First Thoughts/Angeliki: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Is it a book worth creating?<br /> | Is it a book worth creating? more challenging procedures but with the meaning of design or technology but with the meaning of critical thinking/approach/ research/concept<br /> | ||
not productive but critical->not just making posters manually/mechanically like you do in bachelor studies but using also tools from the contemporary art. How to make things public could be the question | |||
meeting other PZI students and get feedback/ many references<br /> | meeting other PZI students and get feedback/ many references<br /> |
Revision as of 20:47, 6 December 2017
connection of old archives (radical software) with new (active archives) and their ways of reflecting them/ interfacing them
read more texts that I feel are filling the puzzle (many texts I have read previously I met them here)--make deeper my personal research
experiment with more material and produce many small things derived from philosophies, other examples and artists (like antfarm, timecapsule, connecting with previous interests)
Is it a book worth creating? more challenging procedures but with the meaning of design or technology but with the meaning of critical thinking/approach/ research/concept
not productive but critical->not just making posters manually/mechanically like you do in bachelor studies but using also tools from the contemporary art. How to make things public could be the question
meeting other PZI students and get feedback/ many references
combinational notions (conceptual thinking, programming, writing)
imaginative spaces/ novels and easy going writing/ reading more narratives
non-linear narrative/ no narratives
writing as the actual work (future: oulipo)
liked the networking and meeting/ working in different spaces using different tools guest tutors and archive
editing videos/ easy tools for past projects