User:Tisa/GRS: Difference between revisions

From XPUB & Lens-Based wiki
 
(65 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
=Deadline=
16-11-20




=Session #5=
=PROJECT PROPOSAL=
12-11-20
Tisa N. Herlec
*at the session we spoke about the project proposal (added comments, lines of improvement), the thesis outline comments were received on 14-11-20 via email.


References received on 12-11-20 (project proposal)
I work with the mediums of: text, sound (extended vocal techniques), performance, objects/sculpture, visual (painting, drawing, printmaking), publication/zine, workshops. I am the kind of a creator that makes connections, extends, overflows, chaoticizes, my methodology is the one of addition (it is X AND also X).
*Derrida on "constitution".
*John Crary: The fortunes of the performative
*Andrew  Pickering: The cybernetic brain (performative theatre)
*Catherine Hayles: Unthought ("Non conscious thought". When do you make it conscious? Meditation, focus on non-conscicous thoughts.)
*"murmur of birds" = flocking
*think of different models, self-institutionalizing, making my own institution. bureau. administration of information. artistic movements outside of the mainstream. a way of institutionalizing (eg surrealizm.). a coherent discourse.
*naturalizing artistic activity (fish). category of art is in itself an institution.


...
Collaboration is my main principle in creation – whether between humans (me, collaborators, the public, institutions), works, materials, concepts, ... tinkering, collecting, making, assembling as well as analysing, observing, writing, conversing, playing, ... are in motion. The presence of the other stirs the work and the possibility of perceiving reality into unknown, sometime unimaginable directions. The system is open and anything could happen. Discursive encounters shape everyone involved. Exchange happens. Cybernetic feedback loops are constant.
 
And improvisation as a strategy is crucial. I believe that engaging in practices of improvisation enhance sensibility and awareness, build our capacities for interaction, communication and community building. They aid us unravel hidden patterns of behavior, open potentialities and options, and construct our own methodologies of being and creating in the world. I will continue to improvise  and to share this practice and its affordances with others. (See more below in: [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/GRS#P.S.:_important  P.S.:Important]).
 
==The Constitution==
 
"The Constitution" will be a multiplicity of works assembled in a dynamic installation, parallel to a self-hosted website.
 
The installation and the site present a holistic assemblage of my work, and are the infrastructure that will allow me to open my imaginary to others and trigger a cybernetic circular causal relationship (already established in collaborative segments of my practice). Hence, neither the installation nor the website will be static. Using the protocols of exchange described below, I will generate, dynamicize, share and set concepts in motion together with others.
 
"The Constitution" will have a dual function.
 
First:
It will provide an archival snapshot of a particular moment in my research practice, a trail of breadcrumbs left by my process, a nest for thoughts and their physical manifestation. The works that I will make up to that point and their documentation will inhabit the physical space that will frame and tame them. The website will be the manifestation of the space in a digital realm.
 
Second:
The space will function as the mediator, the plateau of exchange between my imaginary and others' imaginaries. I will open up the space, letting others peek inside my head and experience the multiplicity, the entanglement of works and concepts they emerged from. The space will be open to the public in a time-frame from 10.00 to 20.00 from X. 7. 2020 to X. 7. 2020. In this time I will be present in the space. I will engage in protocols of exchange with them, letting them effect my creative process; changing and rearranging the constituted space and also generating new works in it together with others.
 
More concretely: I will set up a discursive corner in the space. There, I will engage in conversations with others and drink coffee. I will give tours of the space and tell stories and visions behind the works that constitute it. I will perform in the space (using it as a stage) and propose workshops to others. While doing all of this, I will collect imaginaries/responses/associations in different formats such as audio recording, writing (visitors' book and a notepad on my website). If the covid restrictions will be still in place, I will make livestreams of performances and host virtual discussions and workshops on my website, as well as set up a live webcam transmission from "The Constitution" for the duration of its opening hours.
 
All of the data that I will have gathered will effect the space and the works in it, interventions done by me or others will continuously change it, generating something unforeseeable. The project will be an experience in itself, a long-durational performative action and an encounter between variables and constants.
 
It is absolutely necessary for me to establish "The Constitution" as a physical space (regardless the restrictions of contact with the public), in itself it is performative, a process in-constitution. With this, I will allow potentialities to emerge, document the already existing and noticed ones, archiving versions of my works, establish a discourse that is provisional and in its approaches propositional. My process and my works will get a chance at a recurrent dynamicization, unfolding with the presence, the action, the interventions and the insights of others. "The Constitution" is an infrastructure that contains and facilitates flow and improvisation, it defines and enables actions and interactions, a recursive change, a space to learn from each other through conversations and its materializations.
 
"The Constitution" will also function as a stage, allowing a series of performative (inter)actions and collaborations to take place.
 
There will be performances of:
* A duo "ch" with Linus Bonduelle using self-made instruments (found objects amplified by contact microphones, analog effects and voices, developing an improvisational discourse between imaginary characters. [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#ch See more here.]
* An augmentable duo "cTrL+" with a cellist Lucija Gregov, inviting another musician into the performance, augmenting our collaboration, expanding its "function". (cTrL+P for example) [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#cTrL See more here.]
* My solo performance. [https://soundcloud.com/tisaneza Hear snippets of my soundmaking here.]
 
The already existing pursuits in the medium of sound outlined above will expand into: radioplays, field recordings, poetry, sound installations in public space, soundwalks, new collaborations and improvised performances.
 
==Topos==
The meta infrastructure of the space reflects my research interest and is closely related to my thesis outline.
 
A semiotic vision guides my research, metaphorically representing it and giving it a materiality:
 
''A school of fish is swarming in the water. Their movement is rapid, dynamic, consistent, governed by a natural order, flow. Suddenly and silently a fishnet bursts into the water, engulfs a portion of the fish and the human drags them onto the surface. They will die, be gutted and cleaned, sold, bought, consumed, perhaps discarted. The net makes the fish become a part of a system of processing and consumption (that is not their natural ecosystem), imposes a structure onto their being. The remaining fish recurrently reorganize themselves, schooling forward as if nothing had happened.''


Comments received on 14-11-20 (thesis outline):
I am fascinated by the dynamics that such a happening produces, and the metaphorical, semiotic significance of the action of fishing (represented by the fishnet and its materiality): an act of framing happens, a possibly repressive rupture of one system, a passage onto another. Paranodalities emerge. I question on what is inside (a system, a network, the net, the habit, the imaginary), what is outside, what are the characteristics of the permeable membrane in-between, what are the dynamics from/towards the inside/outside, intra-actions that happen, frictions that are constant. All of this also happens between humans: between me and the people that I collaborate with (engage in a common creative process), and also others (the public) that encounters me and my works - through a discursive interactional logic (exchange), including workshops (of sensibilization and improvisation) in which I will directly share some of my insights and methods (collected in chapter [III], the manual).


Your graduation project, The Constitution, makes a performative record of your output, it fosters spontaneity and keeps a record of it; this helps generate subsequent works (feedback=cybernetics).  
I think of: mycelium, roots, lineages, spiders' webs, weaving, entangled matter, chem-trails, transportation pathways, movement, ...
I think of: chaos, flow, homeostasis, structure, networks, organization, taxonomy, process, disciplines, hegemony, ...
I reside somewhere in the middle, grasping for air and observing.


The thesis should follow a similar procedure {= set parameters in which things can happen} the thesis should reflect that: the number (three) and the form(s) (chapters) are given, and there is room for spontaneity within those parameters.
==Material works==
My material works have sprouted from the fascination with nets and ropes: their formal constitution. The way they encompass, leave out, capture, arrange, dissect - and are, in themselves, dissected, decomposed, washed ashore, polluting, ...
(More concretely I will talk about these objects in chapter [II], a fiction story told by the discarded fishnet.)


