2009 102: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
No edit summary
 
(67 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Command Line Media Research ==
== Command Line Media / "Media Bashing" ==


this page is under construction ;)
While the command line, or shell, is a text-based interface, this does not mean that manipulating other kinds of media, image, sound, video, is excluded. Far from it, many command line tools offer extremely useful and uniquely powerful functionality difficult to achieve with [[GUI]] programs. In addition, by applying the basics of [[pipeline | pipelining]] and [[abstraction]] (through creating your own scripts with parameters), the command line enables highly particular and personal media tools to be created by pulling existing tools together in novel ways.


RESEARCH:
Considering the difference between graphical / interactive software and textual / non-interactive, you could compare:
Tool to support visual comparison of front pages newssites a la Sarah Charlesworth's Modern History (1978)
* [http://www.sarahcharlesworth.net/series-view.php?album_id=34&subalbum_id=53 Modern History] examples
* [http://www.muhka.be/toont_beeldende_kunst_detail.php?la=en&id=2590&subbase=actueel&jaartal= The Order Of Things] through the end of the year at the MuKHA, Antwerp.


start with example of how to rip the above page with wget.
{| class=border
& re-assemble with montage...
|graphical / interactive
|command-line / non-interactive
|-
|the [[GIMP]] or Photoshop
|[[ImageMagick]]
|-
|[[FireFox]]
|[[wget]]
|-
|Cinelerra or Final Cut
|[[ffmpeg]]
|}


cron job to automate ?
So the difference is not simply whether a program uses graphics or not -- Command-line programs are designed to perform a very specific task, and typically are specified textually according to a strict syntax (command-line options, etc.) They are non-interactive in the sense that you start them up, they do their thing, and you get the result -- you don't typically influence them while they are running. However, you often can work interactively with these programs through cycles of making changes to a script, running it, observing the result and repeating.
(need simple solution for naming files with date, basic back quoting)


In general build up from really simple CL exercises of using imagemagick, file manipulations (moving, renaming, copying, deleting)... Introducing public_html...
== Making a "frontpage" snapshot tool ==


== Adventures in Command Line ==
An exercise to build a simple tool to support visual comparison of front pages newssites a la Sarah Charlesworth's [http://www.sarahcharlesworth.net/series-view.php?album_id=34&subalbum_id=53 Modern History] (1978). The work, among many other works of interest, can be seen as part of the [http://www.muhka.be/toont_beeldende_kunst_detail.php?la=en&id=2590&subbase=actueel&jaartal= Order Of Things] exhibition until Jan 4, 2009 at the MuKHA, Antwerp.


* http://www.ir.bbn.com/~bschwart/adventure.html
Exercise explores the principle of:
* simple command line tools focused on doing a simple task
* the idea of a pipeline to join various commands together
* introducing the concept of a variable to make a personal "tool"
* cron jobs to automate a process over a long time period


== Tutorial ==


== Chat bots ==
=== Getting a grip on a tool ===


Eliza... tie in with Python callbacks...
Command line programs, as focused and "simple" as they may be, often take some time to get used to. The initial man-page dump of possible options may seem overwhelming at first, but if you simply have a little discipline to try some variations, and above all to record your successes (in a text file and/or by taking notes on a printed copy of a man page), you can soon feel comfortable to use the new program.  


----
We start with the tool [[wget]].


Necessary Tools:
First, simply try to run it:
* ssh program (look up for those on windows)


<source lang="bash">
wget
</source>


* text adventures == early intersection of narrative and computational forms
<source lang="bash">
* multi-person / time sharing / interaction vs. batch
wget --help
* getting comfortable with the command line
</source>
* command line == programming
* pipeline VS. sealed case "suites"


Too much information! A [[pipeline]] to the rescue!


pragmatic exercises / "puzzles" involving:
<source lang="bash">
* wget for some spidering
wget --help | less
* ffmpeg for some media manipulation?
</source>
* imagemagick for some xxzzy ?!


Maybe cool to keep in the spirit of group / network activities / timing.
<source lang="bash">
How to communicate between users logged into the network.
man wget
... too complex for now
</source>


Exercises could take the form of puzzles with a description of a desired end result, like:
Man has an option to output print-friendly postscript output. It's described on the "man" man page. (That's right: "man man"!)
* Produce a single image made up of images collected from the homepage of a particular website.
(wget => montage)


* Produce an animated gif made up of the headlines from a particular news site
<source lang="bash">
? CL feedreader ?? => image => movie ?
man -t wget
</source>


(?! find command / wildcards as a prelimary way to loop )
<source lang="bash">
By creating a single (or more) variables, create a basic tool.
man -t wget > wget.ps
</source>


!! show how copying images / animation to public_html allows for instant web "publishing"
Now you can print the postscript file, or view with a viewer like evince:
 
<source lang="bash">
evince wget.ps
</source>
 
=== Necessary Tools / Topics ===
* Shell basics: cd, pwd, mv, cp
* Connecting to a "remote" server with ssh
* public_html
* scp
* [[wget]]
* [[ImageMagick]]: montage
 
=== Concepts ===
* man pages
* command line options
 
=== Examples of wget ===
 
Start from these examples, culled from the web. Try the examples out, alter the options. Find the options used in the (printed) man page of wget. Collect working (or interesting non-working) commands in a text file, and add comments to remind yourself why they were noteworthy.
 
