Generous Practices: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(citation to Femke's own descrition of the text's method and format) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Femke Snelting: Generous Practices https://calibre.constantvzw.org/read/98/pdf | Femke Snelting: Generous Practices https://calibre.constantvzw.org/read/98/pdf | ||
> ''A fictional conversation, based on emails, physical encounters, IRC and a Skype session.'' | |||
Why this form? | |||
Based on citations from a number of influences, a "fictional conversation" that represents Snelting reflections and inspirations from colleagues inspired by models of Free Software working in the cultural / artistic work. | Based on citations from a number of influences, a "fictional conversation" that represents Snelting reflections and inspirations from colleagues inspired by models of Free Software working in the cultural / artistic work. | ||
Revision as of 08:16, 5 October 2024
aka why (special issue #25)
Generous Practices
Femke Snelting: Generous Practices https://calibre.constantvzw.org/read/98/pdf
> A fictional conversation, based on emails, physical encounters, IRC and a Skype session.
Why this form?
Based on citations from a number of influences, a "fictional conversation" that represents Snelting reflections and inspirations from colleagues inspired by models of Free Software working in the cultural / artistic work.
Read through the introduction (Cultural Ecosystem)
Reflections from Strasbourg
Marie Verdeil's work: Low-tech magazine and Kris de Decker.
The Sponge + Reparative Reading.
Why make Radio?
- Radio Aporee as a project. Look into the community aspect.
Return to Yuill's idea of distributive practice. (Example such as HAKMEM, and Scratch/Cardew). But... also Cardew's later regrets?