Paradoxically, the more the structure is clearly defined, the more room you have to play (the outcome is not set by the the parameters - it is not deterministic- the possibilities of what happens within the perameters are very open (take the alphabet or the musical notation system, for instance).
An outline of emerging works that are going to find their place in "The Constitution" and that are driving my material process ahead:


If the thesis outline is without form or structure it is very difficult for the tutors to assess whether it is going to work. The terms you set for yourself for '''success or failure''' are also unclear. At the moment the text you propose can wander any way, following any passing instinct. If you lack precision at this stage, that is exactly what the text will do (wander where it will). ]  
*Material found on the beach - nets:
[[File:Photo_2020-10-07_14-52-34.jpg|500px]]


response: What if I want that? What id I don't "believe" in failure? Again, it is a matter of framing, contextualizing and also the preparations of the state I am in before/while writing and researching. I believe intention is crucial, and the editing process refines the moment. (Making a work and then putting it into the space, this refines it, defines it, gives it meaning. How things are framed, exposed, exhibited, published.)
*Scanned:
[[File:Scanned_threads.png|500px]]


*updated project proposal [https://pad.xpub.nl/p/tisa_project_proposal_10-11-20 here] and thesis outline [https://pad.xpub.nl/p/tisa_thesis_outline_10-11-20 here] 10-11-20
*Experiments with salt that unify the detached materials:
[[File:Photo_2020-10-14_10-42-22.jpg|500px]]


*[https://pad.xpub.nl/p/GRS_thesis-outline_tisa_2 Expanded project proposal here], thesis outline in [https://pad.xpub.nl/p/GRS_thesis-outline_tisa_1 the previous pad].
*Printmaking with the found material:
*got comments from Steve on 4-11-20
[[File:Indigo.jpg|500px]]


=Session #4=
*Working with threads, "A dark thought with a good purpose":
[[File:Dark.jpg|500px]]


29-10-20
*Painting the in-between spaces, "A battle of energies in the sky"
[[File:Slika_nova_2020.jpg|500px]]


solo tutorial w/Steve
*Archiving my visual research in [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#archival_book_of_visual_research this book]:
[[File:Photo 2020-10-07 14-39-00.jpg|500px]]


transcription and annotations of the tutorial on the pad.
The ongoing work will expand into ceramic sculptures eaten by salt, crystal and mycelium growing pursuits, sculptural knotting of strings and threads and nets (also in a form of a spatial installation), ... I will let material and thought to intuitively guide me. Process is crucial for me.


Edited, reviewed, updated [https://pad.xpub.nl/p/GRS_thesis-outline_tisa_1 Thesis outline & project proposal].
==Website==


Crucial insights from session #3:
In the digital part of my project - my website - I will deploy these features:
* knowledge is all around me, no need to rely on/reference dead authors too much > shift conceptual research more towards kins, collaborators, people that inspire me. > Making a series of interviews. Shaping my research into questions. Posing them to myself. Posing them to others. Asking other people to interview me.
*self-hosting on a Raspberry Pi
* learn from experience and practice > write down key insights that happen. keep a diary/log of shifting perspectives. (fragmented already on pads).
*an instance of mediawiki (data/archive organization)
* learn from self-generated data > make an overview of my works, write about my works, about composition/approach/process/crucial.
*metadata fields (extra info on works - semantic and episodic)
*an open notebook/comment
*playlists (changing speed)
*text to speech instant subtitles generator
*visualisation of sound
*livestreaming
*freewriting tool (python nltk library)
*...


> all this while keeping an eye to my research interests/topics outlined in session #3.
This is my first tryout on the sandbox, using the Jupyter notebooks:


The nature of my work process:
[[File:Website sandbox.png|500px]]
*second-order cybernetics
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_thinking divergent thinking]
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning inductive reasoning]


==Homework==
This sketch serves me as the starting point. Within my website, I want to produce narratives made out of different media (picture, video, sound, text), intuitive flows of associations across the entanglements of my works that the website will archive (and afford new ones to emerge). I will make a linking structure between the elements, a system of indexing (Mediawiki queries).  
Hackpackt:
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Oratory_Services infinite list performance]
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#ch ch: Stand Your Ground and Hold Water piece]
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#archive_of_visual_research archival book] in the making - printing out October images. Physical object.


=Session #3=
The MediaWiki categories are outlined as followed:
15-10-20
*conceptual keywords (being determined while archiving the work. They will trace the  conceptual "red threads".)
*title of the work
*time of creation of the work
*solo/collaborative work
*material medium (painting, performance, sound, object, installation, writing, organization)
*place of showing (radio, gallery, space, public space, publication, nowhere)
*other (affordances of wiki's "red missing link").


==Thesis outline==
The public will be able to navigate through my works in an intuitive, hypertext fashion. My website will be simultaneously an archive and an instant-publishing platform. An infrastructure that will allow me to make visible, to share, experiment and disseminate knowledge, and to be in contact with the public.


[https://pad.xpub.nl/p/GRS_thesis-outline_tisa Wrote this outline today.] Important insight line 14 - 54!
===Updates===
Here are some preliminary sketches (2-12-20):


Outline of the thesis:
[[File:Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-19.jpg|500px]]
*Include annotated bibliography.
[[File:Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-23.jpg|500px]]
*Write: What kind of thesis do you want to write & what do you want your thesis to be about. '''Why and how.'''
[[File:Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-57.jpg|500px]]
[[File:Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-59.jpg|500px]]


==Homework==
Annotated bibliography.
Which five works/texts/... are key to your research?


*[[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_log#Gilles_Deleuze_.26_Felix_Guattari_-_1000_Plateaus 1000 Plateaus]]
*[[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_log#Ulises_Ali_Mejias:_Off_the_Network:_Disrupting_the_Digital_World Off The Network]]
...
*[[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_log#Cyborg_manifesto Cyborg Manifesto]]
*[[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_log#Karen_Barad:_Posthumanist_Performativity:_Toward_an_Understanding_of_How_Matter_Comes_to_Matter Posthumanist Performativity]]
*[[Konstantin Stanislavsky - A students' diary]]


==group session==
introduction w/Steve, Natasha, Marloes


[https://pad.xpub.nl/p/GRS15Oct pad]
On 13-1-21 I have a running RaspberryPi linked with the domain [http://tisa.world tisa.world]:
As long as the criteria (on the pad) are met, the form of the text is up to us.


*What text form would be best appropriate to the content, context of our work?
[[File:Screenshot tdw.png|500px]]
*"The ability to make work and to be able to articulate the reasons for the choices you made; to think seriously about the implications of the work you've made and to respect it as a serious contribution to a discourse."


*"Writing articles that compile a thesis, breaking it down into manageable pieces."
==Tools==
In the realm of technology, I will also attempt to construct the following tools for documentation of my elusive practice:
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Post-production_of_experience "A sculpture made out of focus"], a gyroscope following the movements I make while performing, compiling them into a 3D drawing, printing a 3D sculpture.
*An earphone microphone which I will use to make field recordings and recordings of conversations on walks.
*A pedal camera with which I will capture single moments in my studio space and instantly publish them to a segment on my website.
*a bash imagemagick script that will order and edit the images that go into my Archival book of visual research.
*More contact microphone instruments (already used in the duo "ch").


