User:Alexander Roidl/opensoftware: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Free BSD was the basis for Darwin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system), used for MacOS. Permissive license, so Apple doesn't need to share their modificatio...") |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Attempt to run machines just on the open source releases above: http://www.puredarwin.org/ | Attempt to run machines just on the open source releases above: http://www.puredarwin.org/ | ||
Unix as a concept. Same commands, but a different source code. | Unix as a concept. Same commands, but a different source code. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
=Non-software, free culture licenses before CC= | =Non-software, free culture licenses before CC= | ||
Against DRM license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_DRM_license | Against DRM license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_DRM_license | ||
Open Publication License https://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ | Open Publication License https://www.opencontent.org/openpub/ | ||
Public Domain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain | Public Domain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain | ||
WTFPL - Do what the fuck you want public license http://www.wtfpl.net/about/ | WTFPL - Do what the fuck you want public license http://www.wtfpl.net/about/ | ||
Design Science License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_science_license | Design Science License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_science_license | ||
Free Art License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Art_License | Free Art License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Art_License | ||
=CC= | |||
Creative Commons caused the demise of other free culture licences | |||
Founded by Lawrence Lessig in 2002 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Lessig --> Episode on his presidential campaign http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5607896/ | |||
https://creativecommons.org/choose/?lang=en | |||
'''Problematic because diversity in licenses and ideas is wiped out.''' | |||
=Copyfarleft= | |||
http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Copyfarleft (if you are a corporation you pay for that work) | |||
"The peer production license is an example of the Copyfair type of license, in which only other commoners, cooperatives and nonprofits can share and re-use the material, but not commercial entities intent on making profit through the commons without explicit reciprocity. This fork on the original text of the Creative Commons non-commercial variant makes the PPL an explicitly anti-capitalist version of the CC-NC." | |||
Latest revision as of 13:19, 5 December 2017
Free BSD was the basis for Darwin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_(operating_system), used for MacOS. Permissive license, so Apple doesn't need to share their modifications. (but they share some parts: https://opensource.apple.com/ . But the process of development is not shared, releases are cleaned)
Attempt to run machines just on the open source releases above: http://www.puredarwin.org/
Unix as a concept. Same commands, but a different source code.
Non-software, free culture licenses before CC
Against DRM license https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_DRM_license
Open Publication License https://www.opencontent.org/openpub/
Public Domain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain
WTFPL - Do what the fuck you want public license http://www.wtfpl.net/about/
Design Science License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_science_license
Free Art License https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Art_License
CC
Creative Commons caused the demise of other free culture licences
Founded by Lawrence Lessig in 2002 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Lessig --> Episode on his presidential campaign http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5607896/
https://creativecommons.org/choose/?lang=en
Problematic because diversity in licenses and ideas is wiped out.
Copyfarleft
http://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Copyfarleft (if you are a corporation you pay for that work)
"The peer production license is an example of the Copyfair type of license, in which only other commoners, cooperatives and nonprofits can share and re-use the material, but not commercial entities intent on making profit through the commons without explicit reciprocity. This fork on the original text of the Creative Commons non-commercial variant makes the PPL an explicitly anti-capitalist version of the CC-NC."