User:Bohye Woo/Special Issue 9: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
 
(47 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
PAD for this semester:https://pad.xpub.nl/p/special_issue_9_pads_index
= Interfacing the law 2019 =
= Interfacing the law 2019 =


Line 5: Line 6:
* Letter 1: [http://custodians.online/ In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub]
* Letter 1: [http://custodians.online/ In solidarity with Library Genesis and Sci-Hub]
* Letter 2: [https://torrentfreak.com/images/sci-hub-reply.pdf Alexandra Elbakyan to Mr. Robert W. Sweet]
* Letter 2: [https://torrentfreak.com/images/sci-hub-reply.pdf Alexandra Elbakyan to Mr. Robert W. Sweet]
* Letter 3: [[Media:Dearparticipants.pdf|Dear participants in Interfacing the law!]
* Letter 3: [[Media:Dearparticipants.pdf|Dear participants in Interfacing the law!]]
 
<gallery mode="packed" heights="300px">
File:Shadow-library-idea-01.JPG
File:Shadow-library-idea-02.JPG
File:Shadow-library-idea-03.JPG
</gallery>
[[File:WORKSHOP_INTERFACING_THE_LAW.PNG||600px|frameless|center]]
 


== WORKSHOP WITH FEMKE ==
== WORKSHOP WITH FEMKE ==
Line 53: Line 62:
</gallery>
</gallery>


==== [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/09-05-2019_-Event_4|Thursday 9 May]] ====
==Travel to Riedveld Library==
https://pad.constantvzw.org/p/rietveld_library <br>
http://catalogue.rietveldacademie.nl/about.html
 
==Workshop with Eva Weynmayr==
Borrowing / Poaching / Plagiarising / Pirating / Stealing / Gleaning / Referencing / Leaking / Copying / Imitating / Adapting / Faking / Paraphrasing / Quoting / Reproducing / Using / Counterfeiting / Repeating / Translating / Cloning / Silencing / Editing / Omitting / Reducing / Appending / Redirecting / Recontextualising / Focusing / (Faithfully) Reproducing / Caring / Reformatting / Bootlegging / Reframing / Retracing
 
===BOOK 1 — Feminism/Postmodernism===
<gallery mode="packed" heights="300px">
File:Book-bohye woo.JPG
</gallery>
 
#Reproducing (but not exactly.) Producing again - not reproducing. improving materiality (imposition, bindng), adding value<br>
# Localizing<br>
#Crafting


{{Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/09-05-2019_-Event_4}}
This book was photocopied and assembled in a copy store, when asked by a client
not imitating, or copying. the design of the cover is clearly different. it doesn't try to reproduce perfectly, or faking it.
There are design decisins made. Spine writing updide down. (recultured)


==Travel to Riedveld Library==
What is the price of these books? What is the price of a reprodution?
https://pad.constantvzw.org/p/rietveld_library
Original book: 35dollars, in amazon.us
 
*Cover
Wouldn't it be easy to photocopy the whole cover? It was a choice to only have the title and other elements, probably took more time if they had to use a paper to hide the other elements in the photocopy machine.
Back cover is also very different: no information about the author, or short biography. the emphasis on the author is removed.
 
*Spine
Authoratitive book has title from top to bottom.
Reproduced one has from bottom to top. it's crafted. (Crafting)
 
*Format
Printed Size, Paper, Binding are slighly different.
deliberate decision: bit smaller size than A5: maybe they chose this size of their convenience for printing?
 
*Digital copy from LibGen:  
The cover is same
The contents are photocopied.
There is no Back-cover.


==Workshop with Eva Weynmayr==
In the authoritative copy there's a paper reminding the person who borrowed the book to put it back, this in 2004.
==== [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/10-05-2019_-Event_1|Friday 10 May]] ====


{{Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/10-05-2019_-Event_1}}
===BOOK 2 —  A Room of One's Own===
#Adapting
#Caring
#Adding
#Quoting
#Inserting
#influencing
#opinioning
#bringing into conversation
#layering
#merging


<gallery mode="traditional">
Image:DSC00865.JPG
Image:DSC00871.JPG
Image:DSC00872.JPG
</gallery>
<small>Reading with Eva Weinmayr, 10 May</small>


==Workshop with Dusan Barok==
marginal notes, very simillar approach with the annotated text we were doing in Steve's class
==== [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/04-06-2019_-Event_2|Tuesday 4 June]] ====
How many people were involved?