*"Use the forms you know work for you: If you write articles, poems, scripts, polemics, diary entries, stories, field reports, academic essays, observational essays, description of family video footage, use those skills in making your thesis."
==Methodologies/Research strategies==


*"The fancy term for describing what you do and why you do it is methodology."
*reading and constructing a real-time research log (reading annotations+intertextual links, also summaries of texts and own thoughts on texts, reading theory as if it was poetry (observing own emotion, thoughts, connections);
*writing responses to texts, short essays;
*co-writing/thinking with others - chapter [I];
*recording and transcribing my presentations and tutorials, keeping a diary of my insights/shifting perspectives;
*recording myself speaking and writing intuitively (I call it freewriting);
*writing fiction (poetry, stories) - chapter [II];
*observing/visions/images/hallucinations;
*transcribing content (words) from sound improvisation;
*making an overview of my works (archival and generative);
*analysis of my works and the process that made them;
*making notes of conversations w/friends;
*interviewing practitioners - chapter [III];
*being interviewed by others;
*exchanging letters;
*visual/sculptural: thinking with material, depicting of concepts;
*collecting objects;
*giving form to process-generated data (booklets, sound pieces);
*sound improvisation alone & w/others;
*writing scripts/compositions/exercises (the manual) - chapter [III];
*shifting scale principle (concepts will be applied to different scales, making parallels: x > macro > micro > x ...  x > personal > societal > political > x)
* ...


*"There has to be in your thesis, whatever form it takes, some space to reflect on why you are asking these questions; and an account of the means by which you set about answering them."
I want to learn from:
*myself and my self-generated data, practice, experience.


*"Be clear about these things before you go into writing the thesis think carefully about why you want to write this text and why it needs to take the form that it does."
My intuitive, rhizomatic chaosmos/my practice is [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice documented here.]


*MY QUESTION: "How to respect the unpredictable ways that the process might take when deciding on a form, even content. If breaking down to separate pieces, how to assume the development?" > By December, finding a structure. Having an exploratory process - the content can be experimental. Structured in such a way that allows the development of the project.
*the insights and the works of the people that I personally know.
*the theoretical works in the field.


Thesis formats:
[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_log See my research log here.]
*Report of research and practice (linked)
*Analytical essay exploring related artistic, theoretical, historical and critical issues and practices that inform your practice, without necessarily referring to your work directly.
*The presentation of a text as a body of creative written work.


Examples:
*available in the Bootley library.
*writing a thesis in the form of an archive (of the research) - going in diverse directions in writing, without restricting oneself. It can be personal, matching the process.
*analytical essay of the process of reading the file (below) on the computer + interventions that critically reflect on it.
REF: [http://raley.english.ucsb.edu/wp-content/Engl800/Kittler-nosoftware.pdf Kittler: There is no software]
*creative writing. Choosing an appropriate mode of address. +meta context, explanation


Research basics:
The key terms describing my methodologies are:
*Research sources (JSTOR)
*second-order cybernetics;
*Referencing and citation (Harvard system of referencing)
*discursive;
*Using research to inspire you.
*divergent thinking;
*Beware of research rabbit holes.
*inductive reasoning;
*practice-based research;
*polyvocal, polymorphous and polyamorous.


=Session #2=
==Timetable==
29-9-20


w/Marloes:
All the time:  
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/GRS290920
*making material works
*documentation
*making notes
*performing (as much as restrictions allow or streaming)


&transcribe the recording
November:
*sketch website infrastructure
*learn nltk, css, html
*writing fictional story, chapter [II]
*find a space that will become "The Constitution"
*finish the bash imagemagick script
*19-11-20: py.rate.chnic workshop: a)PART_to_de(PART with Ioana Tomici and Mark van de Heuvel


==Homework==
December:
[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#hackpact_prototype Hackpact Prototype #1]
*4-12: Deadline First Chapter
*17-12: RADADAR digestive circuit event (Cirkulacija2, Ljubljana, SI)
*set up the Raspberry Pi self-hosting, install WikiMedia
*learn nltk, css, html
*make text to speech work
*arrange my archive, documentation of my previous works (for the website)
*cowriting, chapter [I]


==Transcription of the presentation==
January:
*I'm thinking about how structure is something that is always present in all kinds of systems, even if they are not human-made.
*make interviews, chapter [III]
*analyse, test, arrange data, chapter [III]
*make the manual, chapter [III]
*building my website


(showing my prototype)
February:
*Deadline First Draft Thesis
*building my website
*making the gyroscope tool ("The sculpture made out of focus")
*making the pedal camera instant publishing tool


*It is a collection of images. [Beehive, bees have a very clear structure.]
March:
*Deadline Second Draft thesis (texts to 2nd readers)
*building my website


*I am interested in these dynamics that happen because of certain structures. Improvisation is kind of on the other side of it as something that is something that is not predefined and pre-structuralized, but can also be (through composition,  certain rules, protocols, regulations).
April:
*Thesis Deadline
*adding thesis texts to my website
*Finalizing the infrastructure of my website


(max helping me hold up the prototype. "this printer is great, i didn't expect this effect".)
May:
*adding documentation of my works to the website
*residency+performance with cTrL+KG (Kino Šiška, Ljubljana, SI)


*[humans inspecting weather. chaos. butterfly effect. trying to understand what is the sublime structure of weather.]
June:
*Inhabiting "The Constitution"


*[a grid of streets, one square is misplaced]
July:
*opening "The Constitution" to the public


*[root systems, connection to the rhizome (Deleuze, Guattari), the notion of networks and systems - they are not even horizontal, there is another set of rules that regulates a certain system, way of being, way of construction]
...


*[a bookshop Bukvarna in Maribor. no taxonomization, books all over. Something usually very straight-forward, categorized, not necessarily always. And you find crazy things in there. M:"a surrealist, structuralist experience of a library".]
=THESIS OUTLINE=
Tisa N. Herlec


(turning around for 180)
The written part of my thesis will be constructed out of three chapters.
In each, I will discuss one aspect of my research interest using different forms ([I]: a collectively written essay, [II]: a fiction story, [III]: a manual).


*[How tool effects the body. Foucault: bodies of humans are being regulated. Notion of the power, governance that regulates. Orthodontist. Foot deformation. How the social structure/regulation, expectation (beauty standards). Applies to a lot of things > the common denominator: there is an internalized way of how we perceive something to be done in a correct/right/done in a certain way - the social contract basically. And it effects the bodies. Sitting behind a computer for 8 hours a day will probably lead to back pain in 20 years, if not now already.]
These texts, following different writing forms, will be conceptually connected to each other. In every chapter I will include an account on my practice, a subchapter charting the key insights that the works that I make provide.


*[human inside of a theatrical and acoustic space.]
My graduation project "The Constitution" makes a performative record of my practice, it encompasses my process and archives it, and with its encounter with others it progresses and changes, generating subsequent works, influencing and framing the existent ones. This process is conducted within the notion of a cybernetic feedback loop dynamic.


*[robocops and a person reading the constitution. The development after this picture was taken was quite brutal. Repressive organs of the society that govern our behaviour.]
The thesis follows a similar protocol. There is a framework to my thesis - three chapters written (2000-3000 words each) within defined form(at)s. A cybernetic collaboration occurs in all three.  


*I want to understand structure more, know where it comes from and how it effects the everyday life of people. It's quite abstract and theoretical.
==Chapters==
===[I]===


*What is the role of improvisation here? Perhaps (performance, sound, text) is a testing field, a space where blueprints for another kind of structure are suggested/tried out. I think that '''no-structure never exists.''' The absence of structure is almost impossible. If there is structure that is made in the flow, in the dao, in the undictated sorts of behavior, as an opposition to something that already exist - even this is structure. How to analyse it, how to perceive, which patterns are just copy-pasted into the structure.
Form: a cowritten essay


*M:"'''Improvisation is your method to analyse the topic of structure, or is it also about improvisation - is it your method AND your topic?'''"
Object: field report


*T:"It's both. I always do this thing where I put structure into topic, and then it all mixes up. It is like the root system. ... And I don't like labels too much, therefore I try to dissolve it."
In the first chapter of my thesis, a cowritten essay will be produced, an exchange between two thinkers - myself and my friend Leon Holsten. Discourse will unravel in our dialogues (phone conversations and collaborative writing). We will share our own personal experiences of the texts and other references that we are studying together. Writing this text will be an experiment in collaborative writing and a negotiation between standpoints, a study of tensions that might emerge when two conceptual apparatuses find themselves in an in-depth encounter. Publishing this text will allow for a response from its readers (in a form of open commentary section on my website), a possible versioning of successive texts, and expansion into other discursive collaborations with my cowriter.