* http://linuxgazette.net/issue70/chung.html
* http://tipotheday.com/2007/10/11/wget-some-quick-tips/
* http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=718549&page=2
 
To download all the files in a "directory listing":
<source lang="bash">
wget -r -np -nd http://example.com/packages/
</source>
 
=== Solutions ===
 
<source lang="bash">
wget -r -nd -np --follow-tags=img http://www.colourlovers.com -A.jpg,.jpeg
montage *.jpg ../public_html/montage.jpg
</source>
 
Blurps out this file: http://pzwart2.wdka.hro.nl/~tklok/montage.jpg
 
(Notice the wget is run from a different directory the where the picture is placed)
 
*http://pzwart2.wdka.hro.nl/~ebonetti/Emanuele/montage.png
 
*http://pzwart2.wdka.hro.nl/~svilayphiou/techdaze/102/montage.jpg
 
*http://pzwart2.wdka.hro.nl/~cbaronavski/static/hate.jpg
 
== Assignment for next week ==
 
* Chapters 3 & 4 from [[Think Python]]
* Exercises from the book plus the [[Think Python X3 | additional exercise]]
 
Chapter 4 introduces some [[Turtle Graphics]]!

Latest revision as of 15:21, 3 December 2008

Command Line Media / "Media Bashing"

While the command line, or shell, is a text-based interface, this does not mean that manipulating other kinds of media, image, sound, video, is excluded. Far from it, many command line tools offer extremely useful and uniquely powerful functionality difficult to achieve with GUI programs. In addition, by applying the basics of pipelining and abstraction (through creating your own scripts with parameters), the command line enables highly particular and personal media tools to be created by pulling existing tools together in novel ways.

Considering the difference between graphical / interactive software and textual / non-interactive, you could compare:

graphical / interactive command-line / non-interactive
the GIMP or Photoshop ImageMagick
FireFox wget
Cinelerra or Final Cut ffmpeg

So the difference is not simply whether a program uses graphics or not -- Command-line programs are designed to perform a very specific task, and typically are specified textually according to a strict syntax (command-line options, etc.) They are non-interactive in the sense that you start them up, they do their thing, and you get the result -- you don't typically influence them while they are running. However, you often can work interactively with these programs through cycles of making changes to a script, running it, observing the result and repeating.

Making a "frontpage" snapshot tool

An exercise to build a simple tool to support visual comparison of front pages newssites a la Sarah Charlesworth's Modern History (1978). The work, among many other works of interest, can be seen as part of the Order Of Things exhibition until Jan 4, 2009 at the MuKHA, Antwerp.

Exercise explores the principle of:

  • simple command line tools focused on doing a simple task
  • the idea of a pipeline to join various commands together
  • introducing the concept of a variable to make a personal "tool"
  • cron jobs to automate a process over a long time period

Tutorial

Getting a grip on a tool

Command line programs, as focused and "simple" as they may be, often take some time to get used to. The initial man-page dump of possible options may seem overwhelming at first, but if you simply have a little discipline to try some variations, and above all to record your successes (in a text file and/or by taking notes on a printed copy of a man page), you can soon feel comfortable to use the new program.

We start with the tool wget.

First, simply try to run it:

wget
wget --help

Too much information! A pipeline to the rescue!

wget --help | less
man wget

Man has an option to output print-friendly postscript output. It's described on the "man" man page. (That's right: "man man"!)

man -t wget
man -t wget > wget.ps

Now you can print the postscript file, or view with a viewer like evince:

evince wget.ps

Necessary Tools / Topics

  • Shell basics: cd, pwd, mv, cp
  • Connecting to a "remote" server with ssh
  • public_html
  • scp
  • wget
  • ImageMagick: montage

Concepts

  • man pages
  • command line options

Examples of wget

Start from these examples, culled from the web. Try the examples out, alter the options. Find the options used in the (printed) man page of wget. Collect working (or interesting non-working) commands in a text file, and add comments to remind yourself why they were noteworthy.

To download all the files in a "directory listing":

wget -r -np -nd http://example.com/packages/

Solutions

wget -r -nd -np --follow-tags=img http://www.colourlovers.com -A.jpg,.jpeg 
montage *.jpg ../public_html/montage.jpg

Blurps out this file: montage.jpg

(Notice the wget is run from a different directory the where the picture is placed)

  • montage.png
  • montage.jpg
  • hate.jpg

Assignment for next week

Chapter 4 introduces some Turtle Graphics!