2009 201: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


If you follow the archived discussion thread of the proposed image tag, you see things proposed such as an special "include" attribute on the anchor tag to mean to embed, or place that which is referenced in-line in the flow of the referring page. This behavior was not followed however as the anchor tag (<a>) has remained purely a mechanism to introduce click-able links (ie references that the user must click -- or explicitly request following in some fashion), in order to open.
If you follow the archived discussion thread of the proposed image tag, you see things proposed such as an special "include" attribute on the anchor tag to mean to embed, or place that which is referenced in-line in the flow of the referring page. This behavior was not followed however as the anchor tag (<a>) has remained purely a mechanism to introduce click-able links (ie references that the user must click -- or explicitly request following in some fashion), in order to open.
It is interesting to parallel the discussion around <img> tags to those around HTML 5's addition of <audio> and <video> tags. (need references)


* [[IMG collage | Exercise: <img> collage]]
* [[IMG collage | Exercise: <img> collage]]

Revision as of 16:04, 5 January 2009

Linking vs. Embedding

If you follow the archived discussion thread of the proposed image tag, you see things proposed such as an special "include" attribute on the anchor tag to mean to embed, or place that which is referenced in-line in the flow of the referring page. This behavior was not followed however as the anchor tag (<a>) has remained purely a mechanism to introduce click-able links (ie references that the user must click -- or explicitly request following in some fashion), in order to open.

It is interesting to parallel the discussion around tags to those around HTML 5's addition of <audio> and <video> tags. (need references)