*M:"Sometimes I have to put labels on things, in order to understand, to see if I recognize it correctly."
The text will speak about the entanglements that humans take part in. It will take sound as the phenomenon guiding our research of multiplicities and intra-actions between elements in an (eco)system. The domain of field recordings will serve as an inspiration, and so will specific cases of the natural systems adapting to the human interventions into them. Paranodality and non-spaces will be mentioned as the areas of the outside, the tracing of marginalia that pushes the dynamics of influence from the entryways and passages into the networked weave of inseparable elements.


*T:"That's the catch - how not to label something too fast, in '''what way to make the labels into variables'''. So it is not fixed and structuralized, just because the world says it has to be. Sometimes one thing goes under a lot of categories."
Keywords:
entanglement, exchange, influence, networks, collaboration, birds, sensibility, noticing the intricate, implicit multiplicities, paranodal spaces, conglomerates, additive, field recordings, acoustic ecology, cyborgs, ...


*An anecdote from my performance (ctrl+p): In the moment when I was improvising lyrics/poetry, I was digesting all of the material that I was reading and researching. '''Improvisation for me is (in a strange way) also some sort of a composition of thought. A tool that materializes all of the conceptuals into reality, into language, into something that is shared with others.'''"
===[II]===


*M:"'''Method and medium.'''"
Form: a fiction story


*Yes. Improvisation = topic, method and medium.
Object: nets


///
In the second chapter, the fiction story, I will think and write together with the material that is guiding my works - a discarted, deconstructed fishnet, washed ashore of an anonymous beach. I will embody - personify it and let it tell its story through language. This chapter is closely connected to the material works that I will be making this year. (See my "semiotic vision" in the project proposal - it is the ground on which I will build this story on.)


==Marloes' questions==
The narrative will expand from the material itself, speaking about the relation of flow and systems, movement and stillness, birth and pollution, cycles of passing from one structure to another. The net will speak of society's mechanisms of shaping bodies and materials, hegemonic control and governance, the conception of a tool, the externalization of human intent and industrial revolution: the influence of machines/technology on contemporary conceptions of humans and materials (also: dopamine, disembodiment, attention economy, distraction). The principle of personification of a material will allow me to speak on behalf of the material and also on behalf of humans. The net will stumble across social contracts, habitus, normalization.
'''*Why do you want to make it?'''


I consider improvisation as a domain where habitual behavior and social contracts are questioned/challenged, their liminalities explored. The aspect of "hacking the human mind/the human intelligence", finding strategies that overcome habitual behavior /indoctrination, systems that produce us/, enhancing sensibility, exploring subconscious modes of operation as a proposition, opening up options to each one of us, and the way we are intrinsically intertwined.
Keywords:
systems, networks, structures, material, matter, composition, hegemony, social contracts, disobedience, violence, bodies, form, tradition, influence, ...


'''*What do you want to make?'''
===[III]===


''Does it have to be ONE thing that I make? How does this work? How interdisciplinary am i allowed to be? ... Rather than making one work, i want to make a myriad, mutually informing each other, linked to theory (testing out theoretical claims in practice, with others).''
Form: a manual


I want to facilitate [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/pending#Composing_sensibility_workshop workshops] and other forms of interactive situations (such as sound walks), or [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/pending#.22Death_of_the_author.22 this] and [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/pending#Who_cares.3F this], continue [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice performing] (alone and with others) in the field of sound improvisation; write and compose (scripts/compositions/exercises for humans in flow), build machines that help me think [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/pending#Post-production_of_experience this one for example], and theoretically research the field of my interest: the friction between structure/form/composition/systems and improvisation/flow/subconscious.
Object: the interviews


A system for a structuralization/archivation of my research and practice will also be constructed "on the go", its final form will most possibly be a website.
In the third chapter, the manual, I will find inspiration and guidelines to improvisation in collaboration with various practitioners. In the context of a weekly radioshow at Worm Radio (hosted by me, starting in January 2021), I will interview them about: their processes, approaches to the construction of their works, specific practices they do to enter the state of flow, their relation to the documentation of performative, elusive works; and about the ways their past works relate to newer ones. When applicable to the individuals that I will be interviewing, I will also ask them about their methods of teaching improvisation. The interviews will be semi-structured in form, allowing me to improvise on the spot and respond in real-time to the emerging topos.


'''*How do you plan to make it?'''
The data from the interviews and from my own practice will acquire a form of an assemblage, a methodological manual for improvisation and flow. In the process of writing this chapter, my role will be the one of the collector and the archiver, the one that arranges a multitude of recipes in a cookbook (methodologies in a manual) - doing so only when I will have tested, modified and taxonomized them. The manual will consist of methodologies, tactics, scripts, protocols, exercises, scores, compositional techniques and instructions that the readers will be invited to execute alone or with others, using the manual in everyday life and in generative improvisational practices in the media of their choice. My experience and the manual will further support me as a facilitator of workshops for improvisation that I will resume conducting as soon as possible (Covid), sharing methodologies in practice. In the meantime, I am building exercises that can be done in a digital environment (online video group workshops).


[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_strategies Here] is a list of my research strategies.
Writing this chapter will allow me to engage in discussions with improvisers that I respect and cherish; to exchange methodologies and approaches (the back-end/backstage of their practices that are seldomly articulated). It will afford me to look at my practice of improvisation through the prism of methodologies, to analyse, expand and update. This chapter will allow the readers into the backstage of the domain of improvisation (and my own practice that is a part of it), deepening their understanding of its constitution. The recordings of the interviews and their transcripts will be publicly accessible as an addition to this chapter in the form of the radio show (AM and online).  


'''*What is your timetable?'''
Keywords:
improvisation, ubuntu, kinship, collectivity, daoism, theory of flow, chaos theory, flow, process, archive, documentation, improvisation as inherent to beings/systems, improvisation as a resistance tactic, proposition, methodologies, dynamics between improvisation and social contract, strategies of interrupting the scripting, habitus, normalization, disobedience, opposition, empowerment, unscripted dramaturgies, humor, dance, movement, playfulness/playing, collaboration, togetherness, ...


Practice and research simultaneous. Weekly overviews of the work made. Daily arrangement of thoughts. Prototyping continuous.  
...


'''*Who can help you and how?'''
==P.S.: important==


Collaborators, partners in communication, theoreticians and practitioners, tutors and classmates and friends and random encounters, meaningful debates.
My research interest comes from an inner sway, a realization pertaining to my own constitution. I am inclined to rationally understand, categorize and systematize - the world, my own work, the processes I'm dealing with, thinking, others. This is my nemesis. I approach it by engaging into processes and activities in which I challenge my inner limitations and biases, where I search for their edges and push through them, expanding my own affordances.  


'''*Relation to previous practice'''
While improvising, I dynamicize these notions, ground myself in ever-changing processes and prospect the state of continuous flow. I unlearn, let go, get lost, find inspiration, make, think, expand.


