User:ThomasW/Notes Spectator: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 09:54, 3 June 2015

Hilderbrand, L (2007) Media Access Preservation and Technologies, No.12 (pp.6)

"Digital technologies raise (at least) three major dilemmas for archives and access. First, there are no agreed-upon archival standards for digital technologies; rather, they are deemed inherently unstable and unpredictable due to the speed of (commercial planned) technological obsolescence. Celluloid and analog video formats have proven to be more reliable for long-term storage and continie to be used. Digitization does not amount to preservation but is typically a means of convenient short-term access. Second, film, videotape, and digital content must be preserved or at the very least maintained-in order to ensure the long-term survival of texts and future access for audiences. Contemporary decay must be counteracted even as the future formats are still being researched and developed- Third, rights owners may forbid preservation and frustrate access to their works, whether through legal and technological measures." Page 6

Lucas Hilderbrand - Editor

Revision as of 17:24, 25 March 2015 (view source) ThomasW (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "Spectator (2007) Media Access Preservation and Technologies "Digital technologies raise (at least) three major dilemmas for archives and access. First, there are no agreed-up...")		Latest revision as of 09:54, 3 June 2015 (view source) ThomasW (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Spectator~~ (2007) Media Access Preservation and Technologies		Hilderbrand, L (2007) Media Access Preservation and Technologies, No.12 (pp.6)

	"Digital technologies raise (at least) three major dilemmas for archives and access. First, there are no agreed-upon archival standards for digital technologies; rather, they are deemed inherently unstable and unpredictable due to the speed of (commercial planned) technological obsolescence. Celluloid and analog video formats have proven to be more reliable for long-term storage and continie to be used. Digitization does not amount to preservation but is typically a means of convenient short-term access. Second, film, videotape, and digital content must be preserved or at the very least maintained-in order to ensure the long-term survival of texts and future access for audiences. Contemporary decay must be counteracted even as the future formats are still being researched and developed- Third, rights owners may forbid preservation and frustrate access to their works, whether through legal and technological measures."		"Digital technologies raise (at least) three major dilemmas for archives and access. First, there are no agreed-upon archival standards for digital technologies; rather, they are deemed inherently unstable and unpredictable due to the speed of (commercial planned) technological obsolescence. Celluloid and analog video formats have proven to be more reliable for long-term storage and continie to be used. Digitization does not amount to preservation but is typically a means of convenient short-term access. Second, film, videotape, and digital content must be preserved or at the very least maintained-in order to ensure the long-term survival of texts and future access for audiences. Contemporary decay must be counteracted even as the future formats are still being researched and developed- Third, rights owners may forbid preservation and frustrate access to their works, whether through legal and technological measures."