- Thesis outline: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
 
What do you want your thesis to be about?
'''Introduction''' (500 words) <br>
'''Introduction''' (500 words) <br>
<br>
<br>
In the first year of Piet Zwart I have been looking at LGBT related topics. I mostly did so from a personal subjective perspective in photography, and by looking into queer cinema. In the presentation of the second term I made clear that I wanted to be make a statement with my work, be more political. Three strands of thought could be considered in my practice. Researching the photographic medium, but also the idea of 'seeing' in itself, making the (gay) cinematic language my own, and LGBT issues/identity.  
Three strands of thought could be considered in my practice. Researching the photographic medium, but also the idea of 'seeing' in itself, making the (gay) cinematic language my own, and LGBT issues/identity. In the thesis I would like to investigate further on the above mentioned lines of thought and by doing so reflecting on my own practice and methodology. I will do this by first looking at my past and current work, then I will look at the broader context of my work, how it relates to other practitioners/writers, and finally make a conclusion/reflection on the chapters mentioned before.  
In the thesis I would like to investigate the above mentioned lines of thought and by doing so reflecting on my own practice and methodology. I will do this by first looking at my past and current work, then I will look at the broader context of my work, how it relates to other practitioners/writers, and finally make a conclusion/reflection on the before mentioned chapters.  
 
 


<br><br>
<br><br>

Revision as of 14:58, 26 October 2017

What do you want your thesis to be about? Introduction (500 words)

Three strands of thought could be considered in my practice. Researching the photographic medium, but also the idea of 'seeing' in itself, making the (gay) cinematic language my own, and LGBT issues/identity. In the thesis I would like to investigate further on the above mentioned lines of thought and by doing so reflecting on my own practice and methodology. I will do this by first looking at my past and current work, then I will look at the broader context of my work, how it relates to other practitioners/writers, and finally make a conclusion/reflection on the chapters mentioned before.




Past and current work (2000)

- photography: - methodology of the working table (tableau vs. table), collecting and combining images, portraits, distortion,

- video, queer cinema, - how

Relation to other practitioners, writers (2000)
If one thing matters everything matters.

Conclusion (1000 words)


Bibliography (not complete)
Graham, G. (2010), The Gay State

Photography:
Silverman, K. (2015), The miracle of analogy, Stanford University press

About Tillmans:
Dercon, C, Sainsbury, H, & Tillmans, H. (2017), Wolfgang Tillmans 2017, Tate publishing (catalogue of the tate exhibition)
Le Feuvre, L. (2007), Searching for Doubt, Foam magazine #13 searching, winter 2007
Tillmans, W. (2012), Neue Welt, Taschen
Shimizu, M. (2005), Wolfgang Tillmans: The Art of Equivalence (from the book, Wolfgang Tillmans truth study center), Taschen

Silverman, K. (1992), Male Subjectivity at the Margins, Routledge


Face:
https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21728617-life-age-facial-recognition-what-machines-can-tell-your-face