Obvious and full. hehe.
This tension persists in my practice/research where I am materially, processually, conceptually and experientially exploring the dynamics and implications of structure+composition+form+system(s)+hegemony and process+improvisation+flow+subconscious+collective+chaos+empowerment.  
They coexist, entangle, mingle with each other, interact.  


'''*Relation to a larger context'''
I am the embodiment of the friction that I am researching. I am currently in the process of unlearning the notion of binaries and dynamicizing my systems of thought. I share my insights with others.


See: why, and see references.
I am intrigued by the constitution of the world, the structures that we are a part of (as bodies effected by the mediated environment of sociality), I wish to grasp this and juxtapose it to the world as I experience it with the practice of disobedience to its chains: improvisation. I consider improvisation a domain where habitual behavior and social contracts are questioned and challenged, it is an uncharted territory filled with possibilities.
&spell out the links.


'''*References/bibliography'''
Within "The Constitution" (see project proposal), I am hacking my own mind and my habitus. I believe that the constitution of my own methodologies will (when done with devotion and over time) afford me to overcome the implicit indoctrination into the systems that produced me. In my practice I wish to be propositional, to provide options to existence - not only to myself, but also to my kins, collaborators and the public. The insights that I might obtain, I will share, no matter the medium of exchange (this thesis, the works that I will make, conversations and workshops with others, ...).


See a list of references [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research here], and my research log [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_log here].
In the thesis, I wish to explore and expand, articulate and write down my insights, make them publicly available. This will serve as a basis for my future (collaborative) trajectory of my improvisational practice in different media.


*[https://pad.xpub.nl/p/ICTgrad comments on the answers to questions]
==Bibliography==


==First project/practice/research description==
===[I]===
*Donna J. Haraway: A Cyborg Manifesto
*Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari: 1000 Plateaus [multiplicity, BwO]
*Karen Barad: Agential Realism: On the Importance of Material-Discursive Practices [intra-action]
*Ulises Ali Mejias: Off the Network: Disrupting the Digital World [paranodality]
*Marc Auge: Non-Places
*Roland Barthes: From Work to Text
* ...


[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/Graduate_proposal_guidelines Graduate proposal guidelines] > making a proposal for yourself, scope and content, methods and formats. Short, precise, practical outline.
===[II]===
*Ursula Franklin: lectures [prescriptive technology]
*Marcel Mauss: The Techniques of the Body
*Judith Butler: Gender Trouble
*Reza Negarestani: Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials
*Italo Calvino: Cosmicomics
* ...


In my research (theoretical and practical) I derive from my previously established practice of improvisation in a variety of mediums (sound, text, interactive, visual ...).  
===[III]===
*Italo Calvino: Cybernetics and Ghosts
*Konstantin Stanislavski: A Students' Diary
*Pauline Oliveros: Deep Listening
*Antonin Artaud: The Theatre and its Double [the theatre of cruelty]
*Guy Debord: The Society of the Spectacle
*Amelia Jones: Body art/Performing the subject
*Boris Groys: The Loneliness of the Project
*Simon Yulli: All Problems of Notation Will Be Solved By the Masses
* ...


My theoretical field of interest is the friction between structure+composition+form+system(s)+hegemony and improvisation+flow+subconscious+collective+chaos+empowerment.
==Complete list of works==


I am intrigued by the constitution of the world, the structures that we are a part of (as subjects/bodies in a mediated environment of sociality), I wish to understand this better and juxtapose the world as I experience it with the practice of disobedience to its chains: improvisation. I consider improvisation a domain where the liminalities between ''structure+composition'' and ''flow+improvisation'' are explored. Habitual behavior and social contracts are questioned and challenged.
OBJECTS
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#archival_book_of_visual_research The archival book of visual research]
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#nets rhizomatic ready-mades + modified (salt, epoxy)]
*ceramic sculptures [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#salt eaten by salt]
*growing crystals
*knots and nets and weaving and bondage
*...
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#elasticite Elasticite collection and zine]


I will theoretically explore the notions of: tool, script, protocol, habitus, normalization, rhizome, intra-action, structure, power, improvisation, composition, daoism, cybernetics, ...  
INSTALLATIONS
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#net_installation net installation]
*...
*Room for reflection
*Afterlife
*Balance


[[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research Here]] is a list of my references, and [[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_log here]] is my research log (annotations).
VISUAL [https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#painting see images here]
*A dark thought with a good purpose
*A battle of energies in the sky
*Cardboard+strings
*Embossing threads
*Indigo
*Keys etching
*Colour prints (structure) washed by rain
*...
*Chains
*5 faces
*Unshut book
*Breakings


In my practice of "hacking the human mind/habitus", I will constitute strategies that (done with devotion and over time) overcome the implicit indoctrination into the systems that produce us, enhance intuition, sensibility and awareness, explore subconscious modes of operation, empower, enable choice ... I wish to be propositional, to provide options to existence - not only to myself, but also to my kins, collaborators and the public.
PERFORMANCES
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Oratory_Services Oratory Services]
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Wooden_Sticks_On_A_Tractor_Fitted_With_A_Dozer_Blade Wooden Sticks On A Tractor Fitted With A Dozer Blade]
*"cTrL" (cTrL+M, cTrL+V, cTrL+P, ...) w/Lucija Gregov and others
*"ch" w/Linus Bonduelle
*duo w/Pascal Jarchow
*ProPolis
*[https://soundcloud.com/jebiveter/sets/brezimen/s-asH9ORUoWjJ?fbclid=IwAR1L8qWwgyRY53j5ISiPcl3jsL2pWx9HFaukiP_1qd2ICTVEk5RnFZoprHc Brezimni Prekomorci - Nameless Overseas]
*...
*[https://radiostudent.si/glasba/odprti-termin-za-glasbo/no%C4%8Dni-program-ferdo night programme Ferdo]
*cable performance
*On the same page
*Obrazi
*I will become monolog
*Line
*Made out of stone


Practically (formats, mediums, ideas): I want to facilitate [[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Composing_sensibility_session_.28CSS.29 workshops]] and other forms of interactive situations (such as sound walks), or [[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#.22Death_of_the_author.22 this]] and [[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Who_cares.3F this]], continue [[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice my practice]] in the field of sound improvisation; write and compose ([scripts/compositions/exercises] for humans in flow), build machines that help me think [[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Post-production_of_experience like this one for example]].
SOUND PIECES
A system for the archivation of my research and practice will also be constructed "on the go", its final form will most possibly be a website. My research strategies are outlined [[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/research_strategies here]].
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#The_prism:_to_swarm.2C_to_fish.2C_to_school The prism: to swarm, to fish, to school]
*[https://varia.zone/en/corporeal-whispers.html Re#sister: Corporeal Whispers]
*[https://soundcloud.com/tisaneza/maastunnel-south-middle-north Maastunnel field recording] > in the tunnel
*[https://radiostudent.si/kultura/r-a-d-a-r/1-prelet-tnh Radar: Prelet tnh]
*soundwalk neibourhood stories
*Worm radioplay (meeting of meeting spaces)
*...
*[http://www.centralala.si/nezacetniski-zacetki/?fbclid=IwAR2ITMkWQG2eg5CSK7CcM4aRP40-7cpl_eJsfuqI7Eq2i50DSSky58dmrQY Re_humanizacija V]


...
EVENTS/CURATORIAL
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#RADADAR:_multimedia_digestive_circuit RADADAR: multimedia digestive circuit]
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Who_cares.3F Who cares?]
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#sense_smit.28h.29ing_session Sense Smithing Session]
*...
*[http://atrog.org/galerija/foto/modri-kot Modri kot] happenings (expand)
*RADADAR digestive circuit
*[https://www.instagram.com/temp.tc/ temp.tc]
*[https://www.facebook.com/events/1057527037733459/ ORL+]