{{Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/04-06-2019_-Event_2}}
You can see the photocopy marks.


==== [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/05-06-2019_-Event_1|Wednesday 5 June]] ====
The notes are all readable in terms of having their own space, they are not all on top of each other.
How was this done? Someone designed and edited the notes, or are all the authors using the same book?
Is this one book annotated by different people, or many books annotated by the owner of each copy of the book?


{{Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/05-06-2019_-Event_1}}
Very subjective vision, your reading is being interrupted by others' thoughts.
The authorship is shared, collective way of reading and writing: Authorship is participative. Interdependent.
You trasmit your knowledge, the reading is shared


Cover
looks like Reclam publisher, but different. Just like the Feminism/Postmodernism cover of the copy, it doesn't try to reproduce perfectly, or faking it.


==Digital (hidden) Labour==
===Story?===
Thinking about authorship in the context of hidden labour in shadow libraries, I question what does it mean to possess authorship when an act of pirating is happened, how can authorship be made, what are hidden accumulated labours that we don't see physically. These labours are made by sharing, editing, scanning, modifying, downloading files, however, these materials are usually not being considered as part of 'content' as annotation, it is considered to be ignored or intentionally hidden. What, Why, and how are they hidden, how can we divulge? Do we want to acknowledge on our labour or leave it anonymously?


===Method? (How to?)===
— Stretching the Idea of Shadow(ing): The meaning of shadow is an area of darkness, being blocked by something, and being unofficial. And the meaning of Shadowing is a method for observing the ultrastructure of biological specimens by increasing visibility of electron microscope in order to see cells minutely. If I think of 'Shadowing' in the context of hidden labour in shadow libraries, an act of shadowing is that zooming-in the invisible layer of the library to witness traces of what is being hidden.


===Workshop?===
Knowledge labour in the pirate library/
Being a knowledge labourer means to download, to edit, to modify, and to upload files — finding out what labours were spent when pirating.


===How? ===
<gallery mode="traditional">
Diving into a forensic way of investigation on labour: In order to reveal the hidden labour in shadow library, Participant will be a detective to find digital labour footages. Being in a detective mode, we'll track down traces/labours that are made throughout the process of select, copy, scan, upload, download, modify, edit, categorize files and put metadata etc...  
Image:DSC00865.JPG
Image:DSC00871.JPG
Image:DSC00872.JPG
</gallery>


===New knowledge?===
==Workshop with Dusan Barok==
Being as a knowledge labourer, you are aware of thinking on the concept of acknowledgment on hidden labours in shadow library.
==== [[Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/04-06-2019_-Event_2|Tuesday 4 June]] ====


===A role of annotation?===
{{Calendars:Networked_Media_Calendar/Networked_Media_Calendar/04-06-2019_-Event_2}}
Annotation becomes a tool to acknowledge hidden labour produced in shadow libraries. It will be considered as more like a investigation(workshop) report on revealing the hidden labour.


===Aim?===
=Blurry Boundaries Workshop=
To experience the behind scene of what's going on in pirate libraries
'''Blurry Boundaries Wiki Page:''' [[Blurry Boundaries|Blurry Boundaries]]
To be aware of legality, anonymity, and acknowledgment.
[[File:workshop.jpg||700px|frameless|center]]
To find out what possible digital labours were being hidden, and why is it important to think of?
[[File:purplepaper.jpg||700px|frameless|center]]
To understand anonymity in pirating and acknowledging its authorship.


===Tool?===
-------
Exiftool
==Introduction==
Welcome to our {frictions, gain or loss} workshop. When one medium {physical book} is transferred to another {digital book}, situations that happen in the process are unintentionally invisible.
Through the workshop, we will experience what are the steps necessary to build a phygital {physical-digital} library and reveal meticulously on what is the hidden labour and work process behind it.
With this activity, we aim to reflect upon the physicality of a book when it is converted into a digital file, and vice versa.
During the workshop we will question together on how we keep what is lost during these steps and how we could increase the life of the source.


== Resources ==
--------
Select, annotate, analyze, scan, correct, digitize, print, read, transfer, erase, encode, curate, hack, interface, work, copy...


=== Sample libraries ===
What libraries become possible when you transform physical books into digital files, and vice versa? When a digital copy of a book is made for a digital library specific steps are followed. Each of these steps requires a decision – to use tools and to spend time. The work involved in digitising a book is invisible and the digital version often loses its connection to the physical book and the library it came from.


