User:Cristinac/Day2: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
CLiPS | |||
Computational Linguistics & Psycholinguistics | |||
Guy de Pauw, Walter Daelemans, Tom De Smedt | |||
-Chomsky’s work on linguistics: language acquisition device. | |||
-extracting knowledge from data | |||
Natural language processing | |||
most information is in unstructured data (text) | |||
data in digital form | |||
big data (too big to handke with conventional means) | |||
>90% of currently available data was created in the last 2 years | |||
Problems: accuracy levels, speed, fundamental problems (form-meaning relation, semantics, world knowledge) | |||
1 objective knowledge (machine reading): recognising which word types are used | |||
2 subjective knowledge: sentiment, opinion, emotion, modality, (un)certainty. especially with the advent of social media | |||
3 meta knowledge: authorship, author attributes (educational level,age,gender,personality,region,illness), text attributes (date of writing,..): of the, on the, has been | |||
tf IDF | |||
- | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tf%E2%80%93idf | ||
- | |||
Schwartz HA Eichstaedt JC 2013 Personality, Gender, and Language in the age of Social Media - controversial | |||
http://www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu/socialmediapub.pdf | |||
women using more pronouns, men use more determiners and quant ors | |||
-relational language - women | |||
-informative language - men | |||
Lexical / morphological, syntactic reasons for bad translations | |||
ambiguity. example: snappy little girl’s school, adding only in a sentence, all students know two languages (the same languages?) | |||
paraphrase. inference. | |||
ex. The mayors prohibited the students to demonstrate because they preached the revolution (who is they?) | |||
Language processing pipeline: text input to meaning output | |||
Deep Understanding | |||
text input —> | |||
tokenization/normalization | |||
lemmatization (reducing words to their meaning in the dictionary) | |||
part-of-speech tagging: determining what meaning/types of words they are | |||
shallow parsing (who is doing what to whom) | |||
modality/negation | |||
word sense disambiguation (ex bank) | |||
semantic role labelling | |||
named-entity recognition | |||
co-reference resolution | |||
—>meaning output | |||
Text mining (shallow understanding) | |||
contents: extract facts (concepts and relations between concepts) and opinions | |||
meta-data | |||
Text mining (Marti Hearst 2003) | |||
Don Swanson 1981: medical hypothesis generation | |||
example: deception | |||
not everyone is equally successful in deceiving others | |||
Liars use, fewer exclusive words, fewer self and other references, fewer time related words, fewer tentative words, more space related words, more motion verbs, more negations, more negative and positive emotions | |||
Cornell University study (Ott et al 2011) | |||
Human judges fail to make the distinction (truth bias), low inter annotator agreement, 2 out of 3 perform at chance level, classifier succeeds (90% accurate). cues: more superlatives, deceptive: imaginative rather than informative language | |||
however. there are more than 1 differentiations between the text sources | |||
Text categorisation Documents —> Documents—>classes —>text classifier | |||
—>linguistically analysed data —>text classifier | |||
looking at what defines an author, and not what he writes about | |||
Hans Moravec diagram | |||
Sentiment mining | |||
sentiment lexicon, classifiers and annotation | |||
politiekebarometer.be | |||
www.clips.uantwerpen.be/cqrellations | |||
SAS, R, Python | |||
http://www.clips.ua.ac.be/pages/pattern | |||
from pattern.web import Twitter | |||
from pattern.en import sentiment | |||
for tweet in Twitter(language=“en”).search(“#obama”): | |||
print tweet.text | |||
csp files | |||
data sheet functionality of pattern | |||
Classifiers: | |||
ex: predict the sentiment polarity, predict the position of a face | |||
training document, class event, bag-of-words | |||
word bigrams, | |||
character trigrams. example: wrong spelling of “exellent”: exe, xel, ell, len, ent | |||
word lemmas | |||
tokenization: Goed!=goed+! | |||
Annotation=gold standard | |||
online learning option | |||
annotation process | |||
concept clusters | |||