Dramaturgy of thought (possible chapters):
WORKSHOP
*The conception of a tool, the externalization of human intent
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Composing_sensibility_session_.28CSS.29 Composing Sensibility Session]
*Structure as something that is not human-made, but organically grown (Deleuze'n'Guattari), also ritual, composition, notation.
*Hegemonic control over human bodies (Foucault, Mauss)
*Industrial revolution: influence of machines/technology on human bodies and mind (Franklin)
*Social contract, habitus, performing (Butler), structures of control, bio/necropolitics (Foucault, Mbembe).
*Contemporary effects (dopamine, illusion, matrix, disembodiment, attention economy)
*Strategies of interrupting the scripting, normalization, disobedience/opposition/return to the instinctive, sensible, ... (practice+Stanislavski)


=Session #1=
WRITING
17-9-20
*[https://www.deplayer.nl/events/delayer-3 De_layer #3: A possible world]
*HocusBogus: Floating violet
*Ona/Sie/Her
*[https://pzwiki.wdka.nl/mediadesign/User:Tisa/practice#Oratory_Services Oratory Services: Infinite list, Description]
*Interviews
*...
*Metaphors.txt
*What is this?


w/Steve, Marloes, Natasha:
TOOLS
https://pad.xpub.nl/p/GRS_session1_20_21
*A sculpture made out of focus (gyro > 3D)
*An earphone microphone
*A pedal camera
*...
*Distraction manager
*Dissonar
*Approaching

Latest revision as of 09:38, 18 May 2022


PROJECT PROPOSAL

Tisa N. Herlec

I work with the mediums of: text, sound (extended vocal techniques), performance, objects/sculpture, visual (painting, drawing, printmaking), publication/zine, workshops. I am the kind of a creator that makes connections, extends, overflows, chaoticizes, my methodology is the one of addition (it is X AND also X).

Collaboration is my main principle in creation – whether between humans (me, collaborators, the public, institutions), works, materials, concepts, ... tinkering, collecting, making, assembling as well as analysing, observing, writing, conversing, playing, ... are in motion. The presence of the other stirs the work and the possibility of perceiving reality into unknown, sometime unimaginable directions. The system is open and anything could happen. Discursive encounters shape everyone involved. Exchange happens. Cybernetic feedback loops are constant.

And improvisation as a strategy is crucial. I believe that engaging in practices of improvisation enhance sensibility and awareness, build our capacities for interaction, communication and community building. They aid us unravel hidden patterns of behavior, open potentialities and options, and construct our own methodologies of being and creating in the world. I will continue to improvise and to share this practice and its affordances with others. (See more below in: P.S.:Important).

The Constitution

"The Constitution" will be a multiplicity of works assembled in a dynamic installation, parallel to a self-hosted website.

The installation and the site present a holistic assemblage of my work, and are the infrastructure that will allow me to open my imaginary to others and trigger a cybernetic circular causal relationship (already established in collaborative segments of my practice). Hence, neither the installation nor the website will be static. Using the protocols of exchange described below, I will generate, dynamicize, share and set concepts in motion together with others.

"The Constitution" will have a dual function.

First: It will provide an archival snapshot of a particular moment in my research practice, a trail of breadcrumbs left by my process, a nest for thoughts and their physical manifestation. The works that I will make up to that point and their documentation will inhabit the physical space that will frame and tame them. The website will be the manifestation of the space in a digital realm.

Second: The space will function as the mediator, the plateau of exchange between my imaginary and others' imaginaries. I will open up the space, letting others peek inside my head and experience the multiplicity, the entanglement of works and concepts they emerged from. The space will be open to the public in a time-frame from 10.00 to 20.00 from X. 7. 2020 to X. 7. 2020. In this time I will be present in the space. I will engage in protocols of exchange with them, letting them effect my creative process; changing and rearranging the constituted space and also generating new works in it together with others.

More concretely: I will set up a discursive corner in the space. There, I will engage in conversations with others and drink coffee. I will give tours of the space and tell stories and visions behind the works that constitute it. I will perform in the space (using it as a stage) and propose workshops to others. While doing all of this, I will collect imaginaries/responses/associations in different formats such as audio recording, writing (visitors' book and a notepad on my website). If the covid restrictions will be still in place, I will make livestreams of performances and host virtual discussions and workshops on my website, as well as set up a live webcam transmission from "The Constitution" for the duration of its opening hours.

All of the data that I will have gathered will effect the space and the works in it, interventions done by me or others will continuously change it, generating something unforeseeable. The project will be an experience in itself, a long-durational performative action and an encounter between variables and constants.

It is absolutely necessary for me to establish "The Constitution" as a physical space (regardless the restrictions of contact with the public), in itself it is performative, a process in-constitution. With this, I will allow potentialities to emerge, document the already existing and noticed ones, archiving versions of my works, establish a discourse that is provisional and in its approaches propositional. My process and my works will get a chance at a recurrent dynamicization, unfolding with the presence, the action, the interventions and the insights of others. "The Constitution" is an infrastructure that contains and facilitates flow and improvisation, it defines and enables actions and interactions, a recursive change, a space to learn from each other through conversations and its materializations.

"The Constitution" will also function as a stage, allowing a series of performative (inter)actions and collaborations to take place.

There will be performances of:

  • A duo "ch" with Linus Bonduelle using self-made instruments (found objects amplified by contact microphones, analog effects and voices, developing an improvisational discourse between imaginary characters. See more here.
  • An augmentable duo "cTrL+" with a cellist Lucija Gregov, inviting another musician into the performance, augmenting our collaboration, expanding its "function". (cTrL+P for example) See more here.
  • My solo performance. Hear snippets of my soundmaking here.

The already existing pursuits in the medium of sound outlined above will expand into: radioplays, field recordings, poetry, sound installations in public space, soundwalks, new collaborations and improvised performances.

Topos

The meta infrastructure of the space reflects my research interest and is closely related to my thesis outline.

A semiotic vision guides my research, metaphorically representing it and giving it a materiality:

A school of fish is swarming in the water. Their movement is rapid, dynamic, consistent, governed by a natural order, flow. Suddenly and silently a fishnet bursts into the water, engulfs a portion of the fish and the human drags them onto the surface. They will die, be gutted and cleaned, sold, bought, consumed, perhaps discarted. The net makes the fish become a part of a system of processing and consumption (that is not their natural ecosystem), imposes a structure onto their being. The remaining fish recurrently reorganize themselves, schooling forward as if nothing had happened.

I am fascinated by the dynamics that such a happening produces, and the metaphorical, semiotic significance of the action of fishing (represented by the fishnet and its materiality): an act of framing happens, a possibly repressive rupture of one system, a passage onto another. Paranodalities emerge. I question on what is inside (a system, a network, the net, the habit, the imaginary), what is outside, what are the characteristics of the permeable membrane in-between, what are the dynamics from/towards the inside/outside, intra-actions that happen, frictions that are constant. All of this also happens between humans: between me and the people that I collaborate with (engage in a common creative process), and also others (the public) that encounters me and my works - through a discursive interactional logic (exchange), including workshops (of sensibilization and improvisation) in which I will directly share some of my insights and methods (collected in chapter [III], the manual).

I think of: mycelium, roots, lineages, spiders' webs, weaving, entangled matter, chem-trails, transportation pathways, movement, ... I think of: chaos, flow, homeostasis, structure, networks, organization, taxonomy, process, disciplines, hegemony, ... I reside somewhere in the middle, grasping for air and observing.

Material works

My material works have sprouted from the fascination with nets and ropes: their formal constitution. The way they encompass, leave out, capture, arrange, dissect - and are, in themselves, dissected, decomposed, washed ashore, polluting, ... (More concretely I will talk about these objects in chapter [II], a fiction story told by the discarded fishnet.)