* <nowiki>#icanhazpdf</nowiki> [https://twitter.com/hashtag/icanhazpdf?src=hash https://twitter.com/hashtag/icanhazpdf?src=hash]
We aimed to reflect upon different topics such as:
* aaaaarg [http://aaaaarg.fail/ http://aaaaarg.fail]
  the friction between the physical and digital book, what is lost and what is gained when you pass from one format to another.
* Bibliotheca [http://bibliotecha.info/ http://bibliotecha.info/]
  the physicality and contingency of these passages, the labor involved to produce those copies and its hidden position.
* Clockwise libraries [https://clockwise3rldkgu.onion.to/ https://clockwise3rldkgu.onion]
  the mindset of the librarian who has to choose how to produce the digital library, which format to chose and what kind of information to reveal.
* Library Genesis [http://gen.lib.rus.ec http://gen.lib.rus.ec]
  the possibility of a digital library which provides the history of the book and the people involved in its life.
* Memory of the world [http://library.memoryoftheworld.org/ http://library.memoryoftheworld.org]
  annotations which reveal information and challenge the common, static idea of the book.
* Monoskop [http://monoskop.org/ http://monoskop.org]
----------
* On Our Backs [http://voices.revealdigital.com/cgi-bin/independentvoices?a=cl&cl=CL1&sp=BEBJBJCA&ai=1&e=-------en-20--1--txt-txIN---------------1 http://voices.revealdigital.com/cgi-bin/independentvoices?a=cl&cl=CL1&sp=BEBJBJCA&ai=1&e=-------en-20--1--txt-txIN---------------1]
* Project Gutenberg [http://gutenberg.org/ http://gutenberg.org]
* Radical Militant Library (Jotunbane’s Reading Club) [https://c3jemx2ube5v5zpg.onion.to/ https://c3jemx2ube5v5zpg.onion]
* Sci-hub [http://sci-hub.io/ http://sci-hub.tw/]
* Textz.com [http://www.textz.com/ http://www.textz.com]
* [https://bibliotik.me/ https://bibliotik.me]
* volafile.io
* <nowiki>#bookz on IRCHighway/undernet</nowiki>
* The Piratebay @ Worm [http://thepiratebay.worm.org/ http://thepiratebay.worm.org]
* UBU-web [http://ubu.com/ http://ubu.com]
* [http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/XPPL XPPL]


=== Reading ===
==Tools==
'''Hardware''' <br>
Computers - 4 linux/2 mac/1 win
Scanners - 2
Printer - 1 Canon mg3600 (Simon)
<br><br>
'''Software/tools'''<br>
Gimp
makescan.sh (OCR>PDF)
convertpdf.sh (convert the meta.jpeg to .pdf)????
makepdf.sh (merge pdfs)
Digital Library (php uploads + directory list)
<br><br>
'''Others'''<br>
*forms + condition list + info
scale
papers
printer's toner
pens
stapler
bell
timer