Deep Learning | |||
Based on neural networks | |||
encode world knowledge into our vocabulary | |||
queen=king-man+woman | |||
word2vec (not deep learning, same principle, similar additional increase) - application | |||
applications: language technology, speech technology, image recognition, recommender systemen | |||
RUBENS CODE | |||
CODE 1: | |||
from pattern.web import PDF | |||
from pattern.en import sentiment, parse | |||
from pattern.db import Datasheet | |||
ds = Datasheet() | |||
f = open('Bible.pdf') | |||
pdf = PDF(f) | |||
ds.append((pdf.string, 'Bible')) | |||
f = open('quran.pdf') | |||
pdf = PDF(f) | |||
ds.append((pdf.string, 'Quran')) | |||
ds.save('bible_quran.csv') | |||
print 'saved!' | |||
CODE 2: | |||
from pattern.web import URL, plaintext | |||
from pattern.vector import Document, NB, KNN, SLP, SVM, POLYNOMIAL | |||
from pattern.db import csv | |||
from pattern.en import parse | |||
import math | |||
# classifier = SVM(kernel=POLYNOMIAL, degree=10) | |||
classifier = SVM() | |||
print 'TRAINING:' | |||
for text, book in csv('bible_quran_torah.csv'): | |||
length = len(text) | |||
# part_len = int(math.floor(length/10)) | |||
# print book | |||
# # print part_len | |||
# for i in xrange(1,10): | |||
# print i | |||
# s = text[i*part_len : i*part_len + part_len] | |||
# v = Document(parse(s, tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False), type=book, stopwords=True) | |||
# classifier.train(v) | |||
v = Document(parse(text, tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False), type=book, stopwords=True) | |||
classifier.train(v) | |||
print 'CLASSES:',classifier.classes | |||
print 'RESULTS\n======' | |||
return_discrete = True | |||
print "OBAMA" | |||
s = open("speech_obama.txt").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) | |||
print "OSAMA" | |||
s = open("speech_osama.txt").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) | |||
print "MALCOLM X" | |||
s = open("speech_malcolmx").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) | |||
print "ANITA" | |||
s = open("essay_anita.txt").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) | |||
print "POPE" | |||
s = open("speech_pope.txt").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) | |||
print "NETANYAHU" | |||
s = open("speech_netanyahu.txt").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) | |||
print "LUTHER KING" | |||
s = open("speech_luther-king.txt").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) | |||
print "CQRRELATIONS" | |||
s = open("cqrrelations.txt").read().replace('\n','') | |||
s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) | |||
print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete) |
Latest revision as of 11:53, 27 January 2015
CLiPS
Computational Linguistics & Psycholinguistics
Guy de Pauw, Walter Daelemans, Tom De Smedt
-Chomsky’s work on linguistics: language acquisition device. -extracting knowledge from data
Natural language processing most information is in unstructured data (text) data in digital form big data (too big to handke with conventional means)
>90% of currently available data was created in the last 2 years
Problems: accuracy levels, speed, fundamental problems (form-meaning relation, semantics, world knowledge)
1 objective knowledge (machine reading): recognising which word types are used 2 subjective knowledge: sentiment, opinion, emotion, modality, (un)certainty. especially with the advent of social media 3 meta knowledge: authorship, author attributes (educational level,age,gender,personality,region,illness), text attributes (date of writing,..): of the, on the, has been tf IDF
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tf%E2%80%93idf
Schwartz HA Eichstaedt JC 2013 Personality, Gender, and Language in the age of Social Media - controversial http://www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu/socialmediapub.pdf
women using more pronouns, men use more determiners and quant ors -relational language - women -informative language - men
Lexical / morphological, syntactic reasons for bad translations ambiguity. example: snappy little girl’s school, adding only in a sentence, all students know two languages (the same languages?) paraphrase. inference. ex. The mayors prohibited the students to demonstrate because they preached the revolution (who is they?)
