The Individual within the Collective: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
''The Individual within the Collective: Virtual Ideology and the Realization of Collective Principles'', Jan Fernback, (1996) '''Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety''' ed. Steve Jones, Thousand Oacks: Sage Publications Ltd.
''The Individual within the Collective: Virtual Ideology and the Realization of Collective Principles'', Jan Fernback, (1996) '''Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety''' ed. Steve Jones, Thousand Oacks: Sage Publications Ltd.


Moderators of the session:  
'''Moderators:'''
[[Yiorgos Bagkis]]
[[Inge Hoonte]]
[[Laura Macchini]]


* [[User:Yiorgos Bagakis|Yiorgos Bagakis]]
* [[User:Inge Hoonte|Inge Hoonte]]
* [[User:Laura Macchini|Laura Macchini ]]


keywords:
 
'''Keywords:'''
collective, computer-mediated communication, public sphere, counterpublics, virtual community, Gemainschaft, Gesellschaft, social contract, communications decancy act, virtual agora   
 
 
'''Summary of key points raised in the text:'''
* Like in the physical world, there are tensions between the '''individual''' and the '''collective''' in '''cyberspace'''.
 
* '''Computer-mediated communication''' (CMC) users assume that they can overcome the tyranny of geography through cyberspace.
 
* Cyberspace has become a new arena for participation in public life - what agora was to the Greeks - an arena for political debate and education.
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%BCrgen_Habermas Habermas]: the '''public sphere''' - cyberspace might serve as a public sphere similar to the coffee houses in 18th century France and Britain, where public debate was taking place.
 
* Fraser's critiicism towards Habermas: Borgeois men dominated these public spheres where they practiced their own skills of governance.
 
* '''Counterpublics''' (Fraser): gays, feminists, anarchists, and other factions tend to form in response to the dominant public spheres.
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Rheingold Rheingold]: Virtual communities perform the functions of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemeinschaft_and_Gesellschaft Gemeinschaft] community - Our need for human association is so strong that we will seek to build communities of interest in cyberspace because we might have no better option.
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Simmel Simmel]: Individual identity is based partly on social existence. Therefore an individual needs a sense of contributing to the greater community.
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dewey Dewey]: True self knowledge is only achieved through the experience of community life.
Democracy requires individual participation in the creation of collective life.
 
 
 
'''Discussion Notes & Afterthoughts:'''
 
* Is the term Urbanism any valid today?
 
* American culture are the dominant paradigm of virtual community studies
 
* How open and unmoderated is the political debate within counterpublics?

Latest revision as of 23:27, 17 October 2010

The Individual within the Collective: Virtual Ideology and the Realization of Collective Principles, Jan Fernback, (1996) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety ed. Steve Jones, Thousand Oacks: Sage Publications Ltd.

Moderators:


Keywords: collective, computer-mediated communication, public sphere, counterpublics, virtual community, Gemainschaft, Gesellschaft, social contract, communications decancy act, virtual agora


Summary of key points raised in the text:

  • Like in the physical world, there are tensions between the individual and the collective in cyberspace.
  • Computer-mediated communication (CMC) users assume that they can overcome the tyranny of geography through cyberspace.
  • Cyberspace has become a new arena for participation in public life - what agora was to the Greeks - an arena for political debate and education.
  • Habermas: the public sphere - cyberspace might serve as a public sphere similar to the coffee houses in 18th century France and Britain, where public debate was taking place.
  • Fraser's critiicism towards Habermas: Borgeois men dominated these public spheres where they practiced their own skills of governance.
  • Counterpublics (Fraser): gays, feminists, anarchists, and other factions tend to form in response to the dominant public spheres.
  • Rheingold: Virtual communities perform the functions of Gemeinschaft community - Our need for human association is so strong that we will seek to build communities of interest in cyberspace because we might have no better option.
  • Simmel: Individual identity is based partly on social existence. Therefore an individual needs a sense of contributing to the greater community.
  • Dewey: True self knowledge is only achieved through the experience of community life.

Democracy requires individual participation in the creation of collective life.


Discussion Notes & Afterthoughts:

  • Is the term Urbanism any valid today?
  • American culture are the dominant paradigm of virtual community studies
  • How open and unmoderated is the political debate within counterpublics?