* Weinmayr, Eva (2019): "[[Media:Confronting_Authorship_Published_with_content_page--Whose_book_is_it_anyway.pdf|Confronting Authorship, Constructing Practices (How Copyright is Destroying Collective Practice]]" in: ''Whose Book is it Anyway? A View from Elsewhere on Publishing, Copyright and Creativity''. Edited by Janis Jefferies and Sarah Kember
==Explanation==
* Laurie Allen, Balázs Bodó, Chris Kelty (2018): ''Guerilla Open Access'' https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:19825/
In the papers that we are giving you, there is the hidden labour's form that you have to compile while following each step. It is important to write down the starting time of each process to notice how much time do you needed for each step.
* Bodó, Balázs (2015): ''Libraries in the post-scarcity era''. in: Porsdam (ed): Copyrighting Creativity: Creative values, Cultural Heritage Institutions and Systems of Intellectual Property, Ashgate [https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2341818/162448_Libraries_in_the_post_scarcity_era.pdf https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2341818/162448_Libraries_in_the_post_scarcity_era.pdf]
In the end we are going to scan and append it to the digital book (to produce a file with those, oherwise hidden, information of the labour involved to prduce it). The final file will contain the readable pdf, the text produced by trying to convert the scanned image into text and a copy of the hidden labour's form.
* Bodó, Balázs (2019): ''The science of piracy, the piracy of science. Who are the science pirates and where do they come from'' [http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/03/06/the-science-of-piracy-the-piracy-of-science-who-are-the-science-pirates-and-where-do-they-come-from-part-1/ Part I] + [http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2019/03/21/the-science-of-piracy-the-piracy-of-science-who-are-the-science-pirates-and-where-do-they-come-from-part-2/ Part II]
* Weinmayr, Eva (2019): ''[[Media:Confronting_Authorship_Published_with_content_page--Whose_book_is_it_anyway.pdf|Confronting Authorship, Constructing Practices (How Copyright is Destroying Collective Practice)]]'' in: Whose Book is it Anyway? A View from Elsewhere on Publishing, Copyright and Creativity. Edited by Janis Jefferies and Sarah Kember
* Dockray, Sean (2017): ''Interface, Access, Loss'' (notes for a talk) [http://www.academia.edu/11966098/Interface_Access_Loss http://www.academia.edu/11966098/Interface_Access_Loss]
* Elbakyan, Alexandra (2016): ''Why Science is Better with Communism? The Case of Sci-Hub ''(transcript)'' ''[https://openaccess.unt.edu/symposium/2016/info/transcript-and-translation-sci-hub-presentation https://openaccess.unt.edu/symposium/2016/info/transcript-and-translation-sci-hub-presentation]
* Liang, Lawrence (2011): ''Beyond Representation: The Figure of the Pirate.'' in: Access to Knowledge in the Age of Intellectual Property [https://library.memoryoftheworld.org/b/DAvrgk52aetZ8LXC3T18zKc3Tp5gSVcBpplXF6QTaRVpxDJ3 https://library.memoryoftheworld.org/b/DAvrgk52aetZ8LXC3T18zKc3Tp5gSVcBpplXF6QTaRVpxDJ3] p.353-354
* Maigret, Nicolas & Roszkowska, Maria (2015): ''Chapter 2: Insider Perspective The Warez Scene ''in: The Pirate Book [http://thepiratebook.net/ http://thepiratebook.net]
* Mars, Marcell, Zarroug, Manar & Tomislav Medak (2015): ''Public Library'' [http://library.memoryoftheworld.org/b/VG3cDMIz71e2XFDqYEBSat1erDCbmCz9cv2xuitazr_oJsRX http://library.memoryoftheworld.org/b/VG3cDMIz71e2XFDqYEBSat1erDCbmCz9cv2xuitazr_oJsRX]
* Meister, Andre (2013): ''Interviews with e-book pirates'' on: Netzpolitik.org [https://netzpolitik.org/2013/interviews-with-e-book-pirates-the-book-publishing-industry-is-repeating-the-same-mistakes-of-the-music-industry https://netzpolitik.org/2013/interviews-with-e-book-pirates-the-book-publishing-industry-is-repeating-the-same-mistakes-of-the-music-industry]
* ''A users guide to <del>demanding</del> the impossible'' https://artsagainstcuts.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/users-guide-to-the-impossible-web-version.pdf
* Alice Corble and Sara Wingate Gray, ''Back to the Future! Re-visioning 21st Century Public Libraries via a Journey through Time and Space – The Seven Ages of the Librarian in Graphic Novel Style'' in: ''Sarai Reader: projections'' http://archive.sarai.net/files/original/457a6e7bde8cd1b674b8cea8e94eedea.pdf
* ''Evil Media'', Matthew Fuller & Andrew Goffey (Chapter: ''Togetherness'') https://library.memoryoftheworld.org/b/wASHWAtKve4HTCL0VCsKJrlRLlwnkk0hf9uD9TDMIgcDwuGf
* E-mail 'conversation' between Judith Butler and Athena Athanasiou in ''Dispossession: The Performative in the Political'' (Chapter 20: ''The university, the humanities, and the book bloc'' and Chapter 21: ''Spaces of appearance, politics of exposure'') https://monoskop.org/images/1/1f/Dispossession_The_Performative_in_the_Political.pdf
* Interview by Stevphen Shukaitis with Stefano Harvey and Fred Moten in ''The Undercommons, Fugitive planning and black study'' (page 106-115) http://www.minorcompositions.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/undercommons-web.pdf
* ''A book bloc's genealogy'' https://libcom.org/library/book-bloc%E2%80%99s-genealogy


