, is not just limited to the sites and apps of news outlets. Even when focusing on getting your news across on other platforms than your own homepage, there is an interface around that content.

Snowfalling

In the discussion about how to improve journalism in this age, the role of the interface is often overlooked. Experiments focus on new ways of doing research, different methods to involve the audience and new ways of storytelling by using rich media: from VR to podcasts with visual notes alongside it.

For people who create the content, the scope of the interface is limited to the one article, video or VR environment they are working on. The poster child of that approach is Snow Fall (Branch, 2012). This long read about an avalanche in Tunnel Creek was published by the New York Times. It featured a groundbreaking design with full-screen videos, slideshows, and special effects when reader scrolled through the article.

Many other publications copied the format and snowfalling was declared to be 'the future of journalism'. It didn't work out that way, mostly because of the time and resources it takes to create these rich articles with custom interfaces: Snow Fall alone took 6 months to make and had 11 people working on the graphics and the design. In the meantime, the interface of the normal articles stayed the same, because the Snow Fall was made fully outside the systems that the Times used for their 'normal' articles. (Thompson, 2012)

What the examples of CNN and the New York Times show are the influence of the interface on how people engage with an article. The design is not the de facto solution to fix journalism, but the interface can support people to engage with news in a particular way. Before imagining what that could mean for journalism, it is good to see what the foundations are behind most news interface at the moment.

Job to be done

With the rise of the web, the quality of the interaction design became one of the key aspects for having people use websites. In the nineties, the term user experience design (UX) was coined to focus on all aspects of user interaction with the products and services of a company. (Nielsen & Norman, 1998) The field combines interaction design with psychology and many other disciplines that touch upon that topic.

Although identified as a field of design quite recently, the practice of UX already started in the fifties, with foundations that come from Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). Traditionally, this discipline approaches interface and usability from a task-based and rationalistic perspective.

HCI incorporated the importance of experiences and motivations of people using an interactive system (Bødker, 2006) and you see traces of that in UX design. The question is however what type of user experience is the goal. People are still users with a job to be done, preferably in an efficient way.

The notion of user experience got a lot of traction since the dot-com bubble, the work of firms like the Nielsen Group and the inclusion of UX in curricula of design schools. Best practices are shared in digital libraries of interaction patterns: from buttons to colors to clear text.

Humanistic interface

This led to universally used practices in navigating through interfaces and lead users conversion: the goals for which an interface is designed. This could be buying goods, or spending time for example. Good conversion makes the difference between a bankrupt or a profiting webshop.

However, are the foundations for a successful e-commerce interface necessarily the same for the interface of a news medium?

In current task-focused UX theory, the activity of interpreting information has a secondary role. The website, app, or any experience, is seen as a means to an end. But there are other perspectives on this digital space.

Media scholar Johanna Drucker sees the interface as the combination of what we read and how we read. People control the interface as much, as the interface ignites a particular user experience. A website is then not merely a tool, but a space where people engage with information and the systems behind it.

Building upon this idea is the concept of the humanistic interface (Drucker, 2014). This theory fills the interpretation gap in the current practice of UX design because it approaches the interaction design from the idea of critical insight: focusing on comparison, contrast and offering space to make meaning instead of simply presenting content efficiently.

Examples in the wild

Drucker stays quite abstract about what these websites and apps would look like, stating that 'the humanistic interface is still in its infancy'. There are however examples of designs and interactions that fit this idea.

Blendle → kiosk for articles from different publications. Trying to situate the articles by mimicking the design of the publications. Recommend articles in ways to get them outside the filterbubble.

A publisher like Vox Media invests a lot in Chorus. This system powers various websites of this publisher and it takes a slightly different approach than most content management systems in us. Chorus enables the writers of e.g. Vox.com to organize content in non-linear ways (Pfauth, 2014), for example with stack cards. These cards would link to dossiers about topics, which can be referred to in new articles.

Interfacing the comment section differently is one of the methods used by De Correspondent to involve readers and use their knowledge. A dedicated editor for 'conversations' features interesting comments on the front page, and tries to pair readers with specialists in the comment section. Their goal is to use these conversations as starting points for new research, and it is a way to see what readers get from the articles (Wijnberg & Martèl, 2018).

Current UX theory doesn't address user experience in such a way that interaction patterns can be analyzed for their influence on the critical insight of the users.

By connecting examples such as those above to the theory of humanistic interface, there is a common ground to analyze these for facilitating critical insight.

