Generous Practices: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
GB: The interesting thing about a cultural ecosystem is the fact that it's not only about a literal exchange of information and products, but that the system also allows you to share behaviours, approaches, and working methods. The participation of the public also plays an important role. | GB: The interesting thing about a cultural ecosystem is the fact that it's not only about a literal exchange of information and products, but that the system also allows you to share behaviours, approaches, and working methods. The participation of the public also plays an important role. | ||
</blockquote> | |||
<blockquote> | |||
LR: An author never has a neutral position; he or she is an active thinker and player. It's always interesting when creators use their position as an author to give others the opportunity to use their work, instead of protecting everything, but that's just one way of questioning the concept of ‘originality’, authority and the power an author can exercise. | |||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Revision as of 06:33, 7 October 2024
aka why (special issue #25)
Generous Practices
Also in Floss+ART, alongside Yuill's Distributive Practices, Femke Snelting: Generous Practices (also here).
A fictional conversation, based on emails, physical encounters, IRC and a Skype session.
Why this form?
LR: I'm not sure I would use the term ‘ecology’ literally, but we like to work with open source software for example, because it exposes a network of relations between communities, tools and audiences. Of course, these relations go much further than art, literature, theatre or dance. Culture is embedded in social, economical and technological structures.
GB: The interesting thing about a cultural ecosystem is the fact that it's not only about a literal exchange of information and products, but that the system also allows you to share behaviours, approaches, and working methods. The participation of the public also plays an important role.
LR: An author never has a neutral position; he or she is an active thinker and player. It's always interesting when creators use their position as an author to give others the opportunity to use their work, instead of protecting everything, but that's just one way of questioning the concept of ‘originality’, authority and the power an author can exercise.
- Example of Annemieke van der Hoek's Epicpedia... Exposing the wiki as conversation. A form Snelting would re-use in Conversations.
- Parallel with things like RFCs and discussions on mailinglists such as the proposal for an IMG tag.
Based on citations from a number of influences, a "fictional conversation" that represents Snelting reflections and inspirations from colleagues inspired by models of Free Software working in the cultural / artistic work.
Read through the introduction (Cultural Ecosystem)
Reflections from Strasbourg
Marie Verdeil's work: Low-tech magazine and Kris de Decker.
Becoming Sponge + Reparative Reading.
Why make Radio?
- How to give back to an audience?
- Idea to post recordings back to Radio Aporee, yes! Look into the community aspect.
Return to Yuill's idea of distributive practice. (Example such as HAKMEM, and Scratch/Cardew). But... also Cardew's later regrets?