=== Video + film fragments ===
Each of you will have a computer with the main tools we are going to use on the purple sheet there is an explaination of each step to follow to help you during the process of compiling the form.<br><br>
1. For first we are going to ask you to choose a book from Leeszaal, just make sure it fits the scanner. <br>
2. The second step consist in the condition report where we are going to analyze the physical condition of the book. <br>
*There is a scale to check the weight of the book and meant to be compared with the size of the final digital file.<br>
*A chart provided by ebay when you want to sell a book. There you can check the physical condition of the book.<br>
*And on the purple sheet, there is a list of traces as marginalia, underlines and other particular marks that you could find on your book.<br>
3. At the third step, starts the digitalization of the book, here you can chose one or more pages to scan that will become a .jpg image to be renamed and saved in the workshop_folder on the desktop. <br><br>
To run the scanner you can run the 'scan.sh' icon in the folder.<br>
4. Then you can open the image with Pinta (a linux version of paint) or Gimp and correct the image. For example turn it in its original direction, crop it or delete unwanted marks. Then you can save it again in the folder.<br>
5. Now it starts the most complicate step, the translation of the image into text. This process can be done manually but actually there are softwares called OCR which optically recognize the characters in the image. <br>
By running the file called 'ocr.sh' in the folder, the software will automatically start and convert your .jpg into a readable pdf. You can open the pdf with the browser to see how it looks like.<br>
6. Unfortunately the ocr process is not perfect and usually needs a further step to correct it. To see what is the actual text of the ocr ouput, you can open your pdf file with LibreOffice writer, delete the image and reveal the text hidden behind it. <br>
Then you can compare it with the original pdf and save this text in a new pdf inside your folder.<br>
7. At this point we will use the concept of metadata, set of data that describes and gives information about other data. In fact the form will act exactly as a dataset containing your hidden labour. <br>
To make it visible we will ask you to scan it and save it as a pdf into your folder. <br>
8. After that you can run the 'merge_files.sh' in your folder, it will produce your final pdf that you have to rename. It will contain:
*the pdf produced by the ocr
*the pdf with the text of the ocr output
*the pdf of the hidden labour's form<br>
9. The last step will be to print your work and to upload it in our server which you will find on the bookmarks of the browser.
This small digital library that we are going to create is meant to share our works and document the workshop. It will be online in the special issue website


* Brian Knappenberger, ''The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz'' (2014) "follows the story of programming prodigy and information activist Aaron Swartz (...) a personal story about what we lose when we are tone deaf about technology and its relationship to our civil liberties." https://archive.org/details/TheInternetsOwnBoyTheStoryOfAaronSwartz
* Cornelia Sollfrank, ''Giving What You Don't Have'' (2012-2015) "I realised how limited the discourse on appropriation is and shifted the question from what artists can TAKE, to the question of what artists can GIVE, in the sense of what they can contribute to the free circulation of art and culture." http://artwarez.org/projects/GWYDH/ (interview with Andrea Francke, Eva Weinmayr, Piracy Project)
* ''Welcome to the scene, Episode 01'' (2004) "They are revered, reviled, hunted and admired. No one knows who they are - at least, not as far as they know." http://www.welcometothescene.com/
* Jamie King, ''Steal this film II'' (2007) "If Steal this film II proves at all useful in bringing new people into the leagues of those now prepared to think 'after intellectual property', think creatively about the future of distribution, production and creativity, we have achieved our main goal." http://footage.stealthisfilm.com/browse (interview with Lawrence Liang)
* Simon Klose, TPB AFK: ''The Pirate Bay Away from Keyboard'' (2013) "How did Tiamo, a beer crazy hardware fanatic, Brokep a tree hugging eco activist and Anakata, a paranoid cyber libertarian, get the White House to threaten the Swedish government with trade sanctions?" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eTOKXCEwo_8


=== Previous editions ===
==Final Labour Form==
<gallery mode="packed" heights="450px">
File:form_fill.jpg
File:condition_chart.jpg
</gallery>


* http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Interfacing_the_law_(2017)
== Labour form sketches==
* http://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Interfacing_the_law_(2018)
<gallery mode="packed" heights="350px">
File:Worshopsheet04.jpg
File:Worshopsheet01.jpg
</gallery>




<small>This page (?) is copyleft Constant (?) 2017, available under a Free Art Licence http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en/</small>
==A Reader from the Workshop==
Workshop reader.pdf


[[Category:XPUB]]
==Photos==
[[Category:Special Issue]]
<gallery mode="packed" heights="230px">
File:00002.jpg
File:00003.jpg
File:00004.jpg
File:00006.jpg
File:00007.jpg
File:00008.jpg
File:00009.jpg
File:000010.jpg
File:000013.jpg
File:000014.jpg
</gallery>

Latest revision as of 18:20, 9 July 2019

PAD for this semester:https://pad.xpub.nl/p/special_issue_9_pads_index

Interfacing the law 2019

Pirate libraries, shadow libraries, piratical text collections, amateur digital libraries, peer produced libraries and how to read them together.

