User:Kimberley/Final presentation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:To whom.pdf|thumb|"To whom it may affect," (first 21 pages)]] | |||
"Graduation project":<br> | "Graduation project":<br> | ||
[[To whom it may affect|To whom it may affect,]] (This page is a temporary form, the design of the publication is still in process and will be uploaded here asap)<br> | [[To whom it may affect|To whom it may affect,]] (This page is a temporary form, the design of the publication is still in process and will be uploaded here asap)<br> |
Revision as of 16:54, 16 June 2023
"Graduation project":
To whom it may affect, (This page is a temporary form, the design of the publication is still in process and will be uploaded here asap)
"What follows is a corpus of four letters respectively addressed to Jeanne van Heeswijk, Erica Gargaglione, Carolina Castro and Chaiyoung Kim (Chae)—but also, to all of them at once and, ultimately, "to whom it may affect".
Each addressee is concerned with collective approaches whether their practice comprises rehearsing collectiveness, inspecting and documenting mechanics of self-organised cultural organisations, actually co-organising activities within a cultural organisation or more particularly questioning the effect of intimacy on publishing practices through experiments. At last, I would like to acknowledge all addressees for having played a consented or incidental role in the process and the publication of this epistolary chronicle.
Departing from a local issue—itself stemming from the context-specific process of a collective publication—these letters intend to give an account of recurring conflicts relating to collective processes.
The publishing of private missives both represents an invitation and a record of the relations involved in a process that is challenging to document or that may be overridden by its design. These series of epistles are punctuated with a collection of methods to practice collectiveness in publishing contexts. In turn, the suggested methods may be enacted and adapted to any collectivity."
Previous experiments at XPUB:
Annotating | ||||
CCTV
|
Collective editing tools | Restaging reality | Acknowledgment | |
Annotation compass
Cloverleaf
|
52.948.000 tales
|
Audience's agency | Space and surrounding | |
Common narration to host multiple voices | Price tag SI17
AccAcc
Public moment #1
| |||
X-Kitchen
SI18, "Uneven pattern"
SI18, "SIX"
...where an ordinary private setting was turned into a stage, hosting and broadcasting a program.
1. 2. gesture: (dis)placed in an empty room, the familiar arrangement becomes a stage (reenactment)— awareness prompted by the mic, the script and other recording materials. Repurpose an old setting, turning a private space into a space of publication.
F.N.P
Miller's Hollow
|
Retrospective narration as a tool to document a situation | |||
Interdependencies introduction assignment
"Somewhere on the highway, publishing" (thesis)
"To whom it may affect" (project)
|