Autonomous Archive: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
* Finalise [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/questions_PG_autonomous_archive list of questions] we want to ask ''> 05/10''  
* Finalise [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/questions_PG_autonomous_archive list of questions] we want to ask ''> 05/10''  
* Finalise [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interviews_PG_autonomous_archive list of people we want to interview] (inside & outside the PG) ''> 05/10''
* Finalise [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interviews_PG_autonomous_archive list of people we want to interview] (inside & outside the PG) ''> 05/10''
* Contact people we want to interview ''> 05/10''
* Contact people we want to interview ''> 06/10''
* Visit city archive, scan more documents ''> 05/10''<span style="color:#00E600">''Joca''</span>
* Visit city archive, scan more documents ''> 05/10'' <span style="color:#00E600">''Joca, done''</span>
* Visit HNI archive 06/10 [http://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/special-issue-hni-archive Pad with items to request]
* Visit HNI archive 06/10 [http://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/special-issue-hni-archive Pad with items to request]
* Send email to Katia from HNI. Info archive + interview request -> Joca
* Send email to Katia from HNI. Info archive + interview request -> Joca
Line 33: Line 33:
** Linda Malherbe (Verhalenhuis Belvedere) <span style="color:#00E600">''email sent''</span>
** Linda Malherbe (Verhalenhuis Belvedere) <span style="color:#00E600">''email sent''</span>
** Teana Boston-Mammah (Storytelling from the City) <span style="color:#00E600">''email sent''</span>
** Teana Boston-Mammah (Storytelling from the City) <span style="color:#00E600">''email sent''</span>
** Siebe Thissen = specialist in "alternative" histories in Rotterdam <span style="color:#00E600">''Pad: [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interview_PG_SiebeThissen Interview 05/10]''</span>
** Siebe Thissen = specialist in "alternative" histories in Rotterdam <span style="color:#00E600">''done [https://pad.pzimediadesign.nl/p/interview_PG_SiebeThissen Interview 05/10]''</span>
* From this, create our own interview methodology & ethics ''> 06/10''
* From this, create our own interview methodology & ethics ''> 06/10''
* Investigate the conditions and practical aspects of the interviews e.g. recording technology, email, skype (their permission to edit) ''> 10/10''
* Investigate the conditions and practical aspects of the interviews e.g. recording technology, email, skype (their permission to edit) ''> 10/10''

Revision as of 14:58, 5 October 2017

Main questions

  • Why/How is the Poortgebouw valuable to the city?
    • Who is it important for? In what ways?
    • How has this changed through the years?
    • How can our publication add to this?
  • Why is the Poortgebouw worth archiving?
    • What is the situation of the PG today? Is there a sense of urgency?
    • Why is the autonomous archive important?
    • How different are the narratives inside / outside the PG?


Planning

Research Action Points (Content)

  • Define main questions of our publication first draft done
  • Make a list of the available archives, where to find them, how to visit them > Joca, finish up 28/09 done
  • Make a draft list of questions we want to ask > Angeliki, finish up 02/10 done
  • Make a draft list of people we want to interview (inside & outside the PG) > Tash, finish up 02/10 done
  • Prepare questions for the meeting at the Poortgebouw 02/10 > Everyone, finish up 01/10 done
  • City archive recon > Joca, Alex & Alice, meetup at 11:00 at the Archive (Hofdijk 651, Rotterdam) 29/09 done Pad
  • Make a list of topics & search terms for our visit to both City & PG Archive (add them to this pad ) > Everyone, finish up 01/10 done



  • Research interview methods of
    • Linda Malherbe (Verhalenhuis Belvedere) email sent
    • Teana Boston-Mammah (Storytelling from the City) email sent
    • Siebe Thissen = specialist in "alternative" histories in Rotterdam done Interview 05/10
  • From this, create our own interview methodology & ethics > 06/10
  • Investigate the conditions and practical aspects of the interviews e.g. recording technology, email, skype (their permission to edit) > 10/10
  • Research glossary of terms & methodology to collect terms that are used in the different narratives
  • Conduct interviews > 23/10
  • Find out how we can collect / photograph / copy these materials
  • Organize the information we collected into the different narratives
  • Make a first draft of the structure of the publication (chapters etc)
  • Curate the information, to see what's most relevant and important


Research Action Points (Design)

  • PG online research
    • images
    • wiki
    • videos
    • social media
  • PG material research
    • posterwall
    • archive
    • architecture
    • who did their graphics before?
  • PG inhabitants discussion
    • do they want a visual identity?
  • references to other designers
    • design & politics
  • printing
    • paper
    • binding
    • printer
    • budget
    • technique
  • typography


Production Action Points

  • layout
  • typesetting
  • reviewing
  • find a printing technique
  • find a printer
  • prototype
  • actual printing


Design Research

Mood

Moodboard

Scheduling Design & Production

  • 9. Oct – Drafts Layout / Type / Concept
  • 9. Oct – Final outcome presentation: 3 concepts
  • 10. Oct – 13.Oct Correction about the final outcome
  • 13. Oct Decision on layout
  • 16. Oct – 30.Oct Prototyping book + layout
  • 30. Oct – Decision on object (paper, binding…)
  • 30.Oct – 8. Nov Layout / Typesetting
  • 4.Nov – Last Deadline: Editorial report rev.1
  • 4.Nov – 5.Nov – Implementation 1
  • 6.Nov – Last Deadline: Editorial report rev.2
  • 6.Nov – 8.Nov – Implementation 2 / Last layout changes
  • 8. Nov & 9.Nov – detail typography
  • 10.Nov – Write printing data
  • 10. Nov – last deadline passing for print
  • 6. Dec – publication launch


Pad hell


Wiki wiki