WORKSHOP INTERFACING THE LAW.PNG


WORKSHOP WITH FEMKE

Thursday 18 April

11:00 Intro: m-e-t-h-o-d-o-l-o-g-i-e-s (or not)
11:15 Q + Q
12:00 Response-ability
13:00 Lunch / move to Museumpark
14:00 Phenomenal cartography
15:30 s\p\e\l\l\i\n\g and/or Diffractive reading and/or Renaming|reframing
17:00 Feedback + next session

Download kit: m-e-t-h-o-d-o-l-o-g-i-e-s (or not)

Workshop with Bodo Balasz

Travel to Riedveld Library

https://pad.constantvzw.org/p/rietveld_library
http://catalogue.rietveldacademie.nl/about.html

Workshop with Eva Weynmayr

Borrowing / Poaching / Plagiarising / Pirating / Stealing / Gleaning / Referencing / Leaking / Copying / Imitating / Adapting / Faking / Paraphrasing / Quoting / Reproducing / Using / Counterfeiting / Repeating / Translating / Cloning / Silencing / Editing / Omitting / Reducing / Appending / Redirecting / Recontextualising / Focusing / (Faithfully) Reproducing / Caring / Reformatting / Bootlegging / Reframing / Retracing

BOOK 1 — Feminism/Postmodernism

  1. Reproducing (but not exactly.) Producing again - not reproducing. improving materiality (imposition, bindng), adding value
  2. Localizing
  3. Crafting

This book was photocopied and assembled in a copy store, when asked by a client not imitating, or copying. the design of the cover is clearly different. it doesn't try to reproduce perfectly, or faking it. There are design decisins made. Spine writing updide down. (recultured)

What is the price of these books? What is the price of a reprodution? Original book: 35dollars, in amazon.us

  • Cover

Wouldn't it be easy to photocopy the whole cover? It was a choice to only have the title and other elements, probably took more time if they had to use a paper to hide the other elements in the photocopy machine. Back cover is also very different: no information about the author, or short biography. the emphasis on the author is removed.

  • Spine

Authoratitive book has title from top to bottom. Reproduced one has from bottom to top. it's crafted. (Crafting)

  • Format

Printed Size, Paper, Binding are slighly different. deliberate decision: bit smaller size than A5: maybe they chose this size of their convenience for printing?

  • Digital copy from LibGen:

The cover is same The contents are photocopied. There is no Back-cover.

In the authoritative copy there's a paper reminding the person who borrowed the book to put it back, this in 2004.

BOOK 2 — A Room of One's Own

  1. Adapting
  2. Caring
  3. Adding
  4. Quoting
  5. Inserting
  6. influencing
  7. opinioning
  8. bringing into conversation
  9. layering
  10. merging


marginal notes, very simillar approach with the annotated text we were doing in Steve's class How many people were involved?

You can see the photocopy marks.

The notes are all readable in terms of having their own space, they are not all on top of each other. How was this done? Someone designed and edited the notes, or are all the authors using the same book? Is this one book annotated by different people, or many books annotated by the owner of each copy of the book?

Very subjective vision, your reading is being interrupted by others' thoughts. The authorship is shared, collective way of reading and writing: Authorship is participative. Interdependent. You trasmit your knowledge, the reading is shared

Cover looks like Reclam publisher, but different. Just like the Feminism/Postmodernism cover of the copy, it doesn't try to reproduce perfectly, or faking it.



Workshop with Dusan Barok

Tuesday 4 June

XPUB1 Special Issue 9: 10:00 - 17:00 / with Dusan + Femke in the small project space
Workshop with Dusan Barok

10:00 Discuss launch, plans, TODO-lists (Femke)
11:00 Dusan Barok on Monoskop
13:00 Lunch
14:00 Dusan on annotation; return to plans together

Blurry Boundaries Workshop

Blurry Boundaries Wiki Page: Blurry Boundaries

Workshop.jpg
Purplepaper.jpg

Introduction

Welcome to our {frictions, gain or loss} workshop. When one medium {physical book} is transferred to another {digital book}, situations that happen in the process are unintentionally invisible. Through the workshop, we will experience what are the steps necessary to build a phygital {physical-digital} library and reveal meticulously on what is the hidden labour and work process behind it. With this activity, we aim to reflect upon the physicality of a book when it is converted into a digital file, and vice versa. During the workshop we will question together on how we keep what is lost during these steps and how we could increase the life of the source.


