The Individual within the Collective: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* Fraser's critiicism towards Habermas: Borgeois men dominated these public spheres where they practiced their own skills of governance. | * Fraser's critiicism towards Habermas: Borgeois men dominated these public spheres where they practiced their own skills of governance. | ||
* '''Counterpublics'''(Fraser): gays, feminists, anarchists, and other factions tend to form in response to the dominant public spheres. | * '''Counterpublics''' (Fraser): gays, feminists, anarchists, and other factions tend to form in response to the dominant public spheres. | ||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Rheingold Rheingold]: Virtual communities perform the functions of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemeinschaft_and_Gesellschaft Gemeinschaft] community - Our need for human association is so strong that we will seek to build communities of interest in cyberspace because we might have no better option. | |||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Simmel Simmel]: Individual identity is based partly on social existence. Therefore an individual needs a sense of contributing to the greater community. | |||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dewey Dewey]: True self knowledge is only achieved through the experience of community life. | |||
Democracy requires individual participation in the creation of collective life. | |||
'''Discussion Notes & Afterthoughts:''' | '''Discussion Notes & Afterthoughts:''' | ||
* Is the term Urbanism any valid today? | |||
* American culture are the dominant paradigm of virtual community studies | |||
* How open and unmoderated is the political debate within counterpublics? | |||
Latest revision as of 00:27, 18 October 2010
The Individual within the Collective: Virtual Ideology and the Realization of Collective Principles, Jan Fernback, (1996) Virtual Culture: Identity and Communication in Cybersociety ed. Steve Jones, Thousand Oacks: Sage Publications Ltd.
Moderators:
Keywords:
collective, computer-mediated communication, public sphere, counterpublics, virtual community, Gemainschaft, Gesellschaft, social contract, communications decancy act, virtual agora
Summary of key points raised in the text:
- Like in the physical world, there are tensions between the individual and the collective in cyberspace.
- Computer-mediated communication (CMC) users assume that they can overcome the tyranny of geography through cyberspace.
- Cyberspace has become a new arena for participation in public life - what agora was to the Greeks - an arena for political debate and education.
- Habermas: the public sphere - cyberspace might serve as a public sphere similar to the coffee houses in 18th century France and Britain, where public debate was taking place.
- Fraser's critiicism towards Habermas: Borgeois men dominated these public spheres where they practiced their own skills of governance.
- Counterpublics (Fraser): gays, feminists, anarchists, and other factions tend to form in response to the dominant public spheres.
- Rheingold: Virtual communities perform the functions of Gemeinschaft community - Our need for human association is so strong that we will seek to build communities of interest in cyberspace because we might have no better option.
- Simmel: Individual identity is based partly on social existence. Therefore an individual needs a sense of contributing to the greater community.
- Dewey: True self knowledge is only achieved through the experience of community life.
Democracy requires individual participation in the creation of collective life.
Discussion Notes & Afterthoughts:
- Is the term Urbanism any valid today?
- American culture are the dominant paradigm of virtual community studies
- How open and unmoderated is the political debate within counterpublics?