An outline of emerging works that are going to find their place in "The Constitution" and that are driving my material process ahead:

  • Material found on the beach - nets:

Photo 2020-10-07 14-52-34.jpg

  • Scanned:

Scanned threads.png

  • Experiments with salt that unify the detached materials:

Photo 2020-10-14 10-42-22.jpg

  • Printmaking with the found material:

Indigo.jpg

  • Working with threads, "A dark thought with a good purpose":

Dark.jpg

  • Painting the in-between spaces, "A battle of energies in the sky"

Slika nova 2020.jpg

Photo 2020-10-07 14-39-00.jpg

The ongoing work will expand into ceramic sculptures eaten by salt, crystal and mycelium growing pursuits, sculptural knotting of strings and threads and nets (also in a form of a spatial installation), ... I will let material and thought to intuitively guide me. Process is crucial for me.

Website

In the digital part of my project - my website - I will deploy these features:

  • self-hosting on a Raspberry Pi
  • an instance of mediawiki (data/archive organization)
  • metadata fields (extra info on works - semantic and episodic)
  • an open notebook/comment
  • playlists (changing speed)
  • text to speech instant subtitles generator
  • visualisation of sound
  • livestreaming
  • freewriting tool (python nltk library)
  • ...

This is my first tryout on the sandbox, using the Jupyter notebooks:

Website sandbox.png

This sketch serves me as the starting point. Within my website, I want to produce narratives made out of different media (picture, video, sound, text), intuitive flows of associations across the entanglements of my works that the website will archive (and afford new ones to emerge). I will make a linking structure between the elements, a system of indexing (Mediawiki queries).

The MediaWiki categories are outlined as followed:

  • conceptual keywords (being determined while archiving the work. They will trace the conceptual "red threads".)
  • title of the work
  • time of creation of the work
  • solo/collaborative work
  • material medium (painting, performance, sound, object, installation, writing, organization)
  • place of showing (radio, gallery, space, public space, publication, nowhere)
  • other (affordances of wiki's "red missing link").

The public will be able to navigate through my works in an intuitive, hypertext fashion. My website will be simultaneously an archive and an instant-publishing platform. An infrastructure that will allow me to make visible, to share, experiment and disseminate knowledge, and to be in contact with the public.

Updates

Here are some preliminary sketches (2-12-20):

Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-19.jpg Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-23.jpg Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-57.jpg Photo 2020-12-02 16-17-59.jpg



On 13-1-21 I have a running RaspberryPi linked with the domain tisa.world:

Screenshot tdw.png

Tools

In the realm of technology, I will also attempt to construct the following tools for documentation of my elusive practice:

  • "A sculpture made out of focus", a gyroscope following the movements I make while performing, compiling them into a 3D drawing, printing a 3D sculpture.
  • An earphone microphone which I will use to make field recordings and recordings of conversations on walks.
  • A pedal camera with which I will capture single moments in my studio space and instantly publish them to a segment on my website.
  • a bash imagemagick script that will order and edit the images that go into my Archival book of visual research.
  • More contact microphone instruments (already used in the duo "ch").

Methodologies/Research strategies

  • reading and constructing a real-time research log (reading annotations+intertextual links, also summaries of texts and own thoughts on texts, reading theory as if it was poetry (observing own emotion, thoughts, connections);
  • writing responses to texts, short essays;
  • co-writing/thinking with others - chapter [I];
  • recording and transcribing my presentations and tutorials, keeping a diary of my insights/shifting perspectives;
  • recording myself speaking and writing intuitively (I call it freewriting);
  • writing fiction (poetry, stories) - chapter [II];
  • observing/visions/images/hallucinations;
  • transcribing content (words) from sound improvisation;
  • making an overview of my works (archival and generative);
  • analysis of my works and the process that made them;
  • making notes of conversations w/friends;
  • interviewing practitioners - chapter [III];
  • being interviewed by others;
  • exchanging letters;
  • visual/sculptural: thinking with material, depicting of concepts;
  • collecting objects;
  • giving form to process-generated data (booklets, sound pieces);
  • sound improvisation alone & w/others;
  • writing scripts/compositions/exercises (the manual) - chapter [III];
  • shifting scale principle (concepts will be applied to different scales, making parallels: x > macro > micro > x ... x > personal > societal > political > x)
  • ...

I want to learn from:

  • myself and my self-generated data, practice, experience.

My intuitive, rhizomatic chaosmos/my practice is documented here.

  • the insights and the works of the people that I personally know.
  • the theoretical works in the field.

See my research log here.


The key terms describing my methodologies are:

  • second-order cybernetics;
  • discursive;
  • divergent thinking;
  • inductive reasoning;
  • practice-based research;
  • polyvocal, polymorphous and polyamorous.

Timetable

All the time:

  • making material works
  • documentation
  • making notes
  • performing (as much as restrictions allow or streaming)

November:

  • sketch website infrastructure
  • learn nltk, css, html
  • writing fictional story, chapter [II]
  • find a space that will become "The Constitution"
  • finish the bash imagemagick script
  • 19-11-20: py.rate.chnic workshop: a)PART_to_de(PART with Ioana Tomici and Mark van de Heuvel

December:

  • 4-12: Deadline First Chapter
  • 17-12: RADADAR digestive circuit event (Cirkulacija2, Ljubljana, SI)
  • set up the Raspberry Pi self-hosting, install WikiMedia
  • learn nltk, css, html
  • make text to speech work
  • arrange my archive, documentation of my previous works (for the website)
  • cowriting, chapter [I]

January:

  • make interviews, chapter [III]
  • analyse, test, arrange data, chapter [III]
  • make the manual, chapter [III]
  • building my website

February:

  • Deadline First Draft Thesis
  • building my website
  • making the gyroscope tool ("The sculpture made out of focus")
  • making the pedal camera instant publishing tool

March:

  • Deadline Second Draft thesis (texts to 2nd readers)
  • building my website

April:

  • Thesis Deadline
  • adding thesis texts to my website
  • Finalizing the infrastructure of my website

May:

  • adding documentation of my works to the website
  • residency+performance with cTrL+KG (Kino Šiška, Ljubljana, SI)

June:

  • Inhabiting "The Constitution"

July:

  • opening "The Constitution" to the public

...

THESIS OUTLINE

Tisa N. Herlec

The written part of my thesis will be constructed out of three chapters. In each, I will discuss one aspect of my research interest using different forms ([I]: a collectively written essay, [II]: a fiction story, [III]: a manual).

These texts, following different writing forms, will be conceptually connected to each other. In every chapter I will include an account on my practice, a subchapter charting the key insights that the works that I make provide.

My graduation project "The Constitution" makes a performative record of my practice, it encompasses my process and archives it, and with its encounter with others it progresses and changes, generating subsequent works, influencing and framing the existent ones. This process is conducted within the notion of a cybernetic feedback loop dynamic.

The thesis follows a similar protocol. There is a framework to my thesis - three chapters written (2000-3000 words each) within defined form(at)s. A cybernetic collaboration occurs in all three.

Chapters

[I]

Form: a cowritten essay

Object: field report

In the first chapter of my thesis, a cowritten essay will be produced, an exchange between two thinkers - myself and my friend Leon Holsten. Discourse will unravel in our dialogues (phone conversations and collaborative writing). We will share our own personal experiences of the texts and other references that we are studying together. Writing this text will be an experiment in collaborative writing and a negotiation between standpoints, a study of tensions that might emerge when two conceptual apparatuses find themselves in an in-depth encounter. Publishing this text will allow for a response from its readers (in a form of open commentary section on my website), a possible versioning of successive texts, and expansion into other discursive collaborations with my cowriter.