Select, annotate, analyze, scan, correct, digitize, print, read, transfer, erase, encode, curate, hack, interface, work, copy...

What libraries become possible when you transform physical books into digital files, and vice versa? When a digital copy of a book is made for a digital library specific steps are followed. Each of these steps requires a decision – to use tools and to spend time. The work involved in digitising a book is invisible and the digital version often loses its connection to the physical book and the library it came from.

We aimed to reflect upon different topics such as:

  the friction between the physical and digital book, what is lost and what is gained when you pass from one format to another.
  the physicality and contingency of these passages, the labor involved to produce those copies and its hidden position.
  the mindset of the librarian who has to choose how to produce the digital library, which format to chose and what kind of information to reveal.
  the possibility of a digital library which provides the history of the book and the people involved in its life.
  annotations which reveal information and challenge the common, static idea of the book.

Tools

Hardware
Computers - 4 linux/2 mac/1 win Scanners - 2 Printer - 1 Canon mg3600 (Simon)

Software/tools
Gimp makescan.sh (OCR>PDF) convertpdf.sh (convert the meta.jpeg to .pdf)???? makepdf.sh (merge pdfs) Digital Library (php uploads + directory list)

Others

  • forms + condition list + info

scale papers printer's toner pens stapler bell timer

Explanation

In the papers that we are giving you, there is the hidden labour's form that you have to compile while following each step. It is important to write down the starting time of each process to notice how much time do you needed for each step. In the end we are going to scan and append it to the digital book (to produce a file with those, oherwise hidden, information of the labour involved to prduce it). The final file will contain the readable pdf, the text produced by trying to convert the scanned image into text and a copy of the hidden labour's form.

Each of you will have a computer with the main tools we are going to use on the purple sheet there is an explaination of each step to follow to help you during the process of compiling the form.

1. For first we are going to ask you to choose a book from Leeszaal, just make sure it fits the scanner.
2. The second step consist in the condition report where we are going to analyze the physical condition of the book.

  • There is a scale to check the weight of the book and meant to be compared with the size of the final digital file.
  • A chart provided by ebay when you want to sell a book. There you can check the physical condition of the book.
  • And on the purple sheet, there is a list of traces as marginalia, underlines and other particular marks that you could find on your book.

3. At the third step, starts the digitalization of the book, here you can chose one or more pages to scan that will become a .jpg image to be renamed and saved in the workshop_folder on the desktop.

To run the scanner you can run the 'scan.sh' icon in the folder.
4. Then you can open the image with Pinta (a linux version of paint) or Gimp and correct the image. For example turn it in its original direction, crop it or delete unwanted marks. Then you can save it again in the folder.
5. Now it starts the most complicate step, the translation of the image into text. This process can be done manually but actually there are softwares called OCR which optically recognize the characters in the image.
By running the file called 'ocr.sh' in the folder, the software will automatically start and convert your .jpg into a readable pdf. You can open the pdf with the browser to see how it looks like.
6. Unfortunately the ocr process is not perfect and usually needs a further step to correct it. To see what is the actual text of the ocr ouput, you can open your pdf file with LibreOffice writer, delete the image and reveal the text hidden behind it.
Then you can compare it with the original pdf and save this text in a new pdf inside your folder.
7. At this point we will use the concept of metadata, set of data that describes and gives information about other data. In fact the form will act exactly as a dataset containing your hidden labour.
To make it visible we will ask you to scan it and save it as a pdf into your folder.
8. After that you can run the 'merge_files.sh' in your folder, it will produce your final pdf that you have to rename. It will contain:

  • the pdf produced by the ocr
  • the pdf with the text of the ocr output
  • the pdf of the hidden labour's form

9. The last step will be to print your work and to upload it in our server which you will find on the bookmarks of the browser. This small digital library that we are going to create is meant to share our works and document the workshop. It will be online in the special issue website


Final Labour Form

Labour form sketches


A Reader from the Workshop

Workshop reader.pdf

Photos