This is the first step to see these interfaces, not as isolated experiments and to discuss what works and what not. The stack cards of Vox.com didn't had the impact expected by its creators, for example. They imagined that readers would use the stack card to get all insights about complicated news topics. That would empower users to distinguish quality journalism from low-quality articles. In the end, most users ignored the cards with information in the byline. Ezra Klein, editor in chief, admitted that a single feature could not fix the news system. (Moses, 2016)

The interface people watch, listen and read news in, influences the style of experiencing the news. I am interested in how design can facilitate a more meaningful news experience. Meaningful as in considering what happens after 'efficiently getting the content to a user to be consumed'. How can an interface help in provoking a debate? Or support in seeing the connections between an article and own's own situation?

Good to look shortly to newspaper design, and broadcast design, to follow to online news design. Online → biggest source of news content for smart speakers. Broadcast, because of the audio aspect that also plays an important role in the context of personal assistants.

Bibliography

Barnhurst, K.G., Nerone, J.C., 2001. The form of news: a history, The Guilford communication series. The Guilford Press, New York.

Beard, D., 2018. Why paying attention to the homepage will pay off [WWW Document]. Poynter. URL https://www.poynter.org/news/why-paying-attention-homepage-will-pay (accessed 10.3.18).

Bødker, S., 2006. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges, in: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Changing Roles - NordiCHI ’06. Presented at the the 4th Nordic conference, ACM Press, Oslo, Norway, pp. 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182476

Branch, J., 2012. Snow Fall: The Avalanche at Tunnel Creek [WWW Document]. The New York Times. URL http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2012/snow-fall/index.html#/?part=tunnel-creek (accessed 2.12.19).

Brandom, R., 2018. Smart speakers have no idea how to give us news [WWW Document]. The Verge. URL https://www.theverge.com/2018/11/18/18099203/smart-speakers-news-amazon-echo-google-home-homepod (accessed 11.19.18).

Drucker, J., 2014. Graphesis: visual forms of knowledge production, MetaLABprojects. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Drucker, J., 2011. HUMANITIES APPROACHES TO INTERFACE THEORY 20.

Drucker, J., n.d. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly: Performative Materiality and Theoretical Approaches to Interface [WWW Document]. Digital Humanities Quarterly. URL http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000143/000143.html (accessed 9.17.18).

Jonze, S., 2013. Her. Warner Bros. Pictures.

Molla, R., 2018. Voice tech like Alexa and Siri hasn’t found its true calling yet: Inside the voice assistant ‘revolution’ [WWW Document]. Recode. URL https://www.recode.net/2018/11/12/17765390/voice-alexa-siri-assistant-amazon-echo-google-assistant (accessed 11.22.18).

Moses, L., 2017. To update its breaking news strategy online, CNN takes cues from TV. Digiday. URL https://digiday.com/media/update-breaking-news-strategy-online-cnn-takes-cues-tv/ (accessed 10.3.18).

Nielsen, J., Norman, D., 1998. The Definition of User Experience (UX) [WWW Document]. Nielsen Norman Group. URL https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/ (accessed 11.7.18).

Pfauth, E.J., n.d. An inside look into the CMS of Vox Media: Chorus. Ernst-Jan Pfauth. URL https://pfauth.com/publishing-platforms/vox-medias-chorus/ (accessed 11.7.18).

Schmidt, C., n.d. Bylines on the homepage? Not The New York Times’ priority anymore in the latest homepage redesign. Nieman Lab. URL http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/08/bylines-on-the-homepage-not-the-new-york-times-priority-anymore-in-the-latest-homepage-redesign/ (accessed 10.3.18).

Schudson, M., 2013. Fourteen or Fifteen Generations: News as a Cultural Form and Journalism as a Historical Formation. American Journalism 30, 29--35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2013.767695

Thompson, D., 2012. “Snow Fall” Isn’t the Future of Journalism [WWW Document]. The Atlantic. URL https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/12/snow-fall-isnt-the-future-of-journalism/266555/ (accessed 11.5.18).

Wijnberg, R., Martèl, G., 2018. Nieuw voor leden: we maken het makkelijker om kennis te delen op De Correspondent [WWW Document]. De Correspondent. URL https://decorrespondent.nl/8501/nieuw-voor-leden-we-maken-het-makkelijker-om-kennis-te-delen-op-de-correspondent/217880630-8af26840 (accessed 11.7.18).