The text will speak about the entanglements that humans take part in. It will take sound as the phenomenon guiding our research of multiplicities and intra-actions between elements in an (eco)system. The domain of field recordings will serve as an inspiration, and so will specific cases of the natural systems adapting to the human interventions into them. Paranodality and non-spaces will be mentioned as the areas of the outside, the tracing of marginalia that pushes the dynamics of influence from the entryways and passages into the networked weave of inseparable elements.

Keywords: entanglement, exchange, influence, networks, collaboration, birds, sensibility, noticing the intricate, implicit multiplicities, paranodal spaces, conglomerates, additive, field recordings, acoustic ecology, cyborgs, ...

[II]

Form: a fiction story

Object: nets

In the second chapter, the fiction story, I will think and write together with the material that is guiding my works - a discarted, deconstructed fishnet, washed ashore of an anonymous beach. I will embody - personify it and let it tell its story through language. This chapter is closely connected to the material works that I will be making this year. (See my "semiotic vision" in the project proposal - it is the ground on which I will build this story on.)

The narrative will expand from the material itself, speaking about the relation of flow and systems, movement and stillness, birth and pollution, cycles of passing from one structure to another. The net will speak of society's mechanisms of shaping bodies and materials, hegemonic control and governance, the conception of a tool, the externalization of human intent and industrial revolution: the influence of machines/technology on contemporary conceptions of humans and materials (also: dopamine, disembodiment, attention economy, distraction). The principle of personification of a material will allow me to speak on behalf of the material and also on behalf of humans. The net will stumble across social contracts, habitus, normalization.

Keywords: systems, networks, structures, material, matter, composition, hegemony, social contracts, disobedience, violence, bodies, form, tradition, influence, ...

[III]

Form: a manual

Object: the interviews

In the third chapter, the manual, I will find inspiration and guidelines to improvisation in collaboration with various practitioners. In the context of a weekly radioshow at Worm Radio (hosted by me, starting in January 2021), I will interview them about: their processes, approaches to the construction of their works, specific practices they do to enter the state of flow, their relation to the documentation of performative, elusive works; and about the ways their past works relate to newer ones. When applicable to the individuals that I will be interviewing, I will also ask them about their methods of teaching improvisation. The interviews will be semi-structured in form, allowing me to improvise on the spot and respond in real-time to the emerging topos.

The data from the interviews and from my own practice will acquire a form of an assemblage, a methodological manual for improvisation and flow. In the process of writing this chapter, my role will be the one of the collector and the archiver, the one that arranges a multitude of recipes in a cookbook (methodologies in a manual) - doing so only when I will have tested, modified and taxonomized them. The manual will consist of methodologies, tactics, scripts, protocols, exercises, scores, compositional techniques and instructions that the readers will be invited to execute alone or with others, using the manual in everyday life and in generative improvisational practices in the media of their choice. My experience and the manual will further support me as a facilitator of workshops for improvisation that I will resume conducting as soon as possible (Covid), sharing methodologies in practice. In the meantime, I am building exercises that can be done in a digital environment (online video group workshops).

Writing this chapter will allow me to engage in discussions with improvisers that I respect and cherish; to exchange methodologies and approaches (the back-end/backstage of their practices that are seldomly articulated). It will afford me to look at my practice of improvisation through the prism of methodologies, to analyse, expand and update. This chapter will allow the readers into the backstage of the domain of improvisation (and my own practice that is a part of it), deepening their understanding of its constitution. The recordings of the interviews and their transcripts will be publicly accessible as an addition to this chapter in the form of the radio show (AM and online).

Keywords: improvisation, ubuntu, kinship, collectivity, daoism, theory of flow, chaos theory, flow, process, archive, documentation, improvisation as inherent to beings/systems, improvisation as a resistance tactic, proposition, methodologies, dynamics between improvisation and social contract, strategies of interrupting the scripting, habitus, normalization, disobedience, opposition, empowerment, unscripted dramaturgies, humor, dance, movement, playfulness/playing, collaboration, togetherness, ...

...

P.S.: important

My research interest comes from an inner sway, a realization pertaining to my own constitution. I am inclined to rationally understand, categorize and systematize - the world, my own work, the processes I'm dealing with, thinking, others. This is my nemesis. I approach it by engaging into processes and activities in which I challenge my inner limitations and biases, where I search for their edges and push through them, expanding my own affordances.

While improvising, I dynamicize these notions, ground myself in ever-changing processes and prospect the state of continuous flow. I unlearn, let go, get lost, find inspiration, make, think, expand.

This tension persists in my practice/research where I am materially, processually, conceptually and experientially exploring the dynamics and implications of structure+composition+form+system(s)+hegemony and process+improvisation+flow+subconscious+collective+chaos+empowerment. They coexist, entangle, mingle with each other, interact.

I am the embodiment of the friction that I am researching. I am currently in the process of unlearning the notion of binaries and dynamicizing my systems of thought. I share my insights with others.

I am intrigued by the constitution of the world, the structures that we are a part of (as bodies effected by the mediated environment of sociality), I wish to grasp this and juxtapose it to the world as I experience it with the practice of disobedience to its chains: improvisation. I consider improvisation a domain where habitual behavior and social contracts are questioned and challenged, it is an uncharted territory filled with possibilities.

Within "The Constitution" (see project proposal), I am hacking my own mind and my habitus. I believe that the constitution of my own methodologies will (when done with devotion and over time) afford me to overcome the implicit indoctrination into the systems that produced me. In my practice I wish to be propositional, to provide options to existence - not only to myself, but also to my kins, collaborators and the public. The insights that I might obtain, I will share, no matter the medium of exchange (this thesis, the works that I will make, conversations and workshops with others, ...).

In the thesis, I wish to explore and expand, articulate and write down my insights, make them publicly available. This will serve as a basis for my future (collaborative) trajectory of my improvisational practice in different media.

Bibliography

[I]

  • Donna J. Haraway: A Cyborg Manifesto
  • Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari: 1000 Plateaus [multiplicity, BwO]
  • Karen Barad: Agential Realism: On the Importance of Material-Discursive Practices [intra-action]
  • Ulises Ali Mejias: Off the Network: Disrupting the Digital World [paranodality]
  • Marc Auge: Non-Places
  • Roland Barthes: From Work to Text
  • ...

[II]

  • Ursula Franklin: lectures [prescriptive technology]
  • Marcel Mauss: The Techniques of the Body
  • Judith Butler: Gender Trouble
  • Reza Negarestani: Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials
  • Italo Calvino: Cosmicomics
  • ...

[III]

  • Italo Calvino: Cybernetics and Ghosts
  • Konstantin Stanislavski: A Students' Diary
  • Pauline Oliveros: Deep Listening
  • Antonin Artaud: The Theatre and its Double [the theatre of cruelty]
  • Guy Debord: The Society of the Spectacle
  • Amelia Jones: Body art/Performing the subject
  • Boris Groys: The Loneliness of the Project
  • Simon Yulli: All Problems of Notation Will Be Solved By the Masses
  • ...

Complete list of works

OBJECTS

INSTALLATIONS

VISUAL see images here

  • A dark thought with a good purpose
  • A battle of energies in the sky
  • Cardboard+strings
  • Embossing threads
  • Indigo
  • Keys etching
  • Colour prints (structure) washed by rain
  • ...
  • Chains
  • 5 faces
  • Unshut book
  • Breakings

PERFORMANCES

SOUND PIECES

EVENTS/CURATORIAL

WORKSHOP

WRITING

TOOLS

  • A sculpture made out of focus (gyro > 3D)
  • An earphone microphone
  • A pedal camera
  • ...
  • Distraction manager
  • Dissonar
  • Approaching