Language processing pipeline: text input to meaning output Deep Understanding text input —> tokenization/normalization lemmatization (reducing words to their meaning in the dictionary) part-of-speech tagging: determining what meaning/types of words they are shallow parsing (who is doing what to whom) modality/negation word sense disambiguation (ex bank) semantic role labelling named-entity recognition co-reference resolution —>meaning output
Text mining (shallow understanding) contents: extract facts (concepts and relations between concepts) and opinions meta-data
Text mining (Marti Hearst 2003)
Don Swanson 1981: medical hypothesis generation
example: deception
not everyone is equally successful in deceiving others
Liars use, fewer exclusive words, fewer self and other references, fewer time related words, fewer tentative words, more space related words, more motion verbs, more negations, more negative and positive emotions
Cornell University study (Ott et al 2011)
Human judges fail to make the distinction (truth bias), low inter annotator agreement, 2 out of 3 perform at chance level, classifier succeeds (90% accurate). cues: more superlatives, deceptive: imaginative rather than informative language however. there are more than 1 differentiations between the text sources
Text categorisation Documents —> Documents—>classes —>text classifier
—>linguistically analysed data —>text classifier
looking at what defines an author, and not what he writes about Hans Moravec diagram
Sentiment mining
sentiment lexicon, classifiers and annotation
politiekebarometer.be www.clips.uantwerpen.be/cqrellations
SAS, R, Python
http://www.clips.ua.ac.be/pages/pattern
from pattern.web import Twitter
from pattern.en import sentiment
for tweet in Twitter(language=“en”).search(“#obama”): print tweet.text csp files data sheet functionality of pattern
Classifiers:
ex: predict the sentiment polarity, predict the position of a face
training document, class event, bag-of-words
word bigrams,
character trigrams. example: wrong spelling of “exellent”: exe, xel, ell, len, ent
word lemmas
tokenization: Goed!=goed+!
Annotation=gold standard
online learning option
annotation process
concept clusters
Deep Learning Based on neural networks encode world knowledge into our vocabulary queen=king-man+woman
word2vec (not deep learning, same principle, similar additional increase) - application applications: language technology, speech technology, image recognition, recommender systemen
RUBENS CODE
CODE 1: from pattern.web import PDF from pattern.en import sentiment, parse from pattern.db import Datasheet
ds = Datasheet()
f = open('Bible.pdf') pdf = PDF(f) ds.append((pdf.string, 'Bible'))
f = open('quran.pdf') pdf = PDF(f) ds.append((pdf.string, 'Quran'))
ds.save('bible_quran.csv')
print 'saved!'
CODE 2: from pattern.web import URL, plaintext from pattern.vector import Document, NB, KNN, SLP, SVM, POLYNOMIAL from pattern.db import csv from pattern.en import parse import math
- classifier = SVM(kernel=POLYNOMIAL, degree=10)
classifier = SVM()
print 'TRAINING:' for text, book in csv('bible_quran_torah.csv'):
length = len(text) # part_len = int(math.floor(length/10)) # print book # # print part_len # for i in xrange(1,10): # print i # s = text[i*part_len : i*part_len + part_len] # v = Document(parse(s, tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False), type=book, stopwords=True) # classifier.train(v) v = Document(parse(text, tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False), type=book, stopwords=True) classifier.train(v)
print 'CLASSES:',classifier.classes
print 'RESULTS\n======'
return_discrete = True
print "OBAMA" s = open("speech_obama.txt").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)
print "OSAMA" s = open("speech_osama.txt").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)
print "MALCOLM X" s = open("speech_malcolmx").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)
print "ANITA" s = open("essay_anita.txt").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)
print "POPE" s = open("speech_pope.txt").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)
print "NETANYAHU" s = open("speech_netanyahu.txt").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)
print "LUTHER KING" s = open("speech_luther-king.txt").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)
print "CQRRELATIONS" s = open("cqrrelations.txt").read().replace('\n',) s = parse(plaintext(s), tokenize=True, lemata=True, tags=False, relations=False, chunks=False) print classifier.classify(Document(s), discrete=return_discrete)